:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:專利分析相關文獻之分類與演化趨勢研究
作者:林美蘭 引用關係
作者(外文):Mei-Lan Lin
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:管理研究所博士班
指導教授:賴奎魁
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2006
主題關鍵詞:書目計量學演化趨勢專利分析引證分析citation analysispatent analysisbibliometricsevolutional trends
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:32
專利分析已成為產業研究重要的分析工具,其跨足的研究領域多樣而且涉入的研究主題寬廣。專利分析使用專利技術資訊預測產業競爭與技術軌跡,其結果成為產業競爭資訊的來源之一,並從中可以判斷技術與產業未來趨勢。本研究以演化觀點、網絡理論與書目計量學的方法探討過去二十四年(1980-2003年)專利分析文獻的分類與研究發展,並且以經營管理層面為討論範圍。因此本研究以線上資料檢索之文獻建立引證資料庫,嘗試對於單一研究主題萃取重要文獻,而避免受其他跨領域引證次數的干擾。再以多變量的方法,如因素分析、集群分析、多元尺度分析等,驗證研究主流類型,與相關文獻的定位。主要目的是為了了解專利分析的研究現況、研究主題之發展此一領域的代表性研究。再者,歸納各研究領域中核心知識及研究趨勢。針對各研究領域指出主要貢獻者及影響力期刊,並分類與定位各研究團隊之發展方向。最後,探討此一領域理論演化的軌跡與傳承,描繪每一群體在不同時點的動態演化階段。研究結果將專利分析相關研究分類為五個領域,分別為第一群為科技知識的來源、第二群為專利應用與專利價值、第三群為專利研究與科技定位、第四群為科技創新活動指標、及第五群為跨領域應用研究。未來研究方向可以朝向利用萃思分析方法追蹤文獻內之重要典範理論。或以書目對方法探討未來趨勢發展及以社會網絡分析進行對後續研究上以文獻、作者或期刊所建立之網絡研究。或是專利分析文獻分類法應用在其他領域的驗證及其他領域知識的融合與應用研究,如科技人力資源、企業文化、財務等。
Analysis of patent data is important tool for industrial research. Patent analysis has been used in many research fields and applied for rich topics in technology management. Technological forecasting and evolutional trajectories are formulated competitive intelligence by patent analysis. This study was explored the classification and research development of patent analysis literatures for 24 years (1980-2003) and applied by evolutional perspectives, network theories and bibliometrics. The research scope is focused on business and management level. There were some significant literatures retrieved from online electronic database and a citation database was built by their references. After that, the study was analyzed by multivariant methods to classify research taxonomy and literatures relative positions. The study was expected to understanding of current situation of patent analysis research. Additionally, the main purposes of this study were to synthesize core knowledge and research trends in research fields, to point out the major contributors and influential journals, to understand their positions, and to explore evolution life cycle. The research results are classified into five research fields, namely the sources of technology knowledge, patent applications and patent value, patent research and technology position, the indicators of technological and innovative activities, and interdisciplinary applications. The future studies are suggested towards some directions, for example, basic and classical paradigm tracing in patent analysis literatures, future research trends classification by bibliographic coupling, using social network techniques to build literature, author, and journal network, and integrating with interdisciplinary knowledge.
1.吳萬益、林清河,2000,企業研究方法,華泰書局,台北。
2.吳曉君,2004,建構半導體代工業專利分類支援系統:專利共同引用分析的觀點,國立雲林科技大學,博士論文,頁3。
3.陳順宇,2004,多變量分析,華泰書局,台北。
4.張善斌,2004,建立二階段技術定位模式-以商業方法專利分析為例,國立雲林科技大學,博士論文,頁15。
5.蔡明月,2003,資訊計量學與文獻的特性,國立編譯館,台北市。
6.蔡明月、吳嘉雯,2001,“半導體期刊共被引研究”,資訊傳播與圖書館學,第八卷第二期,頁9-21。new window
7.賴奎魁、林美蘭、張淑敏、張善斌,2006,“專利分析相關文獻之分類研究:採用書目計量學方法”,科技管理學刊,第十一卷第一期,頁137-168。new window
8.Abernathy, W. J. and J. M. Utterback, 1978, “Patterns of Industrial Innovation”, Technology Review, pp.41-47, June/July.
9.Abraham, B. P. and S. D. Moitra, 2001, “Innovation assessment through patent analysis”, Technovation, vol. 21, pp.245-252.
10.Albert, M. B., D. Avery, F. Narin, and P. McAllister, 1991, “Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents”, Research Policy, vol. 20, pp.251-259.
11.Almeida, P., 1996, “Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, Winter Special Issue, pp.155-165.
12.Almeida, P. and B. Kogut, 1997, “The exploration of technological diversity and the geographic localization of innovation”, Small Business Economics, vol. 9, pp.21-31.
13.Almeida, P. and B. Kogut, 1999, “Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks”, Management Science, vol. 45(7), pp.905-917.
14.Akin, L., 1998, “Methods for Examining Small Literatures: Explication, Physical Analysis, and Citation Patterns”, Library and Information Science Research, vol. 20(3), pp.251-270.
15.Archibugi, D. and M. Pianta, 1992, “Specialization and Size of Technological Activities in Industrial Countries: The Analysis of Patent Data”, Research Policy, vol. 21, pp.79-93.
16.Arora, A., 1997, “Patents, licensing, and market structure in the chemical industry”, Research Policy, vol. 26, pp.391-403.
17.Ashton, W. B. and R. K. Sen, 1988, “Using patent information in technology business planning—I”, Research Technology Management, vol. 31(6), pp.42-46 Nov/Dec.
18.Ashton, W. B. and R. K. Sen, 1989, “Using patent information in technology business planning—II”, Research Technology Management, vol. 32(1), pp.36-42 Nov/Dec.
19.Barnett, W. P. and R. A. Burgelman, 1996, “Evolutionary perspectives on strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, special issue, pp.5-19.
20.Baroudi, J. J., 1991, “Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions,” Information Systems Research, vol.2(1), pp.1-28.
21.Basberg, B. L., 1982, “Technological Change in the Norwegian Whaling Industry”, Research Policy, vol. 11, pp.163-171.
22.Basberg, B. L., 1987, “Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature”, Research Policy, vol. 16, pp.131-141.
23.Berkowitz, L., 1993, “Getting the Most from Your Patents”, Research Technology Management, vol. 32(2), pp.26-31.
24.Bhattacharya, S. and M. T. R. Khan, 2001, “Monitoring technology trends through patent analysis: a case study of thin film”, Research Evaluation, vol. 10(1), pp.33-45.
25.Bhattacharya, S., H. Kretschmer and M. Meyer, 2003, “Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology”, Scientometrics, vol. 58(2), pp.369-390.
26.Bonzi, S., 1982, “Characteristics of a literature as predictors of business between cited and citing works”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 33(4), pp.208-216.
27.Braam, R. R., H. F. Moed, and A. F. J. van Raan, 1991, “Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis II: dynamical aspects”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 42(4), pp.252-266.
28.Breitzman, A. F. and M. E. Mogee, 2002, “The many applications of patent analysis”, Journal of Information Science, vol. 28(3), pp.187-205.
29.Breitzman, A. F. and P. Thomas, 2002, “Using patent citation analysis to target/value M&A candidates”, Research Technology Management, vol. 45(5), pp.28-36.
30.Breitzman, A. F., P. Thomas and M. Cheney, 2002, “Technological powerhouse or diluted competence: techniques for assessing mergers via patent analysis”, R&D Management, vol. 32(1), pp.1-10.
31.Broadus, R. N., 1987, “Toward a definition of bibliometrics”, Scientometrics, vol. 12(5/6), pp.373-379.
32.Brockhoff, K. K., 1992, “Instruments for patent data analysis in business firms”, Technovation, vol. 12(1), pp.41-58.
33.Burton, M. P., 1995, “The use of citations matrices to group journals”, Scientometrics, vol. 33(2), pp.257-262.
34.Campell, G. and D. W. Fiske, 1959, “Convergent and Dicriminant Validation by the Multitrait-multimethod Matrix”, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 56, pp.81-105.
35.Carpenter, M. P., M. Cooper and F. Narin, 1980, “Linkage Between Basic Research Literature and Patents”, Research Management, pp.30-35, March.
36.Chakrabarti, A. K., 1989, “Technology Indicators: Conceptual Issues and Measurement Problems”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 6, pp.99-116.
37.Chakrabarti, A. K., 1991, “Competition in High Technology: Analysis of Patents of US, Japan, UK, France, West Germany, and Canada”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 38(1), pp.78-84.
38.Chakrabarti, A. K., I. Dror and N. Eakabuse, 1993, “Interorganizational transfer of knowledge: an analysis of patent citations of a defense firm”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 40(1), pp.91-94.
39.Chen, C. and D. Hicks, 2004, “Tracing knowledge diffusion”, Scientometrics, vol. 59(2), pp.199-211.
40.Christensen, C. M., 1992, “Exploring the limits of the technology S-curve”, Production and Operation Management, vol. 1(4), pp.334-357.
41.Chung, K. H., R. A. K. Cox and J. B. Mitchell., 2001, “Citation patterns in the finance literature”, Financial Management, vol. 30(3), pp.99-118.
42.Collins, P. and S. Wyatt, 1988, “Citations in Patents to the Basic Research Literature”, Research Policy, vol. 17, pp.65-74.
43.Diwan, I. and D. Rodrik, 1991, “Patents, Appropriate Technology, and North-South Trade”, Journal of International Economics, vol. 30, pp.27-47.
44.Dore, J.-C., C. Dutheuil, and J.-F. Miquel, 2000 “Multidimensional analysis of trends in patent activity”, Scientometrics, vol. 47(3), pp.475-492.
45.Dosi, G., 1982, “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories”, Research Policy, vol. 11, pp.147-162.
46.Durand, D. E., 1974, “Citation count analysis of behavioral science journals in influential management literature”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 17(3), pp.579-583.
47.Ernst, H., 1995, “Patenting Strategies in the German Mechanical Engineering Industry and their Relationship to Company Performance”, Technovation, vol. 15(4), pp.225-241.
48.Ernst, H., 1998, “Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, vol. 15, pp.279-308.
49.Ernst, H., 2003, “Patent information for strategic technology management”, World Patent Information, vol. 25, pp.233-242.
50.Everett, J. E. and A. Pecotich, 1991, “A combined loglinear/MDS model for mapping journals by citation analysis”, Journal of American Society for Information Science, vol. 42(6), pp.405-413.
51.Fagerberg, J., 1987, “A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth Rates Differ”, Research Policy, vol. 16, pp.87-99.
52.Frame, J. D. and F. Narin, 1990, “The United States, Japan and the Changing Technological Balance”, Research Policy, vol. 19, pp.447-455.
53.Frame, J. D., 1991, “Modelling National Technological Capacity with Patent Indicators”, Scientometrics, vol. 22(3), pp.327-339.
54.Foster, R. N., 1986, “Sension your way up the S-curve”, International Management, vol. 4(10), pp.72-79.
55.Furman, J. L., M. E. Porter and S. Stern, 2002, “The determinants of national innovative capacity”, Research Policy, vol. 31, pp.899-933.
56.Ginarte, J. C. and W. G. Park, 1997, “Determinants of patent rights: a cross-national study”, Research Policy, vol. 26, pp.283-301.
57.Griliches, Z., 1990, “Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXVIII, pp.1661-1707, December.
58.Grindley, P. C. and D. J. Teece, 1997, “Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in semiconductors and electronics”, California Management Review, vol. 39(2), pp.8-41.
59.Grupp, H., U. Schmoch and U. Kuntze, 1991, “Patents as Potential Indicators of The Utility of EC Research Programmes”, Scientometrics, vol. 21(3), pp.417-445.
60.Grupp, H., 1994, “The Measurement of Technical Performance of Innovations by Technometrics and Its Impact on Established Technology Indicators”, Research Policy, vol. 23, pp.175-193.
61.Grupp, H., 1996, “Spillover Effects and the Science Base of Innovations Reconsidered: an Empirical Approach”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 6, pp.175-197.
62.Grupp, H. and U. Schmoch, 1999, “Patent statistics in the age of globalization: new legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation”, Research Policy, vol. 28, pp.377-396.
63.Hannan, M. and J. Freeman, 1977, “The population ecology of organization”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 82, pp.929-964.
64.He, Y. and S. C. Hui, 2002, “Mining a web citation database for author co-citation analysis”, Information Processing & Management, vol. 38, pp.491-508.
65.Hicks, D., T. Breitzman, D. Olivastro and K. Hamilton, 2001, “The changing composition of innovative activity in the US—a portrait based on patent analysis”, Research Policy, vol. 30, pp.681-703.
66.Huang, M.-H., L-Y. Chiang and D.-Z. Chen, 2003, “Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies”, Scientometrics, vol. 58(3), pp.489-506.
67.Jaffe, A. B. and M. Trajenberg, 1996, “Modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries”, Proceedings of National Science of USA, vol. 93, pp.12671-12677.
68.Jaffe, A. B. and M. Trajenberg, 1998, “International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations”, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, vol. 8, pp.105-136.
69.Jaffe, A. B., 2000, “The U.S. patent system in transition policy innovation and the innovation process”, Research policy, vol. 29, pp.531-557.
70.Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg and M. S. Fogarty, 2000, “Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors”, The American Economic Review, vol. 90(2), pp.215-218.
71.Jaffe, A. B., M. Trajtenberg and R. Henderson, 1993, “Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 577-598, August.
72.Kaulio, M. A., 2003, “Initial conditions or process of development? Critical incidents in the early stages of new venture”, R&D Management, vol. 33(2), pp.165-175.
73.Kerin, R. A., R. Varadarajan and R. A. Peterson, 1992 “First-Mover Advantage: A Synthesis, Conceptual, Framework, and Research Propositions,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 56, pp.33-52, October.
74.Kessler, M. M., 1963, “An experimental study of bibliographic coupling between technical papers”, IEEE Transaction on Information Theory, vol. IT-9, pp.49.
75.Khalil, T., 2000, Management of Technology: the key to cmpetitiveness and wealth creation, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Singapore, p81.
76.Kuhn, T., 1922, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago University Press, Chicago. in Dosi, G., 1982, “Technological paradigms and technological trajectories”, Research Policy, vol. 11, pp.147-162.
77.Kostoff, R. N., 1998, “The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation”, Scientometrics, vol. 43(1), pp.27-43.
78.Lai, K. K. and H. J. Wu, 2005, “Using patent co-citation approach to establish a new patent classification system”, Information Processing & Management, vol. 41, pp.313-330.
79.Lerner, J., 1994, “The Importance of Patent Scope-an Empirical Analysis”, The Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 25(2), pp.319-333.
80.Leydesdorff, L., 1998, “Theories of citation?”, Scientometrics, vol. 43(1), pp.5-25.
81.Lim, K., 2004, “The relationship between research and innovation in the semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries (1981-1997)”, Research Policy, vol. 33, pp.287-321.
82.Linn, R. A., 1981, “The when and why of licensed technology”, Research Management, pp.21-25, July.
83.Liu, S. J. and J. Shyu, 1997, “Strategic planning for technology development with patent analysis”, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 13(5/6), pp.661-680.
84.MacRoberts, M. H. and B. R. MacRoberts., 1989, “Problems of citation analysis: a critical review”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 40(5), pp.342-349.
85.Malhotra, N. K., 1996, “The Impact of the Academy of Marketing Science on Marketing Scholarship: An Analysis of the Research Published in JAMS”, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24(4), pp.291-298.
86.Malhotra, N. K., M. Peterson and S. B. Kleiser, 1999, “Marketing Research: A State-of-the-Art Review and Directions for the Twenty-First Century”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 27(2), pp.160-183.
87.Mansfield, E., M. Schwartz and S. Wagner, 1981, “Imitation Costs and Patents: an Empirical Study”, The Economic Journal, vol. 91, pp.907-918.
88.Mansfield, E., 1986, “Patents and Innovation: an Empirical Study”, Management Science, vol. 32(2), pp.173-181.
89.Matutes, C., P. Regibeau and K. Rockett, 1996, “Optimal patent design and the diffusion of innovations”, The Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 27(1), pp.60-83.
90.McCain, K. W., 1991, “Mapping economics through the journal literature: an experiment in journal cocitation analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 42(4), pp.290-296.
91.McMillan, G. S. and R. D. Hamilton, III, 2000, “Using bibliometrics to measure firm knowledge: an analysis of the US pharmaceutical industry”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol.12(4), pp.465-475.
92.Meyer, M., 2000a, “Does science push technology? Patent citing scientific literature”, Research Policy, vol. 29, pp.409-434.
93.Meyer, M., 2000b, “Patent citations in a novel field of technology – what can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science”, Scientometrics, vol. 48(2), pp.151-178.
94.Meyer, M., 2001, “Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano-science and nano-technology”, Scientometrics, vol. 51(1), pp.163-183.
95.Meyer, M., 2002a, “Tracing knowledge flows in innovation system – an informatric perspective on future research on science-based innovation”, Economic System Research, vol. 14(4), pp.323-344.
96.Meyer, M., 2002b, “Tracing knowledge flows in innovation system”, Scientometrics, vol. 54(2), pp.193-212.
97.Meyer, M., 2003, “Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy”, Engineering Management Conference, 2003. IEMC’03. Managing Technology Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change, 2-4, pp.81-85.
98.Michel, J. and B. Bettels, 2001, “Patent citation analysis – a closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports”, Scientometrics, vol. 51(1), pp.185-201.
99.Moehrle, M. G., 2005, “How combinations of TRIZ tools are used in companies – results of a cluster analysis”, R&D Management, vol. 35(3), pp.285-296.
100.Mogee, M. E., 1991, “Using Patent Data for Technology Analysis and Planning”, Research Technology Management, vol. 34(4), pp.43-49.
101.Mogee, M. E. and R. G. Kolar, 1994, “International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 6(4), pp.485-503.
102.Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley and B. S. Silverman, 1996, “Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp.77-91.
103.Mowery, D. C., J. E. Oxley and B. S. Silverman, 1998, “Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm”, Research Policy, vol. 27, pp.507-523.
104.Narin, F., M. P. Carpenter & P. Woolf, 1984, “Technological Performance Assessments Based on Patents and Patent Citations”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 31(4), pp.172-183.
105.Narin, F., 1987, “Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output”, Scientometrics, vol. 34(3), pp.489-496.
106.Narin, F., E. Noma and R. Perry, 1987, “Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength”, Research Policy, vol. 16, pp.143-155.
107.Narin, F. and D. Olivastro, 1992, “Status report: linkage between technology and science”, Research Policy, vol. 21, pp.237-249.
108.Narin, F., 1995, “Patents As Indicators for The Evaluation of Industrial Research Output”, Scientometrics, vol. 34(3), pp.489-496.
109.Narin, F., K. S. Hamilton, and D. Olivastro, 1997, “The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science”, Research Policy, vol. 26, pp.317-330.
110.Narin, F. and D. Olivastro, 1998, “Linkage between patents and papers: an interim EPO/US comparison”, Scientometrics, vol. 41(1-2), pp.51-59.
111.Nason, H. K., 1977, “Perceptions of barriers to innovation”, Research Management, pp.17-20, January.
112.Neeley, J. D. Jr., 1981, “The management and social science literatures: an interdisciplinary cross-citation analysis”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 32(3), pp.217-223.
113.O’Donoghue, T., 1998, “A patentability requirement for sequential innovation”, The Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 29(4), pp.654-679.
114.Paci, R., A. Sassu and S. Usai, 1997, “International patenting and national technological specialization”, Technovation, vol. 17(1), pp.25-38.
115.Pavitt, K., 1985, “Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: possibilities and problems”, Scientometrics, vol. 7(1-2), pp.77-99.
116.Plomp, R., 1994, “The Highly Cited Papers of Professors as an Indicator of a Research Group’s Scientific Performance”, Scientometrics, vol. 29(3), pp.377-393.
117.Price, D., 1965, “Networks of scientific papers”, Science, vol. 149, pp.510-515.
118.Podolny, J. M. and T. E. Stuart, 1995, “A role-based ecology of technological change”, American Journal of Sciology, vol. 100(5), pp.1224-1260.
119.Podolny, J. M., T. E. Stuart and M. T. Hannan, 1996, “Networks, knowledge, and niches: competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984-1991”, American Journal of Sciology, vol. 102(3), pp.659-689.
120.Powell, W. W., K. W. Koput and L. Smith-Doerr, 1996, “Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology”, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, pp.116-145.
121.Rao, I. K. R., 1996, “Methodological and Conceptual Questions of Bibliometric Standards”, Scientometrics, vol. 35(2), pp.265-270.
122.Reitzig, M., 2004, “Strategic Management of Intellectual Property”, MIT Sloan Management Review, pp.35-40, Spring.
123.Schankerman, M. and A. Pakes, 1986, “Estimates of The Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During The Post-1950 Period”, The Economic Journal, vol. 96, pp.1052-1076.
124.Schmoch, U., 1993, “Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators”, Scientometrics, vol. 26(1), pp.193-211.
125.Schmoch, U., 1995, “Evaluation of technological strategies of company by means of MDS maps”, International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 10(4/5/6), pp.426-440.
126.Schmoch, U. and T. Schnoring, 1994, “Technological Strategies of Telecommunications Equipment Manufacturers: a Patent Analysis”, Telecommunications Policy, vol. 18(5), pp.397-413.
127.Servi, P. N. and B. C. Griffith, 1980, “A method for partitioning the journal literature”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 31(1), pp.36-40.
128.Shipman, J. R., 1967, “International Patent Planning”, Harvard Business Review, pp.56-72, March-April.
129.Small, H., 1973, “Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 24(4), pp.265-269.
130.Soh, P.-H. and E. B. Roberts, 2003, “Networks of innovators: a longitudinal perspective”, Research Policy, vol. 32, pp.1569-1588.
131.Stuart, T. E. and J. M. Podolny, 1996, “Local search and the evaluation of technological capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 17, pp.21-38.
132.Sviridov, F. A., 1978, “International patent information: the role of the world intellectual property organization”, Unesco Bulltin Library, vol. XXXII(5), pp.315-321.
133.Thomas, P., 1999, “The effect of technological impact upon patent renewal decisions”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 11(2), pp.181-197.
134.Thomas, P., 2001, “A relationship between technology indicators and stock market performance”, Scientometrics, vol. 51(1), pp.319-333.
135.Tijssen, R. J. W. and Th. N. van Leeuwen, 1995, “On Generalising scientometric journal mapping beyond ISI’s journal and citation database”, Scientometrics, vol. 33(1), pp.93-116.
136.Tijssen, R. J. W. and Th. N. van Leeuwen, 2000, “Technological relevance of science: an assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers”, Scientometrics, vol. 47(2), pp.389-412.
137.Tijssen, R. J. W., 2001, “Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis science – technology interactions and knowledge flows”, Research Policy, vol. 30, 35-54.
138.Tijssen, R. J. W., 2002, “Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors”. Research Policy, vol. 31, pp.509-526.
139.Tong, X. and J. D. Frame, 1994, “Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data”, Research Policy, vol. 23, pp.133-141.
140.Trajtenberg, M., 1990, “A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations”, RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 21(1), pp.172-187.
141.Tsuji, Y. S., 2001a, “Product development in the Japanese and US printer industries”, Technovation, vol. 21, pp.325-332.
142.Tsuji, Y. S., 2001b, A Methodological Study of Patent Statistics for Technoeconomic Analysis- An Approach to the Patentometrics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ph.D. Dissertation, pp.13
143.Tsuji, Y. S., 2002, “Organizational behavior in the R&D process based on patent analysis: Strategic R&D management in a Japanese electronics firm”, Technovation, vol. 22, pp.417-425.
144.Tushman, M. L. and L. Rosenkopf, 1992, “Organizational determinants of technological change: Toward a sociology of technological evolution”, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 14, pp.311-347.
145.Utterback, J. M. and W. J. Abernathy, 1975, “A dynamic model of process and product innovation”, Omega, vol. 3(6), pp.639-656.
146.van der Eerden, C. and F. H. Saelens, 1991, “The Use of Science and Technology Indicators in Strategic Planning”, Research Technology Management, vol. 34(4), pp.43-49.
147.van de Ven, A. H. and M. S. Poole, 1995, “Explaining development and change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, pp.510-540.
148.Verbeek, A., K. Debackere, M. Luwel, P. Andries, E. Zimmermann and F. Deleus, 2002, “Linking science to technology: using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes”, Scientometrics, vol. 54(3), pp.399-420.
149.Verbeek, A., K. Debackere, M. Luwel, and E. Zimmermann, 2002, “Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology-I: the multiple uses of bibliometrics indicators”, International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 4(2), pp.179-211.
150.Verspagen, B., 1999, “Large firms and knowledge flows in the Dutch R&D system: a case study of Philips Electronics”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 11(2), pp.211-233.
151.Vertova, G., 1998, “Technological similarity in national styles of innovation in a historical perspective”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 10(4), pp.437-449.
152.Vertova, G., 1999, “Stability in national patterns of technological specialization: some historical evidence from patent data”, Economics of Innovation & New Technology, vol. 8, pp.331-354.
153.von Wartburg, I., T. Teichert and K. Rost, 2005, “Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis”, Research Policy, vol. 34, pp.1591-1607.
154.White, H. D. and B. C. Griffith, 1981, “Author co-citation: a literature measure of intellectual structure”, Journal of American Society for Information Science, vol. 32, pp.163-171.
155.White, H. D., B. Wellman and N. Nazer, 2004, “Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the “Globenet” interdisciplinary research group”, Journal of American Society for Information Science, vol. 55(2), pp.111-126.
156.www.stic.gov.tw 資料庫系統與簡介
157.Yagi, E., 1965, “An application of a type of matrix to analyze citations of scientific papers”, American Documentation, vol. 16(1), pp.10-19.
158.Zitt, M., R. Barre, A. Sigogneau and F. Laville, 1999, “Territorial concentration and evolution of science and technology activities in the European Union: a descriptive analysis”, Research Policy, vol. 28, pp.545-562.
159.Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and J. Armstrong, 1998, “Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?”, Economic Inquiry, vol. 36(1), pp.65-86.
160.Zucker, L. G., M. R. Darby and J. Armstrong, 1998, “Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology”, Management Science, vol. 48(1), pp.138-153.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE