:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民小學校長領導風格工作壓力與工作價值觀之研究
作者:蕭國倉
作者(外文):Hsiao, Kuochang
校院名稱:國立暨南國際大學
系所名稱:教育政策與行政學系
指導教授:翁福元
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:國民小學校長領導風格工作壓力工作價值觀primary school principalleadership stylework stresswork value belief
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(4) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:280
本研究旨在探討國民小學校長領導風格、工作壓力與工作價值觀間之關係。針對臺灣地區之公立國民小學校長進行問卷調查,藉以暸解國民小學校長領導風格、工作壓力與工作價值觀之現況,並分析不同背景變項之國民小學校長對校長領導風格、工作壓力與工作價值觀之差異情形,同時進一步探討與分析其相關情形。
經整理與分析相關文獻,建構本研究之理論基礎與研究架構,編製「國民小學校長領導風格、工作壓力與工作價值觀」之調查問卷,作為本研究蒐集資料的工具。本研究係以臺灣地區公立國民小學校長2,572人為研究的對象,依各縣市學校總數占全國學校總數之比例,於2012年4月採用「簡單隨機抽樣」的方式,抽取施測學校1,200所之國民小學校長進行郵寄問卷調查施測,回收問卷計有942 份,回收率為79.5%,有效問卷樣本數為923份,佔回收率之98.0%。調查所得資料以描述性統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數、皮爾遜積差相關、典型相關、多元逐步迴歸等統計方法,進行分析與討論歸納整理出以下結論:
1、國民小學校長知覺校長領導風格之權威指導型態屬於「中」的程度,民主參與型態屬於「高」的程度,放任無為型態屬於「中低」的程度。
2、國民小學校長知覺校長工作壓力屬於「中」的程度,以上級壓力的得分最高,以行政領導壓力的得分最低。
3、國民小學校長知覺校長工作價值觀屬於「高」的程度,以自我實現取向的得分最高,以安定與免於焦慮取向的得分最低。
4、國民小學校長領導風格各型態在不同性別、畢業學校、學校所在地、學校所屬區域等變項方面,知覺程度上有部份或全部的顯著差異。
5、國民小學校長工作壓力之各層面與整體工作壓力在不同年齡、畢業學校、任職校長總年資、學校規模、學校所在地、學校所屬區域、校長受訓機構等變項方面,有顯著差異。
6、國民小學校長工作價值觀之向度與整體工作價值觀在不同性別、婚姻狀況、最高學歷、學校規模、學校所在地、學校所屬區域等變項方面,有顯著差異。
7、國民小學校長領導風格之權威指導型態、放任無為型態與國民小學校長工作壓力的各層面、整體工作壓力有顯著正相關;民主參與型態與工作壓之工作負荷壓力、行政領導壓力、公共關係壓力、
角色期許壓力與整體工作壓力有顯著負相關。
8、國民小學校長領導風格之權威指導型態與國民小學校長工作價值觀的尊嚴取向、安全感與經濟報酬取向、安定與免於焦慮取向、整體工作價值觀有顯著正相關;民主參與型態與工作價值觀的各向
度、整體工作價值觀有顯著正相關;放任無為型態與工作價值觀的自我成長取向、自我實現取向、尊嚴取向、社會互動取向與整體工作價值觀有顯著負相關。
9、國民小學校長工作壓力的行政領導壓力與整體工作價值觀有顯著負相關;國民小學校長工作價值觀的自我實現取向、社會互動取向、安定與免於焦慮取向與整體工作壓力有顯著負相關。
10、國民小學校長領導風格之放任無為型態、權威指導型態與工作價值觀之自我成長取向、自我實現取向、安定與免於焦慮取向對於校長工作壓力具有最佳預測力。
依據上述研究結果提出具體建議,提供教育行政機關、國民小學校長及後續研究者作為參考。
The main purpose of this research is focused on the relationship amongst the leadership style, work stress and work valued believes of primary school principals. The researcher conducts questionnaire survey on public primary school principals in Taiwan in order to understand the principal’s leadership style, the status quo of work stress and work values, and to analyze the difference between various backgrounds of principal’s leadership style, work stress and work value belief.
In order to develop the rational and the framework of this study, the author practices a deep literature review. This literature work is used to develop the questionnaire as well. The parameter group of this research is the 2,572 primary school principals of Taiwan. The main method used to select the samples is simple random approach. After the sampling, there are 1,200 psp selected as the samples of their research. In factor, there are 1,200 copies of questionnaire survey process, there are 942 copies mailed back. After the review of these questionnaires, the ratio of mail-back is 79.5%, and the useful ratio is 98% from the mail-back, that is to say that the copy of useful questionnaire is 923. The main statics methods need to analyze the collected data are description statistics method, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Persons correlation, Canonical correlation, and stepwise multiple regression.
After the statistical analysis, the main findings are shown as follow:
1.The perceived leadership style of primary school principals are: the authoritarian-directive style is belonged to mid-high degree, that of democratic-participative leadership style is belonged to high degree, and the free-reign style is belonged to lower degree.
2.The perceived work stress of primary school principals are belonged to mid-high degree, which scored the highest of the superior pressure and the lowest of the administrative leadership pressure.
3.The perceived work value of primary school principals are belonged to high degree, which scored the highest of the self-fulfillment orientation and the lowest of safety and free from anxiety orientation.
4.The perceive leadership style of different variants of primary school principals is partially or totally significant difference.
5.The perceive work stress of different variants of primary school principals is partially or totally significant difference.
6.The perceive work value of different variants of primary school principals is partially or totally significant difference.
7.There is positive significant correlation of each dimension of and whole work-stress between the two leadership styles of primary school principals: authoritarian-directive oriented and free-reign oriented; negative significant difference of democratic-participative oriented.
