臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：組內相關係數與樣本數對於脈絡效果估計的影響：貝氏估計與最大概似估計法的比較
書刊名：教育與心理研究
作者：邱皓政 引用關係／歐宗霖
作者(外文)：Chiou, Hawjeng／Ou, Tsung-lin
出版日期：2016
卷期：39:3
頁次：頁97-137
主題關鍵詞：貝氏估計；脈絡效果；脈絡變數；組內相關係數；最大概似估計；Bayesian estimation；Contextual effect；Contextual variables；Intraclass correlation；Maximum likelihood me
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:172
  • 點閱點閱:192
在多層次模式中，脈絡效果被定義為脈絡變數（個體層次解釋變數的組平均）對於結果變數的影響在排除了個體層次解釋變數的影響後的淨效果，脈絡效果在教育與心理領域用來反映個體所身存的情境對個體所造成的影響，不僅具有方法學上的重要分析價值，更有教育與心理研究之理論與議題意涵。本研究針對解釋變數與結果變數的組內相關係數配對效果，配合樣本數的不同狀況，進行蒙地卡羅模擬研究，並以來自於38家企業1,200名員工的組織創新氣氛與滿意度測量數據進行實徵資料分析。在分析時，本研究特別導入貝氏估計進行模擬研究與實徵資料的各係數與脈絡效果的參數估計，並與最大概似估計進行比較。從模擬研究的分析結果發現，在樣本愈小的情況下，ICCx愈大而ICCy愈小，對於脈絡效果的真值估計愈精確。相對之下，ICCx愈小而ICCy愈大時，參數波動愈大而真值偏誤愈嚴重。同時，模擬結果也發現貝氏估計與ML估計的效率相當一致，而貝氏估計在各種模擬條件下對於脈絡效果真值估計的表現普遍優於最大概似估計。尤其在Ncluster偏低的情況下，貝氏估計有更優越的效能，顯示貝氏估計是最大概似法的良好替代。在實徵分析部分，本研究也發現貝氏估計能夠由蒙地卡羅模擬估計過程中得知誤差發生情形，對於脈絡效果的估計與解釋具有實質助益。最後，本研究對於未來研究建議與研究限制進行討論。
In multilevel modeling, contextual effects are defined as the pure effects of contextual variables on the outcomes after the impact of explanative variable at individual level been removed. The multilevel model with contextual effect is frequently of interest in education and psychological research since the group means of the explanative variable at individual level reflected the situational influence have both methodological an substantive meanings. In the present study, a Monte Carlo simulation along with an empirical data contained 38 companies and 1,200 employees are adapted to explore the influences of intra-class correlation (ICC) of predictor and outcome on the estimation of contextual effects. The Bayesian estimation was applied in this present study in order to compare with the traditional maximum likelihood method. Results of simulation study revealed that, in the cases of small sample size, a smaller ICCx combined with a higher ICCy has better efficient for the parameter estimation; in contrast, a higher ICCx combined with a lower ICCy may has poor performance. The performance of Bayesian estimation is similar with maximum likelihood method. However, the Bayesian estimation shown the superiority of predicting the true value of parameter especially when the Ncluster is low, revealing that the Bayesian estimates is the good alternative with the maximum likelihood method for estimating the contextual effects in the multilevel models. Finally, the limitations and future study are discussed in the end of the paper.
期刊論文
1.Bieg, S.、Backes, S.、Mittag, W.(2011)。The role of intrinsic motivation for teaching, teachers' care and autonomy support in students' self-determined motivation。Journal for Educational Research Online，3(1)，122-140。  new window
2.Kreft, I. G.、De Leeuw, J.、Aiken, L. S.(1995)。The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models。Multivariate Behavioral Research，30(1)，1-21。  new window
3.Gelman, Andrew(2006)。Prior Distributions for Variance Parameters in Hierarchical Models。Bayesian Analysis，1(3)，515-533。  new window
4.Hox, J. J.、van de Schoot, R.、Matthijsse, S.(2012)。How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective。Survey Research Methods，6(2)，87-93。  new window
5.Raudenbush, S. W.(1989)。"Centering" predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices and consequences。Multilevel Modeling Newsletter，1(2)，10-12。  new window
6.Ahmed, W.、Minnaert, A.、van der Werf, G.、Kuyper, H.(2010)。Perceived social support and early adolescents' achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions。Journal of Youth and Adolescence，39(1)，36-46。  new window
7.Lüdtke, O.、Marsh, H. W.、Robitzsch, A.、Trautwein, U.、Asparouhov, T.、Muthén, B.(2008)。The multilevel latent covariate model: a new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies。Psychological Methods，13(3)，203-229。  new window
8.Scheines, R.、Hoijtink, H.、Boomsma, A.(1999)。Bayesian estimation and testing of structural equation models。Psychometrika，64(1)，37-52。  new window
9.Muthén, B.、Asparouhov, T.(2012)。Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory。Psychological Methods，17(3)，313-335。  new window
10.Gelman, Andrew、Rubin, Donald B.(1992)。Inference from Interative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences。Statistical Science，7(4)，457-472。  new window
11.Chan, David(1998)。Functional Relations Among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models。Journal of Applied Psychology，83(2)，234-246。  new window
12.Aguinis, H.、Culpepper, S. A.(2015)。An expanded decision making procedure for examining cross-level interaction effects with multilevel modeling。Organizational Research Methods，18(2)，155-176。  new window
13.Baldwin, S. A.、Fellingham, G. W.(2013)。Bayesian methods for the analysis of small sample multilevel data with a complex variance structure。Psychological Methods，18(2)，151-164。  new window
14.Bayes, T. P.(1763)。An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances。Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society，53，370-418。  new window
15.Bell, S. T.、Towler, A. J.、Fisher, D. M.(2011)。A multilevel examination of the influence of trainee-trainer gender dissimilarity and trainee-classroom gender composition dissimilarity on trainee knowledge acquisition。Human Resource Development Quarterly，22(3)，343-372。  new window
16.Browne, W. J.、Draper, D.(2006)。A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models。Bayesian Analysis，1(3)，473-514。  new window
17.Chen, G.、Mathieu, J. E.、Bliese, P. D.(2004)。A framework for conducting multilevel construct validation。Research in multi-level issues，3，273-303。  new window
18.Cronbach, L. J.、Webb, N.(1979)。Between class and within class effects in a reported aptitude × treatment interaction: A reanalysis of a study by G. L. Anderson。Journal of Educational Psychology，67，717-724。  new window
19.Dalal, D. K.、Zickar, M. J.(2012)。Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression。Organizational Research Methods，15(3)，339-362。  new window
20.Gelman, Andrew、Meng, Xiao-li、Stern, Hal、Rubin, D. B.(19961000)。Posterior Predictive Assessment of Model Fitness Via Realized Discrepancies。Statistica Sinica，6(4)，733-807。  new window
21.Ghosh, M.(2011)。Objective priors: An introduction for frequentists。Statistical Science，26(2)，187-202。  new window
22.Howson, C.(1997)。A logic of induction。Philosophy of Science，64(2)，268-290。  new window
23.Kass, R. E.、Wasserman, L.(1996)。The selection of prior distributions by formal rules。Journal of the American Statistical Association，91(435)，1343-1370。  new window
24.Kruschke, J. K.、Aguinis, H.、Joo, H.(2012)。The time has come: Bayesian methods for data analysis in the organizational sciences。Organizational Research Methods，15(4)，722-752。  new window
25.LaHuis, D. M.、Hartman, M. J.、Hakoyama, S.、Clark, P. C.(2014)。Explained variance measures for multilevel models。Organizational Research Methods，17(4)，433-451。  new window
26.Lüdtke, O.、Marsh, H.、Robitzsch, A.、Trautwein, U.(2011)。A 2 × 2 Taxonomy of Multilevel Latent Contextual Models: Accuracy-Bias Trade-Offs in Full and Partial Error Correction Models。Psychological Methods，16(4)，444-467。  new window
27.Marsh, H. W.、Parker, J. W.(1984)。Determinants of student selfconcept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well?。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology，47(1)，213-231。  new window
28.Marsh, H. W.、Lüdtke, O.、Robitzsch, A.、Trautwein, U.、Asparouhov, T.、Muthén, B.、Nagengast, B.(2009)。Doubly-latent models of school contextual effects: Integrating multilevel and structural equation approaches to control measurement and sampling error。Multivariate Behavioral Research，44(6)，764-802。  new window
29.Marsh, H. W.、Seaton, M.、Trautwein, U.、Lüdtke, O.、Hau, K. T.、O'Mara, A. J.、Craven, R. G.(2008)。The big-fish-littlepond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: Implications for theory, methodology, and future research。Educational Psychology Review，20(3)，319-350。  new window
30.Mathieu, J. E.、Chen, G.(2011)。The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research。Journal of Management，37(2)，610-641。  new window
31.Robinson, W. S.(1950)。Ecological correlations and the behaviour of individuals。American Sociological Review，15(3)，351-357。  new window
32.Suppes, P.(2007)。Where do Bayesian priors come from?。Synthese，156(3)，441-471。  new window
33.Van Mierlo, H.、Vermunt, J. K.、Rutte, C. G.(2009)。Composing group-level constructs from individual-level survey data。Organizational Research Methods，12(2)，368-392。  new window
34.Zyphur, M. J.、Oswald, F. L.(2015)。Bayesian estimation and inference: A user's guide。Journal of Management，41(2)，390-420。  new window
35.Enders, C. K.、Tofighi, D.(20070600)。Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue。Psychological Methods，12(2)，121-138。  new window
36.Klein, K. J.、Conn, A. B.、Smith, D. B.、Sorra, J. S.(2001)。Is Everyone in Agreement? An Exploration of Within-group Agreement in Employee Perceptions of the Work Environment。Journal of Applied Psychology，86(1)，3-16。  new window
37.溫福星、邱皓政(20090600)。多層次模型方法論：階層線性模式的關鍵議題與試解。臺大管理論叢，19(2)，263-293。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.James, Lawrence R.(1982)。Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement。Journal of Applied Psychology，67(2)，219-229。  new window
39.Klein, Katherine J.、Dansereau, Fred、Hall, Rosalie J.(1994)。Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis。Academy of Management Review，19(2)，195-229。  new window
40.Maas, Cora J. M.、Hox, Joop J.(2005)。Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling。Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences，1(3)，86-92。  new window
41.Shrout, P. E.、Fleiss, J. L.(1979)。Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability。Psychological Bulletin，86(2)，420-428。  new window
42.Hofmann, David A.、Gavin, Mark B.(1998)。Centering Decisions in Hierarchical Linear Models: Implications for Research in Organizations。Journal of Management，24(5)，623-641。  new window
43.林鉦棽、彭台光(20061200)。多層次管理研究：分析層次的概念、理論和方法。管理學報，23(6)，649-675。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.Hofmann, D. A.(1997)。An overview of the logic and rational of hierarchical linear models。Journal of Management，23(6)，723-744。  new window
會議論文
1.Chiou, H.(2001)。Creative climate and culture in organizations: From phenomenon observation to the development of measurement tool of Creative Organizational Climate Inventory (COCI)。The Second International Symposium on Child Development。Hong Kong。  new window
2.Grilli, L.、Rampichini, C.(2010)。The role of sample cluster means in effectiveness evaluation。The second meeting of the EARLI SIG18 Educational Effectiveness。Leuven。  new window
研究報告
1.邱皓政、郭建志、劉兆明(2001)。台灣本土組織文化探究的方向與策略 (計畫編號：89-H-FA01-2-4-6)。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.Grilli, L.、Rampichini, C.(2009)。Measurement error in multilevel models with sample cluster means。Department of Statistics, University of Florence。  new window
圖書
1.Gelman, Andrew、Carlin, John B.、Stern, Hal S.、Rubin, Donald B.(2004)。Bayesian Data Analysis。Chapman & Hall。  new window
2.Lee, S. Y.(2007)。Structural equation modeling: A Bayesian approach。Chichester：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.Kreft, I. G. G.(1996)。Are Multilevel Techniques Necessary? An Overview, Including Simulation Studies。Los Angeles, CA：California State University。  new window
4.Muthén, L. K.、Muthén, B. O.(2010)。Mplus user's guide。Los Angeles, California：Muthén & Muthén。  new window
5.Snijders, T.、Bosker, R.(1999)。Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Publications。  new window
6.Duncan, O. C.、Cuzzort, Pay P.、Duncan, Beverly(1966)。Statistical geography: Problems in analyzing areal data。Glencoe, Illinois：Free Press。  new window
7.Gill, J.(2008)。Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral science approach。Boca Raton, FL：Chapman & Hall。  new window
8.Keynes, J. M.(2008)。A treatise on probability。Seaside, OR：Rough Draft Printers。  new window
9.Laplace, P. S.、Dale, A. I.(1995)。Philosophical essay on probabilities。New York, NY：Springer-Verlag。  new window
10.Lynch, Scott M.(2007)。Introduction to applied Bayesian statistics and estimation for social scientists。Springer。  new window
11.Pedhazur, E. J.(1997)。Multiple regression in behavior research: Explanation and prediction。Forth Worth, TA：Harcourt。  new window
12.Cohen, Jacob、Cohen, Patricia、West, Stephen G.、Aiken, Leona S.(2003)。Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
13.Kreft, Ita G. G.、De Leeuw, Jan(1998)。Introducing Multilevel Modeling。Sage。  new window
14.Raudenbush, Stephen W.、Bryk, Anthony S.(2002)。Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Press。  new window
15.Cohen, Jacob E.(1988)。Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
單篇論文
1.Asparouhov, T.，Muthén, B.(2010)。Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus，http://www.statmodel.com/download/BayesAdvantages18.pdf。  new window
其他
1.Muthén, B.(2010)。Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction，http://www.statmodel.com/download/IntroBayesVersion%203.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Algina, J.、Swaminathan, H.(2011)。Centering in two-level nested designs。Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis。New York, NY：Taylor & Francis Group。  new window
2.Snijders, T.(2005)。Power and sample size in multilevel linear models。Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science。Chicester：Wiley。  new window
3.Bliese, P. D.(2000)。Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis。Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions。Jossey-Bass, Inc。  new window
4.Kozlowski, Steve W. J.、Klein, Katherine J.(2000)。A Multilevel Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes。Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions。Jossey-Bass。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究：角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析
2. 運動心理資本對高中運動員知覺自我運動表現影響：教練家長式領導行為的跨層次分析
3. 轉換型領導、交易型領導、倫理氣候與情緒智力對房屋仲介經紀人員工作績效之影響--以信任管理者為中介變數
4. 有工作，還是窮--我國工作貧窮因素之探討
5. 若即若離？探索TSSCI商管社群網絡結構及知識活動--編輯群重疊的策略觀點
6. 知覺教育訓練成效與離職傾向關係之調節式中介模式：心理契約觀點
7. 雇主品牌管理與員工品牌權益：跨層次之中介與調節影響效果
8. 組織政治知覺與印象管理動機對國小教師組織公民行為影響之探究
9. 轉化型領導對群體成員企業社會責任價值觀的雙向影響：程序公正與領導者-部屬企業社會責任價值觀一致性的中介效果
10. 建言行為與員工創新行為績效：一個探討促進型建言、抑制型建言、領導與部屬交換關係與員工創新行為績效的三階交互作用模型
11. 中老年期的憂鬱：以多層次模式探究
12. 創新學習成長氛圍、工作要求--個人能力適配度對員工經驗開放性特質與工作創新表現關係的影響：三階交互作用之檢視
13. 家族集團股權結構與家族領導雙元性對「主理人-主理人」代理問題之探討
14. 會考成績對就近入學影響之研究：多層次分析的取向
15. 老人定點用餐服務現況及參與用餐者之自評效益--以臺北市為例
 
1. 道德領導力對團隊績效與員工建言影響之探索 -以團隊關係衝突為跨層次中介模式
2. 以跨層次模型探討職涯使命感與組織公平氛圍對公部門員工個人工作行為之影響
3. 跨層次觀點下家長式領導、倫理氣候、組織承諾與組織公民行為關係之研究
4. 威權領導對任務績效之影響:以LMX及部屬職場偏差行為為中介因子
5. 科技大學教師專業背景、教師教學表現與學生學習成就之關聯：階層線性模式分析
6. 國小組長知覺校長正向領導、學校組織健康、人境適配與工作幸福感之關係：階層線性模式的驗證
7. 公部門團隊成員行動化知識分享行為之研究-科技信任與雙元性知識分享之調節效果
8. 團隊中的自主性與成員效能：家長式領導的調節
9. 競爭氣候如何燃起員工績效？檢驗競爭氣候與競爭特質交互對工作重塑、工作敬業與工作績效的關係
10. 以多層次分析探討組織認同在個人-組織適配度與離職傾向之調節式中介效果
11. 組織變革對員工離職傾向之跨層次分析:心理契約違反與共享心智模式的中介效果
12. 高績效工作系統與員工績效之跨層次研究：人力資本中介效果及創意自我效能與服務導向干擾效果
13. 我國高級中等學校教師與直屬處室主任關係品質、職場自尊、團體凝聚力與教學效能關聯性之研究
14. 高中教師情緒智力、情緒勞務、組織支持、 心理資本與工作滿意度關係之研究
15. CVIPP模型在我國樂齡學習中心績效評估應用之研究
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：715（臺灣：652，外國：63） ／ 本年度總使用人次：950410 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：66750682
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上