:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:協同行動研究與教學推理模式對聽障組實習教師教學知能發展之研究
作者:黃玉枝 引用關係
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:特殊教育研究所
指導教授:林寶貴
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2002
主題關鍵詞:協同行動研究教學推理模式教學知能實習教師聽障教育collaborative action researchmodel in pedagogical reasoningteaching expertisestudent teachershearing-impairment education
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:47
本研究的主要目的,在於結合協同行動研究的活動型態和Shulman(1987)的教學推理與行動模式,作為教學實習課程的架構,以探討聽障組實習教師在此架構中教學知能的發展。本研究採取質性研究法,共有二十五位師院特教系的大三學生選修本教學實習課程,實習教師分成四組,研究者就四組實習教師中的一組進行深入探究,以了解在整學期的教學實習中,該組實習教師在兩所聽障資源班情境脈絡相當不同的小學中,他們在聽障教學上的理解與推理、轉換與反思、及對話與辯證的過程,從中分析他們在閱讀訓練、發音訓練、國語科教學、及聽能與讀話訓練等科目之教學知能發展的內涵。研究結果發現,實習教師在前述四個科目的教學實踐,有其存在的問題與進展的部分;他們對此實習課程持正向的態度,但也提出他們在其中的困難處;而研究者對此實習課程提也出反思與建議。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the development of student teachers’ teaching expertise through an integrating practicum course. The framework of the practicum course was based on the collaborative action research and Shulman’s (1987) model in pedagogical reasoning and action. Twenty-five junior teacher college students who majored in the education of hearing-impairment children in the department of special education took the practicum course and grouped themselves into four teams. One of the four teams was the focus of this study. During one semester practicum course, these student teachers taught hearing-impairment children in a reasource room of two differente schools. Their teaching reflection reports were analyzed qualitatively to understand the processes of their comprehension, reasoning, transformation, reflection, dialogue and dialectic in teaching practice. Furthermore, the development of these student teachers’ teaching expertise in reading comprehension instruction, phonological training, Chinese language art teaching, and auditory and speechreading training were analyzed thoroughly.
The findings of this study indicate that the teaching expertise of these student teachers have being developed. Although these student teachers put forward the difficulties they have been through,they hold the positive attitude towards the practicum course. Finally, based on the results of this study, the researcher’s reflections and recommendations to the practicum course were presented.
一、 中文部分:
王秋絨 (民80) : 教師專業社會化理論在教育時時上的蘊義(再版)。臺北:師大書苑。
王振德 (民85):資優教育的師資培育。教育資料集刊, 廿一輯,國立教育資料館,125-143。new window
江麗娟、詹文娟、鍾梅菁(民88):三個臭皮匠的努力─反省策略在師院教師改進教學的應用。國立台東師範學院1999行動研究國際學術研討會主題論文集,106-125。
何華國(民82) : 資深啟智教育教師生涯發展。特殊教育與復健學報,3,153-178。new window
李芃娟(民81) : 啟智班教師與家長對智能不足學童教育態度之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,2,97-131。new window
杞昭安(民85) : 師範院校特教系大五學生工作滿意度、工作壓力及其因應方式之研究。特殊教育學報,11,109-141。new window
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯(民84)。質的評鑑與研究(Patton,1990: Qualitative evaluation and research methods)。台北:桂冠。
邢敏華(民86):中美啟聰教育師資培育之比較初探。嘉義師院特殊教育中心特殊教育專輯(一), 225-237。
邢敏華(民88):台灣啟聰教育教師所需具備的專業能力與師資養成課程研究。台南師院學報,32期,459-494頁。new window
邱兆偉(民84):<質的研究>的訴求與設計。教育研究,4期,1-33。
林秀玲(民85):聽覺障礙教育學前階段國語發音教學之探討。國立台中啟聰學校印行。
林幸台、林寶貴、洪儷瑜、盧台華、楊瑛、陳紅錦(民83) : 我國實施特殊兒童個別化教育方案現況調查。特殊教育研究學刊,10,1-42。new window
林寶貴(民71):特殊兒童語文訓練及知動訓練教材教法。台北市立師範學院特殊教育中心印行。
林寶貴(民73):聽覺障礙兒童語言溝通法及語文教學法之研究。教育部教育計畫小組,22-23
林寶貴(民83a):聽覺障礙教育與復健。台北:五南。
林寶貴(民83b):語言障礙與矯治。台北:五南。
林寶貴(民86) : 特教師資培育制度與課程。教育資料集刊, 廿二輯,國立教育資料館,207-234。new window
林寶貴、黃玉枝(民82) : 聽覺障礙兒童普通推理能力結構及其相關因素之研究。載於中華民國特殊教育學會年刊, 學前特殊教育的發展, 161-new window
178。台北:中華民國特殊教育學會。
林寶貴、黃玉枝(民86) : 聽障學生國語文能力及錯誤類型之分析。特殊教育研究學刊,15期, 109-129。new window
林寶貴、錡寶香(民83) : 聽覺障礙學生國語文能力測驗之編製與運用。載於語言障礙與聽力障礙之評估,183-214。臺北:心理出版社。
林寶貴、錡寶香(民88):中文閱讀理解測驗。教育部特殊教育工作小組印行。new window
孟瑛如、陳麗如、李翠玲(民87):師範院校學生參與在家教育輔導工作之探討。竹師特殊教育學報, 2期, 24-43。
洪美慧(民86):以發表教學(口述、筆述)貫串整個教學過程的國語科混合教學。載於國語科混合教學研究,13-33。國立台北師範學院附設實驗國民小學出版。
柯華葳(民88):閱讀理解困難篩檢測驗。教育部特殊教育工作小組印行。new window
洪儷瑜(民87):我國特教師資相關議題研究之檢討與建議。載於身心障礙教育研討會會議實錄, 171-184。
夏林清、中華民國基層教師協會譯(民86)(Altrichter, Posch & Somekh著)。行動研究方法導論。台北:遠流。
陳小娟(民80):教聽障學生說塞擦音的方法。特殊教學學會年刊-特殊教育的新境界。29-46。
陳小娟(民81a):追述法在聽覺障礙學生語言接受力之評量與訓練研究。特殊教育與復健學報,2期,2-105。new window
陳小娟(民81b):聽障學生塞擦音教學探討。台南師院學報,25期,345-362。new window
陳小娟(民82):啟聰學校(班)國小通訓練教材。國立台南師範學院特殊教育中心編印。
陳惠邦(民87):教育行動研究。台北:師大書苑。
許世瑛(民77):中國文法講話(修訂版)。台北:台灣開明書店。
梁福鎮(民89):詮釋學方法及其在教育研究上的應用。載於質的研究方法,221-238。
莊妙芬、吳昆壽(民86) : 身心障礙教師之專業知能調查。國立台南師範學院特教中心。
張蓓莉(民76):回歸主流聽覺障礙學生語言能力之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,2期,37-52。new window
張蓓莉(民83) : 論特殊教育及專業人員之培育。特教新知通訊,1卷7期,1-2頁。
張蓓莉(民84) : 增班設校外之考量─也談身心障礙學生教育安置之問題。特教新知通訊,2卷, 6期,1-2。
張蓓莉(民85) : 國小啟聰教師教學行為之研究。師大學報,41,67-84。new window
張蓓莉、曹秀美與蘇芳柳 (民85): 句型理解能力測驗。台北市:國立台灣師大特殊教育中心。
曾俊卿(民85) : 特殊教育學系學生校外集中實習教學表現之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
傅秀媚(民85) : 特教系組在職進修教師任教特殊班意願及相關因素探討。台中師院學報,10,505-523。new window
黃國榮(民82) : 國民中學啟智班教師教學關注與教學基本能力之研究。特殊教育學報,8,107-141。new window
湯維玲(民85) : 反省取向的教育實習及實例探討。教育部師範校院八十四學年度實習輔導研討會。
甄曉蘭(民86) : 應用建構教學理念於教育專業發展課程之初探。載於國立花蓮師範學院:八十六學年度教育學術研討會論文集。
歐用生(民81):質的研究(再版)。台北:師大書苑。
歐用生(民83):行動研究與學校教育革新。載於:國立台東師範學院:1999行動研究國際學術研討會主題論文集。new window
歐用生(民83):提昇教師行動研究的能力。原載於:研習資訊,11卷,2期。收錄於:歐用生(民85)。教師專業成長。台北:師大書苑,137-150。
歐用生(民85):支持教師參與教育改革。國民教育,36卷,6期, 2-6。
蘇芳柳(民82):聽覺障礙兒童之聽能訓練(1)--提供良好聽覺發展的環境。特殊教育季刊, 49期, 5-10頁。new window
蔡昆瀛(民78) : 國中階段啟聰學校(班)教師數學科教學行為之研究。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡崇建(民83) : 特殊教育教師專業知能發展的需求評估。特殊教育研究學刊,10,103-117。new window
劉錫麒(民82):數學思考教學研究。台北:師大書苑。
錡寶香(民85):聽覺障礙學生的閱讀教學。特教園丁,11卷,4期,6-11。
薛明里(民85): 聽覺障礙學生國語文詞句錯誤分析研究。特殊教育季刊,58,21-24。new window
鍾玉梅(民84):聽覺障礙的語言治療。國立嘉義師範學院特殊教育中心印行。
饒見維(民84) : 從「師資培育」到「教師專業發展」的派典轉移。輯於台北市立師院:師資教育回顧與展望國際學術研討會論文集。
饒見維(民85):教師專業發展-理論與實際。台北:五南。
謝國平(民74):語言學概論。台北:三民書局。new window
二、英文部分:
Adams,M. (1995). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.
Anderson, P.L. & Baker, B.K. (1999). A case-based curriculum approach to special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(3), 188-192.
Bell, G. H. (1985) Can schools develop knowledge their practice? School Organization, 5(2), 175-184.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Borko, H. & Livingston, C. (1989) . Cognition and improvisation : Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 473-498.
Borko , H., Livingston ,C., & Shavelson , R.J.(1990).Teachers’ thinking about instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 11,40-49.
Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning, Educational Researcher, January-February, 32-42.
Brubacher, J.W., Case, C.W., & Reagan, T.G.(1994). Becoming a reflective educator : How to build a culture of inquiry in the school. California: Corwin Press.
Calderhead, J. (1983). Research into teachers’ cognition: Exploring the nature of classroom practice. Paper present at the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada .
Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching & Teaching Education, 5(1), 43-51.
Carr, W. (1995). For education : Towards critical educational inquiry. Buckingham : Open University Press.
Carter, K.(1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W.R. Houston, M. Haberman , & J. Sikula (Eds.) Handbook of research on teacher education.(pp.291-310) New York : Macmillan.
Casareno, A.B., Gregg, M., Ellis, E.S., Rountree, B., Schlichter, C.L., Heineke, S. Colvert, G., & Larkin, M.J.(1995). Learning through reflection: The development of constructivist thinking in MAP. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 10(1), 32-65.
Clark, C. M. & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255-296). N.Y.: Macmillan.
Clarke, J.H. & Agne, R.M. (1997). Interdisciplinary high school teaching: Strategies for intergrated learning. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Cochran-Smith, M. & Lytle, S. (1990) Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Research, 19(2), 2-11.
Copeland, W. D., Birmingham, C., de la Cruz, E., & Lewin, B. (1993). The reflective practitioner in teaching: Toward a research agenda. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(4), 347-359.
Corey, S. (1953). Action research to improve school practices (Handbook). Columbia: New York Teachers’ College.
Cummins, J. (1989). A theoretical framework for bilingual special education. Exceptional Children, 56(2), 111-119
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. N.Y.: Macmillan.
Ellis, E.S., Rountree, B., Casareno, A.B., Gregg, M., & Schlichter, C.L.(1995). The multiple abilities paradigm: Integrated general and special education teacher preparation. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 10(1), 4-31.
Emmer, E. T., Evertson, C. M., & Anderson, L. M.(1980). Effective classroom management at the beginning of the school year. Elementary School Journal, 80, 219-231.
Englert, C.S.(1984). Measuring teacher effectiveness from teacher’s point of view. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17, 1-14.
Erber N. P.(1982). Auditory training. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.), 119-161. New York: Macmillan.
Everhart, V., & Marschark, M.(1988). Linguistic flexibility in the written and signed/oral language productions of deaf and hearing children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 46, 174-193.
Evertson, C. M., Emmer, E. T., & Brophy, J. E.(1980).Predictors of effective teaching in junior high mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 166-178.
