|
1.王冠棠,1997,台南料學園區設立對高科技與關聯產業人口空間分佈影響之研究,國立成功大學都市計畫碩士論文。 2.王連常福、蔡光第,1992,產業決策動態計量模型之建立及相關研究(CGE模型相關研究部分),台灣經濟研究院,。 3.王塗發、賴金端,2001,石化業污染防制投資的經濟效果之計量研究-CGE模型之應用,經濟研究,37卷2期:41-83。 4.行政院主計處,1998,中華民國八十五年台灣地區工商及服務普查報告。 5.行政院主計處,2000,中華民國八十五年台灣地區產業關聯表編製報告。 6.行政院主計處,2004,中華民國行政院主計處網站。 7.行政院經濟建設委員會都市及住宅發展處,1987,民國70年台灣地區區域間產業關聯表編製報告。 8.技術尖兵,1996,平衡南北差距,科技資源南進,16期:1-2。 9.李慕真、徐世勳,1999,氣候變遷對亞太地區農產貿易的影響,經濟研究,36卷1期:63-104。 10.周志龍,2000,地方產業經濟流動與區域發展政策,台灣土地金融季刊,37卷3期:27-45。 11.周諺鴻,1999,以投入產出分析論台南科學園區設置對於區域經濟影響之研究,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。 12.周濟、金慶平,1994,台灣CGE貿易模型之建立與應用,中華經濟研究院經濟專論(161)。 13.尚瑞國、郭迺鋒,2003,財政短絀、肥料換穀制度與臺灣戰後初期之經濟發展-1954年12部門個體結構型CGE模型分析,農經半年刊,74期:23-61。 14.林大侯、吳榮義,1992,產業決策動態計量模型之建立及相關研究(CGE模型部份),台灣經濟研究院。 15.林全、郭炳伸,1986,台灣經濟一般均衡模型之建立及有關租稅歸宿分析,經濟叢書第11種,中央研究院經濟研究所。 16.林百年,1995,臺南科學工業園區的開發規劃座談,空間,76期:16-27。 17.林國榮,1999,台灣人力需求預測動態CGE模型的建立與運用,中國文化大學經濟學研究所博士論文。 18.林國榮、徐世勳、李秉正,2001,入會對臺灣農業就業衝擊之動態一般均衡分析,農業經濟叢刊,7卷1期:101-140。 19.林國榮、張靜貞、徐世勳,2003,入會承諾對臺灣男女勞動需求衝擊之動態一般均衡分析,人口學刊,27期:1-36 20.林國榮、徐世勳、李秉正,2003,入會關稅減讓對臺灣經濟之影響:考慮規模報酬與市場結構差異性的一般均衡分析,經濟論文,31卷4期:637-674。 21.施鴻志,1991,發展科技園區以促進台灣產業升級研討會論文集。 22.洪德生,2000,水資源總體經濟模式(四之一),經濟部水資源局。 23.洪德生,2001,水資源總體經濟模式(四之二),經濟部水資源局。 24.科學發展,1996,臺南科學工業園區專題報導,24卷5期:397-442。 25.徐世勳,許炳鑫 ,1999,APEC農業全面自由化與彈性處理的一般均衡分析,經濟論文,27卷4期: 511-542。 26.徐世勳、李慧琳、李秉正、黃宗煌,1998,提升能源使用效率之二氧化碳排放減量效果及其經濟影響評估,台灣經濟學會年會論文集,273-315頁。 27.徐世勳、林國榮、李秉正,1998,縮減工時對台灣經濟衝擊之一般均衡分析,台灣經濟學會年會論文集,1998年,第1-32頁。 28.徐世勳、林國榮、蘇漢邦、彭開瓊,2000,台灣加入WTO對溫室氣體減量及產業經濟之影響評估,溫室氣體減量對產業及總體經濟之影響說明會論文集。 29.清大永續發展研究室,2000,溫室氣體減量對產業及總體經濟之影響說明會論文集。 30.許志瑞,2000,應用CGE模型進行環境政策之衝擊分析—從具含能量觀點,國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。 31.許嘉棟,1988,我國租稅政策影響之一般均衡分析,現代經濟探討叢書第11種,中央研究院經濟研究所。 32.曾聖文,1999,中國大陸可計算一般均衡模型之研究,國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所碩士論文。 33.曾瓊瑤、徐世勳,2000,台灣課徵探稅之雙紅利效果評估,溫室氣體減量對產業及總體經濟之影響說明會論文集。 34.馮君君,2000,探討產業減污之經濟衝擊與河川品質改善—可計算一般均衡模型之應用,台灣土地科學學報,創刊號1卷:91-114。 35.黃永芳,1996,能源CGE模型之實證應用,淡江大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。 36.黃慶銘、黃玉興,1999,臺灣高科技產業的新據點--臺南科學工業園區現況與未來發展前景,真空科技,12卷1期:45-46。 37.楊子菡、蘇漢邦,2002,綠色租稅改革的租稅福利成本與結構效果,農業與經濟,29期:29-54。 38.楊文瑞,1999,製造業不平衡成長對產業結構與所得分配影響之研究,國立台灣科技大學企業管理學博士論文。 39.楊維楨、邱柳榮,1997,科學園區資源配置之研究,台北銀行月刊,27卷11期:2-20。 40.經濟建設委員會綜合計畫處,1990,台灣可計算一般均衡模型之研究—九部門實質面與金融面模型,自由中國之工業。 41.葉獻文,1998,空氣污染防制對台灣經濟的影響分析,淡江大學產業經濟碩士論文。 42.詹達穎,1999,運輸投資對區域經濟影響之研究—多區域投入產出模式運輸案例之運用,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所博士論文。 43.廖述誼、陳家榮,1996,臺灣地區水泥供給結構變動對整體經濟影響研究,台灣銀行季刊,47卷4期:191-230。 44.鄭玉歆、樊明太等著,1999,中國CGE模型及政策分析,社會科學文獻出版社。 45.盧禮德,1998,我國農業部門關稅調降對所得分配的影響研究,淡江大學產業經濟碩士論文。 46.賴金端,1997,石化業污染防制投資的經濟影響分析-CGE模型之應用,國立中興大學經濟研究所博士論文。 47.Alperovich, G., 1980. Regional elasticities of substitution. Journal of Regional Science, 20: 503-12. 48.Armington, P., 1969. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers, 16: 159-178. 49.Arrow, K. J. and G. Debru, 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22: 265-290. 50.Bergman, L., 1990. Energy and environmental constrains on growth: a CGE modeling approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 12: 671-91. 51.Bergman, L., 1998. Energy policy modeling: A survey of general equilibrium approaches. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10(3): 77-99. 52.Bhattacharyya, S. C., 1996. Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: A survey. Energy Economics, 18: 145-164. 53.Brooke, A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, and R. Raman, 1998. GAMS: A user’s guide. Washington D. C. GAMS Development Corporation. 54.Budiyanti, R., 1996. Application of general equilibrium modeling for measuring regional economic and welfare impacts of quality changes in sport fishing in Oklahoma. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma. 55.Bustillo, I., 2000. Overview of economy-wide NAFTA models. International Journal of Public Administration, 23(5-8): 1443-1464. 56.Clarete, R. L. and J. A. Roumasset, 1986. CGE models and development policy analysis: Problems, pitfalls and challenges. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68: 1212-16. 57.Dervis, K., J. D. Melo, and S. Robinson, 1982. General equilibrium models for development policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 58.Ginburgh, V., amd J. L. Wealbroeck, 1981. Activity analysis and general equilibrium modeling, Armsterdam: North-Holland. 59.Ginburgh, V. and R. Sherman, 1984. Equilibrium and prices in multisector models, New York: Academic Press. 60.Hanson, K. and A. Rose, 1997. Factor productivity and income inequality: A general equilibrium analysis. Applied Economics, 29(8): 1061-1071. 61.Harrigan, F., and P. G. McGregor, 1989. Neoclassical and Keynesian perspectives on the regional macroeconomy: A computable general equilibrium approach. Journal of Regional Science, 29: 555-73. 62.Harris, R., 1984. Applied general equilibrium analysis of small open economies with scale economies and imperfect competition. The American Economic Review, 74: 1016-1032. 63.Harrison, G. W., R. Jones, L. J. Kimbell, and R. Wigle, 1993. How robust is applied general equilibrium analysis?, Journal of Policy Modeling, 15: 99-115. 64.Hefner, F. L., 1997. Using input-output models to measure local economic impacts. International Journal of Public Administration, 20(8&9): 1469-1487. 65.Hertel, T. W., 1985. Partial vs. general equilibrium analysis and choice of functional form: Implications for policy modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 7: 281-303. 66.Hoffmann, S., R. Sherman, and S. Shankar, 1996. The role of defense cuts in the California recession: Computable general equilibrium models and interstate factor mobility. Journal of Regional Science, 36(4): 571-595. 67.IMPLAN Group, Inc., 1996. User’s guide, IMPLANPro: Social accounting and impact analysis software, Stillwater, MN. 68.Irene, P., A. Frank, and S. Bernow, 1999. Economic theory and climate change policy. Energy Policy, 27(9): 501-504. 69.Johansen, L., 1960. A multisectoral model of economic growth, Amsterdam: Noth- Holland Press. 70.Jones, R., and J. Whalley, 1989. A Canadian regional general equilibrium model and some applications. Journal of Urban Economics, 25: 368-404. 71.Kilkenny, M., 1993. Rural/urban effects of terminating farm subsidies. American Agricultural Economics Association, 75: 968-980. 72.Koh, Y., 1991. Analysis of Oklahoma's boom and bust economy by means of a CGE model. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma. 73.Leontief, W. W., 1936. Quantitative input-output relations in the economic system of the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, XVII: 105-125. 74.Li, P. C., and A. Rose, 1995. Global warming policy and the Pennsylvania economy: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Economic Systems Research, 7(2): 151-171. 75.Lucas, R. E., 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 21(1): 3-42. 76.Marcouiller, D., D. Schreiner, and D. Lewis, 1993. Constructing a social accounting matrix to address distributive economic impacts of forest management. Regional Science Perspectives, 23(2): 60-90. 77.North, D. C., 1995. The Adam Smith address: Economic theory in a dynamic economi. Business Economics, 30(1): 7-12. 78.Park, I., 1995. Regional integration among the Asian nations- a computable general equilibrium model study. Westport, Connecticut London. 79.Partridge, M. D., and D. Rickman, 1998. Regional computable general equilibrium modeling: A survey and critical appraisal. International Regional Science Review, 21: 205-248. 80.Richardson, H. W., 1979. Regional economics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 81.Rickman, D. S., 1992. Estimating the impacts of regional business assistance program: alternative closures in a computable general equilibrium model. Papers in Regional Science, 71: 421-435. 82.Rose, A., 1995. Input-output economics and computable general equilibrium models. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6: 295-304. 83.Scarf, H. E., 1967. The approximation of fixed points of a continuous mapping. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 15: 1328-1343. 84.Scarf, Hansen, 1973. The computation of economic equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press. 85.Schreiner, D. F., and D. W. Marcouiller, 1999. Computable general equilibrium modeling for regional analysis. West Virginia University, Web Book. 86.Sebastien, D., and B. Maurizio, 1998. Is there a trade-off between trade liberalization and pollution abatement?, A computable general equilibrium assessment applied to Costa Rica. Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(1): 11-31. 87.Shoven, J. B., and J. Whalley, 1992. Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press. 88.Su, M. J., 1990. The Taiwanese tariff: A linear CGE approach. Ph. D. Thesis, Duke University. 89.Varian, H. R., 1992. Microeconomic analysis, Third edition. New York: Norton & Company, Inc. 90.Walras, L., 1874. Elements of pure economics. Illinois: Richard Irwin, Inc. 91.Weat, G. R., 1995. Comparison of input-output, input- output+ econometric and computable general equilibrium impact models at the regional level. Economic Systems Research, 7: 209-27. 92.Xie, J., and Saltzman, 2000. Environmental policy analysis: An environmental computable general- equilibrium approach for developing countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22(4): 453-489. 93.Yang, H. Y., 2000. Carbon-reducing taxes and income inequality: general equilibrium evaluation of alternative energy taxation in Taiwan. Applied Economics, 32: 1213-1221.
|