:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從原住民教育的角度探討師生互動之因素研究--以桃、竹、苗學區為例
作者:陳春輝
校院名稱:元智大學
系所名稱:管理研究所
指導教授:湯玲郎
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2000
主題關鍵詞:師生互動原住民
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:61
摘 要
本研究探討針對原住民學區內師生互動之良率,可能會影響教學成效,進而五育能均衡發展,但如何建構其模式呢?個人在時點上,以課前互動、課中互動、課後互動、假日互動與假期互動,期師生雙向溝通建立厚植感情,進而達到教學成效,而建構互動模式又以生活關懷、精神關心、作息關注與親子關切,四個因變數來交互運用而達五育均衡發展之目標。
本研究方法採行為研究法,以文獻探討及實地訪視法再配合觀察法交互運用,期能瞭解真象,對症下藥。問卷調查對象以桃、竹、苗原住民學區國中教師之教學成效為主。問卷上亦從各個因素如師生互動良率是否影響教學成效,做一全方位設計,亦期達師生互動相關因子之關係,而建立良性之互動。教學成效設計如升學率之提升,學生良好行為之養成,其成效的表示等等,本研究歸納四種模式包括:
1. 生活關懷模式重雙向關懷,教師關懷學生,學生亦關懷教師。
2. 精神關懷模式以教師單向關心學生,學生受惠為準。
3. 作息關注模式亦以單向關心學生,學生僅受而不授。前兩者深怕會造成師生戀,而以教師主動較佳。
4. 親子關切模式則採雙向式,教師站在如父、母、兄、姊立場來關切學生,學生亦可關切教師,親子間較難有戀情之出現。
經本文研究結果發現教育工作又添了一項教學成效的管道,原住民樂天知命的天性,可謂優勢儘予發揮,但劣勢則喜修正,則原住民教育才有生機、競爭力。
師生互動雖是良法美意,但執行要因勢利導,隨時在變的多元文化時代,師生互動亦伴隨有因時、因地、因人之不同,而有變化。所以身為教育界的老師,要有兼顧傳統良好風俗與創新教學理念,隨時接受任何挑戰的準備。尤其在原住民學區,期盼藉此達到有效的教學管理目的,而提高學生五育均衡的發展與教學成效。
Abstract ( 摘 要 )
The study refers to the interaction between teachers and students, which will have impact on teaching effectiveness in aboriginal school region. To build the behavior pattern, inter-action before class, in class, after class, on holidays, in vacation are a must of teaching by building interaction patterns.
The inter-action patterns consists of life-caring, spirit-caring, learning caring & parent-like caring. The proper & alternate use of the four patterns. These patterns will result in well-balanced education in five areas.
This study is behaviorism oriented, empathizing the research of papers and records, personal visit approach, than corresponded with observation approach. So the true reality will be out and proper resolutions will come up with solution of the existing problems. The questionnaire will be within the boundary of Taoyuan, Hsin-Chu & Miaoli. The effectiveness of the teaching of the teachers in this area will be the target of the questionnaire.
All elements of teaching will be included in the questionnaire – the design of teaching effectiveness, such as the lift of admission rate of the students, the cultivation of the good behavior of the student, and the demonstration of its effectiveness.
Interaction between teachers and students in aboriginal school region will be the first concern for a well-rounded planning. To build positive interaction between students and teachers is the means to the goal – success and effective teaching. This study results in the following four concrete working patterns :
1. Life-caring pattern empathizes two-way care-the teacher protect and cares for students and the student respects the teacher.
2. Spirit-caring pattern forcuses the love of the teacher to students and the students benefit from their care and love. It is a one-way caring.
3. Learning-caring pattern also empathizes one-way caring in order to avoid improper affairs between teachers and students.
4. Parent-like caring pattern can be two-way love. The teacher treats his or her students as family members – children, brothers or sisters. Improper feelings and love will be avoided. Students also treat their teachers as their elders or seniors.
From this study we will find that the educators will see a new possibility to help students in aboriginal school region by making good use of the happy and easy-going nature of the aborigines to develop their strength and get rid of their weakness. The education of the aborigines will be full of new vitality and competitiveness in this ever-changinging and pluralistic society.
The interaction between teachers and students means good and is our ideal in teaching but the educators should provide incentives to their achievements. It also varies with the difference of time, place and people.
As a teacher today, he has to take both traditional customs and the new teaching approaches into consideration and practice and be always ready to accept challenges for effective teaching.
This study is specially designed to apply to the school region for aborigines to attain the educational goals – for the teachers in this region to teach effectively and for the administrators to manage efficiently – to ensure the well-balanced development of students both memtally and physically, in morality and in knowledge.
參考文獻
中文部分:
1. 尤稀·達袞(孔文吉)(民83)。「原住民與傳播媒介之批判-建構原住民自決的反述論」。原住民文化會議論文集,頁97--127,台北:文建會。
2. 王俊明(民71),「國小級任教師之領導行為對班級氣氛的影響」。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
3. 王家通、曾燦燈(民81)。教育行政學。高雄:復文書局。
4. 田培林(民53)。「西方近代教育思想的派別」,載於二十世紀之社會科學--教育學。台北:正中。
5. 白博文(民67):「親職教育之實施」。師友,134期,頁23-25
6. 主婦聯盟(民81):家長會面面觀(I)。台北:主婦聯盟。
7. 主婦聯盟(民81):家長會面面觀(II)。台北:主婦聯盟。
8. 台北市政府(民74):「台北市各級學校學生家長會設置辦法」。台北市政府公報,七十四年秋字第十九期,頁2-3。
9. 台北市政府(民84):台北市各級學校學生家長會設置辦法。台北市政府,八十四年法三字第八四000五九五號令發佈施行。
10. 行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85):教育關懷者實務手冊。台北:行政院教育改革審議委員會編印。
11. 朱雲漢(民68),「台灣地區政治參與模式之研究」。台灣大學政治研究所碩士論文。
12. 呂亞力譯(民62),「政治社會化研究之重心」,載於憲政思潮,第24期。
13. 余振忠譯(民74)。實用管理心理學(下冊)。台北:遠流書局。
14. 李美枝(民78)。社會心理學。台北:大洋出版社。
15. 李麗卿(民78),「國中國文教科書之政治社會化內容分析」,國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
16. 吳明清(民80)。教育研究。台北:五南書局。
17. 吳武典、陳秀蓉(民67),「教師領導行為與學生期待、學業成就及生活適應」。國立台灣師範大學教育心理學報,11﹐87-104。new window
18. 吳清山(民80)。學校行政。台北:心理出版社。
19. 吳清基(民84)。教育與行政。台北:師大書苑。頁253。
20. 易君博(民73)政治理論與研究方法,台北:三民(四版)。new window
21. 周鴻玲譯(民77)。組織社會學。台北:桂冠書局。
22. 林水波(民62),「大眾傳採媒介與政治社會化」。載於思與言,第11卷第3期。
23. 林坤豐(民71)。「國民中小學校長權力運用方式與教師工作滿足感之關係的比較研究」。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
24. 林重澎(民78)。「國民小學校長領導權力基礎與教師士氣關係之研究」。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
25. 林振春(民77):利用學校資源參與社區發展工作。台北:中華民國社區發展研究訓練中心。
26. 林清山(民81)。心理與教育統計學。台北:東華書局。
27. 林清江(民69a),「國家發展中的教育任務」,載於教育發展與國家建設 ,台北:幼獅。
28. 林清江(民69),「我國中小學公民教育內涵及實施成效之研究」,載於教育發展與國家建設。台北:幼獅。
29. 林清江(民71),教育社會學新論。台北:五南。
30. 林榮欽(民72)。管理心理學。台北:五南書局。
31. 林寶山(民73),「班級氣氛和學生對於科學態度的關係」。高雄師院教育學刊,5﹐347-366。
32. 林靈宏(民81)。組織行為。台北:五南書局。
33. 施明發(民62):公共關係在學校行政中的應用。師友,70期,頁22-26。
34. 姜占魁(民81)。行政學。台北:五南書局。
35. 洪鐮德(民65)。政治學與現代社會。台北:牧童出版社。
36. 馬紹∙阿紀(民85)。「原住民報導『原住民新聞』」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
37. 馬康莊、陳信木合譯(民78)。社會學理論。台北:巨流圖書公司。
38. 馬啟華(民70)。政治社會學。台北:正中書局。
39. 馬啟華(民70),政治社會學。台北:正中。
40. 柴松林(民78)。「未來世界的知識觀」,收於金樹人編:未來世界與積極人生。台北:國立台灣師大學生輔導中心,1-12頁。
41. 倪炎元(民85)。「從『山胞』到『原住民』傳播權益-報紙對原住民『正名運動』的論述分析」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
42. 秦夢群(民77)教育行政理論與應用。台北:五南書局。
43. 袁頌西(民63),「我國家庭政治化與少年政治功效意識之研究(上)(下)」載於思與言,11卷5、6期。new window
44. 孫大川、蔡啟賢(民85)。「從言語到書寫-台灣原住民的文字創作、文獻整理及其傳播經驗:以『山海文化』為例」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
45. 許士軍(民70)。管理學。台北:東華書局。
46. 陶在樸,1999,系統動態學,台北:五南圖書出版社。
47. 郭俊次(民72)。組織設計學。台北:商務印書館。
48. 郭進隆譯,1994,Senge﹐P. M原著(1990),第五項修鍊-學習型組織的藝術與實務(原文:The Fifth Discipline),台北:天下文化出版社。
49. 教育部(民84):中華民國教育報告書-邁向二十一世紀的教育遠景。台北:教育部。
50. 教育部統計處(民85):各級學校名錄。台北:教育部統計處。
51. 教育部(民87)原住民族教育法。台北:教育部。
52. 陳忠慶(民69),「假期青年自強活動對大學生政治態度影響之研究」,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
53. 陳志福(民78):國小實施家長義工制度推展途徑之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
54. 陳昭如(民83)。「原住民與漢人新聞媒體-以三次『還我土地運動』新聞為例的初步探討」。〈〈原住民文化會議論文集〉〉,頁129-145,台北:文建會。
55. 張吉江(民74)。組織行為。台北:天一圖書公司。
56. 張秀雄(民82)。民主法治教育之研究。台北:師大書苑。
57. 張秀雄(民87):公民教育的理論與實施,台北,師大書苑。
58. 張金鑑,(民71)。行政學新論。台北:正中書局。
59. 張明輝(民85):學校變革及其因應策略。未出版。new window
60. 張明輝(民80)巴納德組織理論與教育行政。台北:五南書局。
61. 張春興、林清山(民82),教育心理學(十五版)。台北:東華。
62. 張春興(民83)。心理學。台北:東華書局。
63. 陳義彥(民66),「臺灣地區大學生政治社會化之研究」。國立政治大學政治研究所博士論文。
64. 張潤書(民72)。行政學。台北:三民書局。
65. 張錦華(民85)。「多文化主義與原住民傳播權益-以澳洲的原住民媒體政策為例」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
66. 彭瀧森(民74),「國中生政治社會化之研究」。國立台灣師範大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。
67. 辜淑琴(民75),「社會化機構對政治態度形成影響之研究:以台北市松山區公民為例」,東吳大學社會研究所碩士論文。
68. 黃世鈺(民87b)「達娜伊谷的呼喚-原住民家庭教育推展實務探析」。1998原住民成人教育國際觀摩暨學術研討會論文集(一),39-52頁。
69. 黃光國、楊國樞(民68),「企業組織中員工的工作環境知覺與工作士氣」。臺灣人力資源會議。台北:中央研究院經濟研究所。
70. 黃宗慧(民83)。「另類(他者)再現:論弱勢族裔論述中之再現疑義」。台北:台灣大學外國語文學研究所碩士論文。
71. 黃昆輝(民78)。教育行政學。台北:東華書局。
72. 黃昆輝(民79)教育行政原理。台北:三民書局。
73. 黃昆輝(民77),教育行政學。台北:東華書局。
74. 黃 恒(民69),「國民中學教室中師生關係現況及其影響因素」。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
75. 黃葳葳(民85)「弱勢社群對電視新聞節目的回饋-以原住民為例」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
76. 楊懋春(民70)。當代社會學說。台北:黎明文化事業股份有限公司。
77. 溫秀紅(民62),「台灣地區大學生的政治文化之研究」,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
78. 劉幼琍(民85)。「原住民對廣電媒體使用與滿足之調查分析」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
79. 鄭熙彥(民74):學校教育與社區發展。高雄:復文圖書出版社。
80. 鄭肇楨(民 73),心理學。香港:商務印書館。
81. 龍冠海(民56)。社會學。臺北:三民書局。
82. 蔡文恂(民74):「親職教育再出發」。師友,216期,頁15-17。
83. 蔡壁煌(民83)學校與學生政治社會化--高中職學生政治社會化的教育社會學分析。台北。師大書苑。
84. 蔡麟筆譯(民79)。權力、政治與組織。台北:巨流圖書公司。
85. 謝文全(民74)。教育行政。台北£文景出版社。
86. 謝文全(民85):學校行政。台北:五南圖書出版社。
87. 謝偉珠(民85)。「公視原住民記者觀點之探究」。原住民傳播權益與新聞報導研討會,11月8-9日,台北:台灣大學法學院國際會議廳。
