:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高科技廠商特性、研究發展活動與成效之研究-以科學園區廠商實證
作者:丁明勇
作者(外文):Ting, Ming-Yung
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:管理科學研究所
指導教授:張保隆
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1997
主題關鍵詞:高科技廠商研究發展管理研發投入強度廠商屬性廠商績效營業成長率High-Tech FirmsR&D ManagementR&D IntensityFirm''s AttributePerformanceSales Growth
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
本研究乃針對科學園區內高科技廠商研究發展管理務現況,與企業研究發
展管理理論 進行探討。本研究首先透過文獻探討,建立一個廠商研究發
展管理架構,再以該架構為概 念基礎,實證研究科學園區內高科技廠商
之研發投入模式、研發投入對廠商績效影響、及 研發管理特徵因素。
本研究之實證是針對高科技廠商屬性與研發投入之關聯、設立年數不同廠
商研發投入模式,以及廠商研發投入與其績效間相關性進行探討,並將廠
商依績效分群,再分析比較各群廠商的績效表現,及其在研發管理上的差
異。 實證分析結果顯示,園區內國資廠商的研發投入顯著高於外資廠
商;廠商研發投入在設立初期會明顯的較高,而後遞減,最後會成一穩定
的研發投入水準。園區內不同產業別廠商間,研發投入上發現有顯著的差
異。廠商研發投入強度與後續營業成長率、生產力成長率,具有顯著正相
關。惟研發投入強度與生產力及當期營業成長率,則呈顯著負相關。 廠
商依主、客觀績效指標可區分為「穩定創新型」、「守成改進型」 、及
「自信成長型」三群,不同群組廠商在研發管理上,如決策過程、研發管
理者能力、研發環境與部門交流,均顯現出一些不同。 本研究所
建構出的高科技廠商研發管理模式,除可供實務管理上之參考,並可做為
研發管理實證研究之概念架構,至於研發管理的策略面考量,本研究的實
證分析,指出一些可供參考的結果,對於政府制訂科學園區廠商研發投入
與管理政策可有幫助,對於廠商投入研發決策與短期營運,所造成負面影
響之因應亦皆有所幫助。 關鍵字詞:高科技廠商,研究發展管理,研
發投入強度,廠商屬性 ,廠商績效,營業成長率,營業生產力,營業生
產力成長率。
This research is an empirical analysis of high-tech firms at the
HsinchuScience-based Industrial Park ( HSIP ) in Taiwan. The
dissertation focuseson exploring R&D management and its effects
on high-tech firms in HSIP. The HSIP is regarded as one of
the most successful high-tech parks in theworld. Total sales of
the HSIP soared from US$ 75 million in 1983 to overUS$11 billion
in 1995. The study began with analyzing the differences of R&
D investment patternsalong a firm''s three attributes: capital
source, industry category, and age.Then, the relationships
between firms'' R&D investment and performance; and the critical
factors of successful R&D management. The results of the
research indicates: (1) Where R&D patterns wereconcerned, the R&
D intensity of ROC high-tech firms were significantly higherthan
that of their foreign counterparts at the HSIP. New founded ROC
firmshad significantly higher R&D intensity. To foster a firm''s
R&D investmentgovernment incentive plans should consider a firm''
s capital source, age andits industry category. (2) Regarding to
R&D and performance linkages, a firm''sR&D intensity correlated
significantly positively to its sales growth andproductivity
growth, but negatively related to its current performance.
TheR&D intensity is positively correlated to a firm''s self-
appraisal on marketperformance, but negatively related to its R&
D projects'' budget and schedulecontrolling performance. The
ratio of R&D spending per employee is positivelyrelated to its
self-appraisal on technological innovation ability. (3) Themost
important success factors to R&D management were: top management
support,R&D managers dominating R&D strategies, longer R&D
planning horizon, and R&Dproject leaders'' planning and
controlling skills. Integrated as an industrial cluster HSIP
functions not only like a bigcorporation with economies of scale
but also with enormous flexibility. Itseems that the Taiwan
experiences in establishing science-based industrialpark with
well infrastructure could provide a good example for the
developingcountries to their economic development.Key Word:
High-Tech Firms, R&D Management, R&D Intensity, Firm''s
Attribute, Performance, Sales Growth, Productivity,
Productivity Growth.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE