臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：中國大陸各區域之有效率的能源與廢棄物減量目標
作者：李曜純
作者(外文)：Yao-Chun Lee
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：胡均立
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2007
主題關鍵詞：永續發展；資料包絡分析法；能源；廢棄物；減量；污染；sustainable development；data envelopment analysis；energy；waste；abatement；pollution
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
能源的改變與轉換使得任何事情都有可能發生。我們買能源、出售能源，吃能源、浪費能源、儲存能源，更為能源而戰。能源是經濟活動的動力，它包含所有經過轉換而被使用的自然資源。但是過度地使用能源將引起能源短缺、能源危機、能源價格上漲及環境污染等問題。這些環境污染更將透過食物鏈而間接危害所有生物的健康和生命。
中國大陸目前正從一個耗能、低效率且嚴重污染的經濟發展模式過渡成一個節能、高效率且少污染的經濟發展模式。在新燃料及替代能源具可行性及經濟性以前，為維持經濟發展的需要，節能與減廢便成為中國大陸在制定環境政策上的兩大主軸。
本研究主要在計算2000-2003年期間中國大陸27個地區其三種主要能源與三種主要工業廢棄物之有效率的減量。本研究以單一產出項 (實質國內生產毛額) 與五個投入項 (勞動、實質資本存量、耗煤量、耗汽油量及耗電量) 透過資料包絡分析法計算出每年每個地區之每種能源的目標消耗量。相同的，本研究也以單一產出項 (實質國內生產毛額) 與五個投入項 (勞動、實質資本存量、固體廢棄物產量、廢水量及廢氣量) 透過相同的方法計算出每年每個地區之每種廢棄物的目標廢棄量。
有別於傳統著重於效率的DEA模型，本研究的主要貢獻在於建立一個投入項的減量指標，透過目標消耗量 (廢棄量) 與實際消耗量 (實際廢棄量) 計算出每年每個地區在每一種能源 (廢棄物) 上之有效率的減量比率。本研究主要發現如下︰1. 在2000-2003年間，東部地區每一年都最有效率於三種能源與三種廢棄物上。2. 上海與廣東皆處於生產的效率前緣並成為中國大陸所有地區的標竿。3. 陝西和甘肅擁有最高的三種能源減量比率與三種廢棄物減量比率，代表此兩者是全中國大陸最無效率的兩個地區。4. 在三種能源減量與三種廢棄物減量中，煤耗減量與固體廢棄物減量是中國大陸當前最緊急的任務。
Energy changes and transformations make things happen. We buy energy, sell energy, eat energy, waste energy, talk a little about conserving energy, and fight over energy. Energy, a motive force of the economic activity, includes all natural resources that can be used after changing. However, overusing energy will cause the energy shortage, energy crisis, the price of energy going up, and environment pollution. In particular, environment pollution will endanger the organism's health and life through the food chain indirectly.
Mainland China is in a transition period from a highly energy-consuming, low-efficiency, and heavily polluting economic development pattern to an energy saving, high-efficiency, and less polluting economic development pattern. Before new and alternative fuels become available, improving energy saving and waste reducing are two necessities for mainland China to design national environmental policy while remaining its economic development possibilities.
This thesis's main contribution is to create an input abatement index which different from the traditional DEA model. This thesis computes the efficient abatements of three major types of energy and three major types of industrial waste for twenty-seven regions in mainland China during the period 2000-2003. The data envelopment analysis (DEA) with a single output (real GDP) and five inputs (labor, real capital stock, coal consumption, gasoline consumption, and electricity consumption) is used to compute the target energy inputs of each region for each year. Besides, a single output (real GDP) and five inputs (labor, real capital stock, solid wastes, waste water, and waste gas) is used to compute the target waste inputs of each region for each year by the same method.
The efficient abatements ratios of each region in each year then are obtained by comparing the target inputs to the actual inputs. Our major findings are as follows: 1. East area contains most of the efficient regions with respect to three major types of energy and three major types of waste in every year during the research period. 2. Shanghai and Guangdong are producing outputs efficiently with respect to the Chinese production frontier and to be the benchmark for regions in mainland China. 3. Shaanxi and Gansu have the high target abatements ratios of all energy and all waste, implying that the two regions are most inefficient in mainland China. 4. Comparing to the three major types of energy and three major types of waste, coal consumption saving and solid waste reduction is mainland China’s most urgent task.
1.Banker RD, Charnes A and Cooper WW. “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science; 30, pp.1078-1092, 1984.
2.Casares ML, Ulierte N, Mataran A, Ramos A and Zamorano M. “Solid industrial wastes and their management in Asegra (Granada, Spain)”, Waste Management; 25, pp.1075-1082, 2005.
3.Chang CC and Luh YH. “Efficiency change and growth in productivity: the Asian growth experience”, Journal of Asian Economics, 10, pp.551-570, 2000.
4.Charnes A, Cooper WW and Rhodes E. “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp.429-444, 1978.
5.Chen EKY. “The total factor productivity debate: determinants of economic growth in East Asia”, Asian Pacific Economic Literature, 11, pp.18-38, 1997.
6.Chen W. “View from China: Stakeholder capitalism: In an era of unchecked growth, China’s CFOs could use a lesson in stakeholder capitalism”, CFO Magazine; 2006.
7.Coelli TJ. A Guide to Deap Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program Armidale. (Australia): University of New England, 1996.
8.Coelli TJ, Rao DSP and Battese GE. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
9.de Bruyn SM. Economic Growth and the Environment: An Empirical Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
10.de Nooij M, van der Kruk R and van Soest DP. “International comparisons of domestic energy consumption”, Energy Economics, 25, pp.359-373, 2003.
11.Deppe M, Leatherwood T, Lowitt P and Warner N. “A Planner’s overview of eco-industrial development”, American Planning Association Annual Conference, Eco-industrial Session, 2000.
12.Donnelly JE. “Numbers never lie, but what do they say: A comparative look at municipal solid waste recycling in the United States and Germany”, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 15, pp.29-52, 2002.
13.Dorian JP. Minerals, Energy, and Economic Development in China. New York: Oxford, 3, 1994.
14.Drysdale P and Huang Y. “Technological catch-up and economic growth in East Asia and the Pacific”, Economic Record, 73, pp.201-211, 1997.
15.Edvardsen DF and Førsund FR. “International benchmarking of electricity distribution utilities”, Resource and Energy Economics, 25, pp.353-371, 2003.
16.Energy Information Administration (EIA). China: Environmental Issues. Web Site: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/chinaenv.html, 2003.
17.Färe R, Grosskopf S and Hernandez-Sancho F. “Environmental performance: an index number approach”, Resource and Energy Economics, 26, pp.343-352, 2004.
18.Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M and Zhang Z. “Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries”, American Economic Review, 84, pp.66-83, 1994.
19.Hogland W and Stenis J. “Assessment and system analysis of industrial waste management”, Waste Management; 20, pp.537-543, 2000.
20.Hu JL. “Efficient air pollution abatement for regions in China”, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 13, pp.327-340, 2006.
21.Hu, JL and Lee YC. “Efficient three waste abatements for regions in China”, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, (Forthcoming).
22.Hu JL and Kao CH. “Efficient energy-saving targets for APEC economies”, Energy Policy 35, pp.373-382, 2007.
23.Hu JL, Sheu HJ and Lo SF. “Under the shadow of Asian brown clouds: the unbalanced regional productivities in China with environmental concerns”, International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12, pp.429-442, 2005.
24.Hu JL and Wang SC. “Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China”, Energy Policy, 34, pp.3206-3217, 2006.
25.Hu JL, Wang SC and Yeh FY. “Total-factor water efficiency of regions in China”, Resources Policy, (Forthcoming).
26.International Energy Outlook, 2002. Web Site: http://www.allbusiness.com/utilities/186568-1.html
27.Isakov I. “Global energy issue at the G8 agenda”, International Affairs, Moscow, 52, pp.21-30. 2006.
28.Jamasb T and Pollitt M. “International benchmarking and regulation: an application to European electricity distribution utilities”, Energy Policy, 31, pp.1609-1622, 2003.
29.Kambara T. “The energy situation in China”, China Quarterly, 131, pp.608, 1992.
30.Kim JI and Lau LJ. “The sources of growth of the east Asian newly industrialized economies”, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 8, pp.235-271, 1994.
31.Kim JI and Lau LJ. “The role of human capital in the economic growth of the east Asian newly industrialized countries”, Asia-Pacific Economic Review, 1, pp.3-22, 1995.
32.Krüger JJ, Cantner U and Hanusch H. “Total factor productivity, the east Asian miracle and the world production frontier”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136, pp.111-136, 2000.
33.Krugman P. “The myth of Asia’s miracle”, Foreign Affairs, 73, pp.62-78, 1994.
34.Kumar S and Rao DN. “Valuing the benefits of air pollution abatement using a health production function: A case study of Panipat thermal power station, India”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 20, pp.91-102, 2001.
35.Li KW. China’s capital and productivity measurement using financial resources, Economic Growth Center, Yale University; 2003 (http://www.econ.yale.edu/~egcenter/research.htm)
36.López R. “The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, pp.163-184, 1994.
37.Lovell CAK. Production frontiers and productive efficiency in Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. A. K. and Schmidt, S. S. (eds). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.
38.Luft G.. 2006. “Fueling the dragon: China’s race into the oil market”, The Institute for the Analysis of Global Security 2003-2004. Web Site: http://www.iags.org/china.htm
39.National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), Xinhua News Agency, June 23, 2003. Web Site: http://www.china.org.cn/english/BAT/67733.htm
40.National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), Xinhua News Agency, October 4, 2006. Web Site: http://china.org.cn/english/2006/Oct/182953.htm
41.Oates WE and Schwab RM. “Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing?” Journal of Public Economics, 35, pp.333-354, 1988.
42.Oster, S. “Energy: China plans to curb oil, coal use despite expected demand growth”, Wall Street Journal, New York, 17, 2006.
43.Raymond PC and Cohen-Rosenthal E. “Designing eco-industrial parks: a synthesis of some experiences”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 6, pp.181-188, 1998.
44.Resosudarmo BP. “Computable general equilibrium model on air pollution abatement policies with Indonesia as a case study”, Economic Record, 79, pp.63-73, 2003.
45.Smulders S. Endogenous growth theory and the environment in van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (editors). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1999.
46.Songhua River News. Russian scientists find chemicals at 50 times acceptable level in China’s Songhua River; April 2006 (http://songhua-river-news.newslib.com/)
47.State of the Environment Protection Administration of China (SoE). Report on the State of the Environment in China; 2000. (http://www.zhb.gov.cn/english)
48.State Statistic Bureau (SSB). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: Statistical Publishing House; 1997-2004
49.Steenhof PA. “Decomposition of electricity demand in China’s industrial sector”, Energy Economics, 28, pp.370-384, 2006.
50.The Administrative Centre for China’s Agenda 21 (ACCA21). Priority Programme for China’s Agenda 21: Priority 6 - Environmental Pollution Control. (http://english.acca21.org.cn/html/index.jsp)
51.U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2004. 2004 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Washington, DC. 154.
52.Vighi M and Funari E. Pesticide Risk in Groundwater. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers; 1995
53.Vlek PG., Rodríguez-Kul G and Sommer R. “Energy use and CO2 production in tropical agriculture and means and strategies for reduction or mitigation”, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6, pp.213-233, 2004.
54.World Bank, 1993. The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. World Bank, Washington, DC.
55.World Bank. China’s challenges: ensuring growth with equity. 1997 (http://www.worldbank.org)
56.World Bank. China Country Brief. 2001 (http://www.worldbank.org)
57.WSSD, China Country Profile. Johannesburg Summit 2002. The United States of America, Country Profile 2002. The United Nations; 2002
58.Xie J. “An environmentally extended social accounting matrix”, Environmental and Resource Economics, 16, pp.391-406, 2000.
59.Young A. “Lessons from the east Asian NICs: a contrarian view”, European Economic Review, 8, pp.964-973, 1994.
60.Young A. “The tyranny of numbers: confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, pp.641-680, 1995.
61.Zhijun X. and Kuby M. “Supply-side-demand-side optimization and cost-environment tradeoffs for China’s coal and electricity system”, Energy Policy, 25, pp.313-326, 1997.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：418（臺灣：402，外國：16） ／ 本年度總使用人次：3599726 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：69395758
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上