:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兩岸空運直航航點選擇策略之研究
作者:熊正一
作者(外文):Shon, Zheng-Yi
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:交通管理學系
指導教授:張有恆
林正章
學位類別:博士
出版日期:1999
主題關鍵詞:兩岸直航航空運輸航點選擇競爭策略市場佔有率最小成本流量問題中位問題網路規劃Direct Flights Across Taiwan StraitAir TransportationHub LocationCompetitive StrategyMaket ShareMin-Cost Flow ProblemP-Median ProblemNetwork Planning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:36
一九八八年開放大陸探親以來,每年在兩岸出入的上百萬旅客,為中、港、澳、台四地間的航線帶來了上千億新台幣的商機。預計在二十一世紀的最初十年,兩岸的空中交通運輸將可望成為亞洲地區航空客運最大的市場。由於政治議題的糾葛,現階段所有的兩岸旅次都必須透過港澳地區中轉。這種運作模式雖然使得部份握有台港、台澳、及中港、中澳航權的航空公司獲取了龐大的商業利益,但同時也造成了旅客極大的不便。在龐大的旅運需求壓力與兩岸政治情勢逐漸和緩的情勢下,兩岸空運直航的未來似已露出一片曙光。
然而未來兩岸空運直航究竟應該如何進行,產官學研各界卻一直缺乏較為深入的探討和分析。其中最基本也是最關鍵的當屬直航航點選擇的問題。換言之,在大陸數十個對外開放的國際機場當中,最適合用來做為直航機場究竟有那些,應該是台灣未來推動直航政策在技術及政策層面上首先必須確定,並達成內部共識的主要議題。
有鑑於此,本研究首先基於實務運作的可能方式,架構出兩岸直航的可能決策流程;同時並根據不同的決策目標,設計出兩岸直航的最佳航點選擇模式,然後再藉由決策模式進行航點選擇的策略分析。研究先以政府的政策目標做為決策基礎,利用數學規劃模式的構建,以最小旅行成本來分析符合整體利益的直航航點選擇策略。決策模式基本保留了中位問題的架構與網路問題的特性,從而使得問題的複雜程度得以大幅降低。針對此一特性,研究亦設計一相應之求解演算法。實證分析中,各資料項均以兩岸官方所公佈的有關統計數據為主,無法取得的也以合理的研究方法推估求得。根據研究結果顯示,未來兩岸航空客運的部份,依序應以上海、廣州、深圳、廈門、福州、杭州等數個城市為優先通航的航點。而從實證分析中也可看出,香港和澳門雖然可以繼續發揮部份的轉運功能,但嚴重衰退的旅次量將使其所扮演之中轉角色重要性大幅下降。
除了以最小旅行成本的角度來分析直航航點的選擇策略之外,研究也設計了一產業競爭模式,利用個體選擇理論來構建航空公司於直航市場中的競爭模型。此一模型主要是利用消費者選擇機率來探討市場佔有率的觀念,同時並利用已知的旅行效用函數型態在巢式羅吉特函數中求解變數值,來分析廠商的決策行為。研究發現在各種外在經營環境的限制下,不同規模的航空公司將有不同的選點策略;而不同的經營哲學也將帶來不同的決策結果。此外,研究也結合政府政策與航空公司經營策略之間的不同考量,以階層性的決策關係進行整體均衡的分析。其結果也顯示,部份航點確實在未來的直航市場中具有較大的潛力,值得做為各方決策時的參考依據。
Since the government in Taiwan allowed some informal and private contacts with China in 1988, millions of passengers across Taiwan Strait has created billions of money for air carriers among China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. This so-called Great China market would probably be the busiest one with most passenger volume in Asia in the coming decade. Currently, all the travelers across Taiwan Strait are still transit in Hong Kong or Macau for some political reasons. As a result, specific carriers which holds service quota in this area are earning considerable profits, and the travelers are suffering lots of inconveniences. It is widely believed that direct flights across Taiwan Strait would be an inevitable policy to both sides in the near future because of the huge travel demand and the progress made in cross-strait relations.
However, there were only some few researches focused in this important topic in the past years. One of the fundamental issues is hub selection. Among the 40 qualified candidates in China, some useful and helpful airports should be firstly considered to serve the cross-strait passengers, and the methodology of hub selection should also be developed. This is just one of the problems that should be well settled before formal cross-strait negotiations start.
Base on the observation and assumption in real operations, this research has developed a model which describes the process of hub selection. Some decision models with different objectives have then been created under the conceptual structure. The selection strategies were thus be analyzed following the decision model. The first decision model to be created is the government decision model which is assumed to minimize the total travel cost including time value wasted in transit. Some median problem structures and network problem structures which have successfully reduced the problem complexities are left in the model. An efficient algorithm to solve the problem can then be developed. In practical analysis, all the data used in this research were government statistics unless some unreachable ones which have also been predicted carefully. According to the research outcome, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Zhenzhen, Xiamen, Fuzhou, Hangzhou in order should be selected to be the hub and connected with Taiwan directly. Moreover, Hong Kong and Macau that provide transit services are also found less important in passenger market after direct flights start services.
In addition to the cost minimizing model, a maximizing profit or market share model using choice probabilities is also created in this research. Some nested Logit models with pre-defined utility functions are used as market share indexes. Based on airliners’ interest, these decision models have shown that different scale and management philosophy can change the best decisions a lot. Finally, some integrated analysis with hierarchy structure that combined the different decision models discussed above are introduced. It has shown that some airports in China are easily to be chosen as a transit hub with direct flights across Taiwan Strait. These airports with very high potential should be considered to be connected firstly as the research suggested.
1. 中國民用航空總局計劃司編,從統計看民航1997,北京:中國民航出版社,1997年7月。
2. 中華人民共和國旅游局,中國旅游統計年鑑1997,北京:中國旅游出版社,1997年。
3. 中華民國民意測驗協會,民眾對航空及水運事業意向調查報告,交通部統計處委託調查,民國八十二年六月。
4. 王傳芳,九七後台港航運問題之探討報告初稿,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十二年六月。
5. 尹鍾奇,實用大地測量學,台中:逢甲書局,民國六十一年。
6. 石豐宇,李仲彬,航空公司在直飛航班上之寡佔競爭行為分析,中華民國運輸學會第十二屆學術研討會論文集,台北:民國八十六年。
7. 石豐宇,巫永隆,航空公司在軸幅式網路下之靜態與動態賽局,中華民國運輸學會第十三屆學術研討會論文集,台北:民國八十七年,頁71~89。
8. 宇太科技有限公司,我國有關通航之航路規劃與模擬及與大陸航線接軌模式之研究,中華航空事業發展基金會委託研究,民國八十五年十一月。
9. 宇太科技有限公司,大陸空中交通管制系統、管理體系與設施之介紹和分析,中華航空事業發展基金會委託研究,民國八十五年十一月。
10. 美聯科技,台灣地區發展空運中心之可行性研究,交通部運輸研究所,民國八十二年三月。
11. 交通部運輸研究所,未來兩岸可能直航之航港問題研究,民國八十三年十二月。
12. 交通部運輸研究所,台灣地區國內民航發展之研究(運量預測技術報告),民國八十六年七月。
13. 交通部運輸研究所,台灣地區國內民航發展之研究(摘要報告),民國八十六年七月。
14. 行政院大陸委員會,兩岸直航的問題與展望(修定本),中華民國八十三年十月。
15. 汪進財,陳君杰,榮德璘,兩岸直航機場選擇問題初探,中華民國第一屆運輸網路研討會論文集,頁143~152,民國八十五年四月。
16. 沈海涵,我國空運航權的研究,台北:黎明文化事業有限公司,民國八十三年九月。
17. 吳利子,中共民用航空法與兩岸通航概略分析,世界新聞傳播學院學報,第6期,民國八十五年十月,頁325-347。
18. 杜震華,薛琦,亞太營運中心的理論與實際,台北:華泰書局,民國八十四年十二月。
19. 李彌,九七年後不以香港為轉口港之可行性探討,收錄於九七後台港航運問題之探討報告初稿,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十二年六月。
20. 呂錦隆,段良雄,探討國內航空客運旅客選擇行為之影響因素,中華民國運輸學會第十三屆學術研討會論文集,台北:民國八十七年,頁11~20。
21. 林科,兩岸直航多評準決策分析之研究,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,民國八十年六月。
22. 林長壽譯著,作業研究:應用及算法,台北:中央圖書出版社,民國七十九年八月。
23. 苗君易,中國大陸航空科技發展現況調查研究,交通部科技顧問室,民國八十六年。
24. 高雄港務局,高雄港境外航運中心作業規定手冊,中華民國八十四年五月。
25. 翁錦棟,兩岸直航「政策」面之研究-由「國家利益」概念分析一九七九年至一九九四年兩岸之直航政策,國立師範大學三民主義研究所碩士論文,民國八十二年六月。
26. 許巧鶯,溫裕弘,應用灰色決策理論於航空網路設計之研究,中華民國第二屆運輸網路研討會論文集,民國八十六年十月,頁95-105。
27. 許苑杰,航空公司航線排班與營運規劃模式之研究,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國七十六年十二月。
28. 馬天澤,未來兩岸通航問題之研究,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十一年十月。
29. 陳光華,大陸海空運輸產業概況,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十五年。
30. 陳武正,兩岸直航對台灣地區多元影響與對策之研究,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十一年十月。
31. 陳昭宏,航空公司營收管理模式之研究-整合艙位配置與超額訂位之動態策略,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所博士論文,民國八十六年六月。new window
32. 郭淑芬,中正國際機場空運中心策略發展之研究,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文,民國八十一年六月。
33. 郭宗智,國內航空業者策略聯盟動機與型態之研究,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文,民國八十六年七月。
34. 張五岳,中共要求兩岸直接通航策略與我方對策,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十二年五月。
35. 張有恆,林秀璘,沈進成,應用模糊多目標規劃法於公車營運計劃之研究,模糊系統學刊,第三卷,第一期,民國八十六年,頁65-80。new window
36. 張有恆,楊弘道,航空公司飛機型式選擇之研究,運輸計劃季刊,第二十五卷,第一期,民國八十五年三月,頁93~120。new window
37. 張有恆,熊正一,中國大陸軸幅飛航網路發展之研究,第五屆海峽兩岸都市交通學術研討會論文集,台中:逢甲大學,民國八十六年十二月。
38. 張瑩,運籌學基礎,北京:清華大學出版社,1994年。
39. 游豐吉,對大陸民用航空運輸業之探討,中共研究,第三十卷,第十二期,民國八十五年十二月,頁47~67。
40. 程家瑞,未來兩岸通航法律問題,行政院大陸委員會,民國八十三年十二月。
41. 黃雅芬,張堂賢,台海兩岸間航空客運需求系統動態分析與預測,第五屆海峽兩岸都市交通研討會論文集,民國八十六年十二月,頁4-54~4-65。
42. 熊正一,陳春益,汪進財,兩岸直航機場選擇模式旅行成本之探討,中華民國第二屆運輸網路研討會論文集,民國八十六年十月。
43. 盧華安,飛機調度與短期維修整合模式之研究,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所博士論文,民國八十六年六月。new window
44. 錢頌迪主編,運籌學,修訂版,北京:清華大學出版社,1996年。
45. 羅永光,我國發展亞太空運中心之技術性與非技術性問題及對策,跨世紀台灣運輸問題與對策研討會論文集,頁1-7,民國八十四年五月。
46. 鄧聚龍,灰色系統基本方法,三刷,華中理工大學出版社,1992年5月。
47. 鄧聚龍,灰色控制系統修定版,四刷,華中理工大學出版社,1993年9月。
48. 蕭惠玲,我國空運中心政策執行功能之評估研究,國立中興大學共行政及政策研究所碩士論文,民國八十四年六月。
1. Abdinnour, S. F., Solution approaches to hub location problems, Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University, 1994.
2. Abhinorasaeth, P., A discrete location assignment problem with congestion, Ph.D. dissertation, Northeastern University, 1988.
3. Abrahams, M. “ A service quality model of air travel demand: an empirical study”, Transportation Research, Vol. 17A, No. 5, 1983, pp. 385-393.
4. Ahuja, R. K. and T. L. Magnanti and J. B. Orlin, Network Flows: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications, Eaglewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1993.
5. Alamdari, F. E. and I. G. lack,“Passengers’ choice of airline under competition: the use of logit model”, Transport Reviews, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1992, pp. 153-170.
6. Aykin, T., “ On the Location of Hub Facilities”, Transportation Science, Vol. 22, No. 2, May, 1988, pp. 155-157.
7. Aykin, T., “ On “ A quadratic integer program for the location of interacting hub facilities””, European Journal of Operational Reseach, Vol. 46, 1990, pp. 409-411.
8. Aykin, T., “Interacting New Facilities and Location-Allocation Problems”, Transportation Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, August, 1992, pp. 212-222.
9. Aykin, T., “Lagrangian relaxation based approaches to capaciated hub-and-spoke network design problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 79, 1994, pp.501-523.
10. Aykin, T., “ Network Policies for Hub-and-Spoke Systems with Application to the Air Transportation System”, Transportation Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, August, 1995, pp.201-221.
11. Berge, M. E. and C. A. Hopperstad, “ Demand Driven Dispatch: A Method for Dynamc Aircraft Capacity Assignment, Models and Algorithm”, Operations Research, Vol. 41, 1993, pp. 153-168.
12. Campbell, J.F., “ Integer programming formulations of discrete hub location problems”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 72, 1994, pp. 387-405.
13. Chang, Y. H. and, C. C. Shen, “The Optimal Operations Plan for an Urban Public Transit System - Using Fuzzy Multiobjective Programming,” unpublished paper.
14. Chang, Y. H., Z.Y. Shon, “Creating the Hub-and-Spoke Network Structure of Air Transportation for China”, Proceeding of 2nd conference of Hong Kong society for transportation studies, December, 1997.
15. Daskin, M. S., Network and Discrete Location: Models, Algorithms, and Applications, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1995.
16. Eichberger, J., Game Theory for Economists, San Diego: Academic Press, Inc. 1993.
17. Findlay, C. C., “Optimal Air Fares and Flight Frequency and Market Results”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, January, 1983, Pp. 49-66.
18. Fridstrom, L. and H. Thune-Larsen, “ An econometric air travel demand model for the entire conventional domestic network: the case of Norway”, Transportation Reserach, Vol. 23B, No. 3, 1989, pp.213-223.
19. Fujii, Edwin and E.Im and J. Mak, “ The Economics of Direct Flights”, Journal of Trabsport Economics and Policy, May, 1992, pp. 185-195.
20. Gordon, S. and R. Neufville, “ Design of Air Transportation Networks”, Transportation Research, Vol. 7, 1973, pp. 207-222.
21. Hansen, M. “Airline Competition in a Hub-Dominated Environment: An Application of Noncooperative Game Theory,” Transportation Research B, Vol. 24B, No. 1, 1990, pp. 27-43.
22. Hansen, M., “ Modeling the Airline Competition in a Hub-and-Spoke Network”, Proceeding of Air Hub Development Seminar: Challenges and Strategies of a Modern Airport, Taipei, August, 1996, pp.16-57.
23. Ippolito, R. A., “Estimating Airline Demand With Quality of Service Variables”, Journal of Trabsport Economics and Policy, January, 1981, pp. 7-15.
24. Ivy, R. L., Air line hubs: Changes in urban empolyment structure and network connectivity, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1992.
25. Jorge-Calderon, J. D., “A demand model for scheduled airline services on international European routes”, Journal of Air Transport management, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1997, pp.23-35.
26. Klincewicz, J. G., “ Solving A Freight Transport Problem Using Facility Location Techniques”, Operations Research, Vol. 38, No. 1, Jan-Feb., 1990, pp.99-109.
27. Klincewicz, J. G., “Heuristics for the p-hub location problem”, European Journal of Opeartional Research, Vol. 53, 1991, pp. 25-37.
28. Kuby, M. J. and R. G. Gray, “The Hub Network Design Problem with Stopovers and Feeders: The Case of Federal Express”, Transportation Research, Vol. 27A, No. 1, 1993, pp.1-12.
29. Ladany, S. P. and M. Hersh, “ Non-Stop Vs. One Stop Flights”, Transportation Research, Vol. 11, 1977, pp. 155-159.
30. Lin, C. C. and Z. Y. Shon, “The Air Hub Location Problem for Direct Flights Between Two Sides of Taiwan Strait”, Proceeding of 2nd conference of Hong Kong society for transportation studies, December, 1997.
31. Nuggehali, R. S., Multi-facility network location problem, Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, 1993.
32. O’kelly, M. E., “ Activity Levels at Hub Facilities in Interacting Networks”, Geographical Analysis, Vol. 18, No. 4, Oct. 1986, pp.343-356.
33. O’kelly, M. E., “ The Location of Interacting Hub Facilities”, Transportation Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, May, 1986, pp. 92-106.
34. O’kelly, M.. E., “ A quadratic integer program for the location of interacting hub facilities”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 32, 1987, pp. 393-404.
35. O’kelly, M. E. and. H. J. Miller, “Solution Strageties for the Single Facility Minmax Hub Location Problem”, he Journal of the RSAI, Vol. 70, No. 4, 1991, pp. 367-380.
36. O’kelly, M. E., “ Hub Facility Location with Fixed Costs”, The Journal of the RSAI, Vol. 71, No. 3, 1992, pp. 293-306.
37. Oum, T. H. and A. J. Taylor and A. Zhang, “Strategic Airline Policy in the Globalizing Airline Networks”, Transportation Journal, Spring, 1993, pp. 14-30.
38. Pollack, M., “ Airline Route-Frequency Planning: Some Design Trade-Offs”, Transportation Research, Vol. 16A, No. 2, 1982, pp. 149-159.
39. Proussaloglou, K. and F. Koppelman, “ Air carrier demand - and analysis of market share determinants”, Transportation, Vol.22, 1995, pp.371-388.
40. Saatcioglu, O., “ Mathematical Programming Models for Airport Site Selection”, Transportation Research, Vol. 16B, No. 6, 1982, pp. 435-447.
41. Sohn, J. and S. Park, “ A linear program for the two-hub location problem”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 100, 1997, pp. 617-622.
42. Straszheim, M. R., “ Airline Demand Functions in the North Atlantic and Their Pricing Implications”, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, May, 1978, pp.179-195.
43. Suzuki, A. and Z. Drezner, “On the Airline Hub Problem: The Continuous Model”, Journal of Operations Research Society of Japan, Vol. 40, No. 1, March, 1997, pp. 62-74.
44. Talley, W. K. and W. R. Eckroade, “ Airline Passenger Demand in Monopoly Flight Segments of a Single Airline Under Deregulation”, Transportation Journal, winter, 1984, pp. 73-79.
45. Teodorovic, D., “ Flight Frequency Determination”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 109, No. 5, September 1983, pp. 747-757.
46. Teodorovic, D., “Multiattribute Aircraft Choice for Airline Network”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 112, No. 6, November, 1986, pp. 14-25.
47. Teodorovic, D. and E. Krcmar-Nozic, “Multicriteria Model to Determine Flight Frequencies on an Airline Network under Competitive Conditions,” Transportation Science, Vol.23, No.1, February 1989, pp. 103-121.
48. Teodorovic, D. and M. Kalic and G. Pavkovic, “The potential for Using fuzzy set theory in airline network design”, Transportation research, Vol. 28B, No. 2, 1994, pp. 103-121.
49. Teodorovic, D. and M. Kalic, “ A fuzzy route choice model for air transportation networks”, Transportation planning and technologies, Vol. 19, 1995, pp. 109-110.
50. Tsai, D. C., Optimal Competitive Pricing and Entry Under Technological Change, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 1992.
51. Yoo, K. E., and N. Ashford, “Carrier choices of air passengers in pacific rim: Using comparative analysis and complementary interpretation of revealed preference and stated preference data”, Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1562, 1996, pp. 1-7.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top