自我控制運動技能學習之個別差異:學習者時間感、時間壓力及享樂感_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	自我控制運動技能學習之個別差異:學習者時間感、時間壓力及享樂感
作者：	紀穎華
作者(外文)：	Ying Hwa KEE
校院名稱：	國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱：	體育學系
指導教授：	劉有德
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2009
主題關鍵詞：	自我調節學習；人格；學習；個人因素；self-regulated learning；personality；learning；individual factors
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:96

即便過去有關動作學習上的個別差異問題已廣泛的被探討 (Adams, 1987)，但以心理學為基礎，探討動作學習的個別差異卻至今仍不受到重視，研究者相信從心理學層次的觀點探詢學習差異，對於研究與實務應用都有重要的啟示。在本論文研究重点在于探讨学习者在时间感上的心理与他们在自我控制学习上表现行为的关系。研究者推論不同型態的學習者對時間的覺察方式會有所不同，而學習行為將潛意識地受到時間覺察方式的影響. 本論文聚焦於檢驗自我控制學習的個別差異，亦即受試者可以自由控制任務難度。具體而言，本研究檢驗三種不同的學習組型（上下调整形、保守型及固执型）在時間感、不同知覺時間壓力下的行為以及享樂感的差異。32位受試者皆完成歷時五天（每天50次試作）的遙遙球自我控制學習，受試者在每一次嘗試中都可以自由選擇任務難度，受試者依照他們的學習行為被劃分為三種不同的學習組型。結果顯示在完成了五天的練習後，保守型學習者在後测的当下宿命(present fatalism)較前测為低，知覺時間壓力則是隨著不同的學習類型者，而在不同天達到高峰。本研究亦觀察到在五天練習中，不同的學習類型者的行為表現有所差異。最後結果亦發現上下调整形在最後一天的練習中，有最高的享樂感得分。由於學習的個別差異可在自我控制的動作學習中被系統性地觀察，研究者認為未來研究不应將個別差異因素視為一種可容忍的變異，而應是投注更多的心力在個人偏好對動作學習的影響上，相關研究限制以及實務應用亦同時在本文中詳細討論。

以文找文

Although interests on individual difference in motor learning were evident in the last century (Adams, 1987), psychological-based individual difference in motor learning are receiving less attention today. This is despite the fact that differences at that level may have important implications for research and practice. In this thesis, differences in self-controlled learning behavior in relation to learners’ psychology related to passing time are examined. It is likely that different learners would perceive time differently and thus learning behavior might be affected by how they perceived time subconsciously. The current focus is placed on examining individual difference in self-controlled learning, where difficulty level can be controlled. Specifically, difference in the three learner-types, namely, alternating, conservative, and stubborn, are examined in terms of their time perspective, behavior during different time pressure, and in terms of their enjoyment level. Thirty-two participants underwent 5 days (50 trials per day) of self-controlled learning of the roller ball task, and were allowed to select their difficulty levels over the trials. They were then classified into the three learner types based on their learning behavior. Results show that after completing the five-day practice protocol, conservative learners reported a reduction in present fatalism score compared to their earlier report. Perceived time pressure also peaked for different learner-types on different days of practice. Differences in behaviorial variability were also observed between learners over the five days. Finally, results show that enjoyment was the highest for alternating learners on the final day of practice. By showing that individual difference can be observed systematically in a self-controlled motor learning situation, it is proposed that future researchers should not merely treat individual factors as variances that can be tolerated, but should instead pay more attention to the effects of individual preference and inclinations. Limitations and practical implications are discussed.

以文找文

Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor-skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 41-74. new window

Ainley, M., & Patrick, L. (2006). Measuring self-regulated learning processes through tracking patterns of student interaction with achievement activities. Educational Psychology Review, 18(3), 267-286.
Atance, C. M., & O'Neill, D. K. (2001). Episodic future thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 533-539.
Atance, C. M., & O'Neill, D. K. (2005). The emergence of episodic future thinking in humans. Learning and Motivation, 36(2), 126-144.
Bachorowski, J. A., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Impulsive motor behavior: Effects of personality and goal salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(3), 512-518.
Bar-Eli, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2000). Criticality of game situations and decision making in basketball: An application of performance crisis perspective. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 1(1), 27-39. new window

Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi-squared approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 16, 296-298.
Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press.
Biddle, S., & Mutrie, N. (2001). Psychology of physical activity: Determinants, well-being, and interventions. London, England: Routledge.
Bindarwish, J., & Tenenbaum, G. (2006). Metamotivational and contextual effects on performance, self-efficacy, and shifts in affective states. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 7(1), 41-56. new window

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longmans, Green.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. . In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165-178). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Buccheri, R. (2003). Time and the dichotomy subjective/objective. An endo-physical point of view. In R. Buccheri, M. Saniga & W. M. Stuckey (Eds.), The nature of time: Geometry, physics, and perception (pp. 403-416). The Netherlands: Springer.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165-181.
Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 383-400.
Chen, L. H., Chen, M. Y., Lin, M. S., Kee, Y. H., Kuo, C. F., & Shui, S. H. (2008). Impliict theory of athletic ability and self-handicapping in college students. Psychological Reports, 103(2), 476-484.
Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2002). Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(4), 408-415.
Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2006). Nonlinear pedagogy: A constraints-led framework for understanding emergence of game play and movement skills. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 10(1), 71-103. new window

Creten, H., Lens, W., & Simons, J. (2002). The role of perceived instrumentality in Student Motivation, In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.) Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 37-45). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
D'Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo's Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI) - Short Form: An Italian study. Time & Society, 12(2-3), 333-347.
Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Deci, E., Ryan, R. M., Williams, G., Patrick, H., Lynch, M., & Hoefen, S. R. (n.d.). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). Retrieved December, 12, 2008, from http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/IMI_scales.php
Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47-61. new window

Ferrari, J. R., & Diaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Procrastination: Different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 707-714.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions - Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 359, 1367-1378.
Golomer, E., Bouillette, A., Mertz, C., & Keller, J. (2008). Effects of mental imagery styles on shoulder and hip rotations during preparation of Pirouettes. Journal of Motor Behavior, 40(4), 281-290.
Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15(3), 641-669.
Hall, P. A., & Fong, G. T. (2003). The effects of a brief time perspective intervention for increasing physical activity among young adults. Psychology and Health, 18, 685-706.
Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: David McKay.
Hollenstein, T. (2005). Using state space grids to display, describe, quantify, and analyze synchronized time series or event sequences. . Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Methods and Techniques in Behavioral Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Hollenstein, T. (2007). State space grids: Analyzing dynamics across development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(4), 384.
Holman, E. A., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2009). The social language of time: The time perspective-social network connection. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(2), 136-147.
Jackson, S. A., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Flow in sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R. C. (2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(4), 269-279.
Janelle, C. M., Kim, J., & Singer, R. N. (1995). Subject-controlled performance feedback and learning of a closed motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81(2), 627-634.
Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401-415.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kee, Y. H., & Wang, C. K. J. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness, flow dispositions and mental skills adoption: A cluster analytic approach. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9(4), 393-411.
Kelso, J. A. S. (1982). Human motor behavior: An introduction. Hillsdale, N.J.; London: Erlbaum.
Killgore, W. D. S. (1998). The Affect Grid: A moderately valid, nonspecific measure of pleasure and arousal. Psychological Reports, 83(2), 639-642.
Konefal, J., Duncan, R., Meub, W., & Winfield, D. (2006). Time perspective as a potential tool for psychotherapeutic intervention. Psychological Reports, 99(1), 111-120. new window

Konradt, U., Filip, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2003). Flow experience and positive affect during hypermedia learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 309-327.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay Co.
Lamey, A. V., Hollenstein, T., Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (2004). GridWare (Version Version 1.1b) [[Computer software]. http://www.statespacegrids.org]. new window

Landers, D. M., Boutcher, S. H., & Wang, M. Q. (1986). A psychobiological study of archery performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 57(3), 236 - 244.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2(4), 457-475.
Lewis, M. D., Zimmerman, S., Hollenstein, T., & Lamey, A. V. (2004). Reorganization in coping behavior at 11/2 years: Dynamic systems and normative change. Developmental Science, 7(1), 56-73. new window