88. 謝楨芳(民85):「高雄市家長會之現況與設置辦法的檢討」。收錄於新家長會手冊,頁10-16。高雄:財團法人人本教育文教基金會高雄辦事處。
89. 魏 鏞(民60)。社會科學的性質及發展趨勢。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
90. 蕭富峰及李田樹譯,1995,Drucker﹐Peter F 原著(1985),創新與創業精神(原文:Innovation and Entrepreneurship),台北:麥田出版社出版。
英文部分:
1. Aldrich﹐H.(1979)Organizations and Environments﹐Englewood Cilffs﹐N.J.:Prentice-Hall
2. Allman.-Snyder, A.,May M.J., & Garcia, F.C.(1975) Classroom Structure and Childrens Perceptions of Authority:An Open and Closed Case. Urban Education,10, 131-149
3. Arthur, W. B., 1983 "Competing technologies and lock-In by historical small events: the dynamics of allocation under increasing returns,"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Paper, WP-83-92, Laxenburg, Austria. (Center for Economic Policy Research, Paper 43, Stanford)
4. Altman, I. And Taylor, D. (1973).Social PenetrationE The development of interpersonal communication.New York:Holt,Rinehart,and Winston.
5. Anderson, G.J.(1970), Effects of Classroom Social Climate an Indidvidual Learning. American Educational Research Joural, 7,135-152.
6. Berger, C. R. Calabrese, R. J.(1975).Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a development theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research.1(2):99-112.
7. Baisinger, Grace (1979). The National PTA:New Power on the Block. ERIC ED199 446.
8. Barnes﹐S.H.(1996)Participation﹐Education amd Political Competence:Evidence from A Sample of Italian Socialists﹐American Political Sciencd Review﹐Vol.LX;P.348-353.
9. Barnes﹐S.H.(1966)﹐Participation﹐Education and Political Competence:Evidence from A Sample of Italian Socialists. American Political Science Review﹐Vol.LX;P.348-353
10. Ballen,J.and O.Moles(1994).Strong Families ,Strong Schools. 【Online】Available:gopher://gopher.ed.gov:10001/00/initiatives/family/strong/1+.
11. Blankenship , G.(1990),Classroom Climate,Global Knowledge,Global Attitudes, Political Attitudes. Theory and Research in Social Eduation, 18,4,363-386
12. Beattie,N. (1985).Working with Parents:Parent Participation in Four Western European Countries. London: The Falmer Press.Cqmpbell Ystrand and M.D.Usdan (eds.)(1990). The Organization and Control of American Schools. (sixthedition). Columbus,Ohio:Merrill Poblishing Company.
13. Brown, B. F.(1977). Education for Responsible Citizenship. (The Peport of the National Task Force on Ctizenship Education),New York :McGraw-Hill。
14. Campbell, A., Gerald, G., and Miller, W.E.(1954),The Voter
Decides,Evanstone:Row Peterson & Co.
15. Chen, Chao-Yang(1993), Effects of Student Background on Elementary School Children''''s Political Attitudes in Chiayi, The Republic of China. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Northern Colorado.
16. Davis,J. B.(1974), School Authority and Srudent Activism:Political Socialization in Secondary Schools.(Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Albany).Dissertation Abstract International, 1974,35,3073A ,(University Microfilms No. 74-25 ,732)
17. David, Paul A., 1985, “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,”American Economic Review,Proceedings 75,pp. 332-337
18. Decker Ystrand and M.D.Usdan (eds.)(1990). The Organization and Control of American Schools. (sixthedition). Columbus,Ohio:Merrill Poblishing Company.
19. Eckstein,H.(1963).A Perspective on Comparative Politics,Past and Present. In H. Eckstein and D. Apter,Comparative Politics. Glencoe.Ill.:The Free Press.
20. Ehman,L.H.(1980a), The American High School in the Pollitical Socialization Process. Review of Educational Research, 50,99-119.
21. Falbo, T. & Peplau, L. A.(1980).Power Strategies in Intimate Relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38(4),618-628.
22. Flanders, N.A.(1960),Teacher Influence,Pupil Attitude,and Achievement. Minneapolis, Minn. :University of Minnesota Press.
23. Foreign Policy Research Institute(1974)Home-School Diffference in Political Learning:Television''''s Impact upon School Children''''s Perception(Final Report FRRI).Philadelphia.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED121 669).
24. Galbraith.J. K.(1983).The Anatomy of Power. . 轉引自劉北成(譯)。權力的剖析。臺北:時報文化出版社。
25. Gillespie, J. & Soley, M.(1981), Socialization Perspectives for School Governance and Classroom Climates. In B.Z. Presseisen (Ed.),School Governance and Classroom /climate:Concerns of Theory and Practice in Citizen Education. Research Papers Sponsored by National Institute of Education (DHEW),Washington, D.C.
26. Goacher﹐B.and M.Reid (1985).School Reports to Parents. Windsor:NEER-Nelson.
27. Gudykunst, W. B.(1983a, Fall). Similarities and differencesin perception of initial intracultural and intercultural encounters: an exploratory investigation.The Southern Speech Communucation Journal.49,49-65.
28. Herlihy, B . & Herlihy, D.(1985). Management of Organizational gehavior.(5th ed .).Englewood Cliffs, N .J .:Prentice-Hall.
29. Highlands Elementary PTA(1997). PTABoard Members 1997-1998. (Mar.28)【Online】Available:http://www.sound.net/-lu/highlands/broad.htm.
30. Hoy,W. K. & Miskel, C. D.(1987).Educational Administration:Theory,Research and Practice(4th ed.).New York:Randon House .
31. Kim,Y. Y.(1979,November).Dynamics of intrapersonal and interpersonal commmunication: a study of indochinese refugees in the initial phase of acculturation. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Conference, San Antonio, TX.
32. Kim,Y. Y.(1986).Understanding the social context of intergroup communication:a persosnal network approach. (pp.86-95). In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.),Intergrouuuup Communication and Cross-cultural Adaptation. Clevedon ,UK:Multilingual Matters Ltd.
33. Kymlicka, Will (1989). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. McClelland , D. C.(1975).Power:The Inner Experience. New York:Irvington.
35. PTA Today (1987). Parents, as Partners in Education. ERIC EJ351 686.
36. Stacey ,ary(1991). Parents and Teachers Together. Open University Press ,Philadelphia.
37. Storey,J.D.(1989,August), History and Homogeneity: The effects of perceptions of membership group on interpersonal communication.Doctoral dissertation.Stanford University.
38. The National PTA(1974). PTA Priner: National Congress of Parents and Teachers.
39. U.S.Department of Education(1994).Goals 2000:Educate America Act.(Oct. 25)【Online】Available:http://inet.ed.gov/Gzk-fact.htm.
40. Washington State PTA (1997) Washington State PTA 1996-1997 Board of Directors. (Mar.28)【Online】Available:http//:www.wastatepta.org.
41.Miller,JonD.(1986).Parent Involvement in the School:Causes and Effects.ERIC ED274-098.
