:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:綿延之群:以德勒茲-柏格森生命哲學重思生態學之初探
書刊名:文山評論:文學與文化
作者:林宛瑄
作者(外文):Lin, Wan-shuan
出版日期:2011
卷期:4:2
頁次:頁59-89
主題關鍵詞:自然工具理性德勒茲-柏格森生命哲學綿延虛在整體NatureInstrumental rationalityDeleuze-Bergsonian life philosophyThe SwarmDurationVirtuality
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:29
二○○四年印尼發生海嘯以來,重大天災在台灣及世界各地接二連三發生,頻率之高與災情之慘重都超乎過往的想像。眾人咸認這是大自然對現代社會的工業文明物節制破壞環境的反撲,療癒受摧殘的自然環境,並阻止事態更加惡化,便成為許多關心環保人士的著力點除了較屬實務層面的介入之外,相關人士更注意到建立新環境論述以開拓新行動空間的必要性。如果人類濫用科技過度開發是造成環境崩毀的主因,檢討並重整人與自然環境的相對關係似乎才是解決問題的根本之道。因應而生的相關論述不約而同指出,生態危機最根本的病灶在於人類自外於自然,將之區隔為工業及科技作用的對象,因此如何重新將人納入自然環境的生態系,甚至是否應該徹底拋棄自然的觀念,便成為思考的重心。本文將從檢視現今生態論述對於修正自然觀念及人類如何重回生態共群的辯證出發,並藉由對德國小說家薛慶的科幻作品《群》的閱讀,說明其如何標示了一條以德勒茲-柏格森式生命哲學中所談的生命概念來鬆動甚至取代自然觀念的路徑,由是超越與工具理性息息相關的人類經驗,並展演人與宇宙整體的關係必須透過在時間中的存在,亦即綿延,才能真正被了解,並從而展現其生態學上的意義。
In recent years, natural disasters have been striking different areas with increasingly heightened frequency and intensifying severity. It is generally held that human activities, especially those related to industrialization and modernization, account for the deterioration of the natural environment. What underpins the excessive exploitation of nature, as asserted by critics arguing in line with Frankfurt School scholars, is instrumental rationality in modern society which is characterized by the domination of nature. For those who seek remedies for this predicament, therefore, effort should be devoted to both taking efficient measures to restore the environment as well as building proper mindset to prevent further damage. In the latter project, the priority would be to cultivate a new perspective on the relationship between humankind and nature to counter the inappropriate antithesis of nature and society. As part of this collective effort, this paper suggests critically appraising the efficacy of the notion of nature for a new environmental philosophy and proposes to rethink ecology with Deleuze-Bergsonian concept of life. It will be demonstrated by reading The Swarm by Frank Schatzing that how shifting from nature to life contributes to going beyond the properly human experience, which is biased toward our utility and hence a nexus of instrumental rationality, and thereby re-installing humankind in the Whole of the universe, which should be approached in terms of time/duration rather than space.
期刊論文
1.吳明益(20081200)。天真智慧,抑或理性禁忌?關於原住民族漢語文學中所呈現環境倫理觀的初步思考。中外文學,37(4)=423,111-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張典魁(20091200)。陳立夫《唯生論》與柏格森哲學關係之探討。中正歷史學刊,12,157-194。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Beck, Ulrich(1992)。From Industrial Society to the Risk Society: Questions of Survival, Social Structure and Ecological Enlightenment。Theory, Culture and Society,9(1),97-123。  new window
4.(2011)。綿密不斷的覺悟。慈濟月刊 &id= 1490。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Griffin, Susan(1978)。Woman and Nature: The Roaring Inside Her。New York:Harper & Row。  new window
2.Latour, Bruno、Porter, Catherine(2004)。Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy。Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Deleuze, Gilles、Tomlinson, Hugh、Habberjam, Barbara(1991)。Bergsonism。New York:Zone Books。  new window
4.Beck, Ulrich(1992)。Risk society: Toward a new modernity。London:Sage。  new window
5.Colebrook, Claire(2010)。Deleuze and the Meaning of Life。Continuum。  new window
6.Plumwood, Val(1993)。Feminism and the Mastery of Nature。Routledge。  new window
7.Deleuze, Gilles、Tomlinson, Hugh、Habberjam, Barbara(1986)。Cinema 1: The Movement-Image。University of Minnesota Press。  new window
8.Deleuze, Gilles、Patton, Paul(1994)。Difference and Repetition。Columbia University Press。  new window
9.Schätzing, Frank、朱劉華、顏徽玲(2007)。群。野人文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.謝繼昌(2002)。文化、生態與發展:人類學的探討。生態人文主義:邁向一個人與自然共生共榮的社會。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
11.Deleuze, Gilles(1995)。Letter to a Harsh Critic。Negotiations。New York。  new window
12.Schatzing, Frank(2006)。The Swarm: A Novel of the Deep。London。  new window
13.吳明益(2010)。沒有旁觀者的時代。溼地石化 島嶼想像。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
14.Adam, Barbara(1996)。Revision: The Centrality of Time for an Ecological Social Science Perspective.。Risk, Environment & Modernity: Towards a New Ecology。London。  new window
15.Boundas, Constantin V.(1996)。Deleuze-Bergson: An Ontology of the Virtual。Deleuze: A Critical Reader。Cambridge。  new window
16.Cohen, Richard A.(1999)。Philo, Spinoza, Bergson: The Rise of an Ecological Age。The New Bergson。New York。  new window
17.Deleuze, Gilles、Mcmahon, Melissa(1999)。Bergson's Concept of Difference。The New Bergson。Manchester。  new window
18.Macauley, David(1996)。Greening Philosophy and Democratizing Ecology。Minding Nature: The Philosophers of Ecology。New York。  new window
其他
1.張歷君(2011)。從少數政治到諸眾語法:論德勒茲的柏格森主義,http://www.srcs.nctu.edu.tw/joyceliu/mworks/mwonlinecourse/political/data/08.5.pdf。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Beck, U.(1996)。Risk Society and the Provident State。Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology。London:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE