[1] R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithm for mining association rules. In Proceedings of the
20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 487–499. Morgan Kaufmann
Publishers, 1994.
[2] R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. “Mining sequential patterns”. In Proc. 1995 Int. Conf. Data
Engineering (ICDE95), pages 3–14, 1995.
[3] M. Alavi and D.E. Leidner. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:
Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1):107–136, 2001.
[4] J.A. Allen. “Bioinformatics and discovery: induction beckons again”. BioEssays, 23:104–107,
2001.
[5] A. Asperti and G. Longo. Categories, Types, and Structures: An Introduction to Category
Theory for the Working Computer Scientist. MIT Press, 1991.
[6] G. Birkhoff and J. Lipson. Heterogeneous algebras. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 8,
1970.
[7] P. Blackburn, M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema. Modal Logic. Cambridge Uinversity Press, 2001.
[8] S.N. Burris and H.P. Sankappanavar. A Course in Universal Algebra. Springer-Verlag, 1981.
[9] R. Carnap. Logical Foundations of Probability. The University of Chicago Press, Routledge,
1962.
[10] C.F. Chien and L.F. Chen. Using rough set theory to recruit and retain high-potential talents
for semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions On Semiconductor Manufacturing,
20(4), 2007.
[11] P. M. Cohn. Universal Algebra. D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1981.
[12] L. Darden. “Anomaly-driven theory redesign: computational philosophy of science experiments”.
In T.W. Bynum and J.H. Moor, editors, The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are
Changing Philosophy, pages 62–78. Blackwell Publishers, 1998.
[13] K. Dembczynski, S. Greco, and R. Slowinski. Methodology of rough-set-based classification
and sorting with hierarchical structure of attributes and criteria. Control & Cybernetics,
31:891–920, 2002.
[14] S. Demri and E. Orlowska. Incomplete Information: Structure, Inference, Complexity.
EATCS Monographs. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
[15] Y. Dimopoulos and A. Kakas. “Abduction and inductive learning”. In L. De Raedt, editor,
Advances in Inductive Logic Programming, pages 144–171. IOS Press, 1996.
[16] T.F. Fan, W.C. Hu, and C.J. Liau. Decision logics for knowledge representation in data
mining. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Computer Software and Applications
Conference, pages 626–631. IEEE Press, 2001.
[17] T.F. Fan and C.J. Liau. The justification problem of data mining—a decision logic formulation
and its implications. In Proc. of the IEEE ICDM2002 Workshop on the Foundation of Data
Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 113–118, 2002.
[18] T.F. Fan, C.J. Liau, D.R. Liu, and G.H. Tzeng. Granulation based on hybrid information
systems. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and
Cybernetics, pages 4768–4772, 2006.
[19] T.F. Fan, D.R. Liu, and C.J. Liau. “Justification and hypothesis selection in data mining”.
In T.Y. Lin, S. Ohsuga, C.J. Liau, X. Hu, and S. Tsumoto, editors, Foundations of Data
Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 119–130. Springer, 2005.
[20] T.F. Fan, D.R. Liu, and G.H. Tzeng. Arrow decision logic for relational information systems.
LNCS Transactions on Rough Sets, V(LNCS 4100):240–262, 2006.
[21] T.F. Fan, D.R. Liu, and G.H. Tzeng. Rough set-based logics for multicriteria decision analysis.
European Journal of Operational Research, 182(1):340–355, 2007.
[22] Z. Farkas. System integration via logic in knowledge management — a project initiative.
[23] P. Flach. An Inquiry Concerning the Logic of Induction. ITK Dissertation Series, 1995.
[24] P. Flach and A. Kakas. “On the relation between abduction and inductive learning”. In D.M.
Gabbay and R. Kruse, editors, Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management
Systems Vol. 4: Abductive Reasoning and Learning, pages 1–33. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 2000.
[25] D.M. Gabbay. An irreflexivity lemma with applications to axiomatization of conditions on
linear frames. In U. M¨onnich, editor, Aspects of Philosophical Logic, pages 67–89. D. Reidel
Publishing Co., 1981.
[26] F. Giannotti, G. Manco, D. Pedreschi, and F. Turini. “Experiences with a logic-based knowledge
discovery support environment”. In E. Lamma and P. Mello, editors, AI*IA 99: Advances
in Artificial Intelligence, 6th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence,
LNAI 1792, pages 202–213. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[27] D. Gillies. Artificial Intelligence and Scientific Method. Oxford University Press, 1996.
[28] N. Goodman. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, third edition, 1971.
[29] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough set approach to multi-attribute choice and
ranking problems. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Multiple Criteria
Decision Making, pages 318–329, 1997.
[30] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough approximation of a preference relation in
a pairwise comparison table. In L. Polkowski and A. Skowron, editors, Rough Sets in Data
Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 13–36. Physica-Verlag, 1998.
[31] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough approximation of a preference relation by
dominance relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 117(1):63–83, 1999.
[32] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM.
In T. Gal, T. Hanne, and T. Stewart, editors, Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in
MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications, pages 14.1–14.59. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 1999.
[33] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Extension of the rough set approach to multicriteria
decision support. INFOR Journal: Information Systems and Operational Research,
38(3):161–195, 2000.
[34] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough set theory for multicriteria decision analysis.
European Journal of Operational Research, 129(1):1–47, 2001.
[35] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Rough sets methodology for sorting problems
in presence of multiple attributes and criteria. European Journal of Operational Research,
138(2):247–259, 2002.
[36] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. Axiomatic characterization of a general utility
function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision
rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2):271–292, 2004.
[37] S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, R. Slowinski, and J. Stefanowski. Variable consistency model of
dominance-based rough set approach. In W. Ziarko and Y. Yao, editors, Proceedings of the
2nd International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, LNAI 2005,
pages 170–181. Springer-Verlag, 2001.
[38] P. Gr¨unwald, I.J. Myung, and M. Pitt. Advances in Minimum Description Length: Theory
and Applications. The MIT Press, 2004.
[39] J.W. Grzymala-Busse. Algebraic properties of knowledge representation systems. In Proceedings
of the ACM SIGART International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems,
pages 432–440. ACM Press, 1986.
[40] P. H´ajek. Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1998.
[41] J. Han and M. Kamber. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,
2001.
[42] J. Hawthorne. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford University Press, 2003.
[43] J. Hawthorne and L. Bovens. “The preface, the lottery, and rational belief”. Mind, 108:241–
264, 1999.
[44] C.G. Hempel. “Studies in the logic of confirmation”. In C. Hempel, editor, Aspects of
Scienfific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pages 3–46. Free Press,
New York, 1965.
[45] C.G. Hempel. “Studies in the logic of confirmation”. In C. Hempel, editor, Aspects of Scienfific
Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, pages 53–79. Free Press, New
York, 1965.
[46] J. Hintikka and P. Suppes. Aspects of Inductive Logic. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1967.
[47] D. Hofstadter and Fluid Analogies Research Group. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies:
Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. Penguin, 1998.
[48] D. Hume. A Treatise of Human Nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1896.
[49] C.L. Hwang and K. Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making : Methods and Applications.
Springer-Verlag, 1981.
[50] R. Kruse, C. Borgelt, and D. Nauck. Fuzzy data analysis: challenges and perspectives. In
Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pages 1211–1216,
San Francisco, CA, 1999. IEEE.
[51] M. Kryszkiewicz. Properties of incomplete information systems in the framework of rough
sets. In L. Polkowski and A. Skowron, editors, Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery, pages
422–450. Physica-Verlag, 1998.
[52] M. Kryszkiewicz and H. Rybi´nski. Reducing information systems with uncertain attributes.
In Z. W. Ra´s and M. Michalewicz, editors, Proceedings of the 9th ISMIS, LNAI 1079, pages
285–294. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
[53] M. Kryszkiewicz and H. Rybi´nski. Reducing information systems with uncertain real value
attributes. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing and
Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, pages 1165–1169, 1996.
[54] H. Kyburg. Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown,
1961.
[55] C.J. Liau. Belief reasoning, revision and fusion by matrix algebra. In J. Komorowski and
S. Tsumoto, editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Rough Sets and
Current Trends in Computing, LNAI 3066, pages 133–142. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
[56] C.J. Liau. Matrix representation of belief states: An algebraic semantics for belief logics.
International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 12(5):613–
633, 2004.
[57] C.J. Liau and T.Y. Lin. Reasoning about relational granulation in modal logics. In Proc.
of the First IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, pages 534–538. IEEE
Press, 2005.
[58] C.J. Liau and D.R. Liu. A logical approach to fuzzy data analysis. In J.M. Zytkow and
J. Rauch, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Principles of Data Mining
and Knowledge Discovery, LNAI 1704, pages 412–417. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[59] C.J. Liau and D.R. Liu. A possibilistic decision logic with applications. Fundamenta Informaticae,
46(3):199–217, 2001.
[60] W. Lipski. On databases with incomplete information. Journal of the ACM, 28(1):41–70,
1981.
[61] M. Marx and Y. Venema. Multi-Dimensional Modal Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers,
1997.
[62] J. McCarthy. Phenomenal data mining. Communications of the ACM, 43(8):75–79, 2000.
[63] E. Mendelson. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Chapman & Hall/CRC, forth edition,
1997.
[64] S. Muggleton and L. de Raedt. “Inductive logic programming: theory and methods”. Journal
of Logic Programming, 19/20:629–679, 1994.
[65] D.K. Nelkin. “The lottery paradox, knowledge, and rationality”. The Philosophical Review,
109(3):373–409, 2000.
[66] I. Nonaka. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science,
5(1):14–37, 1994.
[67] Z. Pawlak. Rough Sets–Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 1991.
[68] L. Polkowski, S. Tsumoto, and T.Y. Lin, editors. Rough Set Methods and Applications.
Physica-Verlag, 2000.
[69] D. Poole. “Learning, Bayesian probability, graphical models, and abduction”. In P. Flach
and A. Kakas, editors, Abduction and Induction: Essays on Their Relation and Integration.
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
[70] K. R. Popper. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Harper & Row, New York, 1968.
[71] J. Rissanen. “Modeling by shortest data description”. Automatica, 14:465–471, 1978.
[72] A. Satyadas, U. Harigopal, and N.P. Cassaigne. Knowledge management tutorial: an editorial
overview. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics–Part C: Applications and
Reviews, 31(4):429–437, 2001.
[73] P. Schroeder-Heister. “Popper, Karl Raimund”. In International Encyclopedia of the Social
and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, 2001.
[74] J. Scott. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. SAGE Publications, 2 edition, 2000.
[75] A. Skoworn and L. Polkowski, editors. Rough Sets In Knowledge Discovery Vol 1: Methodology
and Applications. Physica-Verlag, 1998.
[76] A. Skoworn and L. Polkowski, editors. Rough Sets In Knowledge Discovery Vol 2: Applications,
Case Studies and Software Systems. Physica-Verlag, 1998.
[77] A. Skowron. Extracting laws from decision tables. Computational Intelligence: An International
Journal, 11:371–388, 1995.
[78] A. Skowron and C. Rauszer. The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems.
In R. Slowinski, editor, Intelligent Decision Support Systems: Handbook of Applications and
Advances in Rough Set Theory, pages 331–362. Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1991.
[79] A. Skowron and R. Swiniarski. Rough sets and higher order vagueness. In D. Slezak, G.Y.
Wang, M. Szczuka, I. Duntsch, and Y.Y. Yao, editors, Proceedings of the 10th International
Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing, LNAI 3641,
pages 33–42. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
[80] A. Skowron and P. Synak. Complex patterns. Fundamenta Informaticae, 60(1-4):351–366,
2004.
[81] R. Slowinski, S. Greco, and B. Matarazzo. Mining decision-rule preference model from rough
approximation of preference relation. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Annual International
Conference on Computer Software and Applications, pages 1129–1134. IEEE Press, 2002.
[82] R. Slowinski, S. Greco, and B. Matarazzo. Rough set analysis of preference-ordered data.
In J.J. Alpigini, J.F. Peters, A. Skowron, and N. Zhong, editors, Proceedings of the 3rd
International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing, LNAI 2475, pages
44–59. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
[83] M.H. Stone. The theory of representations of boolean algebras. Transactions of the American
Mathematical Society, 40:37–111, 1936.
[84] P. Thagard. Computational Philosophy of Science. The MIT Press, 1988.
[85] P. Thagard. Conceptual Revolutions. PrincetonUniversity Press, 1992.
[86] P. Thagard. “Probabilistic networks and explanatory coherence”. Cognitive Science Quarterly,
1:91–144, 2000.
[87] Y. Venema. A crash course in arrow logic. In M. Marx, L. P’olos, and M. Masuch, editors,
Arrow Logic and Multi-Modal Logic, pages 3–34. CSLI Publications, 1996.
[88] R.H. Warren, J.A. Johnson, and G.H. Huang. Application of rough sets to environmental
engineering. LNCS Transactions on Rough Sets, 1:356–374, 2004.
[89] P. Watson. “Inductive learning with corroboration”. In O. Watanabe and T. Yokomori,
editors, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory,
LNAI 1720, pages 145–156. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[90] J. Williamson. Machine learning and the philosophy of science: a dynamic interaction. In Proceedings
of the ECML-PKDD-01 Workshop on Machine Leaning as Experimental Philosophy
of Science, 2001.
[91] T.D. Wilson. The nonsense of “knowledge management”. Information Research, 8(1), 2002.
[92] W.W. Wu, Y.T. Lee, and G.H. Tzeng. Simplifying the manager competency model by using
the rough set approach. In D.Slezak, J. Yao, J.F. Peters, W. Ziarko, and X. Hu, editors,
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining,
and Granular Computing, LNAI 3642, pages 484–494. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
[93] Y.Y. Yao and C.J. Liau. A generalized decision logic language for granular computing. In
Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pages 773–778.
IEEE Press, 2002.
[94] Y.Y. Yao and Q. Liu. A generalized decision logic in interval-set-valued information tables. In
N. Zhong, A. Skowron, and S. Ohsuga, editors, New Directions in Rough Sets, Data Mining,
and Granular-Soft Computing, LNAI 1711, pages 285–293. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
[95] Y.Y. Yao and N. Zhong. An analysis of quantitative measures associated with rules. In
Proceedings of the 2nd Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,
pages 479–488. IEEE Press, 1999.
[96] L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1):3–28,
1978.