臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：汽機車混合車流模擬—新細胞自動機模型之研發
作者：林日新
作者(外文)：Lin, Zih-Shin
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：交通運輸研究所
指導教授：藍武王
邱裕鈞
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2010
主題關鍵詞：細微細胞自動機模型；時空交通參數；混合車流；機車；Refined Cellular Automaton Model；Spatiotemporal Traffic Parameters；Mixed Traffic Flows；Motorcycles
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
細胞自動機模型可分類為一種微觀的數值模擬車流模型，近年來世界各地學者曾提出多種不同的細胞自動機車流模型，用以模擬現實生活中各種複雜的交通現象。但由於目前細胞自動機模型主要應用相對稀疏之格點系統，導致其無法應用於都市之交通模擬，因此本研究提出一種全新的細胞自動機模型，以克服上述限制，並將細胞自動機模型之應用範圍擴展至都市交通之模擬。
本研究基本上可分為三部份，首先，本研究提出一個具細微格點系統之細胞自動機模型，以提昇進行交通模擬時之模型解析度，並有效反應微觀的交通車流特性。與現有其它細胞自動機車流模型相較，本研究所提出細微格點系統之細胞自動機模型主要有三項明顯差異；首先本研究提出「共有單元」的概念做為描述不同車輛尺寸及不同道路寬度的共同基本單元，而一單獨細胞單位及網格則分別定義為車輛及道路之基本單元。其次本研究提出立體通用交通參數之觀念，如此於進行交通模擬時可將不同車輛尺寸及不同道路寬度之影響納入評估。以上述細微格點系統之細胞自動機模型為基礎，本研究並建議採用線段線性變化之車輛速度變化方式，接下來本研究並將車輛之減速能力亦納入交通模擬之分析範圍，以改正現有多數細胞自動機模型模擬結果中普遍存在的一個重要瑕疵，亦即當車輛遭遇障礙物或抵達塞車車陣之後緣時會有不合理的急速刹車行為。本研究所構思的減速機制事實上源起於1950年代美國學者Pipes及Forbes等人所提出原始車流理論。後續模擬結果證實，本研究所提出之減速機制已成功改正現有細胞自動機模型上述車輛不合理減速現象。
其次，本研究建立於應用上述細微格點系統之細胞自動機模型進行交通模擬時擷取區域路段交通參數數據之有效方法。模擬結果亦證實透過上述方式所擷取之區域路段交通參數資料除可成功印證德國知名學者Kerner於2004年所提出之三相車流理論外，並可描述三種車流車相間之相變化。
在本研究的第三部份中，藉由上述改良之細微格點系統，對由汽車及機車所組成之混合車流形態之交通特性進行模擬及分析。模擬結果證實，本研究所提出之細胞自動機模型可模擬一些重要的都市交通之混合車流現象，如機車於塞車車陣中之橫向移動或由車陣後方兩輛並排車輛間空隙鑽入車陣之複雜行為。
雖然現有之細胞自動機車流模型仍廣受認同，但仍持續有人質疑其應用範圍多限縮於高速公路交通模擬，且無法由微觀角度成功描述細微之車輛行為。反之，透過模擬結果分析，可印證本研究所提出新細胞自動機模型之優越性，因其成功地克服一般現有細胞自動機車流模型之適用限制，將可用以分析實際生活中多變的交通現象。基於本研究所提出新細胞自動機模型具有高解析度及高應用彈性等優點，未來各種不同的交通現象，如由不同種類車輛所組成之混合車流形態及複雜的都市交通現象，無論由巨觀或微觀觀點，皆可藉之進行分析模擬。期待本研究所建立新細胞自動機模型未來成為細胞自動機模型發展歷程中之一項重要突破，並加速交通模擬技術之發展。預期未來各種不同之交通管制策略於實際採用前將可應用本研究所建立新細胞自動機模型於事前評估其效果。
Recently, various cellular automaton (hereinafter referred to as CA) models that can be categorized as one branch from the microscopic viewpoint, were developed to describe the phenomena of real traffic flows characterized with complex dynamic behaviors. However, the coarse cell unit adopted in existing CA models makes them extremely difficult to implement urban traffic simulation. Therefore in this study, a novel CA model is developed, in order to release this restriction and henceforth expands the application of CA model to urban traffic scenarios.
This study basically can be divided into three-folds. First, as the onset, a CA model with refined cell/site system is developed in order to enhance the simulation resolution and henceforth to efficiently gauge the microscopic traffic characteristics. Here three important amendments, as compared with traditional CA models, are carried out. First of all, the concept “common unit” is defined to serve as the basic unit for simulating both roads of various widths and vehicles in various sizes, where “cell” and “site” represent the basic unit for vehicle and roadway space respectively. Following that, the 3-D generalized traffic parameters are defined so as to take vehicular and/or roadway widths into consideration. Coupled with this refined cell/site system, piecewise-linear speed variation is introduced into CA simulations. Following this, limited deceleration which in essence arising from Pipes and/or Forbes’ car-following concept, is also proposed for the sake of rectifying one common defect in most existing CA models—unrealistic abrupt deceleration as vehicles encounter stationary obstacles or upstream front of traffic jams. It is evidenced that the proposed refined CA model successfully fixed the unrealistic deceleration behaviors.
Next, the methodology for deriving local traffic parameters when implementing our refined CA models is also defined. The simulation results show that through the derived local traffic parameters, the renowned three-phase traffic patterns, as proposed by Kerner (2004), and the phase transitions among them can be successfully simulated.
In the third part of this study, based upon the aforementioned refined CA model, mixed traffic comprised by cars and motorcycles are analyzed. The simulations reveal that the proposed CA model successfully gauges some important traffic characteristics of urban traffic, such as the unique transverse drift behaviors of motorcycles when break inside traffic jams and the lateral drift behavior for motorcycles breaking into two moving cars from the upstream front of traffic jam.
Aside from their popularity, the existing CA models in the past were continuously criticized for their significantly biased application to freeway traffic and their failure to uncover delicate vehicular behavior from microscopic viewpoint. On the other hand, our simulations evidence the superiority of the proposed novel CA model since it successfully liberates the above-mentioned restriction and is able to capture the violate traffic phenomena in real world. Based upon the enhanced resolution and the increased flexibility of the proposed CA model, analysis of different traffic contexts, such as the mixed traffic comprised by vehicles of various sizes and sophisticated traffic phenomena in urban area, either from microscopic or macroscopic perspective, will be practical in the future. Thus the proposed novel CA model can be deemed as a breakthrough progress in development of CA model and shed some light for the future analysis of traffic modeling. It is looking forward that via the proposed CA model different traffic control strategies for separate traffic contexts can be efficiently evaluated before practical implementation.
1.Ahmed, K.I, Ben-Akiva, M.E., Houtsopoulos, H.N. & Mishalani, R.G. (1997) Models of freeway lane changing and gap acceptance behavior. Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on the Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation.
2.Aron, M. (1988) Car following in an urban network: simulation and experiments. Proceeding of Seminar D 16th PTRC Meeting, pp. 27-39.
3.Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A. & Sugiyama, Y. (1995) Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Physical Review E, Vol. 51, pp. 1035-1042.
4.Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakanishi, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A. & Sugiyama Y. (1998) Analysis of optimal velocity model with explicit delay. Physical Review E, Vol. 58, pp. 5429-5435.
5.Barlovic, R., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A. & Schreckenberg, M. (1998) Metastable states in cellular automata for traffic flow. Eur. Phys. J. B, Vol. 5, pp. 793-800.
6.Benjamin, S.C., Johnson, N.F., & Hui, P.M. (1996) Cellular Automaton Models of Traffic Flow Along a Highway Containing a Junction. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & General, Vol. 29, pp. 3119-3127.
7.Bham, G.H. & Benekohal, R.F. (2004) A high fidelity traffic simulation model based on cellular automata and car-following concepts. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 12, pp. 1-32.
8.Bick, J. H., Newll, G.F. (1960) A continuum model for two-directional traffic flow. Q. Applied Mathematics, Vol. 18, pp. 191-204.
9.Brackstone, M. & McDonald, M. (1999) Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research Part F, Vol. 2, pp. 181-196.
10.Burghout, W. (2004) Hybrid microscopic-mesoscopic traffic simulation. Doctoral Dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden 2004.
11.Cremer, M. & Ludwig, J. (1986) A fast simulation model for traffic flow on the basis of Boolean operations. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 28, pp. 297-303.
12.Chakroborty, P. & Kikuchi, S. (1999) Evaluation of the general motors based car-following models and a proposed fuzzy inference model. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 7, pp. 209-235.
13.Chandler, R.E., Herman, R. & Montroll, E.W. (1958) Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Operations Research, Vol. 6, pp. 165-184.
14.Chiou, Y.C., Lan, L.W., Chung, J.C., Hsu, C.C. & Lin, Z.H. (2009) Two-stage fuzzy logic control for ramp metering with cellular automaton simulation. Journal of Chinese Institute of Transportation, Vol. 21, pp. 1-24.
15.Chowdhury, D., Santen, L. & Schadschneider, A. (2000) Statistical physics of vehicular traffic and some related systems. Physics Reports, Vol. 329, pp.199-329.
16.Chowdhury, D. & Schreckenberg, M. (1999) Self-organization of traffic jams in cities-Effects of stochastic dynamics and signal periods. Physical Review E, Vol. 59, R1311-1314.
17.Chowdhury, D., Wolf, D.E. & Schreckenberg, M. (1997) Particle-hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: effects of lane-changing rules. Physica A, Vol. 235, pp. 417-439.
18.Cooper, P. J. & Zheng, Y. (2002) Turning gap acceptance decision-making: the impact of driver distraction. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 33, pp. 321-335.
19.Daganzo, C.F. (1993) The cell-transmission model. Part I: A simple representation of highway traffic. Research report UCB-ITS-PRR-93-7, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley.
20.Daganzo, C.F. (1994) The cell transmission model: a dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 28, pp. 269-287.
21.Daganzo, C.F. (1995) A finite difference approximation of the kinematic wave model of traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 29B, pp. 261-276.
22.Daganzo, C.F. (1997) Fundamentals of Transportation and Traffic Operations. Elsevier Science Ltd. Pergamon.
23.Daganzo, C.F. (1999) The lagged cell-transmission model. International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Ceder, A. (Ed.), New York, Pergamon.
24.Daganzo, C.F. (2002) A behavioral theory of multi-lane traffic flow. Part I: Long homogeneous freeway sections. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, pp. 131-158.
25.Ebersbach, A., Schneidery, J., Morgensterny, I. & Hammwohner, R. (2000) The influence of trucks on traffic flow- An investigation on the Nagel-Schreckenberg model. International Journal of Modern Physics C, Vol. 11, pp. 837-842.
26.Edie, L.C. (1960) Car following and steady state theory for non-congested traffic. Operations Research, Vol. 9, pp. 66-76.
27.Evans, L. & Rothery, R. (1973) Experimental measurement of perceptual thresholds in car following. Highway Research Record, Vol. 64, pp. 13-29.
28.Ez-Zahraouy, H., Jetto, K. & Benyoussef, A. (2004) The effect of mixture lengths of vehicles on the traffic flow behavior in one-dimensional cellular automaton. European Physical Journal B, Vol. 40, pp. 111-117.
29.Forbes, T.W., Zagorski, H.J., Holshouser, E.L. & Deterline, W.A. (1958) Measurement of driver reactions to tunnel conditions. Highway Research Board, Proceedings, Vol. 37, pp. 345-357.
30.Fukui, M. and Ishibashi, Y. (1996) Traffic flow in 1D cellular automaton model including cars moving with high speed. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Vol. 65, pp. 1868-1870.
31.Gazis, D., Herman, R. & Maradudin, A. (1960) The problem of the amber signal light in traffic flow. Operations Research, Vol. 8, pp. 112-132.
32.Gazis, D.C., Herman, R. & Potts, R.B. (1959) Car following theory of steady state traffic flow. Operations Research, Vol. 7, pp. 499-505.
33.Gazis, D.C., Herman, R. & Rothery, R.W. (1961) Nonlinear follow the leader models of traffic flow. Operations Research, Vol. 9, pp. 545-567.
34.Gipps, P.G. (1981) A behavioral car following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 15, pp. 105-111.
35.Hamed, M.M., Easa, S.M. & Batayneh, R.R. (1997) Disaggregate Gap-Acceptance Model for Unsignalized T-Intersections. J. Transportation. Engineering, Vol. 123, pp. 36-42.
36.Helly, W. (1959) Simulation of bottlenecks in single lane traffic flow. Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors, pp. 207-238.
37.Ho, F.S. & Ioannou, P. (1996) Traffic flow modeling and control using artificial neural networks. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. Vol. 16, pp. 16-26.
38.Hoogendoorn, S.P. (1999) Multi-class continuum modeling of multilane traffic flow. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
39.Hsu, C.C., Lin, Z.S., Chiou, Y.C. & Lan, L.W. (2007) Exploring traffic features with stationary and moving bottlenecks using refined cellular automata. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 7, pp. 2246-2260.
40.Jia, B., Jiang, R., Wu, Q.S. & Hu, M.B. (2005) Honk effect in the two-lane cellular automaton model for traffic flow. Physica A, Vol. 348, pp. 544-552.
41.Jiang, R. & Wu, Q.S. (2003) Cellular automata models for synchronized traffic flow. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & General, Vol. 36, pp. 381–390.
42.Jiang, R. & Wu, Q.S. (2004) Spatial–temporal patterns at an isolated on-ramp in a new cellular automata model based on three-phase traffic theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & General, Vol. 37, pp. 8197–8213.
43.Jiang, R. & Wu, Q.S. (2006) A stopped time dependent randomization cellular automata model for traffic flow controlled by traffic light. Physica A, Vol. 364, pp. 493-496.
44.Kerner, B.S. (1998) Experimental features of self-organization of traffic flow. Physical Review Letter, Vol. 81, pp. 3797-3800.
45.Kerner, B.S. (2004) The Physics of Traffic. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
46.Kerner, B.S. (2005) Control of spatiotemporal congested traffic patterns at highway bottlenecks. Physica A, Vol. 355, pp. 565-601.
47.Kerner, B.S. & Klenov, S.L. (2002) A microscopic model for phase transitions in traffic flow. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & General, Vol. 35, pp. 31-43.
48.Kerner, B.S., Klenov, S.L. & Wolf, D.E. (2002) Cellular automata approach to three-phase traffic theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & General, Vol. 35, pp. 9971-10013.
49.Kerner, B.S. & Klenov, S.L. (2004) Spatiotemporal patterns in heterogeneous traffic flow with variety of driver behavioral characteristics and vehicle parameters. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical & General, Vol. 37, pp. 8753-8788.
50.Kerner, B.S. & Rehborn, H. (1996) Experimental features and characteristics of traffic jams. Physical Review E, Vol. 53, pp. 1297-1300.
51.Kikuchi, S. & Chrkroborty, P. (1993) Car-following model based on fuzzy inference system. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1365, pp. 82-91.
52.Klar, A. & Wegener, R. (1999) A hierarchy of models for multilane vehicular traffic I & II: modeling. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 593, pp. 983-1001.
53.Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A. & Schreckenberg, M. (1999) Disorder effects in cellular automata for two-lane traffic. Physica A, Vol. 265, pp. 614-633.
54.Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A. & Schreckenberg, M. (2000) Towards a realistic microscopic description of highway traffic. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vol. 33, pp. 477-485.
55.Knospe, W., Santen, L., Schadschneider, A. & Schreckenberg, M. (2002) A realistic tow-lane traffic model for highway traffic. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, Vol. 35, pp. 3369–3388.
56.Kometani, E. & Sasaki, T. (1959) Dynamic behavior of traffic with a nonlinear spacing-speed relationship. Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors, pp. 105-119.
57.Krauss, S. & Wagner, P. (1997) Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Physical Review E, Vol. 55, pp. 5597-5602.
58.Lan, L.W. & Chang, C.W. (2003) Moving behaviors of motorbikes in mixed traffic: particle hopping model. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 5, pp. 23-37.
59.Lan, L.W. & Chang, C.W. (2005) Inhomogeneous cellular automata modeling for mixed traffic with cars and motorcycles. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 39, pp. 323-349.
60.Lan, L.W. & Hsu, C.C. (2005) Using cellular automata to explore spatiotemporal traffic patterns. Proceedings, 10th International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, pp. 210-219.
61.Lan, L.W. & Hsu, C.C. (2006) Formation of spatiotemporal traffic patterns with cellular automaton simulation. Transportation Research Board, 85th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, in CD-ROM.
62.Lan, L.W. & Yeh, H.H. (2001) Car following behavior for drivers with non-identical risk aversion: ANFIS approach. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 13, pp. 427-434.
63.Lan, L.W., Chiou, Y.C., Hsu, C.C. & Lin, Z.S. (2007) Spatiotemporal mixed traffic patterns with revised cellular automaton simulation. Proceedings, 12th International Conference of Hong Kong Society for Transportation Studies, pp. 133-142.
64.Lan, L.W., Chiou, Y.C., Lin, Z.S. & Hsu, C.C. (2008) A new cellular automaton model in traffic simulation at a highway work zone. Proceedings, 10th International Conference on Applications of Advanced Technologies in Transportation, Athens, in CD-ROM.
65.Lárraga, M.E., del Río, J.A. & Alvarez-lcaza, L. (2005) Cellular automata for one-lane traffic flow modeling. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 13, pp. 63-74.
66.Leclercq, L. & Moutari, S. (2007) Hybridization of a class of “second order” models of traffic flow. Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, Vol. 15, pp. 918-934.
67.Lee, H.K., Barlovic, R., Schreckenberg, M. & Kim, D. (2004) Mechanical restriction versus human overreaction triggering congested traffic states. Physical Review Letter, Vol. 92, pp. 238702-1~238702-4.
68.Leonard, D.R., Power, P. & Taylor, N.B. (1989) CONTRAM: structure of the model. Transportation Research Laboratory, Crowthorn.
69.Lertworawanich, P. & Elefteriadou, L. (2001) Capacity estimations for Type B weaving areas based on gap acceptance. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1776, pp. 23-34.
70.Leung, S. & Starmer, G. (2005) Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, pp. 1056–106.
71.Lighthill, M.H. & Whitham, G.B. (1955) On kinematic waves: a theory of traffic flow on long crowed roads. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, No. 229, pp. 317-345.
72.Liu, G., Lyrintzis, A.S. & Micahalopoulus, P.G. (1998) Improved high-order model for freeway traffic flow. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1644, pp. 37-46.
73.Mahmassani, H. & Sheffi, Y. (1981) Using gap sequences to estimate gap acceptance functions. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 15, pp. 143-148.
74.Mallikarjuna, C. & Ramachandra Rao, K. (2006) Area Occupancy characteristics of heterogeneous traffic. Transportmetrica, Vol. 2, pp. 223-236.
75.Mallikarjuna, C. & Ramachandra Rao, K. (2008) Cellular Automata Model for Heterogeneous Traffic. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 43, pp. 321-345.
76.May, A.D. (1990) Traffic Flow Fundamentals. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey.
77.Meng, J.P., Dai, H.Q., Dong, L.Y. & Zhang, J.F. (2007) Cellular automaton model for mixed traffic flow with motorcycles. Physica A, Vol. 380, pp. 470-480.
78.Michaels, R.M. (1963) Perceptual factors in car following. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow, pp. 44-59.
79.Munial, P.K. & Pipes, L.A. (1971) Propagation of on-ramp density perturbations on unidirectional two and three-lane freeways. Transportation Research, Vol. 5, pp. 241-255.
80.Nagel, K. & Schreckenberg, M. (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Physics I, Vol. 2, pp. 2221-2229.
81.Nagel, K. (1996) Particle-hopping models and traffic flow theory. Physical Review E, Vol. 53, pp. 4655-4672.
82.Nagel, K. (1998) From particle-hopping models to traffic flow theory. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1644, pp. 1-9.
83.Nagel, K., Wolf, D.E., Wagner, P. & Simon, P. (1998) Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: A systematic approach. Physical Review E, Vol. 58, pp. 1425-1437.
84.Payne, H.J. (1971) Model of freeway traffic and control. Mathematics of Public Systems, Vol. 1, pp. 51-61.
85.Pipes, L.A. (1953) An operational analysis of traffic dynamics. Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 24, pp. 74–281.
86.Pollatscheka, M.A., Polus, A. & Livneh. M. (2002) A decision model for gap acceptance and capacity at intersections. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, pp. 649-663.
87.Pottmeier, A., Barlovic, R., Knospe, W. & Schadschneider, A. (2002) Localized defects in a cellular automaton model for traffic flow with phase separation. Physica A, Vol. 308, pp. 471-482.
88.Reiter, U. (1994) Empirical studies as basis for traffic flow models. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Highway Capacity, Vol. 2, pp. 493-502.
89.Rickert, M., Nagel, K., Schreckenberg, M. & Latour, A. (1996) Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata. Physica A, Vol. 231, pp. 534-550.
90.Richards, P.I. (1956) Shock waves on highway. Operations Research, Vol. 4, pp. 42-51.
91.Sheu, J.B. (2008) A quantum mechanics-based approach to model incident-induced dynamic driver behavior. Physica D, Vol. 237, pp. 1800-1814.
92.Simon, P. & Nagel, K. (1998) Simplified cellular automaton model for city traffic. Physical Review E, Vol. 58, pp. 1286-1295.
93.Sprott J. C. (2003) Chaos and time-series analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.
94.Spyropoulou, I. (2007) Modeling a signal controlled traffic stream using cellular automata. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 15, pp. 175-190.
95.Takayasu, M. & Takayasu, H. (1993) 1/f Noise in a traffic model. Fractals, Vol. 1, pp. 860-866.
96.Teodorović D. (1994) Fuzzy sets theory applications in traffic and transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 74, pp. 379-390.
97.Transportation Research Board (2000) Highway Capacity Manual, National Research Council, Washington D.C.
98.Wagner P., Nagel, K. & Wolf, D.E. (1997) Realistic multi-lane traffic rules for cellular automata. Physica A, Vol. 234, pp. 687-698.
99.Wang, B.H., Wang, L., Hui, P.M. & Hu, B. (2000) The asymptotic steady states of deterministic one-dimensioned traffic flow models. Physica B, Vol. 27, pp. 237-239.
100.Wang, R., Jiang, R., Wu, Q.S. & Liu, M. (2007) Synchronized flow and phase separations in single-lane mixed traffic flow. Physica A, Vol. 378, pp. 475-484.
101.Watanabe, M.S. (2003) Dynamical behavior of a 2D cellular automaton with signal processing - Effect of signal period. Physica A, Vol. 328, pp. 251-260.
102.Wolf, D.E. (1999) Cellular automata for traffic simulations. Physica A, Vol. 263, pp. 438-451.
103.Wong, G.C.K. & Wong, S.C. (2002) A multi-class traffic flow model – an extension of LWR model with heterogeneous drivers. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 36, pp. 827-841.
104.Wang, R., Jiang, R., Wu, Q.S. & Liu, M. (2007) Synchronized flow and phase separations in single-lane mixed traffic flow. Physica A, Vol. 378, pp. 475-484.
105.Xing, J. (1995) A parameter identification of a car following model. Proceedings of the Second World Congress on ATT, Yokohama, November, pp. 1739-1745.
106.Yamg, M.L., Liu, Y.G. & You, Z.S. (2007) A new cellular automata model considering finite deceleration and braking distance. Chinese Physics Letters, Vol. 24, pp. 2910-2913.
107.Yin, H., Wong, S.C., Xu, J. and Wong, C.K. (2002) Urban traffic flow prediction using a fuzzy-neural approach. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 10, pp. 85-98.
108.Zhang, H.M. (1998) A theory of nonequilibrium traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 32, pp. 485-498.
109.Zhang, H.M. & Kim, T. (2005) A car-following theory for multiphase vehicular traffic flow. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, pp. 385-399.
110.Zhu, H.B., Lei, L. & Dai, S.Q. (2009) Two-lane traffic simulations with a blockage induced by an accident car. Physica A, Vol. 388, pp. 2903-2910.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：2007（臺灣：1990，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2645728 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68448420
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上