臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：家長背景、家長參與學校教育與子女學業成就之關聯性：以北北宜三縣市國中學生為例
書刊名：教育研究與發展期刊
作者：張芳華
作者(外文)：Chang, Fang-hua
出版日期：2013
卷期：9:2
頁次：頁117-144
主題關鍵詞：家長參與；學業成績；臺灣青少年成長歷程研究；Parental involvement；Academic achievement；Taiwan Youth Project
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:605
  • 點閱點閱:228
鼓勵家長參與學校教育一直是先進國家的重要教育政策，我國也於2000年後開始訂定法規保障家長參與學校教育的權利，本研究欲探討在此一脈絡下國中家長參與的情況、家長參與的階層化和其影響。更重要的是，高社經背景的家長如何透過家長參與方式來提昇子女學業成就，這些都是值得探究的問題。本文使用台灣青少年成長歷程研究的貫時性資料進行量化分析，有以下發現：一、觀察過去以學校為主的家長參與行為，並比較目前家長參與的情況，證實家長參與並未隨法令的實施而有所提昇。國一家長的學校參與率較高，國二參與率則明顯減少。二、親子關係、親師電話聯繫與參與班級家長會皆對學業成就具有獨立影響力，其中以參與班級家長會的效益最大。三、在班級家長會參與上有著階層化現象，這不利於教育資訊的傳播。四、透過路徑分析發現由於法規的保障，高社經地位家長，積極參與班級家長會，影響了子女的學業成就。
Encouraging parents' involvement in schooling had been the important goal of educational policy in advanced countries. In Taiwan, laws were enacted to protect parental rights on involvement since 2000. In the context of law protection, this study aimed to explore the parental involvement’s phenomenon, parental involvement’s stratification and its effects on children’s academic achievement at junior high schools. Furthermore, this study intended to understand how parents of higher-socioeconomic status were involved in schooling to enhance their children’academic achievement, which caused the uneven opportunity of entering public senior high schools. The study used longitudinal data from Taiwan Youth Project in 2000 to conduct a quantitative analysis and its results were as follows. First, comparing the frequency of schoolbased parental involvement in recent study, the study confirmed that enacted laws did not enhance the frequency of parental involvement. Moreover, the frequency of school participation declined from first grade to second grade at junior high school. Second, parent-child relationship, teachers contact with parents by telephone, and attending parent-teacher meetings had independent influences on children’s academic performance. Among these variables, attendance at the parentteacher meetings had the strongest effect on academic achievement. Third, participation in parentteacher meetings reflected the phenomenon of social stratification, which was detrimental to the dissemination of educational information. Finally, the result of path analysis showed that owing to the legal protection, parents of higher-socioeconomic status influenced their children’s academic achievement by means of active involvement in parent-teacher meetings.
期刊論文
1.李素梅(200902)。臺北縣國民中學家長日實施方式與成效探討。北縣教育，66，68-72。  延伸查詢new window
2.Catsambis, S.(2001)。Expanding knowledge of parental involvement in children's secondary education: Connections with high school seniors' academic success。Social Psychology of Education，5，149-177。  new window
3.Cheung, C. S.、Pomerantz, E. M.(2011)。Parent' involvement in children's learning in the United States and China: Implications for children's academic and emotional adjustment。Child Development，82(3)，935-950。  new window
4.Deplanty, J.、Kern, R. C.、Duchane, K. A.(2007)。Perceptions of parent involvement in academic achievement。The Journal of Educational Research，100(6)，361-368。  new window
5.Nokali, N. E. E.、Bachman, H. J.、Votruba-Drzal, E.(2010)。Parent involvement and children's academic and social development in elementary School。School, Child Development，81(3)，988-1005。  new window
6.Sirvani, H.(2007)。The effect of teacher communication with parents on students' mathematics achievement。American Secondary Education，36(1)，31-46。  new window
7.Stevenson, D. L.、Baker, D. P.(1987)。The family-school relation and the child's school performance。Child Development，58，1348-1357。  new window
8.Tan, E. T.、Goldberg, W. A.(2009)。Parental school involvement in relation to children's grades and adaptation to school。Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology，30，442-453。  new window
9.Tekin, A. K.(2011)。Parent involvement revisited: Background, theories, and models。International Journal of Applied Educational Studies，11(1)，1-13。  new window
10.Pomerantz, E. M.、Moorman, E. A.、Litwack, S. D.(2007)。The How, whom, and why of parents' involvement in children's academic lives: More is not always better。Review of Educational Research，77(3)，373-410。  new window
11.許惠茹(20091200)。國三學生考試經驗之詮釋與反思。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，33-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.江芳盛(2006)。國中生課業補習效果之探討。臺北市立教育大學學報：教育類，37(1)，131-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Miedel, Wendy T.、Reynolds, Arthur J.(1999)。Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter?。Journal of School Psychology，37(4)，379-402。  new window
14.林大森、陳憶芬(20061200)。臺灣高中生參加補習之效益分析。教育研究集刊，52(4)，35-70。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.林俊瑩、吳裕益(20071200)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響：階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊，54(4)，107-144。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林俊瑩(200602)。國小家長對子女的教育期望、參與學校教育態度及參與行為之關聯性。教育政策論壇，9(1)，177-210。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Fan, X. T.、Chen, M.(2001)。Parental involvement and students' academic achievement: a meta-analysis。Educational Psychology Review，13，1-22。  new window
18.張鈿富、葉連祺(20060200)。2005年臺灣地區教育政策與實施成效調查。教育政策論壇，9(1)，1-21。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.侯世昌(20030900)。國民小學家長教育期望與參與學校教育之研究。管理與教育研究學報，1，183-210。  延伸查詢new window
20.Laursen, Brett、Coy, Katherine C.、Collins, W. Andrew(1998)。Reconsidering changes in parent-child conflict across adolescence: A meta-analysis。Child Development，69(3)，817-832。  new window
21.Lin, N.(1982)。Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology。Annual Review of Sociology，24(1)，1-24。  new window
22.Lareau, Annette(1987)。Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital。Sociology of Education，60(2)，73-85。  new window
23.蘇船利、黃毅志(20090900)。文化資本透過學校社會資本對臺東縣國二學生學業成績之影響。教育研究集刊，55(3)，99-129。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Hauser, Robert M.、Tsai, Shu-Ling、Sewell, William H.(1986)。A model of stratification with response error in social and psychological variables。Sociology of Education，56，20-46。  new window
25.林義男(19880300)。國小學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報，11，95-141。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.劉正(20061200)。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化。教育研究集刊，52(4)，1-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.江民瑜、黃蕙君、林俊瑩(20050100)。國小學生家長參與學校教育之性別差異：以高雄縣市為例。教育與社會研究，8，81-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.周新富(20061200)。Coleman社會資本理論在臺灣地區的驗證--家庭、社會資本與學業成就之關係。當代教育研究，14(4)，1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Ho, Sui-Chu Esther、Willms, J. Douglas(1996)。Effects of Parental Involvement on Eighth-Grade Achievement。Sociology of Education，69(2)，126-141。  new window
30.McNeal, Ralph B. Jr.(1999)。Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out。Social Forces，78(1)，117-144。  new window
31.李文益、黃毅志(20041200)。文化資本、社會資本與學生成就的關聯性之研究--以臺東師院為例。臺東大學教育學報，15(2)，23-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.周新富(20080600)。社會階級對子女學業成就的影響：以家庭資源為分析架構。臺灣教育社會學研究，8(1)，1-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.陳怡靖、鄭燿男(20000700)。臺灣地區教育階層化之變遷--檢證社會資本論、文化資本論及財務資本論在臺灣的適用性。國家科學委員會研究彙刊．人文及社會科學，10(3)，416-434。  延伸查詢new window
34.Izzo, C. V.、Weissberg, R. P.、Kasprow, W. J.、Fendrich, M.(1999)。A longitudinal assessment of teacher perceptions of parent involvement in children's education and school performance。American Journal of Community Psychology，27(6)，817-839。  new window
35.巫有鎰(19990700)。影響國小學生學業成就的因果機制--以臺北市和臺東縣作比較。教育研究集刊，43，213-242。new window  延伸查詢new window
36.Grolnick, W. S.、Slowiaczek, M. L.(1994)。Parents' involvement in children's schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model。Child Development，65(1)，237-252。  new window
37.黃毅志(20031200)。「臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構與評估：社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化。教育研究集刊，49(4)，1-31。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.林義男(19930600)。國中學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及其學業成就的關係。輔導學報，16，157-212。new window  延伸查詢new window
39.林慧敏、黃毅志(20090900)。原漢族群、補習教育與學業成績關聯之研究--以臺東地區國中二年級生為例。當代教育研究季刊，17(3)，41-81。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.Lee, Jung-Sook、Bowen, Natasha K.(2006)。Parent Involvement, Cultural Capital, and the Achievement Gap among Elementary School Children。American Educational Research Journal，43(2)，193-218。  new window
41.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology，94(suppl.)，S95-S120。  new window
圖書
1.萬佩萱(2002)。班級家長會DIY。臺北市：財團法人人本教育文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Epstein, J. L.(2001)。School, family and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
3.邱皓政(2005)。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。臺北市：雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
4.教育部(2009)。家長參與教育行動指南。教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
其他
1.National PTA(2005)。Task Force on Building on a Legacy，http://www.readbag.com/pta-2005-annual-report。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bourdieu, P.(1986)。The forms of capital。Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education。Greenwood Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：168（臺灣：168，國外：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：753005 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66554225
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上