Liu, Y.-T., Mayer-Kress, G., & Newell, K. M. (1999). A piecewise linear, stochastic map model for the sequential trial strategy of discrete timing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 103(1-2), 207-228.
Liu, Y.-T., Mayer-Kress, G., & Newell, K. M. (2006). Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 32(2), 380-393.
Livesey, P. J. (1986). Learning and emotion: A biological synthesis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lotze, M., Braun, C., Birbaumer, N., Anders, S., & Cohen, L. G. (2003). Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain, 126, 866-872.
Luo, Z.-Y. (2005). 自我控制工作難度對學習搖搖球的影響 [The effect of self-regulating task difficulty in learning the roller ball task]. Unpublished masters thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Martin, C. L., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., & Hollenstein, T. (2005). Social dynamics in the preschool. Development Review, 25(3-4), 299-327.
Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(10), 496-502.
Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R. S. W., & Eves, F. F. (2003). The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(3), 376-402.
Mayer-Kress, G., Liu, Y.-T., & Newell, K. M. (2006). Complex systems and human movement. Complexity, 12(2), 40-51.
McAuley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60(1), 48-58. new window

McCormack, T., & Hoerl, C. (1999). Memory and temporal perspective: The role of temporal frameworks in memory development. Developmental Review, 19, 154-182.
McInerney, D. M. (2004). A discussion of future time perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 141-151.
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Oxford: Blackwell.
Morrow, J. R., Jackson, A. W., Disch, J. G., & Mood, D. P. (2005). Measurement and evaluation in human performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp. 341-361). Amsterdam: Martin Nijhoff.
Newell, K. M. (2003). Schema Theory (1975): Retrospectives and prospectives. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 383-388.
Newell, K. M., Liu, Y.-T., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2001). Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychological Review, 108(1), 57-82. new window

Newell, K. M., Liu, Y.-T., & Mayer-Kress, G. (2003). A dynamical systems interpretation of epigenetic landscapes for infant motor development. Infant Behavior and Development, 26(4), 449-472.
Noda, M., Takai, J., & Yoshida, T. (2007). The influence of time pressure on mood-congruent effects: Evaluating products with limited information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(2), 403-425.
Rainey, D. W. (1995). Sources of stress among baseball and softball umpires. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7(1), 1-10. new window

Rainey, D. W., & Hardy, L. (1999). Sources of stress, burnout and intention to terminate among rugby union referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17, 797-806.
Reeve, J. (1989). The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13(2), 83-103.
Roche, A. N. L., & Frankel, A. (1986). Time perspective and health. Health Education Research, 1(2), 139-142. new window

Rogatko, T. (2009). The influence of flow on positive affect in college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(2), 133-148.
Russell, J., Weiss, A., & Mendelsohn, G. (1989). Affect Grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493-502.
Schöllhorn, W. I., Mayer-Kress, G., Newell, K. M., & Michelbrink, M. (2009). Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. Human Movement Science, 28(3), 319-333.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005). Motor control and learning. Champaign, Ill.; Leeds: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1997). Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science, 277(5327), 821-825.
Sidaway, B., Yook, D., & Russell, D. (1999). Distributed Control in Rapid Sequential Aiming Responses. Journal of Motor Behavior, 31(4), 367-380.
Singer, R. N., Lidor, R., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1993). To be aware or not aware? What to think about while learning and performing a motor skill. Sport Psychologist, 7(1), 19-30. new window

Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 343-348.
Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 763-786.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1996). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Tu, C.-Y. (2005). 拖延行為的研究--量表編製及相關因素之探討 [Procrastination: Inventories development and its correlates]. Unpublished doctoral thesis, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Republic of China.
Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Seidman, J., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A., & Stickgold, R. (2003). Sleep and the time course of motor skill learning. Learning & Memory, 10(4).
Wang, C. K. J., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2001). Young people's motivational profiles in physical activity: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23, 1-22.
Ward, J. H. (1963 ). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244.
Welch, N., McNaughton, S. A., Hunter, W., Hume, C., & Crawford, D. (2009). Is the perception of time pressure a barrier to healthy eating and physical activity among women? Public Health Nutrition, 12, 888-895.
Williams, L. R., & Anshel, M. H. (2000). Cognitive style in adolescent athletes. Journal of Sport Behavior., 23, 70-89.
Woolhouse, L. S., & Bayne, R. (2000). Personality and the use of intuition: Individual differences in strategy and performance on an implicit learning task. European Journal of Personality, 14, 157-170.
Wulf, G., Clauss, A., Shea, C. H., & Whitacre, C. A. (2001). Benefits of self-control in dyad practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72(3), 299-303.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288.
Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 1007-1023.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	重回正軌：大學生為何、如何中斷學業拖延
2.	大學生未來時間觀與自我調整學習之關係：知覺工具性的中介效果檢驗

1.	1
2.	大學生防禦性悲觀、拖延、自我設限及因應策略對幸福感影響之探討

無相關書籍

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