:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:東亞發展中經濟體行動電話產業政策與研發策略之比較研究
作者:徐玉學
作者(外文):Yu-Hsueh Hsu
校院名稱:國立交通大學
系所名稱:經營管理研究所
指導教授:胡均立
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2007
主題關鍵詞:通訊產業電信產業政策開發中經濟體研發活動研發效率Communications industryTelecom industrial policyDeveloping EconomiesR&D activitiesR&D efficiency
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
近年新興開發中國家經濟快速成長,廣受全球矚目。開發中國家以龐大市場規模與低廉勞動成本之利,吸引全球資金與國際大廠的目光。另一方面,自1996年全球主要國家及地區陸續推動電信自由化後,以往國營獨占的局面逐漸被打破,許多新通訊技術與服務不斷為業者所推出,並得以進入一般民眾的生活領域,通訊產業無疑已成為動輒左右全球景氣榮枯的指標,因此全球主要IT大廠均投入相當的人力、物力、財力來搶攻行動電話這塊市場大餅,世界各主要國家也希望透過產業政策的手段來達到扶持國內行動電話製造商的目的。
而根據Lessard(2003)關於「產業國際化潛力」的分析模型,行動電話與網路設備產業是一個典型的國際化產業。在這種具有國際化特徵的產業中,那些因跨國經營而享有規模經濟的國際企業相對於任何一個國家的本土企業都擁有難以逾越的優勢,因此本研究試圖以東亞主要開發中國家在行動通訊產業的發展為例,為後進業者歸納出如何達到「後發先至」的效果。
本論文之研究範圍,包括東亞地區主要行動通訊服務商、行動電話品牌商、通訊設備製造商、通訊設備代工廠商等。並以中國大陸、南韓、台灣地區為主要分析課題,歸納出各種不同的成長模式:
一、南韓模式:以高度垂直整合為基礎架構,同時藉由通訊設備、通訊服務需要高度互動特性,來達到在地化的優勢。而行動電話廠商則在有限的研發資源上,藉由提高研發效率來拉近與領先業者之間的差距。
二、中國大陸模式:以龐大本土市場規模為籌碼,以政府產業政策做股權、生產權、銷售權等限制來逐步吸引外資進入,以構建自有技術能量。而在成長策略方面,其模式為先將本土廠商品牌規模建立,再追求自有研發與製造能力之突破。
三、台灣模式:台灣代工廠商以PC代工為基礎架構進行微調,針對通訊產業缺乏共通標準的產業生態下,發展出趨近於一對一的ODM代工模式,在有限的研發資源投入下,以補足代工夥伴在產品線上的不足,作為其研發策略。除使代工關係更為緊密,亦可與代工夥伴在技術能力上同步成長。
The production of more and more basic goods and services, even IT product are being transferred from the high-wage economies of the North to the low-wage economies of the South. Organizations are increasingly turning to outsourcing in an attempt to enhance their competitiveness due to globalisation, especially in IT industry. Through outsourcing, manufacturing costs as well as investment in plants and equipments can be reduced.
On the other hand, the researcher (Lessard 2003) also indicated that the typically international industry has some characteristics such as economy of scale, comparative advantage, and so on. In the ICT industry, due to globalisation and the trend in world trade, major cellular phone makers, Nokia and Motorola, sell their phones in most of countries with advantage of economies of scale and a firm's comparative advantages. For latecomers, in order to compete with foreign leading companies, they should take advantage such as economy of scale or market niche expect policy protection. Therefore, this paper tries to find out the benchmark and developing models for developing economies. Our research target focuses on the cellular phone industry in East Asian developing economies including China, Korea, and Taiwan.
China’s mobile industrial policy has affected the development of its mobile industry as a whole. China focuses on extending domestic venders’ market share by combining the industrial policy and domestic market supply/needs. However, setting up R&D ability is an important issue in the next step for the China’s mobile industry.
In Korean model, this paper shows that South Korean firms’ R&D efficiency has generally been superior to European and American competitors in the past years, and their innovative power came from three sources: interaction with operators, getting the information of service and applications from service providers, and internal and external competition. After successful experiences in innovative products for the domestic market, South Korean cellular phone makers use customised design with foreign mobile operators and their foreign R&D centres to localise design and modifications in order to meet foreign market demand.
Finally, this paper compares the development modes of major cellular phone and NB/PC manufacturers as two OEM client-oriented industries in Taiwan. Because the cellular phone is a type of consumer product with relatively less standardization, and Taiwan’s cellular phone makers have used different approaches to attract global OEM outsourcing orders in addition to cost down, the experience of these manufacturers as latecomers shows how they have implemented R&D resources more effectively in the face of non-standard products. Due to different industry ecosystems, Taiwan’s cellular phone makers pay more attention on R&D activities in order to attract their OEM clients by developing relatively complete product lines.
REFERENCES
Ahn, J.H., Kim, M.S., Lee, D.J., 2005. Learning from the failure: experiences in the Korean telecommunications market. Technovation, 25, 69-82.
Anderson, J. C., Hakansson, H., Johanson, J., 1994. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-15.
Bauer J.M., 2003. Impact of license fees on the prices of mobile voice service. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 417-434.
Berra, M., 2003. Information communications technology and local development. Telematics and Informatics, 20, 215-234.
Bettis, R., Bradley, S., Hamel, G., 1992. Outsourcing and industrial decline. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 7-22.
Bone, S., Saxon, T., 2000. Developing effective technology strategies. Research Technology Management, 43(4), 50-58.
Bortolotti, B., D’Souza, J., Fantini, M., 2002. Privatization and the sources of performance improvement in the global telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 243-268.
Bowonder, B., Yadav, S., Kumar, B.S., 2000. R&D spending patterns of global firms. Research Technology Management, 43(5), 40-56.
Brander, J., Spencer, B., 1985. Export subsidies and market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18, 83-100.
Chang, H., Koski, H., Majumdar, S. K., 2003. Regulation and investment behavior in the telecommunications sector: policies and patterns in US and Europe. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 677-699.
Chang, P.L., Hsu, C.W., Tsai, C.T., 1999. A stage approach for industrial technology development and implementation - the case of Taiwan’s computer industry. Technovation, 19, 233-241.
Chang, S.C., 2005. The TFT-LCD industry in Taiwan: competitive advantages and future developments. Technology in Society, 27, 199-215.
Cho, D.H., Yu, P.I., 2000. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in the Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation, 20, 691-704.
Choi, S.K., Lee, M.H., Chung, G.H., 2001. Competition in Korean mobile telecommunications market: business strategy and regulatory environment. Telecommunications Policy, 25, 125-138.
Chu, P.Y., Lin, Y.L., Hsiung, H.H., Liu, T.Y., 2006. Intellectual capital: An empirical study of ITRI. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 886-902.
Chung, J.W., Bae, Z.T., Kim, J.S., 2003. Changing patterns of technological cooperation activities of innovative small firms along technological development stages in the Korean telecommunication sector. Technovation, 23, 163-173.
Chung, S., 2001. Unification of South and North Korean innovation systems. Technovation, 21, 99-107.
DeCarolis, D.M., Deeds, D.L., 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the bio-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 953-968.
Deng, Z., Lev, B., Narin, F., 1999. Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20-32.
Editorial, G., 2003. Competition in wireless: spectrum, service and technology wars. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 319-324.
Fan, P., 2006. Catching up through developing innovation capability: evidence from China’s telecom-equipment industry. Technovation, 26, 359-368.
Galan, J.I., Sanchez, M.J., 2006. Influence of industry R&D intensity on corporate product diversification: interaction effect of free cash flow. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 531-547.
Gil, Y., Bong, S., Lee, J., 2003. Integration model of technology internalization modes and learning strategy: globally late starter Samsung’s successful practices in South Korea. Technovation, 23, 333-347.
Hazlett, T.W., 2003. Liberalizing US spectrum allocation. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 485-499.
Hitomi, K., 2002. Historical trends and the present state of Korean industry and manufacturing. Technovation, 22, 453-462.
Hobday, M., Rush, H., Bessant, J., 2004. Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership. Research Policy, 33, 1433-1457.
Hu, J.L., Hsu, Y.H., forthcoming. Effects of industrial policy on manufacturing and innovative activities of cell phone manufacturers in China. Technology in Society.
Hu, J.L., Hsu, Y.H., forthcoming. The more interactive, the more innovative? A case study of South Korean cellular phone manufacturers. Technovation.
IDC Worldwide Mobile Phone 2004~2008 Update Report. IDG 2005.
In-Stat Report: Asia Wireless Annual Report: Subscribers, Handsets, and Infrastructure. Gartner Dataquest, 2004.
Jan, T.S., Chen, Y., 2006. The R&D system for industrial development in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 559-574.
Kim, H.J., Byun, S.K., Park, M.C., 2004. Mobile cellular phone subsidy policy in Korea: historical analysis and evaluation. Telecommunications Policy, 28, 23-42.
Kim, L., 1997. The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors. California Management Review, 39, 86-99.
Kim, L., 1998. Crisis construction and organizational learning: capacity building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9, 506-521.
Kim, S., Litman, B., 1998. An economic analysis of the US wireless telephone industry: responses to new technologies. Telematics and Informatics, 16, 27-44.
Krugman, P.R., 1979. A model of innovation technology transfer, and the world distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253-266.
Kumar, S., Zahn, C., 2003. Mobile communications: evolution and impact on business operations. Technovation, 23, 515-520.
Lee, D., 2003. Lessons from the Nigerian GSM auction. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 407-416.
Lee, J., 2000. Challenges of Korean technology-based ventures and governmental policies in the emergent-technology sector. Technovation, 20, 489-495.
Lee, J., Bae, Z., Choi, D., 1988. Technology development process in a developing country: a global model. R&D Management, 18, 235-250.
Lee, J., Bae, Z., Lee, J., 1994. Strategic management of a large-scale technology development: the case of the Korean telecommunication industry. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 11, 149-170.
Lee, K., Lim, C., 2001. Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries. Research Policy, 30, 459-483.
Lessard, D.R., 2003. Frameworks for global strategic analysis. Journal of Strategic Management Education, 1(1), 19-37.
LG Annual Report, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.
Lin, B.W., Chen, J.S., 2005. Corporate technology portfolios and R&D performance measures: a study of technology intensive firms. R&D Management, 35, 157-170.
Lin, J.T., Wang, F.K., Lo, S.L., Hsu, W.T., Wang, Y.T., 2006. Analysis of the supply and demand in the TFT-LCD market. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 422-435.
Makhaya, G., Roberts. S., 2003. Telecommunications in developing countries: reflections from the South African experience. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 41-59.
Mathews, J.A., 2002. The origins and dynamics of Taiwan’s R&D consortia. Research Policy, 31, 633-651.
McDowell, S.D., Lee, J., 2003. India’s experiments in mobile licensing. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 371-382.
MIC, 1996-2005 Information Industry Yearbook, Institute for Information Industry (III) Taiwan, ROC 2005.
Ministry of Information Technology of China. About Establishing a Main Policy for the Independent Knowledge Property Rights of the Cellular Phone Industry in China. Available from: (in Chinese).
Ministry of Information Technology of China. Foreign Capital in People Republic of China Invests Telecom Industry Management Codes, 1999. Available from: (in Chinese).
Motorola Annual Report, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.
Mureithi, M., 2003. Self-destructive competition in cellular industry: regulatory options to harness the benefits of liberalization. Telecommunications Policy, 27, 11-19.
Nokia Annual Report, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.
Pitt, D.C., Levine, N., Xu, Y., 1996. Touching stones to cross the river: Evolving telecommunications policy priorities in contemporary China. Journal of Contemporary China, 5, 347-65.
Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G., 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-93.
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G., 1978. The external control of organizations: a resource dependency perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Rice, J., Galvin, P., 2006. Alliance patterns during industry life cycle emergence: the case of Ericsson and Nokia. Technovation, 26, 384-395.
Samsung Annual Report, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005
Song, J.D., Kim, J.C., 2001 Is five too many? simulation analysis of profitability and cost structure in the Korean mobile telephone industry. Telecommunications Policy, 25, 101-123.
State Council of the People's Republic of China. The Ninth Five Year Economic and Social Develop Plan Codes in People Republic of China, 1995. Available from: < http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/fzgh/ghwb/gjjh/W020050614801665203975.pdf> (in Chinese).
State Council of the People's Republic of China. The Tenth Five Year Economic and Social Develop Plan Codes in People Republic of China, 2001. Available from: (in Chinese).
Tang, S.C., Lee, S.N., 2003. Growth in adversity: non-economic factors in telecommunications development in China. Telematics and Informatics, 20, 19-33.
Tan, Z., 2002. Product cycle theory and telecommunications industry-foreign direct investment, government policy, and indigenous manufacturing in China. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 17-30.
Trillas, F., 2002. Mergers, acquisitions and control of telecommunications firms in Europe. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 269-286.
Ure, J., 2003. Deconstruction 3G and reconstructing telecoms. Telecommunication Policy, 27, 187-206.
Williamson, O.E., 1979. Transaction cost analysis: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233-261.
Williamson, O.E., 1981. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.
Wu, C.G., Zhang, X., 1992. An analysis of the seemingly high profit in the industry. Posts and Telecommunications Economy, 18, 6-9.
Wu, S.Y., Hung, S.C., Lin, B.W., 2006. Agile strategy adaptation in semiconductor wafer foundries: An example in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73, 436-451.
Xie, W., White, S., 2006. Windows of opportunity, learning strategies and the rise of China's handset makers. International Journal of Technology Management, 36, 230-248.
Yan, X., 2001. The impact of the regulatory framework on fixed-mobile interconnection settlements: the case of China and Hong Kong. Telecommunications Policy, 25, 515-532.
Zhang, B., 2002. Understanding China’s telecommunications policymaking and reforms: a tale of transition toward liberalization. Telematics and Informatics, 19, 331-349.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE