專案團隊成效的影響因素—從團隊認知及創新規範的角度出發_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	專案團隊成效的影響因素—從團隊認知及創新規範的角度出發
作者：	林裕勛
作者(外文)：	Yu-Hsun Lin
校院名稱：	國立中央大學
系所名稱：	資訊管理研究所
指導教授：	周惠文
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2011
主題關鍵詞：	團隊認知；團隊績效；交換記憶系統；集體心智；創新規範；成效；innovation norms；team cognition；team performance；performance outcomes；transactive memory system (TMS)；collective mind
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:31

本論文援引團隊認知和創新規範來探討專案團隊成效的成因。藉由將團隊認知概念操作化為交換記憶系統與集體心智，本論文檢視在專案團隊中，團隊認知如何發展；並探討團隊認知對創新規範的影響；以及團隊認知和創新規範兩者和團隊成效的關聯。縱斷面資料蒐集自38個跨學門的專案團隊，這些團隊由162位大二學生所組成，每個專案團隊都參與一個為期16周的宿舍更新競賽。研究獲致以下結論。首先，在團隊認知發展的過程中，交換記憶系統會影響集體心智。而集體心智影響創新規範的形成。集體心智與創新規範以下列三個方式影響團隊成效。首先，集體心智直接影響團隊成效的主觀團隊績效和客觀團隊績效。另外，創新規範對主觀團隊績效有顯著地影響，但對客觀團隊績效並無顯著地影響。最後，集體心智透過創新規範間接影響主觀團隊績效。藉由探討團隊認知的發展，以及其和創新規範與團隊成效兩者的關聯，本論文有利於學術界與實務界了解專案團隊之創新規範與團隊成效的成因。

以文找文

This dissertation investigates how performance outcomes form among project teams by examining team cognition and innovation norms. Conceptualizing team cognition in terms of the transactive memory system (TMS) and the collective mind, this dissertation proposes a theory of how team cognition develops on project teams. The relationship between team cognition and innovation norms is scrutinized, as is the impact of those norms on performance outcomes. Longitudinal data were collected from 38 interdisciplinary project teams composed of 162 sophomores participating in a 16-week dormitory remodeling campaign. The results support the following conclusions: 1) the development of team cognition is influenced by the TMS, which exerts its effect through the collective mind of each interdisciplinary project team; 2) the collective mind is involved in the process of forming innovation norms; and 3) the collective mind and innovation norms affect performance outcomes in several ways. First, the collective mind directly influences performance outcomes, including subjective and objective team performance. Second, innovation norms affect subjective team performance but do not influence objective team performance. Third, the collective mind facilitates subjective team performance via innovation norms. By relating team cognition to innovation norms and performance outcomes, this dissertation provides both academics and practitioners with insight into how innovation norms form and how project teams achieve their desired performance outcomes.

以文找文

Aboelela, S.W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., et al. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review of the literature. Health Services Research, 42(1), 329-346. new window

Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42(8), 1105-1120.

Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Keskin, H., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). Transactive memory system in new product development teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(1), 95-111. new window

Alterman, R., & Garland, A. (2001). Convention in joint activity. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 611–657.
Austin, J. R. (2000). Knowing what and whom other people know: linking transactive memory with external connections in organizational groups. Academy of Management Proceedings, (0896-7911), F1-F6.
Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606-632.
Caldwell, D. F., & O''Reilly, C. A. (2003). The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations. Small Group Research, 34(4), 497-517.
Cannon Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on shared cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 195-202.

Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii-xvi. new window

Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
Chou, H.W. & Lin, Y.H. (2010). The Development of Teamwork Norms:The Roles of Task-knowledge Coordination and Team Boundary Spanning. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2010 (pp. 1652-1659). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/35789.
Chou, H. W., Lin, Y. H. & Chou, S. B., Collective Efficacy and Performance in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Team Cognition, Social Behavior and Personality, forthcoming.
Crowston, K., & Kammerer, E. E. (1998). Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems Journal, 37(2), 227-245.
DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32-53. new window

Druskat, V. U., & Pescosolido, A. T. (2002). The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55(3), 283-314.

Engelmann, T., Dehler, J., Bodemer, D., & Buder, J. g. (2009). Knowledge awareness in CSCL: A psychological perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 949-960.
Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. The Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 47-53. new window

Fiore, S. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39(3), 251-277.
Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. The Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489-505.
Fornell, C., & Larcker D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. new window

George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116.
Hair, J. F. , Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4),435-449.
Jackson, P., & Klobas, J. (2008). Transactive memory systems in organizations: Implications for knowledge directories. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 409-424.
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. new window

Joreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. O. A. (1982). Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Jung, D. I., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Opening the black box: An experimental investigation of the mediating effects of trust and value congruence on transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of organizational Behavior, 21(8), 949-964.
Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783-808.
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124.
Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587-604.
Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519-1533.
Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159-178.

Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581-598.
Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactivememory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(4), 384 –393.
Lin, Y.H. & Chou, H.W. (2009). Exploring the formation of collective efficacy in college student learning teams. In T. Bastiaens et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (pp. 2863-2870). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/32891.
London, M., Polzer, J. T., & Omoregie, H. (2005). Interpersonal congruence, transactive memory, and feedback processes: An integrative model of group learning. Human Resource Development Review, 4(2), 114-135.
Mayor, M. (Ed.) (2009), Longman dictionary of contemporary English (Fifth edition), Harlow, UK: Person Education Limited. ISBN: 9781408215333.
Madhavan, R., & Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management. The Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 1-12.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59. new window

Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2009). Investigating the relationship between transactive memory and performance in collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 43-54. new window

Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of innovation in organizations. American Political Science Review, 63(1), 111-126. new window

Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky, L. (2000). Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 117–133. new window

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Olson, E. M., Walker, O. C., & Ruekert, R. W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 48-62. new window

O’Reilly, C., & Flatt, S. (1989, August). Executive team demography, organizational innovation, and firm performance. Paper presented at the 49th annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
Prichard, J. S., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and performance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696-726.
Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P. J., & Stein, J. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18-28. new window

Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory: Performance relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746-771.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). Smart PLS 2.0 (beta). Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg.
Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 574-599.
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press.
Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group Dynamics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schmickl, C., & Kieser, A. (2008). How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations? Research Policy, 37(3),473-491.
Sethi, R., Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (2001). Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 73-85. new window

Shen, Y., & Gallivan, M. (2008). The Influence of Subgroup Dynamics on Knowledge Coordination in Distributed Software Development Teams: A Transactive Memory System and Group Faultline Perspective. In M. Barrett, E. Davidson, C. Middleton & J. DeGross (Eds.), Information Technology in the Service Economy: Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century (Vol. 267, pp. 103-116): Springer Boston.

Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Campbell, G. E., Milanovich, D. M., & Reynolds, A. M. (2001). Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: two empirical studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 179-194.
Tasa, K., Taggar, S., & Seijts, G. H. (2007). The development of collective efficacy in teams: A multilevel and longitudinal perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 17-27. new window

Vissers, G., & Dankbaar, B. (2002). Creativity in multidisciplinary new product development teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 31-42. new window

Wegner, D. M. (1987). Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 185-205). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13(3), 319-339.
Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 923-929.
Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357-381.
Roberts, M. L., & Wortzel, L. H. (1979). New life-style determinants of women''s food shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 28-39.
Yoo, Y., & Kanawattanachai, P. (2001). Developments of transactive memory systems and collective mind in virtual teams. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(2), 187-208.
Zand, D. E. (1972). Trust and managerial problem solving. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 229-239.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

無相關期刊論文

1.	1
2.	探究社會認知理論於軟體設計之團隊績效研究
3.	知識團隊之成員多樣化與團隊績效之研究—團隊認知及知識整合之中介效果

1.	1
2.	探究社會認知理論於軟體設計之團隊績效研究
3.	知識團隊之成員多樣化與團隊績效之研究—團隊認知及知識整合之中介效果
4.	1
5.	探究社會認知理論於軟體設計之團隊績效研究
6.	知識團隊之成員多樣化與團隊績效之研究—團隊認知及知識整合之中介效果

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