Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42, 38-46.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barber C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In Contribution to English ‘syntax and philology. Reprinted in J.M. Swales (Ed.) Episodes in ESP. 1988. Hermel Hempstead: Prentice Hall International.
Bardov-Harlig, K., & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 17-34.
Bazerman,C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
Belcher, D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 154-186.
Berkenkotter, G., & Huckin, T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bhatia, V.K. (1993). Analyzing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bitchener J. & Basturkmen H. (2006).Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4-19.
Bloom, B., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, F.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: cognitive domain . New York: McKay.
Bock, J. & Irwin, D. (1980). Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence production. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 467-484.
Boote, D.N. & Beile, P. (2005) Scholars before researchers: on the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34 (6), 3-15.
Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational research: an introduction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
Brett.P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13 (1), 47-59.
Brown G. & Yule G. (1983). Discourse analysis. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bunton, D. (1999) The use of higher level metatext in Ph.D. theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.
Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purpose. 4, 207- 224.
Chafe, W. (1979). The flow of thought and the flow of langauge. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 12. Discourse and syntax (p. 159-181). New York: Academic Press.
Cheng A. (2007). Understanding learners and learning in ESP genre-based writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 76-89.
Chiu, R. (1972). Measuring register characteristics: a prerequisite for preparing advanced level TESOL programs. TESOL Quarterly, 6(2), 129-141.
Christie F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: a systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 759-763.
Cooley, L., & Lewkowicz, J. (1995). The writing needs of graduate students’ at the University of Hong Kong: A project report. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics and Language Teaching, 18, 121-123.
Crookes, G.. (1986) Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics, 7, 57-70.
Crystal D., & Davy D. (1969). Investigating English style. IN: Indiana: University Press.
Daiker, D., Kerek, A.,& Morenberg, M. (1986). The writer’s options: combining to composing. New York: Harper & Row.
Dong Y. (1998). Non-native graduate students’ thesis/dissertation writing in science: self-reports by students and their advisors from two U.S. institutions. English for Specific Purposes, 17(4), 369-390.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1986). Genre analysis: An investigation of the introduction and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Talking about text (pp. 128-145). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
Ellis J., & Ure J. (1969). Language varieties: register. In R. Meacham. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics: information and control, 251-250. London: Pergamon.
Feng, H.P. (2005). A process-product approach of teaching academic writing: ssing the teaching of writing a literature review as an example. Paper presented in the 22nd international conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China. June 4-5. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Flowerdew. J. (2002). Academic discourse. London: Pearson.
Froese, A.D, Gantz, B.S., and Henry, A.L. (1998). Teaching students to write literature reviews: a meta-analytic model. Teaching of Psychology, 25 (2), 102-105.
Givon, T. (1983). Topic continuation in discourse: The functional domain of switch reference. In J. Haiman & P. Munro (Eds.), Switch-reference and universal grammar (p. 51-82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givon, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In R.S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (p. 175-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gledhill, C. (2000). The discourse function of collocation in research article introduction. English for Specific Purposes, 19, 115-135.
Gosden H. (1995). Success in research article writing and revision: a social-constructionist perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 14(1), 37-57.
Granello, D. H. (2001). Promoting cognitive complexity in graduate written work: Using bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool to improve literature reviews. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40 (4), 292-307.
Graney, J. (1992). A framework for text graphing. System. 20 (2). 161-167.
Gregory, M., & Carroll. S. (1978).Language and situation: language varieties and their social contexts. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gustafsson, M. (1975). Some syntactic properties of English law language. Publications of the Department of English. University of Turku.
Halliday, M., & Hasan R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Halliday, M., & Hasan. R. (1989). Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. (1976). Theme and information in the English Clause. In G.R. Kress (Ed.), System and function in language (p. 174-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.
Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London: Sage publications Ltd.
Hewings M, 1993. The end! How to conclude a dissertation. In G M Blue (Ed.) Language, Learning and Success: studying through English, Developments in TEFL. Hemel Hempstead: Phoenix TEFL.
Hill, T. (1958). Institutional linguistics. Orbis, 7, 441-445.
Hill. S., Soppelsa B., & West G. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental-research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 333-347.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley –Evans, T.(1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion section in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7, 113-122.
Hopper, P. (1979). Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (Ed.), Discourse and syntax (p. 213-241). New York: Academic Press.
Hugh, A. (2003). Teaching for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2004). Graduates’ gratitude: the generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 303-324.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: an ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 693-722.
Jenkins. S., Jordan, M., & Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: a survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51¬-67.
Johns A., & J. Swales (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 13-28.
Johns A. (1991). English for specific purposes (ESP): its history and contributions. In Celce-Murcia. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Johns, A. (2003). Genre and ESL/EFL composition instruction. In B. Kroll, (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. (p. 195-217). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kuno, S. (1980). Functional syntax. In E.A. Moravcski & J.R. Wirth (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 13. Current approaches to syntax (p. 117-135). New York: Academic Press)
Kuo, C. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121-138.
Kuo, C. (2001). Academic Competence: Designing an EAP Course for Ph.D. Students. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference on English Teaching and Learning in the Republic of China.
Kuo, C. (2002). Phraseology in Scientific Research Articles. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/ Fourth Pan-Asian Conference.
Lau, H. (2003b). The structure of academic journal abstracts written by Taiwanese PhD students. Taiwan Journal of TESOL. Taipei: National Chengchi University.
Kwan, B. (2006). The Schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (1), 30-55.
Lackstrom J., Selinker L., & Trimble. L. (1973). Technical rhetorical principles and grammatical choice. TESOL Quarterly, 7(2), 127-136.
Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: the work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2-7.
Lau, H. (2000). Interaction markers used by Taiwanese PhD students of physics. Selected Papers from the 13th International Symposium on English Teaching and Learning. 158-165.
Lim, J. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: a pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25 (3), 282-309.
Liu, P. C. (2007). Learning how to write a good MA thesis literature review: a case study of one Taiwanese graduate student. Yuan Chih University, Unpubished master thesis.
Lores R. (2004). On RA abstracts: from rhetorical structure to thematic organization. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 280-302.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Martin, J. (1985). Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis. In J. Benson and W. Greaves (Eds.): Systemic perspective on discourse. (pp. 248-274). Norwood NJ: Ablex.
Martin, J. (1992). English text. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McCarthy M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press.
McNabb R. (2001). Making the gesture: graduate student submissions and the expectation of journal referees. Composition Studies, 29(1), 9-26.
Miller C.R.(1994). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
Moravcsik M., & Murugesan P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of Citation. Social Studies of Science, 5, 86-92.
Nwogu, K.(1997). The medical research paper: structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
Paltridge B. (1994). Genre analysis and the identification of textual boundaries, Applied Linguistics, 15, 288-299.
Paltridge, B. (2004). Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37, 87-105.
Peacock, M. ( 2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497.
Petric B. (2007). Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. English for Specific Purposes, 6(3), 238-256.
Posteguillo, S. (1999). The semantic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 139-160.
Prince, E. (1978). A comparison of wh-clefts and it-clefts in discourse. Language, 54, 83-96.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Reid. T. (1956). Linguistics, structuralism and philology. Archivum Linguisticicum, 8 (1), 21-37.
Richards, R. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: structures from a functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 264-279.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Santos, M. (1996) The textual organization of research paper abstract in applied linguistics. Text, 16, 481-499.
Saville-Troike, M. (1982). The ethnography of communication. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Scott, W. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 17, 321-325.
Selinker L., Trimble M., & Trimble L. (1978). Rhetorical function- shift in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 12(3), 311-320.
Selinker L., Trimble R.,& Trimble L. (1976). presuppositional rhetorical information in EST discourse. TESOL Quarterly, 10(3), 281-290.
Shaw J. (1995). A schema approach to the formal literature review in engineering theses. System, 23(3), 325-335.
Sim, J., & Wright, C. (2005). The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85, 257-268.
Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1983). Types of synthesis and their criteria. In S. Ward and L. Reed (Eds.), knowledge structure and use: implications for synthesis and interpretation (pp. 343-362). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Swales, J. (1971). Writing scientific English. London: Nelson.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Birmingham, UK: LSU, University of Aston.
Swales, J.M.(1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J.M., & Feak C.B. (2000). English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Swales J.M., & Lindemann, S. (2002). Teaching the literature review to international graduate students. In A. Johns (Ed.), Genres and the classroom- multiple perspectives (pp. 105-119). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 4(2), 175-191.
Tarone, E., Dwyer S., Gillette S., & Icke V. (1981). On the use of the passive in two astrophysics journal papers. ESP Journal, 1(2), 123-140.
Thompson (2005). Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 4, 307-323.
Thompson, P., & Tribble C. (2001) Looing at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language, Learning and Technology, 5(3) 91-105.
Trimble L. (1985). English for science and technology: a discourse approach. UK: Cambridge Press.
Tsai, Y. C. (2006). Effects of online academic English materials on graduate students’ writing: introductions in research articles of the applied linguistic disciplines. Unpublished Master Thesis. National Ching Hua University.
Ward, G., & Birner, B. (2001). Discourse and information structure. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 119-137). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Weissberg, R. & Buker, S. (1990). Writing up research: Experimental research report writing for students of English. NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Wilhelm, W.J., & Kaunelis, D. (2005). Literature reviews: analysis, planning, and query techniques. The DTEFLa Pi Epsilon Journal, 47(2), 91-106.
Williams, P. (1999). Result sections of medical research articles; analysis of rhetorical categories for pedagogical purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 347-366.
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 365-385.
劉賢軒. (1999). <英文學術期刊論文中的解釋過程>。《第十六屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集》，頁375-384，台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。
劉賢軒. (2001). <學術期刊論文中的情態表達: 台灣博士生的「謹言慎行」>。《第十八屆中華民國英語文教學國際研討會論文集》，頁375-384，台北市: 文鶴出版有限公司。
劉賢軒. (2003a). <章類分析與學術英文教學: 台灣博士生的摘要改進問題>，《英語教學》，第二十七卷第四期，頁65-77，國立台灣師範大學。