8.There is positive significant correlation of each dimension of and whole work- value between the two leadership styles of primary school principals: authoritarian-directive oriented and democratic-participative; negative significant difference of free-reign oriented.
9.There is negative significant correlation between administrative leadership pressure and whole work value; self-fulfillment, social-interaction and safety and free from anxiety of work value have negative significant correlation with whole work pressure.
10.The free-reign and authoritarian-directive leadership styles, and the self-development, self-fulfillment, and safety and free from anxiety dimensions of work-value belief of primary school principals have go the highest predict capacity on their work-stress.
The helpful suggestions based on the findings mentioned above have made for educational administrators, primary principals and the future researchers.
一、中文部分
王心怡(2002)。國中校長情緒智力、轉型領導風格與辦學績效之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化。
王玉麟(2006)。高職科主任工作壓力之探討。學校行政,45,140-153。
王如哲、林明地、張志明、黃乃熒、楊振昇(1999)。教育行政。高雄:復文。
王保進(2006)。中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北:心理。
王淑俐(2004)。人際關係與溝通。臺北:三民書局。
王麗美(2007)。高職校長領導風格對學校組織創新發展之研究分析。商業職業教育,107,18-28。
王叢桂(1992)。社會轉型中之工作價值變遷研究(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告 No:NSC-81-0301-H-031-02)。
王叢桂(1995)。工作價值的傳遞與變遷及其影響因素的探索(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告 No:NSC-84-2413-H-031-002)。
王叢桂(2002)。影響工作價值觀傳遞之因素:男性中小企業主及一般職業工作者子女之比較。應用心理研究,14,77-18。new window
白華國(2006)。工作價值觀與領導行為之相關性研究 : 以女性國中校長為例(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學管理在職專班,臺中。
左冬玲(2006)。台北市高級中學生活輔導組長工作價值觀、工作壓力與工作滿足相關之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學生活應用科學研究所,臺北。
江麗美(譯)(2001)。有效壓力管理。(原作者:G. Hargreaves)。臺北:智庫。(原著出版年:1999)
江鴻鈞(1995)。台灣省國民小學初任校長工作壓力及其因應方式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台中師範學院教育研究所,臺中。
全國法規資料庫(2011)。檢索自http://law.moj.gov.tw/。
沈儀方(2004)。國小身心障礙資源班教師工作壓力、工作價值觀與專業承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院國民教育所,屏東。
沈育如(2011年8月25日)。雜務多責任重 青壯校長爆退休潮。聯合報。
檢索自http://mag.udn.com/mag/campus/storypage.
吳宗立(1996)。國中學校行政人員工作壓力與因應策略之研究。國教學報,8,99–131。
吳怡靜(2011年8月)。主管放輕鬆9招戰勝工作壓力。天下雜誌,478。檢索
自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.
吳明清(2006)。學校領導策略:以校長為領導者的整合架構。現代教育論壇,14,9-14。
吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北:知城數位科技。
吳清山(1990)。學校行政。臺北:心理出版社。
吳清山(2004)。學校行政研究。臺北:高等教育出版社。
吳清山(2004)。學校行政(六版)。臺北:心理出版社。
吳清山、林天佑(2005)。工作壓力。教育資料與研究,65,135。
吳清基(1989)。教師與進修。臺北:師大書苑。new window
吳清基(2001)。學校行政新論。臺北:師大師苑。
吳惠琴(2010)。雲林縣國民小學女校長領導風格與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所,雲林。
吳銘達(1990)。影響高中高職學生生計價值觀因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所,臺北。
吳劍雄(1999)。工作壓力的形成與因應之道之探討—個人、組織及社會環境的三管齊下。中國勞工,996,16-19。
吳鐵雄、李坤崇、劉佑星、歐慧敏(1995)。工作價值觀量表之編製研究。臺北: 行政院青年輔導委員會(編號:019044850074)。
李玉惠(2007)。中小學校長辦學績效評鑑。學校行政,50,46-62。
李弘暉(2011)。【管理趨勢】領導新風格 。檢索自
http://blog.yam.com/mpinshiang/article/16304531
李明來(2008)。國小校長領導風格、權力運用與教師組織變革支持度關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南。new window
李茂能(2006)。結構方程模式軟體Amos之簡介及其在測驗編製上之應用。台北:心理。
李家明(2009)。國民小學校長領導風格、行銷管理與學校公共關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
李新鄉、黃文宏、張哲彰(1997)。師範院校自費生與一般大學教育學程學生就讀滿意度、工作價值觀、教師角色知覺與任教承諾之比較研究(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告No:NSC-86-new window
2413-H-023-003)。
李新鏘、林宜美、陳美君、陳碧玉等譯(1999)。健康心理學:行為與健康入門。臺北:心理。
余朝權(1995)。管理人員工作價值與其項變因之研究:採生涯觀點。東吳經濟商學學報,16,1-30。new window
呂春嬌(2003)。大學圖書館長領導風格之質性研究。師大學報:人文與社會類,48(1),40。new window
宋茂松(2008)。國民中學校長工作壓力與因應策略之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化。
沈振基(2005)。臺南市國民小學推展公共關係現況之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南。
周明守(1996)。釋放工作壓力。臺北:尚文。
周春美、沈建華(1993)。生涯的導航-談高職學生正確工作價值觀之具體做法。技術 及職業教育雙月刊,15,25-29。
周譽峰(2008)。國民小學校長轉型領導、互易領導與教師專業成長關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
林天祐等著(2000)。臺灣教育探原。臺北:國立教育資料館。
林天佑(2000) 。從知識經濟思維教育人員專業成長與發展。學校行政,9,24-27。
林文律(2006)。中小學校長談校務經營。臺北:心理。
林文毅( 2007 )。高雄縣國民小學校長領導風格與學校創新經營之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