Fawns, R., & Nance, D. (1993). Teacher knowledge, education studies and advanced skills credentials. Australian Journal of Education, 37(3),
248-258.
Fenstermacher, G. (1978). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. In L.S. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol.6, pp157-185). Itasca, IL : Peacock.
Fenstermacher, G. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching. Three aspects. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp.37-49). New York : Macmillan.
Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition motivation , and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Fogarty, J. L., Wang, M. C., & Creek, R. (1983). A descriptive study of experienced and novice teachers'' interactive instructional thoughts and actions. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 22-32.
Gagne, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R.(1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Gelzer, L.(1988). Developing reading appreciation in young children. Perspectives for Teachers of the Hearing Impaired, 6(2), 13-16.
Good, T. L. & Grouws, D. A.(1979). Teaching effects: A process-product study in fourth grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 49-54.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29, 75-92.
Gudmundsdottir, S. & Shulman, L. S. (1987). Pedagogical content knowledge in social studies. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 31, 59-70.
Housner, L. D. & Griffey, D. C.(1983). Teacher cognition: Differences in planning and interactive decision making between experienced and inexperienced teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
Kelly, L. P. (1995). Processing of bottom-up and top-down information by skilled and average deaf readers and implication for whole language instruction. Exceptional Children, 61(4), 318-334.
Kelly, L. (1996). The interaction of syntactic competence and vocabulary during reading by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(1), 75-90.
Kenney, S.L. & LaMontagne M.J.(1999). Portfolio development: A process for facilitating reflection and professionalism in preservice special education students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(3), 184-187.
King, C., & Quigley, S. (1985). Reading and deafness. San Diego, CA:College-
Hill Press.
Kluwin, T. N. & Moores, D. F. (1989). Mathematics achievement of hearing-
impairment adolescents in different placements. Exceptional Children, 55, 327-355.
Larkin, M.J., Colvert, G.C., Ellis, E.S., Iran-Nejad, A., Casareno, A.B., Gregg , M., Rountree, B.S., & Schlichter, C.L., (1995). Applying wholetheme constructivism in the multiple abilities program(MAP): An integrated general and special education teacher preparation program. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 10(1), 67-86.
Leinhardt, G.(1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 52-75.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 34-46.
Ling, D. (1976) .Speech and the hearing-impaired child: Theory and Practices. Washington, DC Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
Ling, D. (1989). Foundations of spoken language for hearing-impaired children. Washington, DC:Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf.
Livingston, C. & Borko, H. (1989). Expert-novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 36-42.
Luckner, J. (1991). Skills needed for teaching hearing-impaired adolescents. American Annals of the Deaf, 136, 422-427.
Luetke-Stahlman, B. (1999). Language across the curriculum─When students are deaf or hard of hearing. Hillsboro, OR: Butte Publications.
Luetke-Stahlman, B., & Hayes, P. L., & Nielsen, D. C. (1996). Essential practices as adults read to meet the needs of deaf or hard of hearing students. American Annals of the Deaf, 141(4), 309-320.
Luetke-Stahlman, B., & Luckner, J. (1991). Effectively teaching students with hearing impairments. NY: Longman.
Marks, R.(1987). Those who appreciate; A case study of Joe, a beginning mathematics teacher. Stanford, CA: School of Education, Stanford University.
McGraw, L. (1987). An anthropologist in the classroom: Chris. Stanford, CA: School of Education , Stanford University.
Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R.(1985). Teaching students with learning problems(2nd ed.).Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Meyer, J. E. (1983). “New paradigm research in practice: The trials and tribulations of action research.” Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1066-72.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman , A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook(2nd ed.). California: SAGE.
Moog,J., & Geers, A. (1985). Grammatical analysis of elicited language. St. Louis, MO: Central Institute for the Deaf.
Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In NCTM, Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp.7-18). Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph No.4.
Oja, S. N. & Smulyan, L.(1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. New York: The Falmer Press.
Osterman, K.F. & Kottkamp, R.B.(1993). Reflective Practice for Educators : Improving Schooling Through Professional Development. Newbury Park, California: A Sage Publications Company.
Paul, P. (1984). The comprehension of multimeaning words from selected frequency levels by deaf and hearing subjects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Paul, P., & Quigley, S. (1984). Language and deafness (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Singular.
Payne, J., & Quigley, S. (1987). Hearing-impaired children’s comprehension of verb-particle combinations. The Volta Review, 89(3), 133-143.
Peter, R. & Treagust, D. (1992). Primary pre-service teachers’ pedagogical . reasoning skill. Research in Science Education , 22, 323-330.
Peter, R. & Treagust, D. (1995). Developing preservice teachers’ pedagogical reasoning abilitys. Research in Science Education, 25(3), 291-305.
Peterson, P.L. & Comeaux, M.A.(1987). Teachers’ schemata for classroom events : The mental scaffolding of teachers’ thinking during classroom instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 319-331.
Peterson, P., Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. P.(1991). Teachers'' knowledge of students'' mathematics problem solving knowledge. In J.Brophy(Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 2. Teacher''s subject matter knowledge and classroom instuction. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pink, W. T. (1992). A School-Within-A-School for at-risk youth: staff development and program success. In W. T. Pink & A. A. Hyde (Eds.). Effective staff development for school change. Norwood, N. J. : Ablex Pub. Corporation.
Posner, G. J.(1989). Field experience : Methods of reflective teaching. New York : Longma.
Russell, T. & Munby, H. (Eds.) (1992). Teachers and teaching : From classroom to reflection. London: The Falmer Press.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.(1988). Assessment in special and remedial education(4th edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Satchwell, S.(1993). Does teaching reading strategies to deaf children help increase their reading levels? Association of Canadian Educators of the Hearing Impaired (ACEHI), 19, 38-48.
Schon, D. A.(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professional think in action. New York: Basic Books Inc., Publishers.
Schon, D. A.(1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Schratz, M.(ed.) (1993). Qualitatives voices in educational research. London: Falmer.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), pp. 1-23.
Schwartz, S. (1996). Choices in deafness: A parents’ guide to communication options(2nd ed.). MD: Woodbine house.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvaard Educational Review, 57(1),1-21.
Snow, C. (1993). Families as social contexts for literacy development. New Directions for Child Development, 61, 11-24.
Somekh, B. (1991). Teachers becoming researchers: An exploration in dynamic collaboration, RUCCUS Occasional Papers, 2, 97-144, London: University of Western Ontario.
Somekh, B. (1995). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavors: a position paper on action research methodology. British Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 339-356.
Sparks-Langer, G. M. & Colton, A.B.(1993). Synthesis of research on teachers’ reflective thinking. In: Woolfolk, A.E.(ed.).Readings & cases in educational psychology. Allyn and Bacon.
Tabachnick, B. R. & Zeichner, K. (1991). Issues and practices in inquiry-
oriented teacher education. New York: The Falmer Press.
Stein,M.K., Baxter, J.A., & Leinhardt, G.(1990). Subject-matter knowledge and elementary instruction: A case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 639-663.
Sternberg, R.J.(1999). Cognitive Psychology. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.
Sternberg, R.J. & Horvath, J.A.(1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, August-September, 9-17.
Vygotsky, L.S.(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webb, R. (1990). Practitioner research in the primary school. London: Falmer.
Webster’ Third New International Dictionary (1986).Springfield: Merriam- Webster.
Weiss, C. E., Lillywhite, H.S., & Gordon, M.E. (1980). Clinical management of articulation disorders. St. Louis : The C.V. Mosby Company.
Westerman, D. A. (1991) Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305.
Wiersma, W. (1995).Research methods in education: An introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wilbur, R., & Goodhart, W.(1985). Comprehension of indefinite pronouns and quantifiers by hearing-impaired children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 417-434.
Wilson, K. (1979). Inference and language processing in hearing and deaf children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
Winitzky, N. (1992). Structure and process in thinking about classroom management: An exploratory study of prospective teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8(1), 1-14.
Winzer, M. (1985, August). Encouraging reading through an inactive method: Strategies for hearing impaired children. Paper presented at the Seventeenth International Congress on the Education of the Deaf, Manchester, England.
Zeichner, K. & Tabachnick, B. R. (1991). Teacher socialization. In W. R. Houston (Ed.) Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 329-348). New York: Macmillan.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE