:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:旅遊需求與不同市場結構下遊憩經濟效益分析--以台灣地區國內旅遊市場為例
作者:陳肇堯 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen,Chau-Yau
校院名稱:國立成功大學
系所名稱:都市計劃學系
指導教授:姜渝生
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2000
主題關鍵詞:旅遊需求間斷性/連續性Translog成本函數經濟效益Tourism DemandDiscrete/ContinuousTranslog Cost FunctionEconomic Benefits
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:63
摘 要
隨著經濟的快速成長、交通可及性提高、及個人所得的增加,觀光遊憩事業已成為經濟結構轉型中的台灣地區重要產業之一。然而過去有關遊憩需求方面的研究,不是利用總體資料從事相關研究而忽略遊憩參與的決策乃以個人遊憩經驗為基礎,就是僅利用個體資料探討單一階段或單一活動的遊憩行為,欠缺對遊憩活動之需求行為的完整分析與遊客的遊憩時間需求分析。在遊憩資源的供給方面,過去相關研究鮮有從經濟觀點探討遊憩區經營的經濟特性者,致無從與經濟導向之遊憩需求分析結合,探討遊憩資源開發的經濟效益。
本研究以消費者效用最大化的傳統經濟理論為基礎,透過遊客從事旅遊活動的旅遊時間需求函數之建立,並採用Hanemann (1984b)等人所建構源於同一個間接效用函數的間斷性/連續性選擇模式,利用Roy‘s identity導出遊客從事旅遊活動的旅遊次數與旅遊地點間斷性選擇模式,及遊客旅遊時間長短的連續性選擇模式,以初步建立一套分析遊客需求行為的較完整之理論架構,同時透過台灣地區十個主要旅遊據點之遊客旅遊活動的問卷調查資料之實證研究,探討台灣地區遊客從事國內旅遊活動的旅遊需求行為。關於遊憩供給的經濟分析,本研究利用Translog成本函數建立遊憩區經營的短期變動成本函數,並藉由台灣地區96個遊憩區的經營概況資料,分析台灣地區遊憩區經營的生產技術、生產投入要素的使用、及資本投資效率等相關經濟特性。利用旅遊需求模式及供給面成本分析所導出的遊憩生產之邊際成本,本研究採用Anderson, Palma, & Thisse(1992)所建立之個體選擇模式的供需分析架構,導出不同市場供給條件下的遊憩經濟效益分析架構,探討不同遊憩發展政策下之遊憩經濟效益的政策效果。
經實證研究結果,本研究利用旅遊成本函數估計國人從事旅遊活動的時間價值約為其工資率的73%,同時遊客從事國內旅遊活動時,全年旅遊次數較多的者與旅遊次數較少者,其對旅遊據點距離及旅遊支出傾向等偏好有明顯的差異。再藉由旅遊次數選擇模式的參數校估結果,本研究發現家中持有較多小汽車之遊客,從事旅遊活動的頻率較高;旅遊時間邊際成本對遊客之旅遊次數選擇為負的影響效果;所得對遊客旅遊活動頻率則是正面的影響效果,其邊際效用隨旅遊次數的增加及所得的提高而降低。而在遊客從事旅遊活動的時間長短方面,所得對遊客全年旅遊天數為正面的影響效果,旅遊時間邊際成本對遊客全年旅遊天數則是負的影響效果。進一步利用彈性與敏感度分析旅遊時間邊際成本與所得改變的綜合效果發現,遊客之旅遊花費或工資水準改變造成其旅遊時間邊際成本增加時,遊客的旅遊活動型態可能轉變為旅遊次數較頻繁、但單次旅遊活動持續時間較短的旅遊活動型態;所得提高則可能使國內旅遊市場的遊客型態產生改變,即中、低所得或旅遊次數較少之遊客,可能增加其旅遊次數與天數,但高所得或旅遊次數較多的遊客,則可能減少其旅遊次數與天數。
在台灣地區遊憩區經營的成本分析方面,利用Translog成本函數導出遊憩區經營的產出成本彈性為0.3551,顯示遊憩區的生產技術呈規模報酬遞增。在生產投入要素使用方面,本研究發現人事與營運價格變動對遊憩區經營成本的影響較大,反映了遊憩區經營者將經營重點擺在遊客的衍生消費行為上;同時由人事與營運及人事與設備維修均呈替代關係的結果,顯示利用既有的人力資源從事營運與非專業性的設施或設備維護工作,將有助於提升要素使用效率;而人事費用的價格需求彈性最大,反映出遊憩區的經營者對人員的使用相當靈活。至於資本投資效率方面,公營遊憩區過度投資之趨勢相當普遍,顯示公營遊憩區可能因擔負營利以外的其他社會目標,使其經營投資效率遠不及民營遊憩區。
最後利用寡佔市場與完全競爭市場之市場供給條件下的遊憩經濟效益比較,本研究發現完全競爭市場較寡佔市場約可增加5億元的經濟效益;此外,當完全競爭市場中的經營者增加25%的資本投入時,可能造成市場中經營者減少及整體遊憩經濟效益減少約13.5%的社會損失;至於整體市場之旅遊需求提高25%時,在寡佔市場情況下遊憩經濟效益也會等量地增加25%,但在完全競爭市場因競爭經營者的加入使市場整體生產成本提高,因此遊憩經濟效益僅提高約18.3%。在考慮環境資源利用的效率與遊憩經濟效益後,本研究認為都會區型之觀光遊憩發展,因為環境資源替代使用的機會較高,宜採較為開放的市場發展結構,維護遊客的經濟效益;但都市近郊型、郊外型、與原野型之觀光遊憩發展則因其環境資源替代使用機會較少,同時開發利用後的可回復性較低,宜採限制經營者進出市場之發展方式,並以公辦民營方式一方面提高遊憩區經營的效率,兼可透過價格監督機制保障遊客經濟效益。
Synchronizing with the economic growth, the higer accessibility in transportation, and the increase in per capita income, tourism has grown to be one of the most important industries during the period of economic transition in Taiwan. However, past studies of demand analysis in recreation are either explored with aggregate data or aimed at the disaggregate choice behavior for recreation activities or sites, and neglect both the participation in recreation decided by individual recreation experience and the demand for leisure time. As to the supply side, most of the past studies are lack of considerations of economic conditions, and the deficiency makes it impossible to combine both the supply and demand for recreation to evaluate the economic benefits for recreation supply.
Based on the theory of utility maximization for consumer, the demand function of recreation time for tourists is derived by the household production function of Translog type, and the discrete/continuous choice model developed by Hanemann(1984b) is adopted to formulate the overall recreation demand analysis model. The study intends to construct an overall analysis framework combining a continuous total tourism time choice model with the discrete participation and site choice model, and, by using the tourists‘ activity data of 10 major recreational sites on Taiwan, the domestic tourism demand behavior for tourists in Taiwan is demonstrated in details. With regard to economic analysis of resource supply, the Translog cost function is specified so as to analyze the economic characteristics of recreation supply in Taiwan, and the production technology, the utilization of input factors, and the investment efficiency in capital are explored by the estimated cost function using the cost data of 96 recreational sites in Taiwan. Finally, by adopting the analysis framework combining both the demand and supply side suggested by Anderson, Palma, & Thisse(1992), the trousim demand analysis model and the marginal cost for recreation supply are then used to formulate the profit function for recreation supply, and the economic benefits under various supply market conditions are derived to compare the policy implications for recreation development strategies.
The empirical analysis for the tourism cost function shows that the time value of tourism is about 73% of tourists‘ wage rate. The results of the estimated discrete site choice model show that tourists making tours frequently are significantly different from those making tours rarely in the distance that they travel and the propensity of their tourism cost. Through the result of the parameter calibration for discrete recreation participation model, it is found that tourists who own more automobiles would probably take part in tourism activity more frequently. Besides, the marginal cost of tourism time, the cost that a person increases an extra toursim day, effects negatively on tourism participation. Conversely, tourists‘ income shows positive effects on tourism participation, and its marginal utility decreases with the increasing of the tourists’ participation frequency and income. The results of the regression total tourism time choice model indicate that tourists‘ income effects positively on their total tourism days, while tourists’ marginal cost of tourism time effects negatively. Furthermore, by the analysis of elasticity and sensitivity, the increase in marginal cost of tourism time, resulting from the increase in tourists’ expenditure or wage rate, would probably make their tourism pattern turn to be more frequent but less days, while the increase in tourists‘ income may increase the frequencies and days of those tourists whose income are lower and who make tours less frequently but decrease the frequencies and days of those tourists whose income are high and who make tours more frequently.
The result of the empirical study on cost analysis shows that the cost elasticity of output for recreation supply arrives at about 0.3551, which means the production technology for recreation supply is constant returns to scale in Taiwan. The input factor elasticities for recreation supply shows that the variations in labor price and operation price effect heavily on production cost and which means that the operators put more emphases on the derivative consumption of tourists. Meanwhile, the substitutive relation between labor cost and operation cost and that between labor cost and maintenance cost reprensent that the utilization efficiency of input factors can be effectively increased by using the existing labors to work on operation and maintenance which are not specialized. The labor price elasticity of demand is the greatest among the input factors, and which means the use of labors is the most flexible. In addition, the result of the analysis on the utilization of capital reveals that the operation efficiency for the recreational sites of public ownership is significantly lower than those of private ownership.
Lastly, to assess economic benefits of recreation under market structure of oligopoly and perfect competition, it is found that market structure of perfect competition can achieve an economic benefit of 500 million more than that of oligopoly market. in addition, when the capital invested is increased to 125% under market structure of perfect competition, it would probably result in a decreasement of 13.5% of economic benefits. Nevertheless, the increase in total demand of tourism can effectively increase the economic benefits of both kind of recreational market, and the increasement of economic benefits for oligopoly market arrives at about 25% while that for perfect competition market is about 18.3% when total demand of tourism is increased to 125%. Taking into considerations of the utilization of environmental resources together with the economic benefits, it is suggested to set the market opened for recreational sites of metropolitan types so as to protect the economic benefits of tourists because of its higher opportunity of substitutive use but to constrain the freedom of entering or exiting market for the other three types of recreational sites for the sake of their lower opportunity of substitutive use and unrecovery of resource use. In order to increase the efficiency of operation and to protect the economic benefits of tourists, it is suggested the market development of state-developed and private-operated form together with a price-supersiving mechanism for the constrained markets.
王小娥、吳雅音,(1993),台鐵多元產出成本結構之分析,運輸計劃季刊,22(3),259-290。new window
王小娥、鍾佩真,(1994),台鐵生產力及總要素生產力變化之研究--1987至1992年,運輸計畫季刊,23(2),125-154。new window
內政部營建署,(1990),都市計畫專業用語之解說及彙編,中華民國都市計劃學會。
李明宗,(1994),休閒、觀光、遊憩論文集,台北:地景企業股份有限公司。
林晏州,(1984),遊憩者選擇遊憩區行為之研究,都市與計畫,10,33-49。
林佐鼎,(1984),都市內個體運具選擇模式之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學交通科學研究所。
林宏鍾、(1989),彈性函數、對偶性及其應用之探討—我國商業銀行之多元生產成本理論實證研究,碩士論文,國立政治大學經濟研究所。
林裕清,(1994),小汽車持有數與使用量之間斷性/連續性混合需求模型之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
段良雄,(1979),遊憩設施區位之選定—極大熵法之應用,碩士論文,中興台灣大學法商學院都市計畫研究所。
段良雄,(1988),遊憩需求模式,戶外遊憩研究,1(4),71-80。new window
胡學彥,(1988),遊客遊憩區選擇模式,碩士論文,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所。
洪淑禎,(1992),觀光遊憩需求強度之研究-階層羅吉特模式之應用,碩士論文,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
姜渝生,(1995),非市場評估方法,計畫投資評估上課講義,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
唐富藏,(1981),運輸經濟學,台北:華泰書局。
陳昭明,(1981),台灣森林遊樂需求資源經營之調查與分析,台灣大學森林學系研究報告。
陳肇堯,(1989),自用小客車選擇遊憩區位與旅遊路線模式之建立,碩士論文,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
曾國基,(1987),森林遊樂區行銷管理技術之應用,碩士論文,中興大學森林學研究所。
張溫波譯,Gould, J. P. and C. E. Ferguson著,(1981),個體經濟理論,台北:五南圖書公司。
黃世賢,(1998),國家公園遊憩經濟效益值之估計--以陽明山國家公園為例,碩士論文,國立中興大學法商學院都市計劃研究所。
黃宗煌,(1986),時間價值對遊憩效益的影響及其評估方法,台灣土地金融季刊,23(3),173-182。
黃宗煌,(1989),遊憩資源稀少性之測定方法,台灣土地金融季刊,26(4),165-178.。
游恆山譯,Mullen, B. & C. Johnson 著,(1996),消費者行為心理學,台北:五南圖書公司。
廖仁哲,(1996),小汽車持有與使用、工作運具選擇混合需求模型之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所。
劉錦桂 & 邱士榮,(1993),影響遊憩區選擇之地點特性與遊憩利益因素及其關係之研究,規劃及設計學報,1(2),101-116。
鄭蕙燕,(1995),台灣地區休閒農場遊憩經濟效益之估測,臺灣經濟,228,57-65。
歐聖榮 & 張集毓,(1995),遊憩區市場定位之研究,戶外遊憩研究,8(3),15-45。new window
魏弘發,(1996),遊客選擇行為與遊憩阻礙之研究--以台灣民俗村為例,碩士論文,逢甲大學建築及都市計畫研究所。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE