Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. 1987. Innovation, market structure and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567-574.
Acs, J.Z., Varga, A., and Anselin, L. 2002. Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge. Research Policy, 31(7), 1069-1085.
Adams, J. D., and Griliches, Z. 1996. Measuring science: An exploration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12664-12670.
Adams, J. D., and Griliches, Z. 1998. Research productivity in a system of universities. Annales d''économie et de Statistique, 49/50, 127-162.
Adams, J. D., and Griliches, Z. 2000. Research productivity in a system of universities. The Economics and Econometrics of Innovation, 105-140. Boston and London : Kluwer Academic.
Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Basant, R., and Fikkert, B. 1996. The effects of R&D, foreign technology purchase, and domestic and international spillovers on productivity in Indian firms. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2), 187-199.
Bleiklie, I., Hostaker, R., and Vabo, A. 2000. Policy and practice in higher education-reforming Norwegian university. London: Jessica Kinsley.
Bloedon, R. V., and Stokes, D. R. 1994. Making university industry collaborative research succeed. Research Technology Management, 37(2), 44-49.
Bontis, N. 1998. Intellectual Capital：An exploratory study that develops measures and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63-76.
Brown, M., and Sevenson, R. 1998. Measuring R&D productivity. Research Technology Management, 31,11-15.
Carlsson, B., Jacobsson,S., Holmen, M., andRickne, A. 2002, Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31(2), 233-245.
Carlsson, B., and Fridh, A. 2002. Technology transfer in United States universities. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12(1), 199-232.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). Unpublished manuscript.
Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., and Walsh, J. P. 2002. Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
Cohen, W. M. 2004. Patents and appropriation: Concerns and evidence. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2), 57-71.
Colyvas, J., Crow, M., Gelijns, A., Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R. R., Rosenberg, N., and Sampat, B. N. 2002. How do university inventions get into practice?. Management Science, 48(1), 61-72.
Dasgupta, P., and David, P.A. 1994. Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
Edvinsson, L., and Malone, M. S. 1997. Intellectual Capital：Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden roots, USA： Happer Collins.
Edvinsson, L. 1997. Developing intellectual capital at skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366-373.
Ernst, H. 2001. Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analysis on the Firm Level. Research Policy, 30(1), 143-157.
Etzkowitz, H. 2003. Research groups as quasi-firms: The invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
Geraint, J., and Johnes, J. 1993. Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An Application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 45(2), 332-347.
Griliches, Z. 1989. Patents: recent trends and puzzles. Unpublished manuscript.
Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661-1707.
Griliches, Z. 1992. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 29-47.
Grupp, H., and Mogee, M. E. 2004. Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators?. Research Policy, 33(9), 1373-1384.
Grogorio, M. Q., and Bernardo, C. G. 2002. Aspects of university research and technology transfer to private industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1-2), 51-58.
Hameri, A. 1996. Technology transfers between basic research and industry. Technovation, 16(2), 51-57.
Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., and Hamilton, K. 2001. The changing composition of innovative activity in the U.S. - A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30(4), 681-703.
IMD 2000. The world competitiveness yearbook.
Ikpaahindi, L. 1985. An overview of Bibliometerics: Its measurements ,law and their application. Libri, 35(2), 163-177.
Jaffe, A. B., and Lerner, G. 2004. Innovation and its discontinents: How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kumar, N., and Siddharthan, N. S. 1994. Technology, firm size and export behavior in developing countries: The case of Indian enterprises. Journal of Development Studies, 32(2), 288-309.
Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., and Bozeman, B. 2007. An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655.
Lipsey, R. G. 2002. Some implications of endogenous technological change for technology policies in developing countries. Economics of Innovation New Tech, 11(4-5), 321-351.
Luu, N., Williams, P., Wykes, J., and Weir, T. 2001. Invisible value: The case for measuring and reporting intellectual capital. ISR New Economy Issues Paper, 1, 1-18.
Lyuton, E. A. 1996. Internal constraints to fuller university engagement in regional economic development-experiences in the USA. Industry and Higher Education, 10(2), 79-87.
Mansfield, E. 1986. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Science, 32(2), 173-181.
Morgan, R. P., and Strickland, D. E. 2001. US university research contributions to industry：Findings and conjectures. Science and Public policy, 28(2), 113-121.
Mowery, D. C. 1998. The changing structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy. Rsearch Policy, 27(6), 639-654.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N. and Ziedonis, A. A. 2001. The gorwth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: An assessment of the effects of the BAyh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy, 30(1), 99-119.
Mowery D., Nelson R., and Fagerberg J. 2004. Systems of innovation-A critical review of the state of the art, Chapter7 in Handbook of Innovation, Oxford University Press.
Mowery, D., Nelson, R. R., Sampat, B. N., and Ziedonis, A. A. 2004. Ivory tower and industrial innovation: Univerity-industry technology before and after the bayh-dole act. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
NiosiJ. 2002. National systems ofinnovationsare “ X-efficient”( and x-effective) Why some are slow learners. Research Policy, 31(2) , 291-302.
Noyons, E. 2001. Bibliometric mapping of science in a science policy contest. Scientometrics, 50(1), 83-92.
O’Shea, P. R., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., and Roche, F. 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. university. Research Policy, 34(7), 994-1009.
Pakes, A., and Griliches, Z. 1980. Patents and R&D at the firm level: A first report. Economic Letters, 5(4), 377-381.
Pakes, A. 1985. On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. The Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 390-409.
Porter, M. E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
Powers, J. B., and McDougall, P. P. 2005. University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (3), 291-311.
Reitzig, M. 2003, What determines patent value-insights from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy, 32(1), 13-26.
Ruth, S. K. 1996. Successful business alliance. The Methodology of Business Education, 34, 10-23.
Schumann, P. A. Jr., Ramsley, D. and Prestwood, D. C. L. 1995. Measuring R&D performance. Research-Technology Management, 38(3), 45-54.
Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., and Link, A. 2003. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices：An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Thursby, J.G., and Jensen, R. 2001. Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing：a survey of major US universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59-72.
Thursby, J. G., and Kemp, S. 2002. Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31(1), 109-124.
Tijssen, R. J. W., Buter, R. K., and Van Leeuwen, T. N. 2002. Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389-412.
Valentin, F., and Jensen, R. L. 2007. Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 251-276.
Wong, P. K., and Singh, A. 2010. University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 83(1), 271-294.
Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., and Armstrong, J. 1998. Geographically localized knowledge: Spillovers or markets?. Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86.