:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣之婚姻配對模式
書刊名:人文及社會科學集刊
作者:蔡淑鈴 引用關係
出版日期:1994
卷期:6:2
頁次:頁335-371
主題關鍵詞:臺灣婚姻配對
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(35) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:35
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:339
     在社會階層與社會流動的文獻上,有兩個基本假設主導著婚姻配對的討論。第一 種假設是同質性地位通婚,主張人類社會裡最普遍也最盛行的配對方式是社會地位相近者彼 此聯婚。第二種假設是「男高女低」的配對方式,認為女性傾向於嫁給社會地位比自己高的 男性。 本文使用一些最近的全臺問卷調查資料,利用 log-multivariate models 的統計分 析方法,初步探討臺灣的婚姻配對模式,分析結果可以支持「同質性地位通婚」的假設。不 論是就賦予地位(如族�暺P階級背景)來說,或是依成就地位(以教育取得為例)而論,我 們都觀察到臺灣民眾傾向於和自己社會位置相近者結婚。這種傾向若展現在族�撉瘧搣吨W就 是族�擗滷B的現象,若流露在出身背景的考量上就是「門當戶對」的選擇。不過,同類相聚 也不是人類配對現象唯一的法則。當異質性地位通婚發生時,我們發現「男高女低」的原則 可以充分解釋選擇性的教育配對,但不能完全說明階級之間婚姻流動的現象。另一方面,我 們發現一旦控制住人口年輪在屬性分配上的差異後,「門當戶對」在配對選擇上的重要性相 當穩定,並沒有隨著時間而改變;反之,族�擗滷B傾向則有減弱的趨勢。
     "Like marries like" is a long standing hypothesis in sociological inquiries into mate selection. In practice, the prevalence of homogamy with respect to a variety of social attributes, such as race, ethnicity, religion, and socioeconomic achievements, has been observed in several countries. This paper explores trends and patterns of assortative mating in postwar Taiwan, with particular attention paid to the tendency toward status homogamy. Marriage choice is a multidimensional phenomenon. A distinction is made between ascriptive and achievement-oriented characteristics in marriage selection. Ascriptive status homogamy is measured by the similarity of spouses with respect to their social origins, such as ethnicity and father's class position. The achieved dimension of status homogamy is evaluated by the similarity of spouses' educational attainments. All of these aspects of status homogamy are empirically examined by applying log-multivariate models to cohort data on intermarriage collected from recent islandwide social surveys. The empirical results indicate a significant tendency for people in Taiwan to marry homogamously. Besides, assortative mating patterns has remained stable regardless of class background or educational attainment. On the other hand, ethnic endogamy has decreased across cohorts examined.
期刊論文
1.Hwang, Sean-Shong、Saenz, Rogelio(1990)。The Problem Posed by Immigrants Married Abroad on Intermarriage Research: The Case of Asian Americans。International Migration Review,24(3),563-576。  new window
2.Kalmijn, Matthijs(1991)。Status Homogamy in the United States。American Journal of Sociology,97(2),496-523。  new window
3.Rockwell, Richard C.(1976)。Historical Trends and Variations in Educational Homogamy。Journal of Marriage and Family,38(1),83-95。  new window
4.Mare, Robert D.(1991)。Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating。American Sociological Review,56(1),15-32。  new window
5.張茂桂、蕭新煌、章英華(19871010)。大學生的「中國結」與「臺灣結」:自我認定與通婚觀念的分析。中國論壇,25(1)=289,34-55。  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡淑鈴、文崇一(19861200)。性別與社會流動 : 臺灣之實徵研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,60,121-147。  延伸查詢new window
7.Acker, Joan R.(1973)。Women and Social Stratification: A Case of Intellectual Sexism。American Journal of Sociology,78,936-945。  new window
8.Acker, Joan R.(1980)。Women and Stratification: A Review of Recent Literature。Contemporary Sociology,9(1),25-35。  new window
9.Becker. Gary S.(1974)。A Theory of Marriage。Journal of Political Economy,82(2),11-26。  new window
10.Becker. Gary S.(1973)。A Theory of Marriage。Journal of Political Economy,81(4),813-846。  new window
11.Burgess, Ernest W.、Wallin, Paul(1943)。Homogamy in Social Characteristics。American Journal of Sociology,49,117-124。  new window
12.Ganzeboom, Harry B. G.、Treiman, Donald J.、Ultee, Wout C.(1991)。Comparative Intergenerational Stratification Research: Three Generations and Beyond。Annual Review of Sociology,17,277-302。  new window
13.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.、Sewell, W. H.(1974)。Toward Comparable Data on Inequality and Stratification。American Sociologist,9,18-25。  new window
14.Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。A Structural Model of the Mobility Tables。Social Forces,56,919-953。  new window
15.Hauser, Robert M.(1981)。The Structure of Social Relationships: Cross-Classifications of Mobility, Kinship, and Friendship。ISH-Jaurnal,5,1-51。  new window
16.Hollingshead, August B.(1950)。Cultural Factors in the Selection of Marriage Mates。American Sociological Review,15,619-627。  new window
17.Hout, Michael(1982)。The Association between Husbands' and Wives' Occupations in Two-Earner Families。American Journal of Sociology,88(2),397-409。  new window
18.Lieberson, Stanley、Waters, Mary(1985)。Recent Social Trends: Ethnic Mixtures in the United States。Sociology and Social Research,70,43-52。  new window
19.Ritter, Kathleen V.、Hargens, Lowell L.(1975)。Occupational Positions and Class Identifications: A Test of the Asymmetry Hypothesis。American Journal of Sociology,80(4),934-948。  new window
20.Tzeng, Meei-Shenn(1992)。The Effects of Socioeconomic Heterogamy and Changes on Marital Dissolution for First Marriages。Journal of Marriage and the Family,54,609-619。  new window
21.Tsai, Shu-Ling(1992)。Social Change and Status Attainment in Taiwan: Comparisons of Ethnic Groups。International Perspectives on Education and Society,2,225-256。  new window
22.Schoen, Robert、Wooldredge, John(1989)。Marriage Choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969-71 and 1979-81。Journal of Marriage and Family,51(2),465-481。  new window
23.王甫昌(19940400)。光復後臺灣漢人族群通婚的原因與形式初探。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,76,43-96。  延伸查詢new window
24.張維安、王德睦(1983)。社會流動與選擇性婚姻。中國社會學刊,7,191-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Hendrickx, John、Lammers, Jan、Ultee, Wout(1991)。Double Homogamy: Marriages That are both Educationally and Religiously Mixed. Trends in the Netherlands up to 1970。The Conference of the ISA Research Committee for Social Stratification,(會議日期: June 18-21, 1991)。Prague。  new window
2.Tsai, Shu-Ling(1993)。Gender Stratification Revisited: Status Homogamy in Taiwan。The Conference of Research Committee on Social Stratification, International Sociological Association,(會議日期: May 20-22, 1993)。University of Trordheim。  new window
學位論文
1.Chang, Huey-chi(1992)。The Trends of Occupational Assortative Marriages in the United States, 1940-1988(碩士論文)。University of Wisconsin-Madison。  new window
圖書
1.陳運棟(1981)。客家人。臺北:聯亞出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Blau, Peter M.(1977)。Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure。New York:The Free Press。  new window
3.Blau, Peter M.(1964)。Exchange and Power in Social Lift。New York:John Wiley and Sons。  new window
4.Carter, Hugh N.、Glick, Paul C.(1976)。Marriage and Divorce: A Social and Economic Study。Cambridge, Massachusetts:Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Bogardus, Emory S.(1959)。Social Distance。Yellow Springs, Ohio:Antioch Press。  new window
6.Homans, George C.(1974)。Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms。New York:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc。  new window
7.Johnson, Robert A.(1980)。Religious Assortative Marriage in the United States。New York:Academic Press。  new window
8.Laumann, Edward O.(1966)。Prestige and Association in an Urban Community: An Analysis of an Urban Stratification System。New York:The Bobbs-Merrill Company。  new window
9.Parsons, Talcott(1949)。Essays in Sociological Theory Pure and Applied。Glencoe, Illinois:The Free press。  new window
10.Becker, Gary Stanley(1981)。A Treatise on the Family。Harvard University Press。  new window
11.Blau, Peter Michael、Duncan, Otis Dudley(1967)。The American Occupational Structure。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
12.Featherman, David L.、Hauser, Robert M.(1978)。Opportunity and Change。New York:Academic Books。  new window
圖書論文
1.蔡淑鈴、瞿海源(1988)。主客觀職業量表之初步建構。臺灣社會現象的分析。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Coleman, D. A.(1977)。Assortative Mating in Britain。Equalities and Inequalities in Family Life。New York:Academic Press。  new window
3.Hauser, Robert M.(1979)。Some Exploratory Methods for Modeling Mobility Tables and Other Cross-Classified Data。Sociological Methodology, 1980。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
4.Goode, William J.(1974)。Comment: The Economics of Nonmonetary Variables。Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children, and Human Capital。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Goldthorpe, John H.(1973)。Occupational Grading and Occupational Prestige。Social Stratification and Career Mobility。Mouton。  new window
6.Johnson, Marshall(1992)。Classification, Power, and Markets: Waning of the Ethnic Division of Labor。Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle。New York:AI. E. Sharpe, Inc.。  new window
7.Lipman-Blumen, Jean(1976)。Toward a Homosocial Theory of Sex Roles: An Explanation of the Sex Segregation of Social Institutions。Women and the Workplace。Chicago:The University of Chicago。  new window
8.Tsai, Shu-Ling、Chiu, Hei-Yuan(1991)。Constructing Occupational Scales for Taiwan。Research in Social Stratification and Mobility。Greenwich, Connecticut:JAI Press。  new window
9.Gates, Hill(1981)。Ethnicity and Social Class。The Anthropology of Taiwanese Society。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
10.蔡淑鈴(1988)。社會地位取得:山地、閩客及外省之比較。變遷中的台灣社會:第一次社會變遷基本調查資料的分析。臺北:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
11.伊慶春、熊瑞梅(1994)。擇偶過程之網絡與婚姻關係:對介紹人、婚姻配對、和婚姻滿意度之分析。臺灣社會的民眾意向:社會科學的分析。臺北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE