網際網路輔助設計工作室教學的研究__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	網際網路輔助設計工作室教學的研究
作者：	陳文誌
作者(外文)：	Wenzhi Chen
校院名稱：	雲林科技大學
系所名稱：	設計學研究所博士班
指導教授：	游萬來
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2009
主題關鍵詞：	線上設計學習環境；合作設計；設計工作室；網際網路；design studio；collaborative design；Internet；online design learning environment
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:39

本研究探討運用網際網路與線上設計學習環境輔助設計工作室課程教學與學習的影響與問題，採用行動研究途徑，經由計畫、設計、使用與評估4個階段進行。首先，在「計畫」階段結合相關文獻的發現與實際操作網際網路輔助設計教學的使用經驗，提出線上設計學習環境的開發架構。接著在「設計」階段依該架構設計、建置了線上設計學習環境的原型 -- 合創思設計。「使用」階段則運用「合創思設計」線上學習環境進行設計工作室課程的輔助以及跨校合作設計學習專案。最後的「評估」階段則經由問卷調查、焦點團體訪談，以及參與線上輔助教學過程的觀察與學習歷程資料等，了解學習者的感受與態度，進而探討運用網際網路與線上設計學習環境輔助設計工作室課程所造成的影響與問題。
研究針對參與學生所做的調查與訪談結果發現：1) 學生認為運用線上設計學習環境輔助設計工作室的教學對於課程、教師以及學生具有正面的影響；2) 學生在此方式學習過程中遭遇的主要問題為設備操作與網路障礙等的技術性問題、溝通與認知差異所造成的人性問題，以及使用性與效率等系統的問題；3) 大部分的學生都有使用網際網路輔助學習的經驗，且多願意接受運用網際網路輔助設計工作室的教學方式；4)「合創思設計」各層級所提供的功能符合學生的需求，但滿意度偏低。
根據研究的結果與實際使用的經驗與需求，合創思設計線上設計學習環境進行了軟硬體系統的更新、介面的修正與功能的加強等改善措施。根據研究結果與6年多的使用經驗，研究者提供以下建議供運用網際網路輔助設計專業課程教學與學習者參考：1) 思考課程的合適度與運用網路科技的程度；2) 要有良好的網路基礎建設與技術支援；3) 做好事前的規畫以及教師和學生的調適；4) 持續的參與和調整；5) 注意學生網路成癮與迷失的風險。
本研究從學習者的角度探討基於網際網路所建置的線上設計學習境運用於設計工作室課程所造成的影響與問題，其結果可以提供相關的教學與研究參考。未來將以改善合創思設計的使用性以及永續經營為目標，同時針對設計學習專案的流程與管理、同步與非同步線上溝通模式對於設計溝通的影響、設計資訊與設計學習的關係，以及設計文件與知識的管理與運用等議題進行研究，以提供更多的資訊來了解網際網路與資訊科技對於設計教育的影響。

以文找文

The purpose of this study is to design and implement of an online design learning environment to support the instruction and learning in design studio. The action research approach was applied with plan, design, use, and review phases. In the plan phase, a framework for development of online design learning environment was proposed following the literature review and combined with the experiences of using Internet mediated design courses. Then, a prototype of online design learning environment – CoCreaThink Design – was built according to the framework in the design phase. The CoCreaThink Design was used to mediate the design studio courses and to conduct the online collaborative design learning projects in the use phase. Finally, the student attitude and perceptions were investigated through questionnaire and focus group interview for understanding the influences and problems of using Internet to mediate design studio course.
The main results are as follows: 1) the students regard that using Internet and online design learning environment to support design studio instruction and learning had positive influences; 2) the main problems students faced included the technical, human and system problems; 3) most students had experiences in using IT to support learning, and presented their willing to accept it; 4) the need of the functions provided by “CoCreaThink Design” is high, but the satisfaction is low.
Considering these results, some suggestions are proposed: 1) to consider the suitability of using Internet and online design learning environment to support the instruction and learning in design course; 2) to improve network infrastructure and technical support; 3) to encourage well planning and adaption of the instructor and learner; 4) to keep continuous participation and adjustment; 5) to be careful of the risk of addiction and myth of the Internet.

以文找文

Abbey, B., 2000, Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education, Hershey: IDEA group publishing.
Abrams, G., & Haefner, J., 2002, Blending Online and Traditional Instruction in the Mathematics Classroom, Retrieved Feb. 3, 2008, from The Technology Source Archives: http://technologysource.org/article/blending_online_and_traditional_instruction_in_the_mathematics_classroom/
Advanced Distributed Learning, 2008, SCORM, Retrieved Oct. 30, 2008, from Advanced Distributed Learning: http://www.adlnet.gov/Scorm/index.aspx
Arsham, H, 2001, Impact of the Internet on Learning and Teaching, USDLA Journal,Vol. 16, No.3.
Attoe, W., & Mugerauer, R., 1991, Excellent studio teaching in architecture, Studies in Higher Education,Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 41-50.
Bender, D. M., 2005, Developing a Collaborative Multidisciplinary Online Design Course, The Journal of Educators Online, Vol. 2, No.2, pp. 1-12.
Bender, D. M., & Vredevoogd, J. D., 2006,. Using Online Education Technologies to Support Studio Instruction, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 114-122.
Bender, D., & Good, L., 2003, Attitudes of Higher Education Interior Design Faculty toward Distance Education, Journal of Interior Design, Vol. 29, No. 1/2, pp. 66-81.
Blackboard Inc., 1997-2008, Blackboard, Retrieved Oct. 30, 2008, from Blackboard: http://www.blackboard.com/us/index.bbb
Blevis, E.; Lim, Y.-K.; Stolterman, E.; & Makice, K., 2008, The Iterative Design of a Virtual Design Studio, TechTrends, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 74-83.
Bourase, C.; Gkamas, A.; & Tsiatsos, T., 1999, A Web-Based Distributed Environment to Support Teleteaching: Design and Implementation Issues, Proceedings of 10th International Workshop on Database and Expert System Application, pp. 906-911.
Bradley, C., & Oliver, M., 2002, The evolution of pedagogic models for work-based learning within a virtual university, Computers & Education, Vol. 38, No. 1-3, pp. 37-52.
Brandt, E., 2004, Action research in user-centred product development, AI & Society, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 113-133.
Broadfoot, O., & Bennett, R., 2003, Design Studios: Online? Comparing traditional face-to-face Design Studio education with modern internet-based design studios, Apple University Consortium Conference: Digital Voyages, Adelaide, Australia.: University of Adelaide.
Bruce, R., 1999, Educational technology planning, Victoria, BC: Centre for Curriculum, Transfer and Technology.
Brusasco, P. L.; Caneparo, L.; Carrara, G.; Fioravanti, A.; Novembri, G.; & Zorgno, A. M., 2000, Computer Supported Design Studio, Automation in Construction, Vol. 9, pp. 393–408.
Bucciarelli, L. L., 2001, Design knowledge & learning: a socially mediated activity, in C. M. Eastman; W. M. McCracken; & W. C. Newsletter (Eds), Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, ELSEVIER, pp. 297-314.
Budd, J.; Vanka, S.; & Runton, A., 1999, The ID-Online Asynchronous Learning Network: a ‘Virtual Studio’ for Interdisciplinary Design Collaboration, Digital Creativity, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 205-214.
Cameron, M.; Forsyth, A.; Green, W.; Lu, H.; McGirr, P.; Owens, P. E.; & Stoltz, R., 2001, Learning through Service. College Teaching, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 105-114.
Carter, J., 2002, A framework for the development of multimedia systems for use in engineering education, Computers & Education, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 111-128.
Chang, T.-W., & Huang, J. H., 2002, A Pilot Study of Role-Interplay in a Web-Based Learning Environment, Education Media International, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 75-85.
Chastain, T., & Elliott, A., 2000, Cultivating design competence: online support for beginning design studio, Automation in Construction, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 83-91.
Chen, W., & You, M., 2003, A framework for the development of online design learning environment, The 6th Asian Design International Conference, Tsukuba, Japan.
Chen, W., & You, M., 2001, Participation analysis of online class interactions in Internet mediated design course, Bulletin of the 5th Asian Design Conference (CD ROM), Seoul, Korea, TW-056.
Chen, W., & You, M., 2008, Student Response to an Internet-Mediated Industrial Design Studio Course, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, DOI: 10.1007/s10798-9068-2.
Chen, W., & You, M., 2007, The Differences Between the Influences of Synchronous and Asynchronous Modes on Collaborative Learning Project of Industrial Design, in D. Schuler (Ed.), Online Communities and Social Computing (Vol. 4564), Berlin: Springer, pp. 275-283.
Chen, Y.; Frame, I.; & Maver, T., 1998, A virtual studio environment for design integration, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 787-800.
Cheng, Y.-W., 2000, Web-based Teamwork in Design Education, Sociedad Iberoamericana de Grafica Digital (SIGRADI) 2000, Rio de Janerio, Brazil.
Chiu, M.-L., 2002, An organizational view of design communication in design collaboration, Design Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 187-210.
Chu, P.-Y.; Chen, L.-C.; & Wei, W.-L., 2007, A study on the effect of using a knowledge management system on design education, International Association of Societies of Design Research 2007, Hong Kong.
Clayton, M. J.; Warden, R. B.; & Parker, T. W., 2002, Virtual construction of architecture using 3D CAD and simulation, Automation in Construction, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 227-235.
Cloete, E., 2001, Electronic education system model, Computers & Education, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 171-182.
Dave, B., & Danahy, J., 2000, Virtual study abroad and exchange studio, Automation in Construction, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 57-71.
Dringus, L., & Terrell, S., 1999, The Framework for DIRECTED Online Learning Environments, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 55-67.
Dyson, M. C., & Campello, S. B., 2003, Evaluating Virtual Learning Environments: What are we Measuring? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-20.
Elger, D., & Russell, P., 2003, The virtual campus: a new place for (lifelong) learning? Automation in Construction, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp. 671-676.
Forgber, U., & Russell, P., 1999, Interdisciplinary Collaboration in the Virtual Design Studio, The European Association of Architectural Education (EAAE) 17th International Conference, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Gillani, B., 2003, Learning theories and the design of e-learning environment, Oxford: University Press of America, Inc.
Govindasamy, T., 2001, Successful implementation of e-Learning: Pedagogical considerations, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 3-4, pp. 287-299.
Gunn, C., 1997, CAL evaluation: future directions, Association for Learning Technology Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 40-47.
Gustafson, K., & Kors, K., 2004, Strategic implications of an educational technology assessment, Educause Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 2.
Haymaker, J.; Keel, P.; Ackermann, E.; & Porter, W., 2000, Filter mediated design: generating coherence in collaborative design, Design Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 205-220.
Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P., 1999, The Potential for Collaborative Problem Solving in Design and Technology, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 1-36.
Hsu, S.; Marques, O.; Hamza, M. K.; & Alhalabi, B., 1999, How to Design a Virtual Classroom 10 Easy Steps to Follow, T.H.E. Journal, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 96-98.
IBM, 2008, Lotus Learning Management System, Retrieved Sep. 25, 2008, from: http://www-01.ibm.com/software/lotus/products/learning-management-system/
Jones, A.; Barnard, J.; Calder, J.; Scanlon, E.; & Thompson, J., 2000, Evaluating learning and teaching technologies in further education, Association for Learning Technology Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 56-66.
Kalay, Y. E., 2006, The impact of information technology on design methods, products and practices, Design Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 357-380.
Kerawalla, L.; Minocha, S.; Kirkup, G.; & Conole, G., 2009, An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 31-42.
Kolarevic, B.; Schmit, G.; Hirschberg, U.; & Kurmann, D., 2000, An experiment in design collaboration, Automation in Construction, Vol.9, No. 1, pp. 73-81.
Kvan, T., 2000, Collaborative design: what is it? Automation in Construction, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 409-415.
Kvan, T., 2001a, The pedagogy of virtual design studios, Automation in Construction, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 345-353.
Kvan, T., 2001b, The problem in studio teaching—revisiting the pedagogy of studio teaching, The 1st ARCASIA Committee on Architectural Education (ACAE) Conference on Architectural, Singapore, pp. 95-105.
Lahti, H.; Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P.; & Hakkarainen, K., 2004, Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing, Design Studies, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 351-371.
Latch Craig, D., & Zimring, C., 2000, Supporting collaborative design groups as design communities, Design Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 187-204.
Lewin, K., 1946, Action research and minority problems, Journal of Social Issues, Vol 2, No. 4, pp. 34-46.
Lowther, D. L.; Jones, M. G.; & Plants, R., 2000, Preparing tomorrow''s teachers to use Web-based education, in B. Abbet, Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education, Idea Group Publishing, pp. 129-146.
MacDonald, C. J.; Stodel, E. J.; Farres, L. G.; Breithaupt, K.; & Gabriel, M. A., 2001, The demand-driven learning model: A framework for Web-based learning, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 9-30.
Maher, M., 1999, Variations on the Virtual Design Studio, Fourth International Workshop on CSCW in Design, Compiegne, France.
Martίnez, R.-A.; Miláns del Bosch, M.; Henar Pérez Herrero, M.; & Sampedro Nuño, A., 2007, Psychopedagogical components and processes in e-learning. Lessons from an unsuccessful on-line course, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 146-161.
Masterman, L., & Sharples, M., 2002, A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history, Computers & Education, Vol. 38, No. 1-3, pp. 165-185.
Matthews, D., & Weigand, J., 2001, Collaborative design over the Internet: A case study, Journal of Interior Design, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 45-53.
McCormick, R., 2004, Collaboration: The Challenge of ICT, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 159-176.
Nam, T. J., 2001, Computer support for collaborative design: analysis of tools for an integrated collaborative design environment, Bulletin of the 5th Asian Design Conference (CD ROM), Seoul, Korea.
Notash, L., & Garriock, M., 2003, International virtual design studio (IVDS) program: overview, challenges, and students'' perspectives, Education, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 345-349.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K., 1999, Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom, Jossey-Bass.
Passerini, K., & Granger, M. J., 2000, A developmental model for distance learning using the Internet, Computers & Education, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1-15.
Peng, C., 2001, Design through digital interaction: computing communications and collaboration on design, Intellect Ltd.
Press, M., & Cooper, R., 2003, The Design Experience: The Role of Design and Designers in the Twenty-First Century, Ashgate.
Ravenscroft, A., 2009, Social software, Web 2.0 and learning: status and implications of an evolving paradigm, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 1-5.
Reimer, Y., & Douglas, S., 2003, Teaching HCI design with studio approach, Computer Science Education, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 191-205.
Sagun, A., & Demirkan, H., 2007, On-line critiques in collaborative design studio, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, DOI: 10.1007/s10798-007-9.
Scanlon, E.; Jones, A.; Barnard, J.; Thompson, J.; & Calder, J., 2000, Evaluating information and communication technologies for learning, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 101-107.
Schnabel, M.; Kvan, T.; Kruijff, E.; & Donath, D., 2001, The First Virtual Environment Design Studio, The 19 th ECAADE-conference, Helsinki, Finland.
Schön, D. A., 1987, Education the reflective practitioner, London: Jossey-Bass.
Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P.; Lahti, H.; Muukkonen, H.; & Hakkarainen, K., 2000, Collaborative designing in a networked learning environment, in S. Scrivener; L. Ball; & A. Woodcock (Eds), Collaborative Design, London: Springer-Verlag, pp. 411-420.
Simoff, S. J., & Maher, M. L., 2000, Analysing participation in collaborative design environments, Design Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 119-144.
Simoff, S. J., & Maher, M. L., 1997, Web Mediated Design Courses: Challenges and Realities in Teaching Electronic Collaboration, 6th Workshop on Enabling Technologies Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET-ICE ''97), pp. 314-319.
Steeples, C., & Jones, C., 2003, Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues (2th Ed.), London: Springer.
Swann, C., 2001, Action research and the practice of design, Design Issues, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 49-61.
Ulusoy, Z., 1999, To design versus to understand design: the role of graphic representations and verbal expressions, Design Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 123-130.
Van Eijl, P., & Pilot, A., 2003, Using a Virtual Learning Environment in Collaborative Learning: Criteria for Success, Educational Technology, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 54-56.
Weston, C.; Gandell, T.; McAlpine, L.; & Finkelstein, A., 1999, Designing Instruction for the Context of Online Learning, The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 35-44.
Wikipedia, C., 2008, WebCT, Retrieved Dec. 1, 2008, from Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WebCT&oldid=247764874
Wood, J., 2003, A report on the use of ICT in art and design, British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (Becta).
Yee, S., 2001, Building Communities for Design Education:Using Telecommunication Technology for Remote Collaborative Learning, Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Zahner, J., 2002, Teachers explore knowledge management and E-learning as models for professional development, TechTrends, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 11-16.
Žavbi, R., & Tavčar, J., 2005, Preparing undergraduate students for work in virtual product development teams, Computers & Education, Vol. 44, pp. 357-376.
Zimring, C., & Latch Craig, D., 2001, Defining design between domains: an argument for design research ? la caret, in C. M. Eastman; W. M. McCracken; & W. C. Newsletter (Eds), Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education, ELSEVIER, pp. 125-146.
Zwart, D., & Resnick, H., 2000, The 10 Things Every Training Manager Should Know About TKM, Retrieved Oct. 30, 2002, from Generation21 Learning Systems: http://www. gen21. com/nr/Tkm. pdf
中國文化大學遠距教學中心 & 大夏數位傳播有限公司, 2005, go2school 終身數位學習網. 2008年10月30日擷取自 go2school 終身數位學習網: http://www.go2school.com.tw/
國立中山大學, 2008, 國立中山大學網路大學系統. 2008年10月31日擷取自國立中山大學網路大學系統: http://cu.nsysu.edu.tw
國立台灣大學, 2003-7, NTU CEIBA 國立台灣大學非同步課程管理系統. 2008年10月31日擷取自 NTU CEIBA 國立台灣大學非同步課程管理系統: https://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/
國立高雄師範大學, 2008, 國立高雄師範大學網路學園. 2008年10月30日擷取自國立高雄師範大學網路學園: http://eu.nknu.edu.tw/
陳文誌 & 游萬來, 2001a, 網際網路在設計課程上應用的探討, 工業設計 (數位化時代的設計教育研討會論文集), Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 139-146. new window

陳文誌 & 游萬來, 2001b, 網際網路在設計課程的應用：線上輔助設計課程的建構初探, 中華民國設計學會第6屆設計學術研究成果研討會論文集 (光碟版), 高雄, 台灣, pp. 243-248. new window

陳文誌 & 游萬來, 2001c, 網際網路在設計課程的應用：線上課程互動的參與度分析, 第十六屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文集, 藝術、設計及語文類, 視覺傳達設計組, 台灣, 花蓮, pp. 331-340. new window

陳文誌 & 游萬來, 2002, 線上設計課程活動的環境與介面設計研究, 行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告, 長庚大學.
陶蕃瀛, 2004, 行動研究：一種增強權能的助人工作方法, 應用心理研究, Vol. 23, pp. 33-48. new window

蔡清田, 2000, 教育行動研究, 五南.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	長期照顧的社會經濟與網絡治理：「厚熊笑狗」行動研究初探
2.	「做」簡單，「教」很難：照顧實務指導員試辦計畫之行動研究
3.	行動研究於傳播內容設計實務之應用
4.	建置社區巷弄長照站的培力與治理策略：水沙連區域的行動研究
5.	生態系統取向班級輔導活動設計實施與成效：以建立班級友善氣氛為例
6.	本土夫妻共識形成與情感增溫--以參與式行動研究深化家庭理論建構與教育實踐
7.	為施虐父母提供到宅式親職教育之行動研究
8.	學生參與社區發展工作之行動研究
9.	缺角的學校諮商輔導工作：適應欠佳學生「親職支持外展方案」的行動研究經驗
10.	反思性實務為基礎之倫理教學研究：醫管碩專班學生的學習歷程探討
11.	社會經濟組織的永續治理策略分析--菩提長青村的個案行動研究
12.	非營利組織導入社會企業的行動：臺灣福氣的個案研究
13.	舞蹈治療團體歷程初探：運作、連結與改變的行動辯證反思
14.	非營利組織和政府間的社會創新與合作：臺中市社區發展育成中心的行動研究
15.	推動臺南市家庭暴力安全防護網之行動研究

1.	「反」「僕」歸真：護理教育工作者的實踐反映批判
2.	STEM教育融入幼兒園課程與教學之研究
3.	社會歷史文化中的身心復元之道：大陸鄉村醫務社會工作者的行動研究
4.	上海地區家事調解社會工作專業知能建構之行動研究
5.	建構家暴家庭社區社會支持模式之行動研究
6.	創意教學數位平台建構及其學習成效之研究
7.	從愛滋感染者到帕斯堤聯盟的培力歷程探究
8.	臺北市遊民社會福利需求之研究
9.	「家長支持家長」的在地實踐–陪伴障礙幼兒家長的行動研究
10.	「新移民子女文化回應課程方案」建構與實踐之研究
11.	建立初入安置機構兒童之定向遊戲治療工作模式
12.	社區工作實務與理論的對話：建構一個社區工作實踐的行動視角
13.	高雄市想像力教育推動策略之發展與成效
14.	巧布拼貼的集體協作—在後段技職教育體系中的輔導實踐
15.	促使一個民間社會服務組織發展的行動研究－以失敗為師的佛子／社工實踐

1.	類湯恩比館的實踐取向：社工社群在草根社區的服務學習與推進

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