參考文獻
一、中文部分
丁一顧（2004）。臨床視導對國小實習教師教學效能影響之研究。台北市立教育大學國民教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
方德隆（1999）。課程與教學研究。高雄市：復文。
王保進（2006a）。從專業評鑑機構標準發展檢視我國大學評鑑標準。教育政策論壇，9（1），43-68。王保進（2006b）。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北巿：心理。
王靜如（1999）。美國國家科學教育標準有關科學教學的探究。屏師科學教育，9，24-30。
白碧香（2004）。幼稚園實習輔導教師實施臨床視導之研究。國立新竹教育大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
江蔥（2005）。台北縣國小教師對臨床視導之需求性研究。台北市立教育大學教育行政與評鑑研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
呂木琳（2002）。教學視導-理論與實務（二版）。台北巿：五南。
呂永財（2005）。「國民中小學教師教學專業能力指標」應用於專業發展導向教師評鑑之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
余榮仁（2000）。學校本位教師評鑑制度之研究--評鑑者與被評鑑者間之反省性合作行動探究。臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2006）。SPSS與統計應用分析（二版）。台北巿：五南。
吳清山（1990）。臨床視導在教育實習上的應用。載於中華民國師範教育學會（主編），師範教育政策與問題（頁185-200）。台北巿：師大書苑。
吳清山、張素偵（2002）。教師評鑑：理念、挑戰與策略。載於中華民國師範教育學會（主編），師資培育的政策與檢討（頁177-192）。台北巿：學富文化。吳清山、林天祐（2000）。教育名詞：臨床視導。教育資料與研究，32，74。
吳清山、林天祐（2003）。教育名詞解釋：教師專業化。教育研究月刊，112，164。
吳林輝（1999）。臨床視導在台北市國中實習教師教學輔導之需求性研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。吳政原（2004）。國小初任教師第一年教師評鑑指標之建構。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。李奉儒（2006）。國中小學教師評鑑機制規劃之芻議：英國的經驗與啟示。教育研究與發展期刊，2（3），193-216。李明怡（2006）。宜蘭縣國民小學實施學校本位教師評鑑之研究。國立花蓮教育大學/學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。
李昆璉（2007）。國小教師專業發展評鑑歷程之個案研究~石頭坑的故事。國立新竹教育大學人資處學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
李承憲（2009）。嘉義與台南縣市國民小學實施教師專業發展評鑑之研究。國立嘉義大學教育行政與政策發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。
林志成（2002）。授能導向的專業發展評鑑。教育政策論壇，5（2），81-101。林劭仁（2008）。教育評鑑標準的發展與探索。台北巿：心理。
林榮彩（2002）。高雄市國小教師專業評鑑實施意見之研究。台南師範學院教師在職進修學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。
邱錦昌（1995）。教育視導之理論與實際。臺北市：五南。
周紋如（2008）。台東縣國小試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施現況與教師專業成長關係之研究。國立臺東大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺東市。
胡芳智（2003）。同儕視導對教師教學語言行為發展之研究。國立新竹師範學院課程與教學碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
柯嚴賀（2001）。國民小學教師考績制度現況與改進之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
高強華（1995）。論提升教師專業成長的「教師評鑑」。載於中國教育學會主編，教育評鑑（頁247-272）。台北市：師大書苑。高雄市政府教育局（2000）。高雄市高級中等以下學校教師專業評鑑試行要點。高雄教育簡訊，21，8。
高雄市政府教育局（2001）。高雄市各國小八十九學年度教師專業評鑑檢核情形。高雄市各級學校實施教師教學評鑑說明會，高雄市政政府教育局第三科。
洪瑞富（2008）。中部地區國民小學教師專業發展評鑑試辦情形及相關問題之研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
施樹宏（2004）。國小教師評鑑規準及實施程序之研究∼以台北市為例。國立台北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
胡久樹（2006）。國民小學初任教師評鑑指標建構之研究。國立台灣海洋大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，基隆市。
教育部（2006）。教育部補助試辦教師專業發展評鑑實施計畫。台北巿：作者。
教育部（2008）。公立高級中等以下學校教師成績考核辦法。台北巿：作者。
教育部（2009）。教育部補助辦理教師專業發展評鑑實施要點。台北巿：作者。
教育部（2007）。高級中等以下學校教師專業發展評鑑手冊。潘慧玲、張素貞、吳俊憲、張錫勳、陳順和、李美穗等編，未出版。
張春興（1995）。張氏心理學辭典（二版）。台北巿：東華。
張淑芬（2008）。教師專業發展評鑑運作與影響之研究-以歡樂國小為例。玄奘大學教育人力資源與發展學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
張清濱（2005）。教學視導與評鑑。台北巿：五南。張新仁（2004）。談加強教師培育及專業成長。教育資料與研究，58，8-16。張新仁（2005）。中小學教師教學評鑑工具之發展編製。載於潘慧玲主編，教育評鑑回顧與展望（頁91-130）。台北市：心理。
張新仁（2006）。教師專業發展評鑑指標。載於高雄縣政府教育局主辦「高雄縣試辦教師專業發展評鑑初階培訓研習」手冊（頁28-32）。高雄縣：教育局。
張新仁、馮莉雅、邱上真（2004）。發展中小學教師評鑑工具之研究。教育資料集刊，29，247-269。張德銳（1992）。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。載於中華民國師範教育學會（主編），教育專業（頁241-284）。臺北市：師大書苑。張德銳（1998）。美國教學專業化的三個機制作用及其借鏡。初等教育學刊，6，59-80。張德銳（1999a）。我國中小學教師評鑑的檢討與展望。師友，381，5-8。張德銳（1999b）。新書評介：教師臨床視導的技巧--職前教師及在職教師適用。課程與教學季刊，2（2），131-136。
張德銳（2000a）。師資培育與教師評鑑。臺北市：師大書苑。張德銳（2000b）。臺北市中等學校學校本位教學輔導工作坊訓練手冊。臺北市：教育局。
張德銳（2003a）。中小學初任教師的教學輔導與考核。課程與教學季刊，6（3），67-86。張德銳（2003b）。實習輔導的三個利器。載於實習輔導：培育明日的專業良師（頁2-18）。
張德銳（2004a）。專業發展導向教師評鑑的規劃與推動策略。教育資料集刊，29，169-193。
張德銳（2004b）。中學教師教學專業發展系統。台北市：五南。張德銳（2004c）。教學檔案促進教師專業發展。台北市：高等教育。
張德銳、吳林輝、賴佳敏、余瑞陽、邱春堂、楊士賢、張清楚（1999）。臨床視導在國小實習教師教學輔導之需求性研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC 88-2413-H-133-004）。行政院國家科學委員會。張德銳、蔡秀媛、許藤繼、江啟昱、李俊達、蔡美錦、李柏佳、陳順和、馮清皇、賴志鋒（2000）。發展性教學輔導系統-理論與實務。台北市：五南。
張德銳、丁一顧、高紅瑛、李俊達、許雅惠、陳信夫（2003）。台北市國民小學教師輔導教師制度九十一學年度實施成效評鑑報告。台北市立師範學院初等教育學系。張德銳、李俊達、蔡雅玲（2004）。國小初任教師教學檔案對教學省思與教學效能影響之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告（NSC 92-2413-H133-002）。台北市立師範學院。張德銳、丁一顧（2005）。教學臨床視導對新進教師教學效能影響之研究。當代教育研究，13（3），149-180。陳白玲（2003）。國民小學校長對教師評鑑態度之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
陳怡君（2003）。國民小學教師評鑑之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
陳麗莉（2003）。發展性教學輔導系統應用研究-一位國小實習教師教學成長歷程。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
梁一成（2003）。教師評鑑之研究--以快樂國小教師教學檔案為例。國立臺東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺東市。
許正宗（2002）。國民小學初任教師臨床視導之個案研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
許明峰（2005）。國民小學教師評鑑手冊建構之研究。國立新竹教育大學進修部學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
許德便（2004）。南部地區國中教師對教師評鑑制度態度之研究。台南師範學院教師在職進修課程與教學碩士學位班碩士論文，未出版，臺南市。
傅木龍（1998）。英國中小學教師評鑑制度研究及其對我國之啟示。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北市。馮莉雅（2001）。國中教師教學效能評鑑之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄市。馮佩玲（2008）。國民中學試辦教師專業發展評鑑之個案研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
曾淑惠（2002）。教育方案評鑑。台北市：師大書苑。
曾憲政、張新仁、張德銳、許玉齡、馮莉雅、陳順和、劉秀慧（2007）。中小學教師專業發展評鑑規準之研究。教育部委託專案研究。新竹市：國立新竹教育大學。
湯誌龍（2001）。中小學教師評鑑制度之研究-澳洲維多利亞省的實施經驗。比較教育，51，105-127。黃春滿（2004）。實施臨床視導對國中國文教師教學專業成長影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學國文系在職進修碩士學位班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃昆輝（1979）。台北市高職教師態度與教學問題之調查分析。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊，22，189-330。
黃德祥（2000）。推展教師評鑑與教育視導提昇教師專業品質。發表於國立高雄師範大學主辦之「建立學生輔導新體制」學術研討會，高雄市。
黃德祥、薛秀宜（2004）。教師評鑑的模式與發展趨勢。教育研究月刊，127，18-32。葉麗錦（2003）。高雄市國小教師專業評鑑實施現況與教師專業成長關係之研究。屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。
楊憲勇（2009）。臺北縣國民中學試辦教師專業發展評鑑之個案研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
楊麗珠（2005）。台中市國民小學教育人員對教師評鑑意見之研究。台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺中市。
劉美慧、黃嘉莉、康玉琳（2008）。臺灣中小學教師評鑑方案之分析。載於潘慧玲﹙主編﹚，教師評鑑理論與實務﹙頁197-225﹚。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
潘慧玲（2003）。緒論：轉變中的教育研究觀點。載於潘慧玲﹙主編﹚，教育研究的取徑：觀念與應用﹙頁1-34﹚。臺北市：高等教育。
潘慧玲、王麗雲、簡茂發、孫志麟、張素貞、張錫勳、陳順和（2004）。發展國民中小學教師專業能力指標之研究（普及版）。教育部國教司委託專案報告。台北市：國立臺灣大學師範大學教育研究中心。潘慧玲、張素貞、吳俊憲、張錫勳、陳順和、李美穗（2007）。高級中等以下學校教師專業發展評鑑手冊。教育部。
潘慧玲、王麗雲、張素貞、鄭淑惠、林純雯（2007）。高級中等以下學校試辦教師專業發展評鑑之後設評鑑規劃研究。教育部國教司委託專案報告。台北市：國立臺灣大學師範大學教育政策與行政研究所。
潘慧玲、張德銳、張新仁（2008a）。臺灣中小學教師評鑑/專業標準之建構：成果篇。載於潘慧玲﹙主編﹚，教師評鑑理論與實務﹙頁281-298﹚。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
潘慧玲、張德銳、張新仁（2008b）。臺灣中小學教師評鑑/專業標準之建構：歷程篇。載於潘慧玲﹙主編﹚，教師評鑑理論與實務﹙頁229-279﹚。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心。
歐陽教、高強華、王秋絨、李春芳、張德銳（1992）。教師評鑑模式之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心。蔡志鏗（2004）。一位實習教師專業成長故事--臨床視導之個案研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
蔡美錦（2005）。臨床視導對國民小學英語教師教學專業成長歷程之個案研究。台北市立教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
蔡培村（1999）。終身學習教師的發展與培育。教育資料集刊，24，101-120。賴廷生（2002）。國小實施發展性教學輔導之研究-以二位實習教師為例。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
賴政國（2001）。國小教師臨床教學視導之行動研究。國立臺北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
蕭美智（2004）。校長實施臨床視導之研究--以台北縣快樂國小為例。國立台北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
謝文全（1989）。教育行政--理論與實際。台北市：文景出版社。
鍾禮章（2003）。國民中學實施教師專業評鑑制度之研究。國立政治大學學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
簡茂發（2002）。國民中小學教師教學專業發展之研究。台北市：財團法人李連教育基金會。
顏國樑（2003）。從教師專業發展導向論實施教師評鑑的策略。教育資料集刊，28，259-286。
蘇錦麗（1997）。高等教育評鑑理論與實際。台北市：五南。饒見維（2003）。教師專業發展-理論與實務（二版）。台北市：五南。
二、外文部分
Acheson, K. A. , & Gall, M. (1997). Techniques in the clinical supervision of teachers(4th ed.). New York: Longman.
Acheson, K. A. , & Gall, M. (2003). Clinical supervision and teacher development- Preservice and inservice application(5th ed.). (Rev. ed. of: Technigues in the clinical supervision of teachers(4th ed.)). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Babbie, E. R. (2001). The practice of social research (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
Baume, D. (2001). A briefing on assessment of portfolios. LTSN Generic Centre, Assessmentseries No. 6. York: Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN).
Bollington, R. , Hopkins, D. , & West, M. (1990). An introducetion to teacher appraiseal. London: Cassel.
Borich, G. D. (2004). Effective teaching methods(5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Bourgeois,M. R. L.（2006）.Superintendents’ perceptions of clinical supervision practices in a district-wide implementation program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,The University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS.
Brandt, C. , Thomas, J. , & Burke, M. (2008). State Policies on Teacher Evaluation Practices in the Midwest Region. REL Technical Brief. REL 2008-No. 004. Retrieved August 3 , 2008 , from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/3e/77/71.pdf
Briggs, A. D. (1985). Teachers’and administrators’perceptions of clinical supervision. (EdD dissertation, Northern Arizona University, 1985). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT8517604.
Brown, G. , & Irby, B. J. (2001). The principal portfolio (second edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Burnham, B. R. (1995). Strategies for evaluation people. In B. R. Burnham (Ed.) Evaluating human resources, programs, and organizations, (pp. 33-44). Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Burroughs, R. (2001). Composing standards and composing teachers. The problem of National Board Certification. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 223-232.
Burroughs, R. , Schwartz, T. A. , & Hendricks-Lee, M. (2000). Communities of practices and discourse communities: negotiating boundaries in NBPTS certification. Teachers College Record, 102, 346-376.
Caruso, M. (1993). An evaluation of a clinical supervision course format. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 395225).
Center for Instructional Development and Research (2003). Approaches to assessment of teaching.
Clayson, D. E. (2005). Within-Class Variability in Student-Teacher Evaluations: Examples and Problems. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3(1), 109-124. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 869186951).
Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Coolidge, K. W.（2005）. Teacher and supervisor reflections: A case study of interpersonal process recall (IPR) and clinical supervision. DAI-B, 65(12). (University Microfilms No. AAT 31-64984).
Council of Chief State School Officers(2007). Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). Retrieved August 12, 2007 , from http://www.ccsso.org/projects/Interstate_New_Teacher_Assessment_and_Support_Consortium/.
Creswell, J. W. (1998).Qualitative inquiry and research design : choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crooks, T. (2003). Some criteria for intelligent accountability applied to accountability in New Zealand. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational research Association. Chicago.
Danielson, C.(1996). Enhancing professional practice：A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA：Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Danielson, C. , & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation: To enchance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Darling-Hammond, L. , & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 523-545.
Darling-Hammond, L. , Wise, A. E. , & Pease, S. R. (1983). Teacher evaluation in the organizational context: A review of the literature. Review of Education Research, 53(3), 285-325.
Department for Children, Schools and Families(2007). Statutory Guidance on Induction for Newly Qualified Teachers in England. London: Author.
Department of Education & Training(2008a). Salaries and teaching levels. Retrieved January 5, 2008 , from http://www.det.wa.edu.au/teachingwa/detcms/navigation/working-in-a-public-school/salaries-and-teaching-levels/.
Department of Education & Training(2008b). Graduate teachers. Retrieved January 5, 2008 , from http://www.det.wa.edu.au/teachingwa/detcms/navigation/current-public-school-teachers-and-administrators/graduate-teachers/.
Department of Education and Science(1991). School teacher appraisal (Circular 12/91). London: HMSO.
Department for Education and Employment (1998). Teaching and Higher Education Act 1998. London: the Stationery Office Bookshops.
Department for Education and Skills (2006a).2001 Induction Standards. Retrieved November 1, 2006 , from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/ professional development/induction /standards/.
Department for Education and Skills (2006b).2003 Induction Standards. Retrieved November 1, 2006 , from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/ professional development/induction /standards/.
Duke, D. L. (1990). Teaching an introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Duke, D. L. & Stiggins, R. J. (1986). Teacher Evaluating: Five Keys to Growth. Washington, D. C. : National Education Association .
Eisner, E. (1982). An Artistic Approach to Supervision. In T.J. Sergiovanni(Ed.). Supervision of Teaching: 1982 ASCD Yearbook(pp. 53-66). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ellett, C. D. , & Garland, J. S. (1987). Teacher evaluation practices in our largest school districts: are they measuring up to“state-of-the-art”systems? Journal of PersonnelEvaluation in Education, 1(1), 69-92.
Evaluator Training Manual. (2002). Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Education.
Feldvebel, A. M. (1980). Teacher Evaluation: Ingredients of a Credible Model. The Clearing House, 53, 416-420.
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley.
Franco, J. C. (1990). Training and implementation of clinical supervision in the State of Alaska. (EdD dissertation, University of San Francisco, 1990). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT9109282.
Fuller, F. F.（1969）. Concerns of teacher: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.
Fussell, D. R. (1985). Relationships between clinical supervision practices and leadership style of elementary school principals. (EducatD dissertation, University of Wyoming, 1985). ProQuest Digital Dissertations,
Gallagher, H. A. (2004). Vaughn Elementary's Innovative Teacher Evaluation System: Are Teacher Evaluation Scores Related to Growth in Student Achievement? PJE. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 79. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 1082481371).
Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond Testing. London: The Falmer Press.
Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for learning: How to help teacher succeed. Alexandria, VA:association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Goldhammer, R. , Anderson, R. H. , & Krajewski, R. J. (1993). Clinical supervision-special methods for the supervision of teacher. (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Goddard, H. J. (2004). Elementary music teachers' and principals' perceptions of music teacher evaluation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(08), 2932A. (UMI No. 3144268)
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Harris, B. M. (1985). Supervisory behavior in education(3rd ed.). Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harris, B. M. , & Hill, J. (1982). The DeTEK handbook. National Educational Laboratory.
Harrison, M. J. (1994). Quality issues in higher education: A post-modern phenomenon? In G.D. Doherty(Ed.). Developing quality system in education(pp. 52-67), London: Routledge.
Heneman, H. G. , Milanowski, A. T. (2003). Continuing Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(2), 173-195. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 654497311).
Holodisk, N. A. (1988). Clinical supervision practices as reported by elementary school principals. (EdD dissertation, Temple University, 1988). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT8818800.
Holtzapple, E. (2003). Criterion-Related Validity Evidence for a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(3), 207-219. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 865999411).
Holsack-Curlin, K. (1988). Using peer coaching to improve the implementation of a process approach to writing instruction: A clinical supervision model. (PhD dissertation, University of South Florida, 1988). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT8819359.
Hunter, M. (1983). Script taping：An essential supervisory tool. Educational Leadership, 41(3). 43.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Suppport Consortium(1992). Model Standards for Beginning Teacher Licensing, Assessment and Development: A Resource for State Dialogue. Washington,D.C. : Author.
Iowa Department of Education(2002a). A Model Framework for Designing a Local Staff Evaluation System Based on the Iowa Teaching Standards and Criteria. Retrieved July 15 , 2006 , from http://www.iowaccess.org/educate/ecese/tqt/tc/doc/evalmodv2.doc
Iowa Department of Education(2002b). Teacher Quality. Retrieved July 15 , 2006 , from http://www.iowaccess.org/educate/ecese/tqt/tc/index.html
Iowa Department of Education(2002c). Iowa Teaching Standards and Model Criteria. Des Moines, IA: Author.
Iwanicki, E. F. (1981). Contract plans:A professional growth-oriented approach to evaluating teacher performance. In J. Mllman (Ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation(pp. 203-228). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Iwanicki, E. F. (1990). Teacher evaluation for school improvement. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond(Eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teacher（pp.158-174）. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation(2007). The Personnel Evaluation Standards. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kelly, C. (2006). Teacher evaluation and its relationship to teacher practice and student achievement in a successful urban middle school: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(10), 3667A. (UMI No. 3237735)
Kent, S. I. (2001). Supervision of student teachers: Practices of cooperating teachers prepared in a clinical supervision course. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 6(3), 228-244.
Kimball, S. M. (2001). Innovations in teacher evaluation: Case studies of two school districts with teacher evaluation systems based on the Framework for Teaching. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(11), 3641A. (UMI No. 3033269)
Kimball, S. M. , White, B. , Milanowski, A. T. , & Borman, G. (2004). Examining the Relationship Between Teacher Evaluation and Student Assessment Results in Washoe County. PJE. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 54. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 1082481331).
La Masa, M. E. (2005). An elementary school's perceptions of the effectiveness of teacher evaluation to enhance teacher practice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(06), 2045A. (UMI No. 3180461)
Langmuir, D. A. (1998). Making sense of teacher collaboration: A case study of two teachers’ engagement in clinical supervision. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia(Canada).
Lansman, R. R. (2006). A case study of teacher evaluation and supervision at a high-achieving urban elementary school. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(09), 3247A. (UMI No. 3233791)
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Linde, C. H. (1998). Clinical supervision in teacher evaluation: A pivotal factor in the quality management of education. ProQuest Education Journals, 119(2), 328-335.
Loup, K. S. , Garland, J. S. , Ellett, C. D. , & Rugutt, J. K. (1996). Ten years later: findings from a replication of a study of teacher evaluation practices in our 100 largest school districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10(3), 203–26.
Mabry, L. (1999). Portfolio Plus- a critical guide to alternative assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Machell, J. R. (1991). The teacher evaluation environment: An examination of attributes related to teacher growth. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(07), 2350A. (UMI No. 9135051)
Mackie, D. J. (1998). Collegial observation: An alternative teacher evaluation strategy using cognitive coaching to promote professional growth and development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(03), 0678A. (UMI No. 9826689)
Marshall, C. , & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing Qualitative Research(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McGreal, T. L. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Milanowski, A. T. , Heneman, H. G. (2001). Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System: A Pilot Study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 193. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 355896751).
Miller, W. L. , & Crabtree, B. F. (1992). In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller(Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 3-30). Newbury Park, Calif. : Sage
Millman, J. (1981). Student Achievement as a Measure of Teacher Competence. In J. Millman(Ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation (pp. 146-166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mosca, G. F. (2003). A case study investigating a teacher evaluation plan as a professional development initiative. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(03), 747A. (UMI No. 3085512)
Mosher, R. L. , & Purpel. D. E. (1972). Supervision-The reluctant profession. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Muhonen-Hernandez, V. (2005). California teacher evaluation and improved teacher practice. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(06), 2050A. (UMI No. 3180452)
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards(2006). What teachers should know and be able to do. Retrieved July 21, 2006, from http://www.nbpts.org/pdf/coreprops.pdf
National Commission on Educational Excellence (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Retrieved July 12, 2006, from http://www.goalline.org/Goal%20Line/NatAtRisk.html
Oser, F. (1998). Standards in teacher training. European Education, 30(2), 20-25.
Ovando, M. N. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 213. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 355896821).
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Perez-Orozco, J. (2005). Teacher evaluation and its impact on teacher practices (California). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(06), 2053A. (UMI No. 3180338)
Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher evaluation : a comprehensive guide to new directions and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Peterson, K. D. , Wahlquist, C. , Brown, J. E. , & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2003). Parent Surveys for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(4), 317-330. Retrieved August 1, 2007, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 975794631).
Popham, W. J. (1973). Evaluating Instruction. Englewood. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the test? Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16-20.
Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction to social research : quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raths, J. (1999). A consumer’s guide to teacher standards. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(2), 136-142.
Rodriguez, A. J. D. (1991). The relationship between clinical supervision practices and instructional leadership of elementary principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.
Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing reflective approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 22-30.
Santos-Camerino, C. (2005). Teacher evaluation and its impact on teacher practice (California). Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(06), 2057A. (UMI No. 3180381)
Schalock, H. D. (1998). Student progress in learning : Teacher responsibility, accountability and reality. Journal of Personnel Evaluation ,12(3), 237-246.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schumacher, G. T. (2004). Perceptions of the impact of a standards-based teacher evaluation system, based on the Danielson "Framework for Teaching" model, on teaching and student learning (Charlotte Danielson). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65(04), 1205A. (UMI No. 3128070)
Scime, J. (1984). The conflict between evaluation and supervision: A study of a clinical supervision program designed to link instruction, supervision, and evaluation to staff development (Dundee, Illinois). (EdD dissertation, Peabody College for Teacher of Vanderbilt University, 1984). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT8419264.
Scriven, M. (1967).The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven(Eds. ), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation(pp. 39-83). Chicago : Rand McNally.
Scriven, M. (1972). An introduction to meta-evaluation. In P. A. Taylor, & D. M. Cowley,(Eds.). Readings in curriculum evaluation (pp.84-86). Dubuque, Iowa: W. C. Brown.
Scriven, M. (1973). Educational evaluation: Theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Scriven, M. (1994). Duties of the teacher. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8,151-184.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1982). Clinical Supervision and Teacher Evaluation. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Shinkfield, A. J. , & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1995). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Smith, K. (2005). New methods and perspectives on teacher evaluation. In D. Beijaard, P. C. Meijer, G. Morine-Dershimer, & H. Tillema, (Eds.), Teacher Professional Development in Changing Conditions(pp. 95-114). Dordrecht : Springer.
Smith, K. , & Tillema, H. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41(2), 193-205.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Steinhaus, L. M. (1987). Clinical and nonclinical supervision practices in Wyoming schools. (EdD dissertation, University of Wyoming, 1987). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT8813316.
Stronge, J. H. (2006). Teacher evaluation and school improvement. In J.H. Stronge (Ed.). Evaluating teaching : a guide to current thinking and best practice. (2nd ed.). (pp. 1-23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Stronge, J. H. & Tucker, P. D. (2003). Handbook on teacher evaluation: Assessing and improving performance. Larchmont, N.Y. : Eye On Education.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1974). Toward a technology for evaluating evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED090319.).
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). Personnel evaluations metaevaluation checklist(based on the personnel evaluation standards). Retrieved January 7, 2008, from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists/personnel_metaeval.pdf
Torbet, R. P. (1988). How extensively and in what forms is clinical supervision being used in Colorado public elementary schools. (PhD dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder, 1988). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT8912227.
Training and Development Agency for Schools(2007a). Professional Standards for Teachers in England from September 2007. Retrieved November 26, 2007 , from http://www.tda.gov.uk/upload/resources/pdf/i/introduction_to_standards.pdf.
Training and Development Agency for Schools(2007b).Supporting the Induction Process: Guidance for Newly Qualified Teachers. Retrieved November 26, 2007 , from http://www.tda.gov.uk/teachers/induction/corestandardsandassessment/corestandards.aspx.
Traynor-Nilsen, P. (2006). The teacher evaluation process: Impacts and implications on teacher behavior in the classroom. A case study on the link between teacher evaluation and the student success in a California elementary school. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67(09), 3260A. (UMI No. 3233804)
Tucker, P. D. , Stronge, J. H. , Gareis, C. R. , & Beers, C. S. (2003). The efficacy of portfolios for teacher evaluation and professional development: Do they make a difference? Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(5), 572-602. Retrieved May 1, 2009, from ProQuest Education Journals database. (Document ID: 664605061).
Turner, G. & Clift, P. S. (1988). Studies in teacher appraisal. London: Falmer.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The university of Chicago Press.
Unruh, A. , & Turner, H. E. (1970). Supervision for change and innovation. Boston : Houghton Mifflin.
Vinson, B. M. (1995). A comparison of sense of efficacy before and after clinical experience for pre-student teaching novices in an elementary methods program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service. No. ED394914.).
Wagner, N. L.(2001). Clinical supervision as a mechanism for observing and discussing teacher leadership capacities. Dissertation Abstracts Internation.（University microfilms NO.3021382）
Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (1993). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Weller, R. H. (1971). Verbal Communication in Instructional Supervision. New York: Teachers College Press.
Wheeler, P. , & Haertel, G. D. (1993). Resource Handbook on Performance Assessment and Measurement: A Tool for Students, Practitioners, and Policymakers. Berkeley, CA: Owl Press. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 367686)
Wheeler, P. H. , & Scriven, M. (2006). Building the Foundation: Teacher Roles and Responsibilities. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.). Evaluating teaching : A guide to current thinking and best practice. (2nd ed.). (pp. 27-53). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Wiles, J. , & Bondi, J. (1986). Supervision: A guide to practice. (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Williams, F. F. (1993). Clinical supervision implementation strategies and behavioral changes: An ethnography of elementary school personnel. (PhD dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University and San Diego State University, 1993). ProQuest Digital Dissertations, AAT9330368.
Wilson, A. , & Pitman, L. (2001). Best practice handbook for Australian university libraries. Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
Wolf, K. (2006). Portfolio in teacher evaluation. In J. H. Stronge (Ed.). Evaluating teaching : a guide to current thinking and best practice. (2nd ed.). (pp. 168-185). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and metheds(3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.