42.Lane,Jana(1979). Parent Involvement in Teacher Education and Staff Development:Simply a Question of How. ERIC EJ202-397.
43.Campbell, A., Gerald, G., and Miller, W.E.(1954),The Voter Decides,Evanstone:Row Peterson & Co.
44.Astin, A.W.(1970) The Methodolllgy of Research on College Impact, Part I I, Sociology of Education Vol. 43,P.437-450.
45.Sampson, R.V.(1965). The Psychology of Power. New York: Random House.
46.Randolph, W. A. & Posner, B. Z.(1987). Questionnaire:PBS-Self and scoring. In W.A. Randolph & R. S. Blackburn (Eds), Managing Organizational Behavior. Irwin, R. D. , Inc.
47.Wolfgang Brezinka: Der erziehungsbedurftihe ensch und die Institution, in: Wolfgang Brezinka(Hrsg.): Weltweite Erziehung. Festschrift fur Friedrich Schneider, Verlag Herder Freiburg 1961.
48.Heinz Remplein: Die seelische Entwicklung des Menschen im Kindes-und Jugendalter, Grundlagen, Erkenntnisse und Padagogische Flogerungen der Kinds-und Jugendpsychologie, Ernst Reinhard Verlag Munchen und Basel 1971.
49.George F. Kneller: Educational Anthropology, an introduction, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1965.
50.Phinney'''' J.S.& Rotheram''''M.J.(1987).Children''''s ethnic socialization: Themes and implications. In Rotheram'''' M.J.& Phinney'''' J.S.(Eds).Children''''s ethnic socialization. London:Sage.
51.Wong,I-shou(1975),Mountain People in the Lowlands?e A Prreliminary Report on the Migration of Formosan Aborigines. The Proceedings of the Association of American Geographers.
52Hickson, D.J. et al.(1971). A Strategic Contingencies Theory of Intra-organizational power. Administrative Science Quarterky,216-229.
53.irkel, P.A. & Guditus, C.W.(1979). Bases of Power among Public School Principals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ED 170 856.
54.ons, C.A. (1992). Principal Self-Efficavy and Power Bases,Unpublished doctoral dissertation,University of North Dakata.
55.ellriegel, D. , Slocum, J.W.& Woodman, R.W.(1988).Organizational Behavior. 轉引自  林靈宏(編譯):行為組織。台北:五南書局
56.use, R.J.(1977). a 1976 Theory of Charismatic Leadership. In B. Heerlihy & D. Herlihy (Eds.), Improving Principal-Teacher Relationships by Understanding the Concept of Power. NASSP Bulletin/December,97.
57.andolph, W.A. & Blackburn, R.S.(1989). Managing Organiztional Behavior. Irwin, R.D. , Inc.
58.iu, R.G.H.(1979). The Craft of Power. New York:John Wiley & Sons.
59.irkel, P.A. & Guditus, C.W.(1979).Bases of Power among Public School Principals. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ED 170 856.
60.ng,I-shou(1975),Mountain People in the Lowlands:A Preliminary Report on the Migration of Formosan Aborigines. The Proceedings of the Association of American Geographes.
61.hai''''chen-kang(1967),Taiwan aborigines,A gentic study of tribal variations. Cambridge Harvard University Press.
62.vine,J.J. & York,D.E.(1995).Learning styles and culturally diverse students:A literature review.
63.inny,J.S. & Rotheram,M.J.(1987).Children''''s ethinic socialization:Themes and implications. In Rotheram''''M.J. & Phiny''''J.S.(Eds).Children''''s ethnic socialization. London: Sage.
64.aunders,M.(1982).Multural teaching:A guide for the classroom.London:Mcgraw-Hill.
65.senthal,M.J. & Phinney,J.S.(1987).Introduction:Definitions and Perspectives in the study of children''''s ethnic socialization. In Rotheram,M.J. & Phinney,J.S.(Eds).Children''''s ethnic socialization. London:Sage.
66.hman,L.H.(1972),Political Efficacy and the High School Social Studies Curriculum. In B.G.Massialas(Ed.).Political Youth, Traditional Schools. Englewood Cliffs,N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
67.wley,W.D.(1997),Reforming the Civics Curriculum through Restructuring of Teacher Behavior.The American Political Science Review, 71,319-325.
68.hnson,N.R.(1972),Political Climates and Party Choice of High School Youth.Public Opinion Quarterly, 36,1,48-55.
69.relman,R.M.(1971),Political Socialization and Educational Climates. New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
70.e,G.T. & Thomas,J.B.(1979),Intenational Dictionary of Education, New York:Nichols.
71.iro, V.(1983),The Political Integration of Woman:Roles, Socialization and Politics. Urban, I11.:University of I11linois Press.
72.frutz,J.M.,Koeppe, R.P.,& Soper,E.W.(1988),Dictionary of Education. New York:/Facts on File.
73.ndhawa, B.S.,& Michayluk, J.O.(1975),Learning Environment in Rural and Urban Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 265-285.
74.ickett,E.J., & Moos,R.H.(1973).Social Environment of Junior High and High School Classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 93-102.
75.avers,E.F.(1983).The Role of School in Political Socialization Reconsidered:Evidence from 1970 and 1979. Uouth and Society, 14,4,475-500.
76.andenburger,A.D.and Nalbuff,B.J.,1995, "The Right Game:Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy,"Harvard Buisness Review, (July-August).
77.stignon, H. and Roberston, T.S.,1985, "A Propositional Inventory of New Diffusion Research," Journal Consumer Research, 11,pp. 849-867.
78.odson, J.A. and Muller, E.,1978, "Model of New Prodeuct Diffusion Through Advertising and word-of-mouth,"Management Science, 24(15),pp. 1568-1578.
79.uker,Peter F.,1994," Theory of Business," Harvard Business Review(Sep-Oct).
80.indaraian, M. and Ramaswamy, N, 1990, "Discontinues Innovation Diffusion Analysis, "Proceedings of the 1990 International System Dynamics Conference, pp. 455-467.
81.rester,Jay W.,1961,Industrial Dynamics, Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press.
82.ase,R.,1988,The Firm,the Market and the Law, The Chicago University Press.
83.derson, P. and M. Tushman,1990, “Technological Discontinuities and dominant design/e a cyclical model of technological change,”Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.35,pp. 604-633.
84.thur,Brain W.,1996, “Increasing Returns and the New World of Business,”Harvard Business Review, July-August,pp. 100-109.
85.ernathy, A.,1995, "Microcomputer Manufacturers," in G.R. Carrol and M.T. Hannan (eds.),Organizations in Industry:Strategy,Struture and Selection, Oxford University Press, pp.37-58.
86.mpbell,R.F.,L.L.Cunningham,R.O.Nystrand M.D.Usdan(eds.)(1990). The Organization and Control of American Schools. (sixth edition). Columbus,Ohio:Merrill Publishing Company.
87.rry,W.and M.D.Tannenbaum(1992). Parents,Power,and the Public School. In Kaplan (ed.),Education and the Family. Boston,Mass:Allyn and Bacon.
88.mmel,Carol(1976). Putting the Public Bask into Publuc Schools. ERIC EJ134 460.
89.tright,M.J.(1989). The Nation PTA Talks to Parents: How to Get the Best Education for Your Child. New YOrk:Doubleday.
90.ick,M.D.L.(1985). Parents''''Organizations and the Articulation of Wishes for Secondary Schooling. Comparative Education 21.1:47-65.
91.p (1993). Developing Home-/School Partnerships:From Concepts to Practice. New York:Teachers College,Columbia University.
92.rry,M. and Levin,H.M.(1985),Schooling and Work in the Democratic State, Stamford,Calif:Stanford University Press.
93.llin,s R (1979),The Credential Society, New York:Academic Press.
94.ilov,O.(1991).Political Socialization and Schooling Effects Among Israeli Adolescents,Comparative Education Review,Vol.35,No.3,p.430-446.
95.mond, G.A. & Verba,S.(1963)The Civil Culture,Princeton,N.J.:Princeton University.
96.wey,J.(1961/1966),Democracy and Education,(Paperback edition).New York:The Free Press.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE