:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:都市計畫草圖替選方案分析模式
作者:林楨家 引用關係
作者(外文):Jen-Jia Lin
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:交通運輸研究所
指導教授:馮正民
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1999
主題關鍵詞:都市計畫配置土地使用運輸網路數學規劃基因演算法urban planlayoutland usetransportation networkmathematical programminggenetic algorithm
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
當規劃者無助地面對一張地圖,不知從何下手配置實質項目時,他最大的願望應該是手邊能有一個可以有效地協助規劃者進行草稿配置作業的分析工具;如此,規劃者就不需要只是窩在辦公室裡,依據自己的好惡,勉強湊出一、二個替選方案應景,而是更有系統地面對並處理市民的感受,藉由先進科技的協助,產生很多相匹敵的替選方案,這樣繼續進行下一步評選與細部設計工作方有意義。
本研究即在構建上述規劃者所期望擁有的分析工具,它是由一個多目標數學規劃模式與一套基因演算法所組成;前者將配置問題提綱挈領地規範成數學規劃模式,後者則負責為這個模式找出近似非劣解集作為替選方案。模式採漸進複雜的方法構建,演算法經過多次測試而確認其求解能力;所需輸入的參數資料,必需經由調查方能獲得,以確實掌握民眾的感受;分析結果為接近柏拉圖最適境的替選方案;整體而言,這個分析工具應該符合規劃者的需要。
為瞭解所構建分析工具在實際問題上的表現,本研究針對「社子島地區」與「淡海新市鎮」二個都市計畫區進行實例研究,並對後者進行參數敏感度分析;除驗證並展示其實用價值外,並發現以下重要結論:一是配置內容愈單純的都市計畫案,愈有可能只找到單一方案;二是分析範圍應以規劃範圍為中心予以適度擴大;三是土地使用與交通運輸兩種手段搭配使用,在提高發展效率的目標上,會較各自單獨運用來得好;四是分區尺度愈小,配置結果將愈細緻明確;五是運算時間、基因字串與分區數之間存在函數關係,可據以由問題規模估計作業時間;六是配置結果確能反映輸入參數值所隱含之規劃理念與偏好期望,且演算結果之穩定度相當高。
When a planner do not know how to start to allocate the physical items and look at the planned area map helplessly, it is wished that an analysis tool can be generated to assist planner to proceed the sketch layout task. With this tool, the planner can sincerely face to and systematically deal with the preference of citizen to generate nondominated alternatives, rather than decide the layout environment pretentiously in the office and generate few alternatives in a forced manner. Thus the next tasks, evaluation and precise design will be more meaningful.
The objective of this study is to construct an analysis tool, which is needed by the planners as mentioned above. The tool consists of two elements: a mathematical programming model and a genetic algorithm. The model is constituted from the key factors of layout problem in an increasingly complex process. The algorithm is used to find the approximating nondominated solutions for the model, and its searching ability is identified through many tests. The input data for this tool must be investigated in order to follow the preference of citizen. The alternatives generated by this tool are approximating to the Pareto optimum. We think that this tool is nearly matched with the planners'' need.
Two case studies, Sheh-Tzyy-Dao and Tan-Hai new town, are described to illustrate the application process and outputs. There are some findings in the case studies. First, the fewer types of land uses the case is, the more possible to generate only one solution. Second, the analysis area should be the appropriate enlargement of planned area. Third, the integrated strategies of land use and transportation have better performance on increasing development efficiency than individual strategies of land use or transportation. Fourth, the smaller the cell is, the more detail and clear the layout will be. Fifth, the function relationships among calculating time, string length and number of cells can be used to estimate operation time from the problem scale. Sixth, the outputs of model do reflect the planning principles and expectation, which are implied in the input parameters, and the algorithm is very stable on the solutions seeking.
1. 內政部(1993),變更淡海新市鎮特定區主要計畫(配合第一期細部計畫案)書。
2. 台北市政府都市發展局(1996),關渡及社子島地區環境分析與整體規劃構想案第一期規劃研究報告,委託中華民國區域科學學會辦理。
3. 台北市政府都市發展局(1997a),關渡及社子島地區環境分析與整體規劃構想案第二期規劃研究報告,委託中華民國區域科學學會辦理。
4. 台北市政府都市發展局(1997b),關渡及社子島地區環境分析與整體規劃構想案第三期規劃研究報告,委託中華民國區域科學學會辦理。
5. 台灣省政府(1990),擬定淡海新市鎮特定區主要計畫書。
6. 台灣省政府住宅及都市發展處市鄉規劃局(1997),變更淡海新市鎮特定區主要計畫(第一次通盤檢討)簡報資料。
7. 李治綱、楊廣益(1993),「單行道網路設計模式之研究」,運輸計劃季刊,第22卷,第1期,第65-78頁。
8. 李治輝(1993),在無非退化性假設下以敏感性資訊求解二階路網設計問題,交通大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
9. 邱文彥(1980),新鎮土地使用計畫設計模型之研究-以桃園甲社區為實例,中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
10. 吳貞純(1997),地理資訊系統應用於森林遊樂區土地使用分區之研究-以八仙山森林遊樂區為例,中興大學森林研究所碩士論文。
11. 吳德民(1985),公路網改善決策支援系統雛型設計-台灣北區為例,交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
12. 張巧玲(1986),路網改善評估之不連續多準則決策系統設計-以邏輯程式設計,交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
13. 張勝雄(1992),運輸路網改善計畫之決策模式-路網設計啟發解之發展與應用,交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文。
14. 陳建勛(1997),應用地理資訊系統於土地使用配置之研究,中興大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
15. 曹勝雄(1993),路網設計問題啟發式解法與其多目標決策之研究,交通大學交通運輸研究所博士論文。
16. 曾國雄、王日昌、黃明居(1996),「以基因演算法與樣板路徑求解旅行推銷員問題」,運輸計劃季刊,第25卷,第3期,第493-516頁。
17. 曾國雄、林楨家(1997),「淡海新市鎮消防隊佈設區位之研究-TOPSIS多目標規劃法之應用」,都市與計劃,第24卷,第1期,第81-98頁。
18. 曾國雄、邱裕鈞、許書耕(1997),「主線欄柵式收費站最佳區位遺傳演算尋優法與逐步尋優法之比較分析」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第9卷,第1期,第171-178頁。
19. 葉光毅、黃俊強(1994),「都市道路網路評估之先驗性研究」,中華民國運輸學會第九屆學術論文研討會論文集,第161-168頁。
20. 廖彩雲(1987),運輸路網改善評估之專家系統雛型設計-多目標評估方法之應用,交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
21. 樓邦儒(1995),台北市消防隊多目標區位模式之研究,中國文化大學地學研究所地理組碩士論文。
22. 謝偉松(1994),新市鎮運輸系統規劃之研究-空間結構形態規劃法則之應用,交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
23. 藍國賓(1998),地理資訊系統輔助土地使用分區劃設之研究-以陽明山國家公園一般管制區為例,台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
24. Al-sultan, K. S., Hussain, M. F. and Nizami, J. S. (1996), "A genetic algorithm for the set covering problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 702-709.
25. Bammi, D. and Bammi, D. (1979), "Development of comprehensive land use plan by means of a multiple objective mathematical programming model," Interfaces, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 50-63.
26. Bammi, D., Bammi, D. and Paton, R. (1976), "Urban planning to minimize environmental impact," Environment and Planning A, Vol. 8, pp. 245-359.
27. Barber, G. M. (1976), "Land-use plan design via interactive multiple-objective programming," Environment and Planning A, Vol. 8, pp. 625-636.
28. Ben-ayed, O., Boyce, D. E. and Blair III, C. E. (1988), "A general bilevel linear programming formulation of the network design problem," Transportation Research B, Vol. 22B, No. 4, pp. 311-318.
29. Ben-Shahar, H., Mazor, A. and Pines, D. (1969), "Town planning and walefare maximization: a methodological approach," Regional Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 105-113.
30. Boyce, D. E., Farhi, A. and Weischedel, R. (1973), " Optimal network problem: a branch-and-bound algorithm," Environment and Planning, Vol. 5, pp. 519-533.
31. Boyce, D. E. and Janson, B. N. (1980), "A discrete transportation network design problem with combined trip distribution and assignment," Transportation Research B, Vol. 14B, No. 2, pp. 147-154.
32. Brill, E. D., Chang, S. Y. and Hopkins, L. D. (1982), "Modeling to generate alternatives: the HSJ approach and an illustration using a problem in land use planning," Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 221-235.
33. Brotchie, J. F. (1978), "A new approach to urban modeling," Management Science, Vol. 24, No. 16, pp. 1753-1758.
34. Brotchie, J. F., Dickey, J. W. and Sharpe, R. (1980), TOPAZ-General planning technique and its applications at the regional, urban, and facility planning levels, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
35. Chakroborty, P., Deb, K. and Subrahmanyam, P. S. (1995), "Optimal scheduling on urban transit systems using genetic algorithm," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 6, pp. 544-553.
36. Church, R. L. and ReVelle, C. (1974), "The maximal covering location problem," Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 32, No. 101, pp. 101-118.
37. David, G. A. (1994), "Exact local solution of the continuous network design problem via stochastic user equilibrium assignment," Transportation Research B, Vol. 28B, No. 1, pp. 61-75.
38. Dickey, J. W. and Leiner, C. (1983), "Use of TOPAZ for transportation-land use planning in a suburban county," Transportation Research Record, 931, pp. 20-26.
39. Dickey, J. W., Leone, P. A. and Schwarte, A. R. (1973), "Use of TOPAZ for generating alternative land use schemes," Highway Research Record, 422, pp. 39-52.
40. Dickey, J. W. and Najafi, F. T. (1973), "Regional land use schemes generated by TOPAZ," Regional Studies, Vol. 7, pp. 373-386.
41. Dokmeci, V. F. (1993), "Multiobjective land-use planning model," Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 15-22.
42. Dombi, J. (1982), "Ageneral class of fuzzy operators, the Demorgan class of operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 8, pp. 149-163.
43. Freisz, T. L., Cho, H. J., Mehta, N. J., Tobin, R. L. and Anandalingam, G. (1992), "A simulated annealing approach to the network design problem with variational inequality constraints," Transportation Science, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 18-26.
44. Gen, M. and Cheng, R. (1997), Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
45. Gilbert, K. C., Holmes, D. D. and Rosenthal, R. E. (1985), "A multiobjective discrete optimization model for land allocation," Management Science, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 1509-1522.
46. Goldberg, D. E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
47. Gorden, P. and MacReynolds, W. K. (1974), "Optimal urban forms," Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 217-231.
48. Hoc, H. H. (1973), "A computational approach to the selection of an optimal network," Management Science, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 488-498.
49. Hogan, K. and ReVelle, C. (1986), "Concepts and applications of backup coverage," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1434-1444.
50. Hopkins, L. D. (1977), "Land-use plan design-quadratic assignment and central-facility models," Environment and Planning A, Vol. 9, pp. 625-642.
51. Janson, B. N. and Buckels, L. S. (1991), "Network design programming of U.S. highway improvements," Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 4, pp. 457-478.
52. Janson, B. N. and Husaini, A. (1987), "Heuristic ranking and selection procedures for network design problems," Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 21, pp. 17-46.
53. Klir, G. J. and Yuan, B. (1995), Fuzzy Set and Fuzzy Logical: Theory and Applications, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
54. Koopmans, T. C. and Beckmann, M. (1957), "Assignment problems and the location of economic activities," Econometrica, 25, pp. 53-76.
55. LeBlanc, L. J. (1975), "An algorithm for the discrete network design problem," Transportation Science, Vol. 9, pp. 183-199.
56. LeBlanc, L. J. and Abdulaal, M. (1984), "A comparison of user-optimum versus system-optimum traffic assignment in transportation network design," Transportation Research B, Vol. 18B, No. 2, pp. 115-121.
57. LeBlanc, L. J. and Boyce, D. E. (1986), "A bilevel programming algorithm for exact solution of the network design problem with user-optimal flows," Transportation Research B, Vol. 20B, No. 3, pp. 259-265.
58. Los, M. (1978), "Simultaneous optimization of land use and transportation - a synthesis of the quadratic assignment problem and the optimal network problem," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 21-42.
59. Los, M. (1979), "A discrete-convex programming approach to the simultaneous optimization of land use and transportation," Transportation Research B, Vol. 13B, pp. 33-48.
60. Lundqvist, L. (1973), "Integrated location-transportation analysis; a decomposition approach," Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 233-262.
61. MacKinnon, R. D. and Hodgson, M. J. (1970), "Optimal transportation networks: a case study of highway systems," Environment and Planning, Vol. 2, pp. 267-284.
62. Magnanti, T. L. and Wong, R. T. (1984), "Network design and transportation planning: models and algorithms," Transportation Science, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-55.
63. Miyamoto, S. (1990), Fuzzy Sets in Information Retrieval and Cluster Analysis, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
64. Ochs, J. (1969), "An application of linear programming to urban spatial organization," Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 451-457.
65. Owen, S. H. and Daskin, M. S. (1998), "Strategic facility location: a review," European Journal of Operational Research, No, 111, pp. 423-447.
66. Palmer, C. C. and Kershenbaum, A. (1995), "An approach to a problem in network design using genetic algorithms," Networks, Vol. 26, pp. 151-163.
67. Pereira, A. G. (1996), "Generating alternative routes by multicriteria evaluation and a genetic algorithm," Environment and Planning B, Vol. 23, pp. 711-720.
68. Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1981), Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 2nd ed., New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
69. Poorzahedy, H. and Turnquist, M. A. (1982), "Approximate algorithms for the discrete network design problem," Transportation Research B, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 45-55.
70. Putman, S. H. (1987), "Mathematical programming formulations of transportation and land use models: practical implications of recent research," Transportation Research Record, 1125, pp.39-47.
71. Ridgley, M. A. and Giambelluca, T. W. (1992), "Linking water-balance simulation and multiobjective programming: land use plan design in Hawaii," Environment and Planning B, Vol. 19, pp. 317-336.
72. Sheffi, Y. (1985), Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
73. Sinha, K. C., Adamski, J. T. and Schlager, K. J. (1973), "Use of random-search technique to obtain optimal land use plan design," Highway Research Record, 422, pp.53-65.
74. Suwansirikul, C., Friesz, T. L. and Tobin, R. L. (1987), "Equilibrium decomposed optimization: a heuristic for the continuous equilibrium network design problem," Transportation Science, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 254-263.
75. Tung, S. I. (1988), "Designing optimal transportation networks: an expert system approach," Transportation Planning Journal, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 533-559.
76. Tung, R. S. I. and Schnider, J. B. (1987), "Urban form optimization system: a computer-aided design and evaluation tool for assisting the investigation of interrelationships between land use and transportation," Transportation Research Record, 1125, pp. 48-56.
77. Xiong, Y. and Schneider, J. B. (1995), "Transportation network design using a cumulative genetic algorithm and neural network," Transportation Research Record, 1364, pp. 37-44.
78. Yang, H. and Bell, M. G. H. (1998), "Models and algorithms for road network design: a review and some new developments," Transport Reviews, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 257-278.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE