臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：金磚四國的經濟發展與環境汙染之分析研究
作者：蔡中民
作者(外文)：Tsai, Chung-Ming
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：管理科學系所
指導教授：包曉天
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2010
主題關鍵詞：CO2排放量；能源消耗量；經濟成長；Granger因果模型；金磚四國；Carbon dioxide emission；Energy consumption；Economic growth；Granger causality model；BRIC
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:21
本研究使用縱橫型態資料，探討新興國家(如金磚四國：巴西、俄羅斯、印度和中國) 在1971至2005年間(俄羅斯，1990-2005)的二氧化碳排放量、能源消耗量和經濟成長的動態因果關係。研究結果顯示，三者間有長期均衡關係，且能源消耗量對碳排放量有顯著正向影響，而國內生產毛額(GDP)和碳排放量有倒 U 型曲線關係，即碳排放量會隨著經濟成長的增加而逐漸惡化，產生漸增—穩定—衰減三階段變化。另外，碳排放的短期變化量大部份是受到前一期系統偏離均衡產生的誤差量和能源消耗的短期變化量所影響，而GDP的短期變化量對碳放量的影響相對較小。另一方面，當此系統偏離長期均衡時，金磚四國以趨近0.77(俄羅斯)至5.85年(巴西)之速度進行調整。
由動態因果關係分析顯示， 碳排放量與能源消耗量有著雙向強因果關係，碳排放量和能源消耗量分別對GDP有單向強因果關係。且碳排放量對GDP有負向影響。另外，能源消耗量與GDP有長期雙向因果關係。因此，可以推論新興國家(如金磚四國)是能源相依的國家。由於金磚四國的能源密度普遍高於均值，在不會反向影響經濟成長的前提下，本研究建議新興的能源依賴國應該增加能源供應端的投資和提昇能源效率，並加強節約能源政策，以減少不必要的能源浪費，提昇環境品質，以達到京都議定書的標準。
This paper examines dynamic causal relationships between pollutant emissions, energy consumption and output for a panel of BRIC countries over the period 1971-2005, except for Russia (1990-2005). In long-run equilibrium energy consumption has a positive and statistically significant impact on emissions, while real output exhibits the inverted U-shape pattern associated with the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis with the threshold income of 5.393 (in logarithms). In the short term, changes in emissions are driven mostly by the error correction term and short term energy consumption shocks, as opposed to short term output shocks for each country. Short-term deviations from the long term equilibrium take from 0.770 years (Russia) to 5.848 years (Brazil) to correct. The panel causality results indicate there are energy consumption-emissions bidirectional strong causality and energy consumption-output bidirectional long-run causality, along with unidirectional both strong and short-run causalities from emissions and energy consumption, respectively, to output. Overall, in order to reduce emissions and not to adversely affect economic growth, increasing both energy supply investment and energy efficiency, and stepping up energy conservation policies to reduce unnecessary wastage of energy can be initiated for energy-dependent BRIC countries.
Abuaf N., Jorion, P., 1990. Purchasing power parity in the long run, Journal of Finance 45, 157-174.
Akarca, A.T., Long, T.V., 1980. On the relationship between energy and GNP: a reexamination. Journal of Energy Development 5, 326-331.
Akbostanci, E., Turut-Asik, S., Tunc, G.I., 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37, 861-867.
Al-Iriani M.A., 2006. Energy–GDP relationship revisited: An example from GCC countries using panel causality. Energy Policy 34, 3342-3350.
Alves, D.C.O., Bueno, R.D., 2003. Short-run, long-run and cross elasticities of gasoline demand in Brazil. Energy Economics 25, 191-199.
Ang, J.B., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35, 4772-4778.
Ang, J.B., 2008. Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling 30, 271-278.
Apergis, N., Payne, J. E., 2009. CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37, 3282-3286.
Asafa-Adjaye, J., 2000. The relationship between energy consumption, energy prices and economic growth: time series evidence from Asian developing countries. Energy Economics 22, 615-625.
Barbieri, L., 2006. Panel Unit Root Tests: a Review, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Sociali - Piacenza, Working Paper in Economia, ottobre.
Belloumi, M., 2009. Energy consumption and GDP in Tunisia: Cointegration and causality analysis. Energy Policy 37, 2745-2753.
Bowden, N., Payne, J.E., 2009. The causal relationship between US energy consumption and real output: a disaggregated analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling 31, 180-188.
Breitung, J., 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. Advances in Econometrics 15, 161-177.
Brown, R., Durbin, J., Evans, J., 1975. Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 37, 149-172.
Cheng, H.F., Gutierrez, M., Mahajan, A., Shachmurove, Y., Shahrokhi, M., 2007. A future global economy to be built by BRICs. Global Finance Journal 18, 143-156.
Choi, I., 2001. Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance 20, 249–272.
Ciarreta, A., Zarraga, A., 2010. Economic growth-electricity consumption causality in 12 European countries: a dynamic panel data approach. Energy Policy 38, 3790-3796.
Coondoo, D., Dinda, S., 2008. The carbon dioxide emission and income: a temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics 65, 375-385.
Dinda, S., 2004. A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 53, 403-413.
Dinda, S., Coondoo, D., 2006. Income and Emission: A panel data based cointegration analysis. Ecological Economics 57, 167-181.
Douglas, J. 2006. India claims its emissions cause no harm to world's atmosphere. Natural News.
Ekins, P., 1997. The Kuznets curve for the environment and economic growth: examining the evidence, Environment and Planning A 29, 805-830.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), 2007. International Energy Statistics.
Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., 1987. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55, 251-276.
Fisher, R.A. 1932. Statistical Methods for Research Workers”, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, 4th Edition.
Friedl, B., Getzner, M., 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecological Economics 45, 133-148.
Granger, C.W.J., 1969. Investigating causal relation by econometric and cross- sectional method. Econometrica 37, 424-438.
Grossman, G., Krueger, A., 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economics Research Working Paper, No. 3194, NBER, Cambridge.
Halicioglu, F., 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37, 1156-1164.
Hanck, C., 2009. A meta analytic approach to testing for panel cointegration. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 38, 1051-1070.
Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., Wilson, D.M., 2002. Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 541–551.
Hawksworth, J., 2006. The world in 2050. PriceWaterHouseCoopers.
Hlouskova, J., Wagner M., 2006. The performance of panel unit root and stationarity tests: results from a large scale simulation study. Econometric Reviewers 25, 85-116
International Institute for Management Development (IMD), 2005. World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005, IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53-74.
Inman, M., 2008. China CO2 emissions growing faster than anticipated. National Geographic News.
Jarque, C.M., Bera, A.K., 1980. Efficient tests for normality, homoskedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters 6, 255-259.
Johansen, S. 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12, 231-254.
Johansen S., Juselius, K., 1990. Maximum likelihood estimation and inferences on cointegration with approach. Oxford Bullentin of Economics and Statistics 52, 169-209.
Kao, C., 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics 90, 1-44.
Kraft, J., Kraft, A., 1978. On the relationship between energy and GNP. Journal of Energy Development 3, 401-403.
La Rovere, E.L., Pereira, A.S., 2007. Brazil & climate change: a country profile. Science and Development Network.
Larsson, R., Lyhagen, J., Löthgren, M., 2001. Likelihood based cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels. Econometrics Journal 4,109-142.
Lee, C.C., 2005. Energy consumption and GDP in developing countries: a cointegrated panel analysis. Energy Economics 27, 415-427.
Lee, C.C., Chang, C.P., 2005. Structural breaks, energy consumption, and economic growth revisited: evidence from Taiwan. Energy Economics 27, 857-872.
Lee, C.C., Chang, C.P., Chen, P.F., 2008. Energy–income causality in OECD countries revisited: the key role of capital stock. Energy Economics 30, 2359-2373.
Lee, C.C., Chang, C.P., 2009. FDI, financial development, and economic growth: international evidence. Journal of Applied Economics 12, 249-271.
Lee, C.C., Lee, J.D., 2009. Income and CO2 emissions: evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. Energy Policy 37, 413-423.
Levine, A., Lin, C.F., 1992. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties, University of California at San Diego, Discussion Paper 92-93.
Levine, A., Lin, C.F., Chu, C.S., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24.
Maddala, G.S., Wu, S., 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 631-652.new window
Mahadevan, R., Asafu-Adjaye, J., 2007. Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy 35, 2481-2490.
MacKinnon, J.G., Haug, A.A., Michelis, L., 1999. Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. Journal of Applied Econometrics 14, 563-577.
Managi, S., Jena, P.R., 2008. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecological Economics 65, 432-440.
Mandal, S.K., Madheswaran, S., 2010. Causality between energy consumption and output growth in the Indian cement industry: an application of the panel vector error correction model (VECM). Energy Policy 38, 6560-6565.
Martinez-Zarzoso I., Bengochea-Morancho, A., 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of an Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2. Economics Letters 82, 121-126.
Masih, A.M.M., Masih, R., 1996. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality: results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modeling techniques. Energy Economics 18, 165-183.
Mehrara, M., 2007. Energy consumption and economic growth: The case of oil exporting countries. Energy Policy 35, 2939-2945.
Mishra, V., Smyth, R., Sharma, S., 2009. The energy-GDP nexus: Evidence from a panel of Pacific Island countries. Resource and Energy Economics 31, 210-220.
Murray, J. 2009. Medvedev: Russian emissions could increase under new target. BusinessGreen.
Narayan, P.K., Narayan, S., Prasad, A., 2008. A structural VAR analysis of electricity consumption and real GDP: evidence from the G7 countries. Energy Policy 36, 2765-2769.
Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., 2008. Energy consumption and real GDP in G7 countries: new evidence from panel cointegration with structural breaks. Energy Economics 30, 2331-2341.
Oh, W., Lee, K., 2004. Energy consumption and economic growth in Korea: testing the causality relation. Journal of Policy Modeling 26, 973-981.
O'Neill, J., Wilson, D., Purushothaman, R. Stupnytska, A., 2005. How solid are the BRICs? Goldman Sachs: Global Economic Paper Vol. 134.
Oxley, L., Greasley, D., 1998. Vector autoregression, cointegration and causality: testing for causes of the British industrial revolution. Applied Economics 30, 1387-1397.
Pao H.T., 2009. Forecast of electricity consumption and economic growth in Taiwan by state space modeling. Energy 34, 1779-1791.
Pedroni, P., 1997. Panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests, with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new Results. Indiana University, Working Paper in Economics, November.
Pedroni, P., 1999. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 653-670.
Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration; asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory 20, 597-625.
Phillips, P.C., Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75, 335-346.
Selden, T.M., Forrest, A.S., Lochart, J.E. 1999. Analyzing the reductions in US air pollution emissions: 1970–1990. Land Economics 75, 1-21.
Shiu, A., Lam, P.L., 2004. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Energy policy 32, 47-54.
Sims, C.A., 1972. Money, income and causality. American Economic Review 62, 540-552.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., 2003. Energy consumption and GDP: causality relationship in G-7 countries and emerging markets. Energy Economics 25, 33-37.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., 2009. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an EU candidate member. Ecological Economics 68, 2706-2712.
Soytas, U., Sari, R., Ewing, B.T., 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics 62, 482-489.
Stern, D.I., 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 32, 1419-1439.
Tamazian, A., Chousa, J.P., Vadlamannati, K.C., 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37, 246-253.
The World Bank, 2007a. Growth and CO2 emissions: how do different countries fare. Environment Department, Washington, DC.
The World Bank, 2007b. The Little Green Data Book 2007. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Toda, H.Y., Yamamoto, T., 1995. Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics 66, 225-250.
Wagner, M., 2008. The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resource and Energy Economics 30, 388-408.
Wilson, D., Purushothaman, R., 2003. Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050. Global Economic paper no. 99, Goldman Sachs.
Yoo, S.H., 2005. Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 33, 1627-1632.
Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Yu, S., Hu, Z., 2007. Electricity consumption and economic growth in China: cointegration and co-feature analysis. Energy Economics 29, 1179-1191.
Zapata, H.O., Rambaldi, A.N., 1997. Monte Carlo evidence on cointegration and causation. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 59, 285-298.
Zhang, X.P., Cheng, X.M., 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics 68, 2706-2712.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：892（臺灣：886，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2459241 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68253774
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上