林合懋(2000)。國民小學校長的成就目標、終身學習經驗、轉型領導與其多元智慧學校經營理念之關係(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北。new window
林邦傑、李良哲、黃貴祥(1990)。大專在學青年工作價值觀與工作環境需求之調查報告。臺北: 行政院青年輔導委員會(編號:19044790037)。
林明地(1996)。學校與社區關係—從家長參與的理念談起。教育研究,51,30-40。new window
林明地(1998)。家長參與學校教育的研究與實際:對教育改革的啟示。教育研究資訊,7(2),61-79。new window
林明地(2000)。校長領導的影響:近三十年來研究結果的分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,10(2),232-254。
林明地(2003)。校長學:工作分析與角色研究取向。臺北:五南。
林明地(2004)。學習型學校的組織文化研究暨校長領導實際分析(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告 No:NSC-91-2413-H-194-006)。new window
林明地譯(1998)。學校領導:平衡邏輯與藝術( Deal, T. E.; Peterson, K. D.著)。臺北:五南。
林幸台(1988)。性別因素、職業自我效能與職業選擇的關係:高一學生對職業的考量與選擇之研究。輔導學報,11,71-94。new window
林秀靜(1998)。國中資優班教師工作壓力與因應方式之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所,彰化。
林信榕(2007)。校長領導與學校文化探究。臺北:師大書苑。new window
林若慧(2006)。以工作壓力模型探討工作--休閒之衝突:兼論緩衝壓力假說。(未出版之博士論文)。銘傳大學管理研究所,臺北。new window
林保豐(2002)。國民小學教師工作壓力、工作價值觀與組織承諾關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所,屏東。
林偉賢、郭騰尹(2002)。了解自己 DIY:認識自己最富有。臺北:實踐家文化。
林萬來(2006)。國小校長工作壓力及其因應策略:以雲林縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學,嘉義。
林新發(1999﹚。教育與學校行政研究-原理和應用。臺北:師大書苑。
林靜宜(1998)。專科學生工作價值觀及其相關因素之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系,高雄。
邱勝濱(2008)。高中職校長領導特質、領導行為與領導效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系,彰化。new window
邱榮茂( 2002 )。臺中縣國民小學校長領導行為與管理模式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所,臺中。
侯志偉(2009)。學校創新經營與教師工作投入之關係研究-以校長領導風格、行政服務品質及教師專業成長為干擾變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南。
柯幸宜(2008)。竹、苗三縣市國民小學校長工作壓力與因應策略之調查研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所,臺北。
段秀玲(2002)。壓力管理:心靈紓解教戰守策。臺北:楷達文化。
姜淑燕(2008)。雲嘉南國民中學校長工作壓力與職業倦怠關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。致遠管理學院教育研究所,臺南。
洪瑞斌、劉兆明 (2003)。工作價值觀研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,19,211-250。new window
范熾文(2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window
范熾文(2011)。學校創新經營: 意涵、困境與因應策略。教育人力與專業發展雙月刊,28 (1),79-85。
翁桓盛(2002)。中等學校實施校長遴選制度後校長領導風格與辦學績效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化。
徐碩志(2011)。臺中市國民小學教師知覺校長領導風格與教師超額問題因應策略之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中。
徐儆暉(2001)。工作場所職業壓力。檢索自 http://www.iosh.gov.tw/data/f2/sp58-9.htm
徐藝華(2006)。別讓回任成為校長的斷魂梯,師友,467,8-14。
秦夢群(1997)。教育行政-理論部分。臺北:五南。
秦夢群(1998)。教育行政-理論部分。臺北:五南。
秦夢群(2001)。教育領導取向之分析。發表於國立中正大學教育研究所第九次教育行政論壇,嘉義。
秦夢群(2004)。校長領導與學校組織效能關係之後設分析研究(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告 No:NSC-92-2413-H-004-003)。
席榮維(2007)。國民中小學校長工作價值觀、重要他人支持、自我效能感對其工作選擇的影響研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北。new window
夏林清、游慧卿(1984)。工作價值觀問卷介紹與初步修訂報告。測驗與輔導雙月刊,60,1030-1036。
許志賢(1999)。教育人員的進修現況及未來走向。「教育人員進修面面觀」學術研討會,國立教育資料館。new window
許烱祥(2007)。中部地區國民小學初任校長工作壓力及其因應策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中。
張永欽( 2002 )。臺北市立國小校長領導行為塑造學校組織文化與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所,臺北。
張玟慧、徐超聖(2011)。國小校長領導風格與學校本位課程發展之關係。教育資料與研究雙月刊,101,31-58。new window
張明輝(1998)。學校行政革新專輯。臺北:國立台灣師範大學。
張明輝(2009)。學校經營的軟實力。教育研究月刊,188,27-35。new window
張春興(1996)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華。
張信務(2011年8月9日)。解決人才荒,制度改革才能治本。臺灣立報。檢索自http://www.lihpao.com/
張清濱(1997)。學校行政與教育革新。台北:台灣書店。
張酒雄、楊百世、楊志能、莊麗娟、董力華、李新民、黃昌誠、廖仁智(1997)。高雄地區高中生升學壓力與因應行為之調查研究。教育學刊,13,149-195。new window
張華堂(2005)。國民中學校長工作壓力及其因應方式之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所,臺北。
張瑞村(2008)。幼稚園教師工作價值觀之初探研究。朝陽人文社會學刊,6 (2) ,145-196。new window
張慶勳(1996)。學校組織行為。臺北:五南。new window
張慶勳(1997)。學校組織轉化領導研究。高雄:復文。new window
張慶勳 (2000)。國小校長轉型、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。高雄:復文。new window
張慶勳(2004)。國小校長領導風格與行為之研究。屏東師院學報,20,1-38。new window
張慶勳(2006)。校本文化領導的理念與實踐:一位國小初任校長的個案研究。高雄:復文。new window
莊雅茜(2010)。領導風格、組織特性與員工創造力關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。南台科技大學企業管理系人力資源管理研究所,臺南。
莊麗霞(2009)。探尋~一位校長領導風格之生命敘說(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
康自立(1992)。職業發展的探討。職業教育學院學報,1,1-30。
郭明德(2002)。現階段教育改革中,校長角色的定位與因應策略。研習資訊,19(4),62-75。
郭逸瑄(2003)。高級中學校長領導行為與教師賦權增能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所,臺北。
陳志誠(2006)。國民中學校長工作壓力及其因應策略之研究-以雲嘉南五縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。致遠管理學院教育研究所,臺南。
陳昆仁 (2003)。推動九年一貫課程─校長領導的理念與藝術。學校行政,33,105-116。new window
陳玫君(1995)。影響五專生生涯決策能立即工作價值觀的相關因素之研究。臺南師院學生學刊,16,39-63。
陳英豪、汪榮才、劉佑星、歐滄和及李坤崇(1987)。工作價值觀量表修訂報告。臺南師專學報,20,1-33。new window
陳秉璋、陳信木(1990)。價值社會學。臺北:桂冠。
陳莘昀(1992)。如何解除工作壓力。臺北:光見。
陳瑞惠(2003)。私立高中教師工作價值觀、工作壓力與組織承諾之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化。
陳銘宗、劉兆明(1995)。工作價值觀及其形成歷程之探討。應用心理學報,4,73-103。
陳麗如(2010)。臺南市國民中學初任女性校長工作壓力及其因應策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺灣首府大學教育研究所,臺南。
陳慶瑞(1995)。費德勒權變領導理論之分析與擴展。臺北:師大書苑 。new window
曹國雄(1994)。工作價值對員工工作態度的影響。人力資源學報,4,1-20。
教育部國語推行委員會(2007)。教育部重編國語辭典修訂本(網路版)。檢索自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgi-bin/newDict/dict.sh?cond=%AD%B7 %AE%E6&pieceLen=50&fld=1&cat=&ukey=1151271993&serial=1&recNo=1&op=f&imgFont=1
游光昭、張明輝 (2002)。學校轉型領導與學習型學校理念的實踐─以一位高中校長推動「校園網路化」的過程為例。中等教育,53(1)。new window
曾錦泉(2004)。國民中學組織變革與校長工作壓力及因應策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化。
曾瑞醮(2005)。私立高級中等學校校長的工作、壓力分析與因應策略。學校行政雙月刊,38,31-50。
黃同圳(1993)。青年勞工工作價值觀與組織向心力之研究。臺北:行政院青年輔導委員會。
黃光國(1977)。中國社會的因應策略方式。中華心理學刊,19,61-73。
黃光國(1993)。自我實現與華人社會中的價值變遷。載於楊國樞(主編),中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點(121-172頁)。臺北:桂冠。new window
黃宗顯(1988)。國小校長工作壓力與行政決定合理性的關係研究。臺南師院學 報,21,71-116。new window
黃昆輝(1989)。教育行政學。臺北:東華書局 。
黃昆輝(1996 )。教育行政學(二版)。臺北:東華書局。
黃昆輝(2002)。教育行政學。臺北:東華書局。
黃振恭(2008)。不同世代國民小學教師工作價值觀、角色知覺與教學自我效能和專業表現之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所,嘉義。new window
黃傳永(1999)。校長轉型領導與家長參與學校教育之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學教育研究所,花蓮。
黃寶園(2003)。結合統合分析與結構方程模式之理論驗證:以壓力調節反應模式之建立與驗證為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。new window
楊國樞(1994)。中國人的價值觀—社會科學觀點。臺北:桂冠。new window
葉連祺(2005)。國小校長領導能力理論、評量和分類之研究(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告No:NSC-92-2413-H-260-007)。
葉日武(譯)(1992)。新時代的領導風格-激發潛能的管理技巧(原作者:Dr. Jard DeVille)。臺北:中國生產力中心。(原著出版年:1996)
葉重新(1995)。常用教育研究法簡介。國教輔導,35(1)。
趙傑夫(1988)。我國臺灣地區國民中學校長工作壓力之研究-工作壓力與社會支持、因應方式、工作滿足關係之分析(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
廖昌珺(2009)。國民小學校長不同領導風格與教師專業發展態度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政學系,南投。
廖學蔚(2007)。屏東縣國民小學校長轉化、互易領導與學校創新經營關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所,屏東。
蔡秀香(2006)。台北縣國民中學校長工作價值觀與學校效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北。
蔡育佑(2006)。運動教練工作壓力、工作價值觀與組織承諾之相關分析。輔仁大學體育學刊,5,106-119。new window
蔡炳坤(2007)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
蔡培村(1980)。國中校長領導型式、教師人格特質與學校組織氣氛之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。new window
蔡培村(1996)。學校經營與管理。高雄:麗文文化。
蔡培村(1998)。學校經營與管理學校經營與管理。高雄:麗文文化。
蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學-理論、實務與研究。高雄:麗文文化。
蔡進雄(2001)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣師範大學教育學系,臺北。new window
蔡寶俊(2005)。教育改革中國民小學校長之角色變遷與工作壓力之探討。海峽兩岸中小學校長培育與校務評鑑學術研討會發表之論文,臺北。
潘慧玲(2000)。教育議題的性別視野。臺北:國立台灣師範大學。
潘震澤譯(2001):為什麼斑馬不會得胃潰瘍?壓力、壓力相關疾病及抗壓之道最新指南。臺北:遠流。
歐慧敏(2010)。學前教師工作壓力、因應策略、工作倦怠之評量級工作壓力適
應歷程之研究(國科會補助專題研究計畫成果報告 No:NSC-98-2410-H-343-014)。
歐慧敏(2008)。教師工作壓力與工作倦怠間之適應歷程。教育研究月刊,166, 109-123。new window
鄭彩鳳(2003)。學校行政-理論與實務(第三版)。高雄:麗文。
鄭雅文(1996)。國民小學校長領導型態與教師溝通滿足感關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所,臺南。
劉兆明(1991)。工作動機理論的發展。應用心理學報,1,39-51。
劉安彥、陳英豪(1997)。青年心理學。臺北:三民書局。
劉宣容(2001)。桃竹苗四縣市國小教師工作價值觀與參與學校行政決定之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所,臺北。
劉雅惠(2011)。中彰地區國民中小學教師的工作壓力、工作價值觀與工作倦怠之相關研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學教育學系,臺中。new window
劉瑞梅(2007)。臺南縣市國民小學校長領導風格、行政溝通行為與學校效能之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南。
蔣奎雨(2006)。高雄市國民小學校長領導風格、教師工作壓力與學校效能的關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南大學教育經營與管理研究所,臺南。
盧慧凌(1999)。國民小學教師工作價值與任教意願之研究。國立新竹師院國民教育研所論文集,4,228-247。
錢淑芬(1998)。工作價值觀量表在軍官養成教育上的運用,復興崗學報,65,83-142。new window
蕭國倉(2003)。國民小學特殊教育教師工作價值觀與工作壓力相關之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所,彰化。
蕭國倉、過修齊、王素貞(2008)。當前我國國小校長領導權面臨之挑戰及因應策略:數個案例分析。學校行政論壇第二十次研討會發表之論文,臺灣師範大學。
謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。臺北:高等教育。
謝文全(2004)。教育行政學。臺北:高等教育 。
謝純育(2007)。宜蘭縣國民小學初任校長工作壓力與因應策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。佛光大學社會教育學研究所,宜蘭。
濮世緯(1997)。國小校長轉型領導、教師制握信念與教師職業倦怠關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,臺北。
濮世緯(2003)。國小校長轉型領導、學校文化取向與學校創新經營關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學教育學系,臺北。new window
繆敏志(2000)。組織變革策略與文化對經理人工作壓力與適應影響之研究。臺北:揚智文化。new window
繆敏志(1993)。工作壓力之理論基礎與模式及其管理方法。中國行政,82(2),21-46。
鞠德風(2008)。魅力領導的形成理論、作用和影響─一個整合性觀點。復興崗學報,92,439-458。new window
魏方亭(2001)。嘉南地區圈中教師工作價值觀、自我效能感及工作壓力與任教承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學教育研究所,嘉義。
藍采風(2003)。全方位壓力管理。臺北:幼獅。
羅虞村(1986)。領導理論研究。臺北:文景。
羅虞村(1995)。領導理論研究(四版)。臺北:文景。


二、英文部分
Adam, E. N., & Nati K. (2006). School principal's leadership style and teachers' self-efficacy. Planning and Changing, 37 (3-4), 205-218.
Anderson, T. C. (2001). The leadership styles of effective beginning principals: Transformational or transactional? (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation), Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO.
Angerer, J. M. (2003). Job burnout. Journal of Employment Counseling, 40, 98-107.
Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B.M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Third edition manual and sampler set. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.
Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and transactional, charismatic, and transformational leadership: A test of antecedents. Journal of
Leadership and Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26-40.
Bargal, D., & Schmid, H. (1989). Recent themes in theory and research on leadership and their implication for management of the human services
administration in social work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 37-55.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.New York:Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1990, winter). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics,: 19-31.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Blanch, R., & Garcia, R. (2008). Factor structure of scores from the maslach burnout inventory: A review and meta-analysis of 45 exploratory
and confirmatory factor-analytic studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement.68, 797-823.

Bloggett J. M. S. (2005). Examing the relationship between an elementary school principle's espoused beliefs about teaching and learning,
leadership style, and the instructional environment of the school. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Auburn University, Auburn, AL.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boyatzis, R. E., & Skelly, F. R. (1991). The impact of changing values on organizational Behavior Reader. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Brown, D. (2002). The role of work and cultural values in occupational choice, satisfaction and success: A theoretical statement. Journal of
Counseling and Development, 80 (1), 48-56.
Bryman. A.(1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London:SAGE Publications.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, US. Department of Labor (2005). Occupation outlook handbook, 2006-07 edition, educationadministrators, Retrieved
from: http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos007.htm
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY:Harper and Row.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Pbs..
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Blackwell, Oxford.
Chadwick, L. J. (1999). A comparative analysis of transformational and transactional leadership in public school principals and their effect
on school culture. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Regent University, Virginia Beach, VA.
Chao, Y. T. (1990). Culture and work organizations: The Chinese case. International Journal of Psychology, 25, 583-592.
Christina, H. G. (2011). The role of the principal's leadership style in the implementation of ICT policy. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 42 (2), 311-326.
Cohen, J. (1988). Satistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Cooper, C. L. (1981). The stress check. London: Prentice-Hall.
Cooper, D. E. (1983). Authenticity and learning: Nietzsche's educational philosophy. London: Routledge.
Curtis, A. J. (2000). Health psychology. Boston: Routledge.
Daniel Z. (2010). Values congruence:Its effect on perceptions of Montana elementary school principal leadership practices and student
achievement. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Montana, Missoula, MT.
Davis J., & Wilson. S. M. (2000). Principals' efforts to empower teachers: Effects on teacher motivation and job satisfaction and stress. The
Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(6),349-353.
Dessler, G. (1997). Human resources management (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Dituri, J. Z. (2004). Explaining teachers’ intentions to aspire to the principalship. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Columbia
University, New York, NY.
Donald, W., & Amber, J. (2010). Towards a framework for leadership coaching. School Leadership & Management,30 (2),159-169.
Dose, P. J. (1997). Methods of coping with values at work: A conceptual analysis and empirical study of measurement issues. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, 11, 135-150.
Driver, M. J. (1990). The dynamic decision maker. New York:Harper and Row.
Erez, M., & Israeli, R. (1980). Work-value orientations and their relationships teachers' activities. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED
236680)
Erik, J. P. (2008). The dynamic between work values and part-time work experiences across the high school years. Journal of Vocational
Behavior ,73 (1), 143-158.
Erik, J. P., & Jeylan T. M. (2010). Intrinsic work value-reward dissonance and work satisfaction during young adulthood. Journal of Vocational
Behavior,76 (3), 507-519.
Estep, T. A. (2000). A study of the relationships between transformational leadership, transactional leadership and specified demographic
factors as enablers of teacher empowerment in rural Pennsylvania School Districts in Appalachia intermediate. (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation), Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
Evans, T. J. (1996). Elementary teachers and principals perception of principal leadership style and school social organization. (Unpublished
doctoral dissertation), Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
Farr, D. T. (2004). School principal recruitment and selection in Montana. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Montana State University,
Bozeman, MT.
Ferrandino, V. L. & Tirozzi, G. N. (2001). How do you reinvent a principal?
Principal perspective. Feb 13, 2006, retrieved from:
http://www.naesp.org/ContentLoad.do?contentId=902
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York:McGraw-Hill.
Fiedler, F.E. & Link, T.G. (1994). Leader intelligence, interpersonal stress, and task performance. In R. J. Sternberg & R. K. Wagner (Eds.).
Mind in context: Interactionist perspectives on human intelligence, (pp.152-167). New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
Fields, L. J. (2005). Patterns of stress and coping mechanisms for novice school administrators. February 25, 2008, retrieved from:
http:// www.usca.edu/esays/vol142005/Fields.pdf
Fowler, A. (1991). How early phonological development might set the stage for phoneme awareness. In S. Brady & D. Shankweiler (Eds.),
Phonological processes in literacy, (pp. 97-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
French, J. R., & Kahn, R. L. (2005). A programmatic approach to studying the industrial environment and mental health. Journal of Social
Issues, 18(1), 1-47.
Friedman, I. A. & Farber, B. A. (1992). Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Research 86(1),
471-82.
Friesen, D. & Richards, D. (1984). Organization stress experienced by teachers and principals. Paper Presented at The Annual Meeting of The
American Educational Research Association (New Orlans, LA, April 23-27, 24-25).
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 693-727.
Fullan, M. (1997). What’s worth fighting for in the principalship. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gilbert, P. K. (1997). Transformational and transactional leadership by community college presidents. Dissertation Abstracts International:
Section A: Humanities and Social Science, 58 (7), 9801092. Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. AAT 9826008)
Glenn, R., & Sheila, W. (2010). Beginning teachers' pupil control ideologies: An empirical examination of the impact of beliefs about
education, mentorship, induction, and principal leadership style. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 104, 43-48.
Gmelch, W. H. (1983). Stress for success: How to optimize your performance.Theory into Practice, 22(1), 7-14.
Goffee, R. & Jones, G. (2000). Why should Anyone be led by you? Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 62–70.
Goleman, D. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Grant, B. A. (1997). Transformational leadership of principals in a mid-size school district in Colorado. Doctoral Dissertation of Colorado
State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Science, 57, 07A, 2765.
Greenberg, S. (1995). Signal transduction of phagocytosis. Trends Cell Biol. 5, 93-99.
Griffin, K. W. (2000). Book review: Creating health behavior change by Cheryl L.Perry. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 664-666.
Griffith, J. (2004). Relation of principal transformational leadership to school staff job satisfaction staff turnover and school performance.
Journal of Educational Administration,42 (3), 333–356.
Groves, D. E. (1996). The effects of transformational leadership behavior of national blue ribbon secondary schools in Cuyahoga Country Ohio.
Dissertations Abstracts International, Section A: Humanities and Social Science, 57(8), 3337. (UMI No.9701816)
Guic, E., Bilbao, M. A., & Bertin C. (2002). Occupational stress and health in a sample of chilean executives. Revista Medica de Chile. 130
(10), 1101-1112.
Gwen, B., & Barbara N. M. (2010). Examination of the effectiveness of male and female educational leaders who made use of the invitational
leadership style of leadership. Journal of Invitational Theory and Practice, 16, 30-56.
Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall.
Hand, L. E. (2010). Role factors, leadership styles and stress among Catholic primary school executives. Bond University School of Humanities
and Social Sciences Department of Psychology.
Hines, J. A. (1999). A case study of women superintendents in the state of Ohio in their roles as transformational leaders in creating school
district climate. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Akron, Akron, OH.
Hodgetts, R. M. (1991). Organizational behavior: Theory and practice, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Hoernemann, M. E. (1998). Transformational leadership and the elementary school principal. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Purdue
University, West Lafayette, IN.
Holland, J. L. (1985). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
House, R. J. (1971). A path goal theory of effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338.
House, R. J., Woycke, J., & Fodor, E. M. (1988). Charismatic and noncharismatic leaders: Differences in behavior and effectiveness. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 64-73). San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass Publisher.
Howley, A., Andrianaivo, S. & Perry, J. (2005). The pain outweighs the gain: Why teachers don’t want to become principals. Teachers College
Record, 107(4), 757-782.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice (6th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Ivancevich, J.M., & Matteson, M.T. (1980). Stress and work a managerial perspective. New York:Scott, Foresman.
Jackson, R. L. (1999). Transformational and transactional leadership in division administration at three institutions of higher education : an
application of the Bass & Avolio Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati, OH.
Jacobs, T. O., & Jaques, E. (1990). Military executive leadership. In K.E.Clark & M. B. Clark (Eds.). Measures of leadership (pp.281-295),
West Orange , NJ:Leadership Library of America.
Joynt, P., & Warner, M. (2002). Managing across cultures: Issues and perspectives. (2nd ed.) London: International Thomson Business Press.
Julie P. K. (2003). Correlation study between leadership style stress in high school
principals in Indiana. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
Kalleberg, A. L. (1997). Work value and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42, 124-143.
Kim,H. S. & Shim,S. (2003). Gender-based approach to the understanding of leadership roles among retail managers .Human Resource Development
Quarterly, 14, 321-342.
Kotler, P. & Andreasen, A.R. (1991). Strategies marketing for nonprofit organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall ,Inc.
Kotter, J. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. NY : The Free Press.
Krohnea, H. W. (2002). Stress and coping theories. Available From A Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Germany.
Koontz, H. & Weihrich,H. (1990). Essentials of management. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-hill.
Kouzes, J. M. & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge. (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishing.
Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational behavior, Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53 (1), 27-35.
Lashway, L. (2006). Distributing leadership. In S. C. Smith & P. K. Piele (Eds.), School leadership: Handbook for excellence in student
learning (4th ed., pp. 245-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
Larry C. (1985). Principal stress. Paper presented at the Annual Fall Conference of the Arkansas Association of Elementary School Principals
(15th, Little Rock, AR, November 10-12, 1985).
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.
Leithwood, K. (1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30 (4),498-518.
Linda, T., &. D. (2005). An exploration of the role of leisure in coping with work related stress using sequential tree analysis. British
Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33 (1), 101-116.
Locke, E. A., & Henne, D. (1986). Work motivation theories. In C. K. Cooper & I. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and
organizational psychology (pp. 1-35). New York: Wiley.
Lu, L., & Lin, G. C. (2002). Work values and job adjustment of Taiwanese workers. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 10 (2),
79-87.
Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (1996). Educational administration: Concept and practices. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Lussier, R., & Achua, C. (2004). Leadership: Theory,application, and skill development (2nd ed.). New York: Thompson South-Western.
Lutton, T. (1988). A study of burnout, stress, and coping strategies among elementary principals. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation),
University of La Verne, La Verna, CA.
Mack T. H. (2007). The effect of leadership style on preservice concerns about becoming a principal. Educational Leadership and
Administration: Teaching and Program evelopment, 19,103-116.
Manthei, R., & Gilmore, A. (1996). Teacher stress in intermediate schools. Educational Research, 38 (1),3-19.
Maria, P., & Ioannis, A. (2008). Burnout, job satisfaction and instructional assignment-related sources of stress in Greek special education
teachers. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education,55 (1),61-76.
Maslach C. (1993). Burnout: A multidimensional perspective. In W. B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach & T. Marek (Eds.), Professional burnout: Recent
developments in theory and research (pp.53-69). Washington, DC: Taylor and Frencis.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). The truth about burnout: How organizations cause personal stress and what to do about it. San Francisco,
CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout, Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
Mason, A. M. (1998). Perceptions of presidential leadership by chief academic officers and their relationships to job satisfaction, motivation
toward extra effort, and perceived effectiveness in American community colleges: a composite model of transformational and transactional
leadership. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
McCall, M., & Lombardo, M. (1983). Off the track: Why and how successful executives get derailed (Tech.Rep.No.21). Greensboro, NC: Center for
Creative Leadership.
McGrath, J. E. (1976). Social and psychological factors in stress. New York:Holt Rinehare and Winston.
McKenna, E. F. (1987). Psychology in business: Theory and applications. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mehmet, K. (2007). The effects of leadership styles on organizational health. Educational Research Quarterly, 30 (3), 23-55.
Melanie, E. L., & Jo-Ida, C. H. (2011). Evidence of construct validity for work values. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79 (2), 379-390.
Michalinos, Z., & Sotiroula, I. (2010). Leadership styles and multicultural education approaches: An exploration of their relationship.
International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13 (2), 163-183.
Mujumdar, S. (2008). Work stress in Australian professionals:The role of culture, gender and work-family conflict. School of Psychology
University of Adelaide.
Mullin, A. G., & Keedy,J.L. (1998). Examining a superintendent's transformational leadership: From the model to successful practice. Retrieved
from ERIC database (ED 421758).
Nobile, J. J., & McCormick J. (2005). Job satisfaction and occupational stress in Catholic primary schools. A paper presented at the Annual
Conference of the Australian Association forResearch in Education, Sydney, November 27th– December 1st.
Northouse, P. G. (2001). Leadership: Theoryand and practice(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ogle, E. H. (2000). The art of being human: A case study of transformational leadership. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of
California, Los Angeles, CA.
Okoroma, N. S. & Robert-Okah, I. (2007). Administrative stress: Implications for secondary school principals. Educational Research Quarterly,
30 (3), 3-21.
Parker, D. F., & DeCotiis, T. A. (1983). Organizational determinants of jobstress. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32, 160-
177.
Paul A. W., Donna H.M., & Rose M.N. (1998). The impact of work values and principal job attributes on principal selection decisions. Report:
ED435131, 27.
Paula, K. Y. & Allan, W. (2010). Secondary school vice-principals: Commitment, challenge, efficacy and synchrony. British Educational Research
Journal,36 (4), 531-548.
Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and
professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53.
Phillips, S., Sen D. & McNamee, R. (2007). Prevalence and causes of self-reported work- related stress in head teachers. Occupational Medicine
(57), 367–376.
Peters, T. J. (1997). Transactional and transformational leadership: Predictors of employee satisfaction, commitment, and productivity.
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI. Available from ProQuest Digital Dissertations (AAI9825395).
Rick, G., & Karen, D. M. (2011). Leading through a fiscal nightmare: The impact on principals and superintendents. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(8),
42-47.
Ritter, F. E., & Reifers, A. L. (2006), Lessons from defining theories of stress. Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems (IMoCS), 254-262.
Robbins, S. P. (1996). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior (9th ed). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organizational behavior (10th ed).Boston, Pearson Education International,Inc.
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational behavior (11th ed). New Jersey, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2002). Management. Upper Saddle River. NJ: Pearson Education.
Robbins R. & Tanck H. (1992). Stress, coping techniques, and depressed affect: Explorations within a normal sample. Psychological Reports: 70,
147-152.
Robert J. W. & Lee J.L. (2010). Stress and the Administrator of rural schools being rebuilt. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association (Denver, CO, Apr 30-May 4, 2010),13.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
Rosenholtz, S. (1991). Teachers' workplace: The organization of schools. New York Teachers College Press.
Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. London: Praeger.
Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revising the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Savery, L. K. & Detiuk, M. (1986). Perceived stress levels of principals. Journal of Educational Administration.24 (2), 272-281.
Schultz, D. P (1977). Psychology and industry today. N.Y.: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Scott, C., Ahadi, S. & Krug, S.E. (1990). An experience sampling approach to the study of principal instructional leadership II: A comparison
of activities and beliefs as bases for understanding effective school leadership. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 327934)
Scott, N. M. (2003). Let’s keep our quality school principals on the job.High School Journal, 86(2), 50-56.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1990). Value-added leadership:How to get extraordinary performance in school. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich..
Sharon, E. P. & A Ross T. (2007).Values in action: Observations of effective principals at work. Journal of Educational Administration, 45
(2), 204-228.
Shina O.(2008). Dimensions of job stress among public secondary school principals in Oyo State, Nigeria. Retrieve from ERIC database. (ED
503654)
Short, P. M., & Rinehart. J. S. (1992). Teacher empowerment and school climate. Retrieve from ERIC database. (ED 347678).
Slavin, L. A., Rainer, K. L., McCreary, M. L., & Gowda, K. K. (1991). Toward a multicultural model of the stress process. Special Issue:
Multicuturalism as a fourth force in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70 (1), 156-163.
Stanford, S. C., & Salmon, P. (1993). Stress: From synapse to syndrome. London: Academic Press.
Sutherland, V. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1991). Understanding stress: A psychological perspective for health professional. London: Chapman and
Hall.
Super, D. E. (1970). Manual for the work values. Chicago: Riverside Publishing Company.
Super, D. E. (1980). A life-span, life-space approach to career development. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129–148.
Taylor, S. E. (1999). Health Psychology (4th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
Thomas, K.W. & Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of
Management Review, 15, 666-681.
Tong Z.X., Zhang J.M.,Yu Y.L.& Ga G. (2010). Drained deformation
behavior of anisotropic sands during cyclic rotation of principal stress axes. Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering,136
(11), 1509-1518.
Trice, H. M. & Beyer, J. M. (1990), Charisma and its routinization in two social movement organization, Research in Oganization Behavior, 8
,113-164.
Tymon, W. G., Jr. (1988). An empirical investigation of a cognitive model of powerment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Temple
University, Philadelphia, PA. Abstracts International: Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 49/08-A (University Microfilms NO. 88-
18,866).
Ubben, G. C., Hughes, L.W., & Norris, C.J. (2001). The principal: Creative leadership for effective schools (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and
Bacon.
Ursin, H., & Eriksen, H. R. (2004). The cognitive activation theory of stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 567–592.
Vanus, D. & McAllister, I. (1991). Gender and work orientation. Work and Occupations, 18(1), 72-93.
West, D. L. (2010). The daily lives of principals: Twenty-one principals in the 21st century. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University
of North Carolina, Greensboro, NC.
Weston, K. E. (2001). An examination of the relationship between transactional and transformational leadership styles and sex-role
identifications of elementary school principals. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), George Washington University, Washington, DC.
William, F. (2009). Principals value-informed decision making, intrapersonal moral discord, and pathways to resolution: The complexities of
moral leadership praxis. Journal of Educational Administration, 47 (1), 50-74.
Winter, P. A., & Morgenthal, J. R. (2002). Principal recruitment in a reform environment: Effects of school achievement and school level on
applicant attraction to the job. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38 (3), 319-340.
Wong K.S., Cheuk W.H., & Rosen S. (2000). The influences of job stress and supervisor support on negative affects and job satisfaction in
kindergarten principals. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality,15 (1), 85-98.
Wormer, K., Besthorn, F. H., & Keefe, T. (2007). Human behavior and the social environment: Groups, communities, and organizations. New York,
Oxford, University Press.
Yukl, G. A. (1994). Leadership in organizations. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall.
Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
Zaccaro, S. J., Kemp, C., & Bader, P. (2004). Leader traits and attributes. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 101-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE