:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣青少年的道德信念:社會依附的影響
書刊名:臺灣社會學
作者:吳明燁 引用關係周玉慧 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Ming-yehJou, Yuh-huey
出版日期:2009
卷期:17
頁次:頁61-100
主題關鍵詞:青少年道德信念社會依附家庭凝聚力學校依附AdolescentMoral beliefSocial attachmentFamily cohesionSchool attachment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:123
  • 點閱點閱:662
本研究運用實證資料描述台灣青少年的道德信念,並從社會依附 的觀點檢視家庭與學校之影響。由於華人對於道德的傳統思維和西方 社會不同,我們將道德區分為「私德」和「公德」兩層面,並主張台 灣青少年的道德信念傾向「私德重於公德」的傳統模式。實證資料的 來源為中央研究院社會所執行之「台灣青少年成長歷程研究」(Taiwan Youth Project),該計畫採問卷調查方法,以長期追蹤方式,蒐集台灣 青少年成長歷程中之個人、家庭與學校資料。本研究結果大致上支持 涂爾幹之社會依附觀點。在家庭依附方面,我們發現親子之間的親近 性與家庭凝聚力都有助於增強青少年道德信念;至於學校依附的影響 力則只限於師生親近性,班級凝聚力並未達到顯著水準。最後,我們 針對本研究在理論、方法及實務方面的應用與限制提出討論。
This study investigates the moral beliefs of Taiwanese adolescents and examines how such beliefs may be associated with adolescent attachment to family and school. On the basis of Chinese cultural tradition, we conceptualize morality as having two dimensions-a private sphere and a public sphere-and argue that Taiwanese adolescents tend to have firmer beliefs in private-sphere morality than in public-sphere morality. The empirical data used to examine the hypotheses derive from the Taiwan Youth Project, a longitudinal survey study conducted by the Institute of Sociology, Academic Sinica. Consistent with Durkheim's social attachment theory, our findings confirm the positive impact of family attachment on both private and public spheres of morality. The findings indicate that either parent-child closeness or family cohesion is likely to strengthen adolescent moral beliefs. Hypotheses about school attachment are only partially supported, however. Attachment to school-teachers but not attachment to one's class is found to be positively associated with adolescents holding firm beliefs in morality. The study concludes with a discussion of its theoretical, methodological, and pragmatic implications as well as its limitations.
期刊論文
1.楊正誠(20060500)。J. Wilson道德教育觀點之析論。中正教育研究,5(1),59-60+62-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Farkas, George(2003)。Cognitive Skills and Noncognitive Traits and Behaviors in Stratification Processes。Annual Review of Sociology,29,541-562。  new window
3.葉紹國(1996)。道德推理的關懷取向思考與正義取向思考的區辨及其在中國社會實踐的特徵。本土心理學研究,5,264-311。  延伸查詢new window
4.Inglehart, Ronald、Baker, Wayne E.(2000)。Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values。American Sociological Review,65(1),19-51。  new window
5.柯澍馨、郭靜靜(20070900)。青少年冒險行為與婚前性行為之研究--以臺北市六所高職學生為例。臺灣性學學刊,13(2),45-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.王意茹(19980700)。當代自由主義社會公民德性之研究。公民訓育學報,7,479-494。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林火旺(19940300)。自由主義的公民教育。通識教育,1(1),35-52。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃文三(20010600)。A Theoretical Study of Moral Development in Adolescence and Its Educational Application。教育學刊,17,355-370。new window  new window
9.Eisenberg, N.、Carlo, G.、Murphy, B.、Van Court, P.(1995)。Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study。Child Development,66(4),1179-1197。  new window
10.馬慶強(19970600)。中國人之感性與認知方面的道德發展:一個七階段發展理論。本土心理學研究,7,166-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.鄔昆如(20070500)。目的論、幸福論、德行論三合一體系的研究。哲學與文化,34(5)=396,61-74。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.汪宏倫(20060600)。從「九年一貫社會學習領域」管窺臺灣公民社會之未來:試論群體生活的當代困境。臺灣社會學刊,36,1-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.蔡明璋(20041200)。臺灣夫妻的家務工作時間:親密關係的影響。臺灣社會學,8,99-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃光國(19980600)。兩種道德:臺灣社會中道德思維研究的再詮釋。本土心理學研究,9,121-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.馬慶強(19980600)。儒家倫理與西方道德:情義難兩全。本土心理學研究,9,205-216。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.李元墩(19980600)。臺灣、大陸與香港三地大學生價值觀及其相關因素之比較研究。長榮學報,2(1),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.尤煌傑(2003)。哲學大家談:你認為一切倫理德行中最重要的一項是什麼?。哲學與文化,30,195-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.沈清松(1998)。論公民德行的陶成。哲學與文化,25,406-418。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.吳明燁(1998)。母親就業對於角色分工的影響-以育有青少年子女的家庭為例。社會文化學報,6,113-145。  延伸查詢new window
20.Damon, William、Gregory, Anne(1997)。The Youth Charter: Towards the Formation of Adolescent Moral Identity。Journal of Moral Education,26(2),117-130。  new window
21.Jeffries, Vincent(1998)。Virtue and the Altruistic Personality。Sociological Perspectives,41(1),151-166。  new window
22.Shelton, Charles M.、McAdams, Dan P.(1990)。In Search of an Everyday Morality: The Development of a Measure。Adolescence,25(100),923-943。  new window
23.Smetana, Judith G.(1988)。Adolescent's and Parent's Conceptions of Parental Authority。Child Development,59(2),321-335。  new window
24.Snarey, John、Pavkov, Thomas(1991)。Beyond Socialization Versus Development: Kohlberg's Approach to Moral Education。Sociological Focus,24(2),105-115。  new window
25.White, Flona A.(2000)。Relationship of Family Socialization Processes to Adolescent Moral Thought。The Journal of Social Psychology,140(1),75-91。  new window
26.White, Flona A.、Matawie, Kenan(2004)。Parental Morality and Family Processes as Predictors of Adolescent Morality。Journal of Child and Family Studies,13(2),219-233。  new window
27.Whitbeck, Les B.、Gecas, Viktor(1988)。Value Attributions and Value Transmission between Parents and Children。Journal of Marriage and the Family,50(3),829-840。  new window
會議論文
1.Jou, Yuh-Huey、Hsieh, Yeu-Sheng(2004)。Continued or Temporary Impact: The Effect of Family Life Events on Adolescents' Depression。  new window
2.Wu, Chyi-In、Lei, Man-Kit(2006)。Reconstruct Research Context for Adolescent in East Asia: Rethinking the Role of Parenting Practice and Deviant Peer on Adolescent Conduct Problems Embed in Classroom Context。  new window
研究報告
1.羅國英(1996)。青少年前期的親子關係與同儕關係:其比較及關聯研究 (計畫編號:NSC85-2413-H-031-001)。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明燁(2000)。性別角色、教養觀與教養行為之研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Santrock, Johm W.(1998)。Adolescence。New York, NY:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
2.Rice, F. Philp、Doldin, Kim Gale、連廷嘉、黃俊豪(2004)。青少年心理學。臺北:學富文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃芳銘(2004)。社會科學統計方法學:結構方程模式。臺北市:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Rubin, Donald B.(1987)。Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys。John Wiley & Sons。  new window
5.邱皓政(2003)。結構方程模式--LISREL的理論、技術與應用。雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊中芳(2001)。如何理解中國人--文化與個人論文集。遠流。  延伸查詢new window
7.涂爾幹(2006)。道德教育。道德教育。上海。  延伸查詢new window
8.Bierhoff, Hans-Werner(2002)。Prosocial Behaviour。Prosocial Behaviour。Hove, UK。  new window
9.Kandel, Denise B.(1986)。Processes of Peer Influence in Adolescence。Development as Action in Context: Problem Behavior and Normal Youth Development。Berlin, Germany。  new window
10.Olson, David. H.、Portner, Jessica、Lavee, Yoav(1985)。Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (Faces III)。St. Paul, MN:University of Minnesota, Department of Family Social Science。  new window
11.Von Der Haar, Christine M.(2005)。Social Psychology: A Sociological Perspective。Social Psychology: A Sociological Perspective。New Jersey, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Peng, Chao-Ying Joanne、Harwell, Michael、Liou, Show-Mann、Ehman, Lee H.(2006)。Advances in Missing Data Methods and Implications for Educational Research。Real Data Analysis。Information Age Publishing。  new window
2.鄔昆如(19910000)。柏拉圖《理想國》的「正義」概念及其現代意義。正義及其相關問題。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學所。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡勇美、尹慶春(1997)。中國家庭價值觀的持續與改變:台灣的例子。九〇年代的臺灣社會。臺北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
4.張福建(1991)。羅爾斯的差異原則及其容許不平等的可能程度。正義及其相關問題。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE