一、中文文獻中華創造力中心（1997）：創造思考工作坊。教育部八十六年大專院校教師「創意活動營」毛連塭、陳龍安、林幸台（2001）。創造力研究。台北：心理出版社。王受榮（1992）：我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。王素香（1995）：一位國小自然科教師班級氣氛形成因素之個案研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。（未出版）吳幸宜譯（1994）：學習理論與教學應用。台北市：心理出版社。吳武典（1979）：國小班級氣氛的因素分析與追蹤研究。師大教育心理學報，第12期，頁133-156。吳淑芬（2000）：發展理化教師教學自我效能量表及理化科學習自我效能量表。（未發表）。杜明城譯（1999）：Mihaly Csiksentmihalyi著。創造力（Creativity）。台北市：時報文化。 辛濤、申繼亮和林榮德（1994）。教師自我效能感與學校因素關係的研究。教育研究, 10, 16-20。 周進洋（1996）：國民中學化學科教師教學能力評鑑模式及工具之研究（Ⅰ）。國科會專題計畫，NSC 84-2513-S-017-006。 周進洋和吳淑芬 (2000)：自我效能影響學生教師專業發展之個案研究。論文發表於中華民國第十六屆科學教育學術研討會。台北市：國立台灣師範大學理學院。 周進洋和張意唯（1998）：情境的認知風格：國中理化學習環境的詮釋性研究。科學與教育學報第二期。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所出版。 林美吟（1989）：國中資優班與普通班班級氣氛之比較研究。台北市立師範學院學報，20、頁189-228。 林義雄（1969）：勒溫場地說的人格結構。教育研究所集刊，11頁，頁185-205。 林寶山譯（1989）：民主主義與教育（Democracy and Education）（John Dewey原著。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。 邱連煌（1985）：兒童、家庭、學校。台北市：文景書局。 姜文閔和韓宗禮（1994）：教育百科辭典教育百科辭典，五南圖書編審委員會主編。台北市：五南圖書出版公司。 洪文東（1997）：創造性思考與科學創造力的培養。國教天地，123,10-14。 孫志麟（1995）：國民小學教師自我效能之研究。教育與心理研究, 18, 165-192。 張巨青和吳寅華（1994）：邏輯與歷史──現代科學方法論的嬗變。台北市：淑馨出版公司。 張俊紳（1997）：國民小學教師教學效能之研究─不同教學效能信念類型教師的教學表現及其教學生產力。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。 張春興（1989）：張氏心理學辭典。台北市：台灣東華書局股份有限公司。 張春興和林清山（1993）：教育心理學。台北市：台灣東華書局股份有限公司。 張意唯（1997）：情境的經驗：學生的個別經驗對國中理化學習環境的影響。國立高雄師範大學研究所碩士論文。（未出版） 張銀富譯（1989）：當代教育思潮。台北：五南圖書公司。 張德銳（1994）：國民小學教師評鑑之研究。載於中華民國師範學院教育學會主編：師範教育多元化與師資素質。台北市：師大書院。 郭明德（1998）：國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文（未出版）。 郭豐淵（2005）：創造力乃生命之本質（Creativity-A Way of Being.）講於九十四年度高雄市國小校長會議。 陳龍安（1995）：創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北：心理出版社。 項必蒂（1979）：高級中學教材、年級暨學生性別與班級氣氛的關係之研究。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。 黃正傑和李隆盛（1993）：班級經營─理念與策略。台北：師大書苑。 詹耀宗（1995）：科學教師教學中之語言行為：一位國民中學理化教師之詮釋性研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。（未出版） 趙居蓮譯（1997）：學習與教學（The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction）Robert M. Gagne著。台北市：心理出版社。 蘇懿生（2003）：融入概念發展的創造性問題解決教學模式對高中生物科的教學成效研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文。（未出版） Adamson, J. E. (1903). The Theory of Education in Plato’s Republic. London. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes personality and behavior. Chicago, IL: Dorsey Press. Albert Einstein (1934). Albert Einstein explains his new mass-energy theorem to reporters in Pittsburgh on Dec. 28, 1934. Photo from The New York Times. Albert Rothenberg. (1999). The Janusian Process in Scientific Creativity. Albert, R. S. (ed.) (1983). Genius Eminence ( New York： Pergamon ). Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J. & Huang, Iris. (1998). T-C. Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 48-62. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Cheng, C-C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Western Australia. International J. Science Education, 22(1), 37-55. Alexander, P. A. (1992). Domain Knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychology, 27, 33-51. Amabile, T. M. (1979). The motivation to be creative. In S. G. Isaken (ed.) Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basics (Buffalo, NY: Bearly) pp. 223-254. Amabile, T. M. (1985).Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399 Amabile, T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York:Springer-Verlag New York Incorporated. Anderson, D. R. (2002). Creative teachers: Risk, responsibility, and love. Journal of Education, 183(1), 33-48. Anderson, G. J. (1971). Effects of course content and teacher sex on the social climate of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 649-663. Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1974). Learning environment. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.), Evaluating educational performance: A source book of methods, instruments, and examples. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan. Anne Welle-Str and Arild TJeldvoll (2003). Creativity, Curricula and Paradigms Scandinavian. Journal of Educational of Educational Research, VOL. 47, No. 3. Armor, D., Conroy-Osequera, P. , Cox, M., King, N., Mcdonnel, L., Pascal, A., Pauley, E., & Zellman, G.(1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs In selected Los Angeles minority school. (R-2007-LAUSD). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Ashton, P. T., Webb, R. B., & Doda, N.(1983). A study of teacher’s sense of efficacy. Final Report, Executive Summary (NIE Contract 400-79-0075).Gainesville, FL: University of Florida (ERIC Document Reporduction Service No.ED231833). Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological modeling: Conflicting theories. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Towards a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215 Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy mechanism In human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147 Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Standford University. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476. Berman, P., & Mclaughlin. M. (1977). Factors affecting Implementation and continuation in Federal programs supporting educational change. V(Ⅶ). (Research Rep. No. R-1589/7-HEW). Santa Monica. CA: Rand Corporation. Bernice McCarthy (1987). The 4-MAT System. Teaching to Learning Styles with Right/ Left Mode Techniques. Boehmer, S., Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2007). Coping and quality of life after tumor surgery: Personal and social resources promote different domains of quality of life. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 20(1), 61-75. Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of Research on Strategies for Motivating Students To Learn. Educational Leadership, 40-48, EJ362226. Browenell, A.. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: Closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11-36. Brown, Bettina Lankard. (1999). Self-Efficacy Belief and Career Development. ERIC Digest No. 205. Cadzen, C. B. (1988).Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. Casey, B. M., & Tucker, E. C. (1994). Problem-centered classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(2), 139-143. Cattel, R. B. (1971). Abilities：Their Structure, Growth and Action (New York： Houghton Miflin). Chang, S. K. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: a preliminary validation study. Journalof Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118-134. Chen, C. P. (1997). Career Projection : Narrative In Context. Journal of Vocational Education and Training 49(2), 311-326. Cheng, C-C., Taylor, P. C., & Aldridge, J. M. (1998). Study on teachers’ beliefs about science and their effect on classroom environment in junior high school. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 383-402. Cronbach, L. J., ＆ Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitude and Instructional methods. New York: Irvington. Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: Producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21(4), 253-260. Csikszentmihalyi, M and Sawyer, K. (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In R. Steinberg and J. Davidson (Eds.) The Nature of Insight. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 329-361. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Haper Collins. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996).The Creative Personality [J].Psychology Today, 29(4):36. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective. In R.J. Sternberg (ed.) Handbook of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dahlgren, L. D., & Marton, F. (1978). Students’ conceptions of subject matter: An aspect of learning and teaching in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 3, 25-35. Daniel White, (1996). Research-Technology Management, (September October), pp. 31-35. De Souza Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and Student Perceptions of creativety in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153. Deepak Kulkarni, Herbert A. Simon (1988). The Processes of Scientific Discovery: The Strategy of Experimentation. Cognitive Science 12(2): 139-175. Dewey, J. (1902). The Child and the Curriculum: Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Dewey, J. (1991). How we think. Buffalo, New York: Prometheus Books. Domino, Schmuck, & Schneider William A. Therivel (2004). Comment - The Invalid Empirical Assessment of the GAM Theory by；Creativity Research Journal, V( 16), Nos. 2 & 3, 357-359. Driscoll, M. P. (2004). Psychology of Learning for Instruction. Dunbar (1995). Human Reproductive Decisions. Macmillan. Dunbar (1995). The Trouble With Science. Faber and Harvard University Press. Dunbar(ed) (1996). Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. Faber and Harvard University Press. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 65-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Dunbar, Knight, & Power (eds). (1999). The Evolution of Culture. Edinburgh University Press. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On –line creativity and conceptual change in science .In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought : An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-494). Washington. DC: APA. Einstein, A. and Infield, L. (1938). The Evolution of Physics ( New York：Simon & Schuster), p. 91. Enochs, L. G. & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief Instrument: A preservice elementary scale. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research In Science Teaching (63rd, Atlanta, GA, April 8-11, 1990). Epistemological foundations of cognition. Feist (1993). Passivhäuser in Mitteleuropa; Dissertation, Unversität Kassel GhK, Kassel 1993. [Feist 1994] Feist, Wolfgang: www.passivhaustagung.de/Passivhaus_D/DYNBIL.htm. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic andscientific creativity [A].Handbook of Creativity[C].In: Sternberg, R J (Eds) New York:Cambridge Press,.273-296. Feldman, D. H. (1986). Nature’s Gambit (New York：Basic Books). Feyerbend, (1970). Anarchistic theory. Findlay, C. S., & Lumsden (1988). The creative mind: Toward an evolutionary theory of discovery and innovation. Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 11, 3-55. Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning: IV. Effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244-257. Fraser, B. J. (1990). Individualized classroom environment questionnaire. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research. Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & Mcrobbie, C. J. (1996). Development, Validation and Use of personal and Class forms of a New Classroom Environment Instrument. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (New York, April). Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom environment instrument for senior high class science. Science Education, 67, 115-131. Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. C. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychological environment at university and college. Studies in Higher Education, 11, 43-54. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind：The Theory of Multiple Intelligence(New York：Basic Books). Gentry, M., & Spring, P.M. (2002). Secondary student perceptioms of their class activities regarding meaningful, challenge, choice, and appeal: An initial validation study. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. 8940, 192-204. Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1996). Experience of novice teachers: Changes In self-efficacy and their beliefs and teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, NY. April 8-12, 1996). Gregory J. Feist (1993). A Structural Model of Scientific Eminence. Psychological Science 4 (6), 366–371. Gregory J. Feist (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence.Vol. 4( 6), November. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newberry Park, CA: Sage. Guildford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. New York: Bearly. Habermas, J. (2001). Warum braucht Europa eine Verfassung? (Why does Europe need a constitution?). Lecture given to the University of Hamburg, 26 June, published in Die Zeit, 27. Retrieved Jan. 8, 2004, from http: // www.zeit.de/2001/27/Politik/200127_verfassung-lang. html. Hallden, O. (1988). The evolution of the species: Pupil perspectives and school perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 541-552. Haller, E., & Strike, K. (1986). An Introduction to Educational Administration. New York: Longman. Harper, B. (2004). Democratic learning environments: Information landscapes (Learning resources). Retrieved Jan. 8, from http://www. xpypsosac.edu.hk/uitweb/material/Workshop3/Infoland.htm. Heinrich Stumpf (1995). Scientific Creativity：A Short Overview；Educational Psychology Review, Vol 7, No. 3, 225-241. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequence: International differences In work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill. Holmes, B. & McLean, M. (1989). The Curriculum: a comparative perpective. London: Unwin Hyman Ltd. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social Support, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Hu, W. P., & Adey, P. (2002). A Scientivity creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403. Huang , Iris, T-C., Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. (1998). A cross-national study of perceived classroom environments in Taiwan and Western Australia: Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches, Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 343-663. Inkeles, C. I.,& Levinson, D. J.(1969).National character: The study of model personality and sociocultural systems. In G. Lindsay & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol.4).Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Isaken, S. G, & Parnes, S. J. (1985). Crrriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavipr, 19(1). 1-29. Isaken, S. G., Kenneth, J. L. Ekvall, G. & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184. J prod Innov Manag (1997). On the Psychology of Scientific Creativity.; 14:219-230. Elsevier Science Inc. 655 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010. Abstracts Editor: C. Anthony Di Benedetto, Temple University. J. W. Jamieson (1993). Concerning Scientific Creativity. Washington D.C.：Volume XXXIII, Number 4, Summer. Jack Block & Adam M. Kremen (1978). Absorption: Construct Explication by Q-Sort Assessments of Personality Institute of Human Development, University of California, Berkeley Jersalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor In stress appraisal processes. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Hemisphere. John L. Heilbron (1992). Creativity and big science. Physics Today, November. American Institute of Physics Johnson-Laid, P. N. (1987). Reasoning, imagining, and creating. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 121-129. Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and Micro- chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 337-379. Jorgensen, P. S. (2004). Children’s participation in a democratic learning. In J. MacBeath and L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Kevin Dunbar (1999). From the Encyclopedia of Creativity. Academic Press, 1, 1379-1384. McGill University (Now at Dartmouth College New Hampshire USA) Klahr, D. & Dunbar, K.(1988). Dual space during scientific reasoning Cognitive science, 12(1), 1-55. Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Gender and age differences in social support: A study on East German refugees. In G. Weidner, M. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender. NATO Science Series, Series I: Life and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 327. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Knoll, N., Rieckmann, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Coping as a mediator between personality and stress outcomes: A longitudinal study with cataract surgery patients. European Journal of Personality, 19, 229-247. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Ha Kuhn, T. (1991). The essential tension: tradition and innovation in scientific research. Labart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sterberg (ed.) Thinking and Problem Solving (London：Academic Press), pp. 289-332. Lacey, C. (1977). The Socialization of Teachers, London：Methuen. Lawson, A. E. (1979). Research on the acquisition of science knowledge. Leonard, Beauvais & Scholl’s (1995). Model of self concept-based motivation. Louis, K. S. (2004). Democratic values, democratic schools: Reflection in an international context. In J. MacBeath and L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning: The Challenge to School Effectiveness. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Lumsden, Linda S. (1994). Student Motivation to learn. ERIC Digest, Number 92. Luszczynska, A., Diehl, M., Gutiérrez Doña, B., Kuusinen, P., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Measuring one component of dispositional self-regulation: Attention control in goal pursuit. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 555-566. Luszczynska, A., Mohamed, N. E., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Self-efficacy and social support predict benefit finding 12 months after cancer surgery: The mediating role of coping strategies. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 10, 365-375. MacBeath, J. (2004). Democratic learning and school effectiveness. In J. MacBeath and L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Macpherson, C. B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Marisa R.L. (1998). Developing student self-efficacy in relation to motivation and academic achievement. Loyola Marymount University. EDUC 663 Sample Research Paper. Marlow (2002). Assessing teacher attitudes in teaching science. Journal of Instructional psychology, 29(1), 25-28. Marton, F. (1979). Skill as an aspect of knowledge. Journal of Higher Education, 50, 602-614. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Sciense, 10, 177-200. Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understaadings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28-49.Reprinted 1988 in R. R. Sherman & W. B. Webb (Eds). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods (pp. 141-161). London: falmer Press. Marton, F. (1988). Describing and improving learning. In R. R. schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 53-82). New York: Plenum Press. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaym. Marton, F., & Saljo. R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Euucational Psychology, 46, 4-11. Marton, F., & Svensson, L. (1979). Conceptions of research in student learning. Higher Education, 8, 471-486. Marton, F., & Wenestam, C.-G. (1978).Qualitative differences in the understanding and retention of the main point in some texts based on the principle example structure. In N. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 633-643). London: Scottish Acdemic Press. Marx, K. & Engles, F. (1974). The German Ideology. Part One. London: Lawrence & Wishart. Max Wertheimer (1945). Generalized Einstein’s point as follows: “The function of thinking is not just solving an actual problem but discovering envisaging.lib.ncue.edu.tw/exam/93/Td/eg01.doc Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creativity about science. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 26(1), 25-29. Michal.W. A. & James. A. B. (1999). In Democracy Schools: Lessons from the Chalk Face. Buckingham : Open University Press. Miller, A.I. (1996). Metaphors in creative scientific thought. Creativity Research Journal, 9(2 & 3), 113-130. Millers (1999). Physics in Perspective. Einstein’s first steps toward general relativity. Gedanken Experiments and Axiomatics, 85-104. Ministry of Education and Science (2002). A School for All. Stockholm: Ministry of Education and Science. Moos, L. (2004). Introduction. In J. MacBeath and L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Moos, R. H., & Tricketf, E. J. (1974). Classroom environment scale manual (1st ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Repter-Palmon, R. and Doares, l. M. (1991). Process analytic of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122. N. Russell Hanson. (1992). The Process of Scientific Creativity and Innovation. Publication No. L64-30.Industrial College of The Armed Forces Washington 25, D. C. National Competency Framework for Beginning Teaching, (1996). National Project on the Quality of Teaching and Learning. NBPTS (2000). The five proposition of accomplished teaching. Nersessian, N. J., Kurz-Milcke, E., & Davies, J. (1992). Ubiquitous computing in science and engineering research laboratories: A case study from biomedical engineering. To appear in G. Kouzoulis et al., (Eds.), In Use Knowledge: Information Technology. Ochse, R. (1990). Before the Gates of Excellence：The Determinants of Creative Genius (Cambridge：Cambridge University Press), p. 187. Pajares, F. & Valiante, G. (1997). Influence of self-efficacy on elementary students’ Writing. The Journal of Educational research, 90(6), 353-360. Pajares, M. F. (1992).Teacher’s beliefs and educational research: Cleaning Up a messy consturct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332. Pearson, A.. (1992). Teacher education in a democracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 24, 83-92. Peter Medawar (2004).South African Journal of Science 100. South African Journal of Science 100, May / June. Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. Technology Teacher, 61940, 7-10. Pontius, R. (1998). Correlation analysis and comparison of two self-efficacy Instruments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research In Science Teaching. (71st, San Diego, CA, April 19-22, 1998). Pullman, p. (2002). Give them a taste of honey, Times Educational Supplement, 8 February: 23. R.Aris, H. T.Davis, and R.H.Stuewer, Minneapolis, Minn. (1983). Springs of scientific creativity : essays of founders of modern science : University of Minnesota Prress. Ramesh Babu, Y. P. (1998). Singh Determinations of Research Productivity. Ramey-Gassert, L. et al. (1996). A qualitative study of factors Influencing science teaching self-efficacy of elementary level teachers. Science Education, 80(3), 283-315. Riley, K. (2004). Reforming for democratic schooling. In J. MacBeath & L. Moos (Eds.), Democratic learning: The challenge to school effectiveness. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Roberts, J. K., Henson, R. K. , Tharp, B. Z., & Moreno, N. (2000). An examination of change In teacher self-efficacy beliefs In science education based on the duration of Inservice activities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association (Dallas, TX, January 27-29, 2000). Runciman, Maynard Smith, & Dunbar (eds). (1997). Evolution of Culture and Language in Primates and Humans. British Academy Press. Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent Thinking (Norwood, NJ：Ablex). Russell, R.D. and C.J. Russell (1992). Creativity and Innovation Management, 15 (1), 45-62. Ryan D.Tweney (1996). Presymbolic processes in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 163–172. Ryan D.Tweney.(1996). Presymbolic processes in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 163–172. Scales for cross-cultural research. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universitat Berlin. Saljo, R. (1979a). Learning about learning . Higher education, 8, 443-451. Saljo, R. (1979b). Learning in the learning’s perspective: I. Some common-sense assumotions (Report No. 76). Goteborg, Sweden: Universiry of Goteborg, Institute of Education. Schröder, K. E. E., & Schwarzer, R. (2001). Do partners' personality resources add to the prediction of patients' coping and quality of life? Psychology & Health, 16(2), 139-159. Schröder, K. E. E., Schwarzer, R., & Endler, N. S. (1997). Predicting cardiac patients’ quality of life from the characteristics of their spouses. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(2), 231-244. Schröder, K. E. E., Schwarzer, R., & Konertz, W. (1998). Coping as a mediator in recovery from cardiac surgery. Psychology & Health., 13(1), 83-97. Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2003). Soziale Unterstützung bei der Krankheitsbewältigung: Die Berliner Social Support Skalen (BSSS) [Social support and coping with illness: The Berlin Social Support Scales [BSSS]). Diagnostica, 49(2), 73-82. Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 716-732. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1(3), 173-207. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Self-efficacy for learning and performance. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY. Schwartz, SH and Bilsky, W. (1990), Toward a Theory of the Universal Contentand Structure of Values Extensions and Cross - Cultural Replications, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, V(58), No.5, pp. 878-891. Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem M. (2000). General self-efficacy. Retrieved Jan. 8, 2004, from URL: //www. fu-berlin.de./gesund/skalen/g▁se.htm Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1993). Collective Teacher Self-Efficacy. Retrieved march 21, 2002, Retrieved Jan. 8, 2004, from URL : //C:\self-efficacy\ Collective Teacher Self-Efficacy.htm Schwarzer, R. (1993). Measurement of perceived self-efficacy. Psychometric Schwarzer, R. (1999). Self-regulatory processes in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors: The role of optimism, goals, and threats. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(2), 115-127. Schwarzer, R. (2000). Manage stress at work through preventive and proactive coping. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (Chpt. 24; pp. 342-355). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Schwarzer, R. (2001). Stress, resources, and proactive coping. Applied Psychology: An International Journal. 50, 400-407. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G. S., & Daytner, G. T.(1999).Collective Teacher Self-Efficacy. Retrieved Jan. 8, 2004, from URL ://C:\self-efficacy\ Collective Teacher Self-Efficacy.htm Schwarzer, R.(ed.).(1992). Self-efficacy.Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere. Schwarzer, R., & Gutiérrez-Doña, B. (2005). More spousal support for men than for women: A comparison of sources and types of support. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 52, 523-532. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). General Self-Efficacy Scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnstone, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35-37. Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON. Schwarzer, R., & Knoll, N. (2002). Positive coping: Mastering demands and searching for meaning (Chpt. 25). In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder, Handbook of positive psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2007). Self-Efficacy. In M. Gerrard & K.D. McCaul (Eds.) Health Behavior Constructs: Theory, Measurement, and Research. National Cancer Institute Website: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/constructs Schwarzer, R., & Rieckmann, N. (2002). Social support, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. In M. Kopp, G. Weidner, M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press. Schwarzer, R., & Schulz, U. (2002). The role of stressful life events. In A. M. Nezu, C. M. Nezu, & P. A. Geller (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, Vol. 9: Health psychology. New York: Wiley. Schwarzer, R., & Schwarzer, C. (1996). A critical survey of coping instruments. In M. Zeidner & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research and applications (pp. 107-132). New York: Wiley. Schwarzer, R., & Taubert, S. (2002). Coping with stress. In E. Frydenberg (Ed.), Beyond coping: Meeting goals, visions and challenges. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G. S., & Daytner, G. T. (1999). Collective Teacher Self-Efficacy. Retrieved Jan. 8, 2004, from URL ://C:\self-efficacy\ Collective Teacher Self-Efficacy.htm. fu-berlin.de./gesund/skalen/t▁se.htm. Schwarzer, R., Schmitz, G. S., & Daytner, G. T. (1999). Teacher Self-Efficacy. Retrieved Jan. 8, 2004, from URL: //www. fu-berlin.de./gesund/skalen/t▁se.htm. Scientometrics, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.309-329. Scott, J. E. (1996). Self-efficacy: A key to literacy learning. Horizon, 36(3), 195-213. She, H. C. (1998). The development and validation of the teacher-student interaction questionnaire (TSIQ) in the secondary science classroom learning environment. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 403-416. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Fundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1-22. Simon, H. A. & Newell, A. H. (1972). Problem Solving：New Jersey：Prentice-Hall. Simonton.Ｄ.Ｋ.(1988). Donald Campell’s model of the creative process : creativity as blind variation and selective retention. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(3), 153-158. Smylie, M. A. (1990). Teacher efficacy at work. In P. Reyes (Ed.). Teachers and their work place: Commitment performance, and productivity. Newbury Park. CA: Sage, 48-66. Stemberg, R. J., & William, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity. Alexandria, VA: association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful Intelligence (New York：Basic Books). Stewart, S. M., & Schwarzer, R. (1996). Stability of coping in Hong Kong medical students: A longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(2), 245-255. Subrata Dasgupta (2003). Multidisciplinary creativity: the case of Herbert A. Simon Cognitive Science 27 683–707. Sulaiman Al-Balushi (2002).Correction fluid to correct your creativity. Science Activities 38 No4 Wint 2002 16-21, The H.W. Wilson Company. Swan & Sonnenschein. Svensson, L. (1976). Study skill and learning. Goteborg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. Svensson, L. (1977). On qualityative differences inlearning: Ⅲ. Study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233-243. Tan, A. G. (2001). Singaporean teachers? Perception of activities useful for forstering creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(2), 131-148. Taylor, P. C. & Fraser, B. J. (1991). Development for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Chicago, Illinois. Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual Revolutions. Med. Libr.Assoc., 78(1):29-37. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (Beaconville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services). Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. psychological Review, 96, 506-520. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing and elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-800. Tuan, H-L., Wang, K-H., & Chang, H-P. (1998). Development of students perceptions of teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge questionnaire. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 129-147. Tuang, H. L., Chang, H. P., Wang, K. H., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). The development of a questionnaire for assessing student perceptions of teachers knowledge in Taiwan and Australia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, Illinois. Voelkl, K. E. (1995). School Warmth, Student Partipation, and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 127-138. von Wright, G. H. (1979). Explanation and understanding. London:RKP. Walberg, Herbert., and others(1980). A Meta-Analysis of Productive Factors In Science Learning Grades 6 Through 12. Chicago, IL：University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, June ED 197939 Wallace, J., Venville, G. B., & Chou, C-Y. (2002). Cooperate is when you don’t fight: Students’ understandings of their classroom learning environment. Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 5, 133-153. Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanvich. Welle-Str and Arild TJeldvoll (2003). Creativity, Curricula and Paradigms. Anne Scandinavian Journal of Educational of Educational Research, 47(3). Welsch, P. K. (1981).The nurturance of creative behavior in educational environments：A comprehensive curriculum approach. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(9), 3870A (University Microfilms No.81-06456). Wildy, H. (1999). Statues, lenses and crystals: Look at qualitative research. Educational Research and Perspectives, 26(2), 61-72. Willams, J. E. (1994). Gender differences In high school students’ efficacy-expection / performance discrepancies across four subject matter domains. Psychology in the School, 31, 232-273. Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91. Yang, J-H., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). A collaborative research on science classroom environments in Taiwan and Western Australia: Framework, method and implication to Taiwan’s science education. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 325-342. Zahn, G. L., Kagan, S., & Wideman, K. F. (1986). Cooperative Learning and Classroom Climate. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 351-362. Zhou, J., Old ham, G. R. (2001). Enhancaing creative performance: Effects of expected developmental assessment strategries and creative personality. Journal of Creatve Behavior, 35(3), 151-167. Ziegelmann, J. P., Luszczynska, A., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2007). Are goal intentions or implementation intentions better predictors of health behavior? A longitudinal study in orthopedic rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 97-102.