一、Dworkin的主要著作
Dworkin, R. (1978) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1985) A Matter of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986) Law’s Empire. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Dworkin, R. (1990) “Equality, Democracy, and Constitution: We the People in Court”Alberta Law Review. 28(2):324-346.
Dworkin, R. (1991) “On Gaps in the Law” in P. Amselek and N. MacCormick (ed) Controversies About Law’s Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp.84-90.
Dworkin, R. (1994) Life’s Dominion. New York: Vintage Books.
Dworkin, R. (1996a) “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It” Philosophy and Public Affairs. 25(2):87-139.
Dworkin, R. (1996b) Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, R. (1998) “The Partnership Conception of Democracy” California Law Review. 86(3):453-458.
Dworkin, R. (2000) Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (ed) (2002) A Badly Flawed Election: Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy. New York: The New Press.
Dworkin, R. (2006a) Justice in Robes. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2006b) Is Democracy Possible Here? Principles for A New Political Debate. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2008) The Supreme Court Phalanx: The Court’s New Right-Wing Bloc. Random House Inc.
Dworkin, R. (forthcoming) Justice for Hedgehogs. Unpublished, excerpts about pp.1-49 in http//www.law.nyu.edu/clppt/program2006/readings/RDpaper.pdf
二、中英文書目
(一)中文文獻
王文宇(1996),〈論德沃京的司法判決理論〉,《台大法學論叢》。第25卷第2期。頁31-60。
王鵬翔(2005),〈論基本權的規範結構〉,《台大法學論叢》。第34 卷第2期。頁1-60。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
王鵬翔(2008),〈法律、融貫性與權威〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第24期。頁23-68。
王寶軍(2002),〈整體的闡釋性構建─德沃金的法律解釋學中的現代主義與後現代主義〉,《當代西方後現代法學》。朱景文編。北京:法律出版社。頁343-361。
石元康(1991),〈自由主義式的平等:德我肯論權利〉,《正義及其相關問題》。戴華、鄭曉時編。台北:中研院社科所。頁317-342。後收錄於石元康(1995),《當代自由主義理論》。台北:聯經。頁27-56。
石元康(1995),〈自由與社會統一:德我肯論社群〉,《第四屆美國文學與思想研討會論文選集:哲學篇》。何志青、洪裕宏編。台北:中研院歐美所。頁29-52。
江宜樺(1998),《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》。台北:揚智。
江宜樺(2001),〈當代兩種自由主義之爭〉,《自由民主的理路》。台北:聯經。頁171-204。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
米健譯(2002),《後現代法哲學─告別演講》。Arthur Kaufmann著。台北:元照。
朱光潛譯(2005),《柏拉圖文藝對話錄》。Plato著。台北:網路與書。
朱景文(2002),〈當前美國法理學的後現代轉向〉,《當代西方後現代法學》。朱景文編。北京:法律出版社。頁1-18。
朱景文(2004),《對西方法律傳統的挑戰:美國批判法律研究運動》。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
朱敬一、李念祖(2003),《基本人權》。台北:時報。
朱敬一、李念祖(2007),〈財產權利分配平等原則的憲法哲思─三種不同的權利理論與憲法釋例〉,《中研院法學期刊》。創刊號。台北:中研院法律所籌備處。頁75-111。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
沈宗靈(2007),《法理學》。台北:五南。
阮文泉(1993),《德沃金法律建構解釋理論之研究》。台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
阮文泉(1997),〈論德沃金建構解釋理論的反實證主義傾向〉,《法理學論叢─紀念楊日然教授》。元照編委會編。台北:元照。頁191-215。
阮文泉(1998),〈法律與文學─以德沃金教授的論述為中心〉,《法律評論》。第64卷7-9期合刊。頁32-40。
余桂霖(1996),〈論杜爾金的正義權利理論〉,《復興崗學報》。第58期。頁1-30。
吳秀瑾(2009),〈德沃金機運平等觀:女性主義批評〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第28期。頁89-138。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
吳豐維(2008),〈Dworkin能夠支撐全面性主張嗎?〉,發表於政治大學哲學系主辦「台灣哲學學會2008年度學術研討會:科學、規範與實踐理性」。10月25-26日。
李心文(2001),《兩位自由主義者對於社群主義批評的回應:羅爾斯與德我肯》。中正大學法律學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
李忠謙(2006),《法學融貫論之研究─以德沃金的整全法為中心》。台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
李柏光、林猛譯(1999),《論民主》。Robert A. Dahl著。台北:聯經。
李建良(2006),〈人之尊嚴做為憲法基本價值之規範意義〉,發表於中研院人社中心政治思想專題研究中心主辦「憲政基本價值」學術研討會,11 月23-24日。
李曉峰(2005),《美國當代著名法學家─德沃金法律思想研究》。北京:人民法院出版社。
李震山(2000),《人性尊嚴與人權保障》。台北:元照。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
邱玉玲譯(1998),《惠特曼⋅草葉集》。台北:格林文化。
林天河(1995),〈個人與社群之關係:試析柏拉圖《法律篇》〉,《政治社群》。陳秀容、江宜樺編。台北:中研院社科所。頁23-37。
林火旺(2001),《倫理學》。台北:五南。
林立(2002),《法學方法論與德沃金》。台北:學林文化。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
林世超(2006),《德沃金法律詮釋理論之研究》。佛光大學哲學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
林芳丞(2007),《從「平等的關懷與尊重」論司法裁判實踐公平正義之可能性》。政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
姚朝森譯(2005),《政治性的概念》。Carl Schmitt著。台北:聯經。
姚朝森(2006),〈人的尊嚴與理性法則─康德人權觀的立論根基〉,發表於中國政治學會主辦「中國政治學會2006年度學術研討會:憲政、民主與人權」。9月17日。
洪絹閔(2006),《胎兒與懷孕女性生命內在價值的權衡─德沃金與康奈爾的同與異》。政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
徐振雄(2002a),〈德沃金「權利理論」中有關「墮胎合憲性」之論證及其限制〉,《萬能學報》。第24期。頁215-230。
徐振雄(2002b),〈德沃金論「道德侵犯非罪化」與「自由主義的政治社群」─ 一個古老的命題:社會可透過刑罰執行道德嗎?〉,《月旦法學雜誌》。第91期。頁107-121。
秦修明等譯(2000),《民主在美國》。Tocqueville著。台北:貓頭鷹。
高榮志(2007),《德沃金「唯一正解」之理論與實踐─由「晶晶書庫案」的「猥褻」爭議談起》。台北大學法律學系碩士論文。未出版。
莊世同(2000),〈Ronald Dworkin與柔性法實證主義〉,《月旦法學雜誌》。第64期。頁54-69。
莊世同(2001),〈再訪Hart的承認規則〉,《當代基礎法學理論:林文雄教授祝壽論文集》。編委會編。台北:新學林。頁73-109。
莊世同(2002),〈法律的規範性與法律的接受〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。創刊號。頁43-84。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
莊世同(2003),〈尋找法律的亞特蘭提斯:《法律帝國》的兩種閱讀〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第5期。頁307-316。
莊世同(2007a),〈合法性與德沃金法理論的道德基礎:初步的考察與省思〉,發表於中正大學哲學系主辦「德沃金的法政哲學」學術研討會。4月27-28日。
莊世同(2007b),〈描述性法理論是可能的嗎?一個批判性的反省〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第21期。頁1-46。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
莊世同(2008),〈合法性與整全性─對德沃金法治觀的審視與反思〉,《2008法律思想與社會變遷》。王鵬翔編。台北:中研院法律所籌備處。頁45-84。
莊世同(2009),〈民主、人權與人性尊嚴─德沃金的高貴論證〉,《台灣民主季刊》。第6卷第3期,頁209-213。
陳文政(2006),《世紀憲法判決─布希控高爾案之分析》。台北:五南。
陳宜中(2007),〈仇恨言論不該受到管制嗎?反思德沃金的反管制論證〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第23期。頁47-87。
陳閔翔(2009a),〈德沃金「人性尊嚴原則」之理論意涵與實踐應用〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第29期。台北:巨流。頁195-249。
陳閔翔(2009b),〈論德沃金的民主理論:一個憲政自由主義的解讀〉,《台灣政治學刊》。第13卷第2期。頁171-223。
陳閔翔(2010),〈書評:民主是可能的嗎?《人權與民主生活》的微言與大義〉,《思想15:文化研究:游與疑》。台北:聯經。頁197-212。
陳起行(2001),〈Dworkin法理學、融貫與法資訊系統〉,《政大法學評論》。第65期。頁1-85。
陳顯武(2005),〈論法學上規則與原則之區分─由非單調邏輯之觀點出發〉,《台大法學論叢》。第34卷第1期。頁1-45。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
許家馨(1999),《法與道德:德沃京對法實證主義分離命題之批判》。政治大學法律學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
許章潤編(2003),《認真對待人權》。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
許章潤(2004),《法學家的智慧:關於法律的知識品格與人文類型》。北京:清華大學出版社。
許漢(2007),〈我們最好相信有客觀的道德真理,是嗎?〉,發表於中正大學哲學系主辦「德沃金的法政哲學」學術研討會。4月27-28日。
郭秋永(2001),《當代三大民主理論》。台北:聯經。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
焦寶乾(2002),〈德沃金的司法自由裁量權理論與中國實踐〉,《法理學論叢》(第3卷)。張文顯、李步云編。北京:法律出版社。頁444-506。
曾國祥(2001),〈歷史實踐與啟蒙批判:歐克秀之哲學保守主義初探〉,《自由主義》。蔡英文、張福建編。台北:中研院社科所。頁227-260。
曾國祥(2004),〈憲政主義與民主的衝突:美國政治思想的一個側面〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第11期。頁35-82。
曾國祥(2009),《主體危機與理性批判:自由主義的保守詮釋》。高雄:巨流。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
黃舒芃(2003),〈再訪「抗多數困境」─從Dworkin憲法理論的角度檢視Bickel的司法審查理論〉,《歐美研究》。第33卷第4期。頁685-709。中譯文請見(2009),《民主國家的憲法及其守護者》。台北:元照。頁391-411。
黃瑞祺(1998),〈理性討論與民主:哈伯瑪斯之溝通理論的民主涵義〉,《多元主義》。蕭高彥、蘇文流編。台北:中研院社科所。頁337-377。
黃瑞祺(2005),〈民主的重構及深化:一個社會學的觀點〉,《社會學:多元、正義、民主與科技風險》。李炳南編。台北:台大國發所。頁149-162。
黃瑞祺(2007),《批判社會學》。台北:三民。
黃瑞祺、陳閔翔(2010),〈審議民主與法治國理想:哈伯馬斯的民主觀〉,《批判、溝通和實踐:哈伯馬斯80論集》。台北:允晨。(頁數排版中)![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
傅鶴鳴(2009),《法律正義論─德沃金法倫理學思想研究》。北京:商務印書館。
張國清譯(2003),《後形而上學希望─新實用主義社會、政治與法律哲學》。Richard Rorty著。上海:上海譯文出版社。
張國清(2007),〈法哲學研究的語言哲學假定─兼論德沃金「唯一正確答案」研究方法的獨斷性〉,《法律與人文》。林來梵編。北京:法律出版社。頁281-289。
蔡英文(2002),《政治實踐與公共空間》。台北:聯經。
楊士奇(2001),《德握金論公民違抗》。政治大學哲學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
楊惠君譯,胡全威校(2008),〈民主憲政〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。Richard Bellamy著。第24期。頁1-22。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
劉宏斌(2009),《德沃金政治哲學研究》。長沙:湖南大學出版社。
劉俊麟(2008),〈哲學家德沃金獲得2007年霍爾堡國際紀念獎〉,《思想》。第8期。頁318-322。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
劉瑞華、黃春興(2001),〈法之自行─德我肯理直原則的經濟學解釋〉,《律師雜誌》。第259期。頁15-30。
鄧正來譯(1999),《法理學》。Bodenheimer著。台北:漢興。
廖正睦(1998),《德沃金自由主義式平等理論之研究》。政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
謝世民(1999),〈論德我肯的資源平等觀〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》。第11卷第1期。頁123-153。
謝世民(2002),〈政治權力、政治權威與政治義務〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。創刊號。頁1-40。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
謝世民(2007),〈德沃金式的全球正義觀〉,發表於中正大學哲學系主辦「德沃金的法政哲學」學術研討會。4月27-28日。
謝世民(2008a),〈法律的概念與本質〉,發表於政治大學哲學系主辦「台灣哲學學會2008年度學術研討會:科學、規範與實踐理性」。10月25-26日。
謝世民(2008b),〈德沃金的入世法學〉,《中國時報》。11月1日。A16。
謝世民(2009),〈一種德沃金式的全球正義觀〉,發表於中央研究院人社中心政治思想專題中心主辦「全球正義與世界秩序」學術研討會。12月7-8日。
謝世民(2010),〈論政治義務:初步回應幾點對Ronald Dworkin理論之批評〉,發表於中央研究院人社中心政治思想專題中心主辦「政治秩序與道德秩序:現代性的規範涵蘊」學術研討會。4月29-30日。
鄭哲民(1995),〈美國墮胎權的爭議:Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al.,v. Robert P. Casey, et al.etc.一案之最高法院判決理由分析〉,《美國最高法院重要判例之研究:1990~1992》。焦興鎧編。台北:中研院歐美所。頁105-128。
錢永祥(2001),〈自由主義為什麼關切平等─當代的一個看法〉,《縱欲與虛無之上:現代情境裡的政治倫理》。台北:聯經。頁347-369。
錢永祥(2003),〈道德平等與待遇平等:試探平等概念的二元結構〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》。第6期。頁195-230。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
錢滿素、袁華清譯(2006),《審判》。Franz Kafka著。台北:商周。
盧珮玲(2005),《分配平等的兩種觀點:德沃金論資源與沈恩論能力》。清華大學哲學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
薄菁菁(1997),《德我肯論墮胎與安樂死》。中正大學哲學研究所碩士論文。未出版。
戴華(2007),〈德沃金論基因科技所衍生的倫理議題〉,發表於中正大學哲學系主辦「德沃金的法政哲學」學術研討會。4月27-28日。
顏厥安(1998),《法與實踐理性》。台北:允晨。
顏厥安(2002),〈憲政主義的法治向度─由法實證主義檢討憲政法理學的理論與實踐問題〉,《現代性與中國社會文化》。蔡英文、江宜樺編。台北:新台灣人基金會。頁115-188。
顏厥安(2004a),《鼠肝與蟲臂的管制─法理學與生命倫理論文集》。台北:元照。
顏厥安(2004b),《規範、論證與行動─法認識論論文集》。台北:元照。
顏厥安(2005a),《憲邦異式─憲政法理學論文集》。台北:元照。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
顏厥安(2005b),《幕垂鴞翔─法理學與政治思想論文集》。台北:元照。
顏厥安(2008),〈德沃金之詮釋主義及其徹底化〉,《中研院法學期刊》。第3期。頁163-200。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
蘇文流(1995),〈服從與政治社群:《克里圖》與《辯護》中蘇格拉底的論點初探〉,《政治社群》。陳秀容、江宜樺編。台北:中研院社科所。頁1-22。
顧肅(2006),《自由主義基本理念》。台北:左岸文化。![new window](/gs32/images/newin.png)
(二)外文文獻
Ahrensdorf, P. J. (1995) The Death of Socrates and the Life of Philosophy: An Interpretation of Plato’s Phaedo. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Annino, P. G. (1997) An Evaluation of Ronald Dworkin’s Hermeneutical Theory of Law. New York: UMI Company.
Altman, A. (1992) “Fissures in the Integrity of Law’s Empire: Ronald Dworkin and the Rule OF Law” in A. Hunt (ed) Reading Dworkin Critically. New York and Oxford: Berg. pp.157-186.
Arneson, R. J. (2002) “Sovereign Virtue” Ethics, 112(2):367-371.
Aristotle, (1984) The Politics. translated by C. Lord. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Badinter, R. and S. Breyer. (ed) (2004) Judges in Contemporary Democracy: An International Conversation. New York and London: New York University Press.
Barker, P. (ed) (1996) Living As Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bartlett, S. (2000) “Discursive Democracy and a Democratic Way of Life” in L. E. Hahn (ed) Perspectives on Habermas. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. pp.367-386.
Barron, A. (1992) “Ronald Dworkin and the Challenge of Postmodernism” in A. Hunt (ed) Reading Dworkin Critically. New York and Oxford: Berg. pp.141-156.
Beyleveld, D. and R. Brownsword (2001) Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bix, B. (1993) Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon.
Burley, J. (ed) (2004) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Brown, A. (2009) Ronald Dworkin’s Theory of Equality: Domestic and Global Perspectives. Basingstoke; New York:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, R. L. (2006) “How Constitutional Theory Found its Soul: The Contributions of Ronald Dworkin” in S. Hershovitz (ed) Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.41-68.
Casal, P. and A. Williams (2004) “Equality of Resources and Procreative Justice” in J. Burley (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.150-169.
Clayton, M. (2004) “A Puzzle about Ethics, Justice, and the Sacred” in J. Burley (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.99-110.
Cohen, M. (ed) (1984) Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allanheld.
Coleman, J. L. (2001) The Practice of Principle: In Defense of A Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Colin, M. M. (1998) Liberalism, Justice, and Markets Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, J. M. (ed) (1997) Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Covell, C. (1992) The Defence of Natural Law: A Study of the Ideas of Law and Justice in the Writings of Lon L. Fuller, Michael Oakeshott, F. A. Hayek, Ronald Dworkin and John Finnis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Culver, K. (2001) “Leaving the Hart-Dworkin Debate” University of Toronto Law Journal. 51(4):367-399.
David, G. B. (2004) “Dworkin, Precedent, confidence and Roe V. Wade” University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 152(3):1221-1253.
Dewey, J. (1980) Democracy and education. in J. Dewey (ed) The middle works, 1899-1924(9) Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dews, P. (1999). “Communicative Paradigms and the Question of Subjectivity: Habermas, Mead and Lacan” in P. Dews (ed) Habermas: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. pp.87-117.
Donohue, B. (2002) “Judicial Hegemony: Dworkin’s Freedom’ Law and the Spectrum of Constitutional Democracies” Ratio Juris 15(3):267-282.
Dyzenhaus, D. (2007) “The Rule of Law as the Rule of Liberal Principle,” in A. Ripstein (ed) Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.56-81.
Eberle, E. J. (2002) Dignity and Liberty: Constitutional Visions in Germany and the United States. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Edgar, A. (2006). Habermas: The Key Concepts. London, New York: Routledge.
Fallon, R. H. Jr. (2003) “Marbury and the Constitutional Mind: A Bicentennial Essay On the Wages of Doctrinal Tension” California Law Review. 91:1-55.
Fallon, R. H. Jr. (2004) The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Finnis, J. (1996) “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?” in R. P. George (ed) Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.1-26.
Fleming, J. E. (2006) “The Place of History and Philosophy in the Moral Reading of the American Constitution” in S. Hershovitz (ed) Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp.23-40.
Foley, E. B. (2001) “Requiem for Hercules” Constitutional Commentary. 18(2):463-479.
Forsyth, M. and M. K.-Soper. (eds) (1996) The Political Classics: Green to Dworkin. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gaffney, P. (1996) Ronald Dworkin on Law as Integrity: Rights as Principles of Adjudication. Lewiston: Mellen University Press.
Galston, W. A. (1986) “Equality of Opportunity and Liberal Theory” in F. S. Lucash (ed) Justice and Equality Here and Now. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, pp.89-107.
Galston, W. A. (2001) “The Obligations of Equality” Review of Politics. 63(3):607-611.
Gardner, J. (2006) “Law’s Aims in Law’s Empire,” in S. Hershovitz (ed) Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.207-223.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Malden, Mass.; Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and Its Critics. Malden, Mass.: Polity Press.
Glassman, R. M. (1989) Democracy and Equality: Theories and Programs for the Modern World. New York: Praeger.
Guest, S. (1997) (second ed) Ronald Dworkin - Jurists: Profiles in Legal Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gray, J. (2002) Two faces of liberalism. Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1979) Communicative and the Evolution of Society. translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol.1- Reason and the Rationalization of Society. translated by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1989a) “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopedia Article” in S. E. Bronner and D. M. Kellner (ed) Critical Theory and Society: A Reader. New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
Habermas, J. (1989b) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. translated by T. Burger. Oxford: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. translated by C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996) Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to A Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. translated by W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1998) The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. C. Cronin and P. D. Greiff (eds) Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Harris, J. (ed) (2001) “Introduction: The Scope and Importance of Bioethics,” in John Harris (ed) Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1-22.
Hart, H. L. A. (1994) (second ed) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Held, V. (1984) Rights and Goods: Justifying Social Action. New York: The Free Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991) Elements of the Philosophy of Right. A. W. Wood (ed) translated by H. B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hershovitz, S. (ed) (2006) Exploring Law’s Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herzog, D. (2002) “How to Think About Equality” Michigan Law Review. 100(6):1621-1639.
Honeyball, S. and J. Walter. (1998) Integrity, Community, and Interpretation: A Critical Analysis of Ronald Dworkin’s Theory of Law. Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth.
Hunt, A. (ed) (1992) Reading Dworkin Critically. New York and Oxford: Berg.
Kamm, F. M. (2004) “Ronald Dworkin’s Views on Abortion and Assisted Suicide” in J. Burley (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.218-240.
Kekes, J. (2002) “Objections to Democratic Egalitarianism” Journal of Social Philosophy. 33(2):163-169.
Kellner, D. (2000) “Habermas, the Public Sphere, and Democracy: A Critical Intervention” in L. E. Hahn (ed) Perspectives on Habermas. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court. pp.259-287.
Kelly, P. (1996) “Ronald Dworkin: Taking Rights Seriously” in M. Forsyth, and M. K.-Soper (eds) The Political Classics: Green to Dworkin, New York: Oxford
University Press. pp.263-287.
Kleinig, J (1978) “Human Rights, Legal Rights and Social Change” in E. Kamenka and A. E-S Tay (eds) Human Rights: Ideas and Ideologies. London: Edward Arnold Publishers. pp.36-47.
Koh, H. H., and R. C. Slye. (1999) “Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights: An Introduction.” in H. H. Koh, and R. C. Slye (eds) New Haven, Deliberative Democracy and Human Rights. CT: Yale University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2001) (second ed) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2004) “Dworkin on Freedom and Culture” in J. Burley (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.113-133.
Lilla, M. (2001) “Wolves and Lambs” in R. Dworkin, M. Lilla, and R. B. Silvers (eds) The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin. New York: The New York Review of Books. pp.31-42.
Leiter, B. (ed) (2001) Objectivity in Law and Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lukes, S. (2001) “An Unfashionable Fox” in R. Dworkin, M. Lilla, and R. B. Silvers (eds) The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin. New York: The New York Review of Books. pp.43-58.
Lyons, D. (1984) “Moral Aspects of Legal Theory” in M. Cohen (ed) Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. London: Duckworth. pp.49-69.
MacCormick, N. (1991) “Foreword to the English Edition” in P. Amselek and N. MacCormick (ed) Controversies About Law’s Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp.vii-x.
Mackie, J. (1984) “The Third Theory of Law” in M. Cohen (ed) Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. London: Duckworth. pp.161-172.
Macleod, C. M. (1998) Liberalism, Justice, and Markets: A Critique of Liberal Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macleod, C. M. (2002) “Book Reviews: Sovereign Virtue” Canadian Journal of Political Science, 35(1):210-211.
Madison, J., A. Hamilton, and J. Jay. (1987) The Federalist Papers. London: Penguin Books.
Matravers, M. (2002) “Responsibility, Luck, and the ’Equality of What?’ Debate” Political Studies. 50(3):558-572.
McCarthy, T. A. (1978). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
McLeod, I. (1999) Legal Theory. Hampshire: Macmillan.
Montesquieu, (1991) The Spirit of Laws. Vo.1. translated by T. Nugent. Littleton, Colorado: Fred B. Rothman&Co.
Morrison, W. (1997) Jurisprudence: From the Greeks to Post-Modernism. Cavendish Publishing Limited.
Mulhall, S. and A. Swift. (1996) (second ed) Liberals and Communitarians. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pasquino, P. (2001) “One and Three: Separation of Powers and the Independence of the Judiciary in the Italian Constitution” in J. Ferejohn, J. N. Rakove, and J. Riley. (eds) Constitutional Culture and Democratic Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.205-222.
Perry, M. J. (1988) Morality, Politics and Law: A Bicentennial Essay. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Plato, (2000) The Trial and Death of Socrates: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Death Scene From Phaedo. translated by G. M. A. Grube. Indianapolis, I N: Hackett.
Plaw, A. (2004) “Why Monist Critiques Feed Value Pluralism: Ronald Dworkin’s Critique of Isaiah Berlin” Social Theory and Practice. 30(1):105-126.
Plaxton, M. (2008) “Arguments of Virtue and Constitutional Criminal Procedure”University of Toronto Law Journal 58:355-376.
Posner, R. A. (1990) The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1995) Overcoming Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1999) The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Priel, D. (2007) “Book Review: In Search of Argument” Texas Law Review 86:141-164.
Rakowski, E. (2001) “Ronald Dworkin, Reverence for Life, and the Limits of State Power” Utilitas. 13(1):33-64.
Rasmussen, D. M. (1996). “How is Valid Law Possible? A Review of Between Facts and Nroms by Jürgen Habermas” In M. Deflem (ed) Habermas, Modernity, and Law. London: Sage Publications. pp.21-44.
Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999) (revised ed) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Raz, J. (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon.
Raz, J. (1986) The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1994) Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics. Clarendon Press: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (2004) “Speaking with One Voice: On Dworkinian Integrity and Coherence”in J. Burley (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.285-290.
Ripstein, A (ed) (2007) Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ripstein, A (2007) “Introduction: Anti-Archimedeanism” and “Liberty and Equality”in A. Ripstein (ed) Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1-21; 82-108.
Rosenfeld, M. (2001) “The Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Constitutional Democracy” Southern California Law Review. 74:1307-1351.
Rorty, R. (1988). “The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy” in The Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom. M. D. Peterson and R. C. Vaughan (ed) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.257-282.
Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, Relativism and Truth: Philosophical Papers Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, M. (1984) (ed) Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press.
Sandel, M. (1996a) “Judgemental Toleration” in R. P. George (ed) Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.107-112.
Sandel, M. (1996b) Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Sandel, M. (1998) (second ed) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sandel, M. (2005) Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scheffler, S. (2003a) “What is Egalitrianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31(1):5-39.
Scheffler, S. (2003b) “Equality as the Virtue of Sovereign: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31(2):199-206.
Schneider, C. (2000) “The Constitutional Protection of Rights in Dworkin’s and Habermas’ Theories of Democracy” UCL Jurisprudence Review. pp.101-121.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1976) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Shapiro, I. (ed) (2001) Abortion the Supreme Court Decisions. Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett Publishing Company.
Shapiro, S. J. (2007) “The ‘Hart-Dworkin’ Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed”in A. Ripstein (ed) Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.22-55.
Shorey, P. (1958) What Plato Said. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Srzednicki, J. T. J. (1976) Elements of Social and Political Philosophy. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sunstein, C. R. (1996) Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (1999) One Case at A Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Stavropoulos, N. (1996) Objectivity in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Stone, I. F. (1989) The Trial of Socrates. New York: Anchor Books.
Taylor, C. (1989) “Cross-Purposes: The Liberal- mmunitarian Debate” in Rosenblum (ed) Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. pp.159-182.
Tebbit, M. (2000) Philosophy of Law: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
Tucker, D. F. B. (1995) The Rehnquist Court and Civil Rights. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Waldeon, J. (1993) Liberal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waldron, J. (2004) “The Rule of Law as a Theater of Debate” in J Burley (ed) Dworkin and His Critics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing. pp.319-336.
Walzer, M. (1990) “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism.” Political Theory. 18(1):6-23.
Weinreb, L. L. (1996) “The Moral Point of View” in R. P. George (ed) Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.195-212.
White, S. K. (1988). The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas: Reason, Justice and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wihl, G. S. (2004) “Fish and Dworkin on the Work of Interpretation in a Democracy”in G. A. Olson and L. Worsham. (ed) Postmodern Sophistry. Albany: State University of New York Press. pp.75-96.
Williams, A (2002a) “Equality for the Ambitious: Critial Study” Philosophical Quarterly, 52(208):377-389.
Williams, A. (2002b) “Dworkin on Capability” Ethics. 113(1):23-39.
Woozley, A. D. (1984) “No Right Answer” in M. Cohen (ed) Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. London: Duckworth. pp.173-181.
Zipursky, B. C. and J. E. Fleming (2007) “Right, Responsibilities and Reflections on the Sanctity of Life” in A. Ripstein. (ed) Ronald Dworkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.109-135.
Zuckert, M. P. (1996) “Is Modern Liberalism Compatible with Limited Government?”in R. P. George (ed) Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. pp.49-85.