臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：台灣金融控股公司管理績效分析
作者：劉憲明
作者(外文)：Liu, Hsian-Ming
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：楊千
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2012
主題關鍵詞：效率；競爭優勢；網絡資料包絡法；公司治理；風險值；條件風險值；Efficiency；Competitive advantage；Network DEA；Corporate governance；Value at Risk；Conditional VaR
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
自從一系列的金融改革及開放之後，台灣金融市場中機構數量變得更為的密集且彼此間的競爭亦更加的激烈。雖然金融的改革與開放有助於台灣金融市場整體效率的提升，然伴隨而來的卻是國內金融機構面臨一個變動相對快速且高度競爭的市場環境。而這結構性的改變，促使台灣的金融機構必須進一步檢視其經營上優勢與弱點，期獲得更多得競爭優勢，維持企業的永續發展。
為了能充分了解台灣金控公司的經營效能及其持續性之競爭優勢，本研究採用二階段資料包絡模式，評估各家金控公司之管理與生產效能，並進一步探討其內部公司治理機制，乃至於外部風險因子對其經營績效的影響與關連。在管理績效的分析指出，金控公司的獲利能力在其經營績效上扮演著關鍵的因素，而規模較小的金控公司因具有較佳的獲利力，故管理績效與競爭優勢上表現較為優異；另獲利來源的剖析亦指出，多數金控公司的主要獲利來源雖然來自於原本的主要業務，但跨業整合擴充經濟範疇的策略，確實能擴充獲利的來源及增加經營的競爭優勢。在公司治理機制的研究指出股權結構及董事會組成等傳統治理變數對於金控公司的管理績效僅具有限的解釋效果。因此，公司外部的投資者必須藉由其他的輔助性指標，如機構投資人的持股與管理者的直接持股及股權偏離程度，來監控公司的經營狀況及診斷投資價值被管理損害的可能性。因此，在公司治理議題的研究上指出金控公司的治理機制及投資者保護仍需回歸至內部營運資訊的揭露程度及管理階層的利益與公司整體價值的收斂程度來做判斷，亦即兩者相關程度越高之金控公司，其公司的管理績效表現越佳。另在金控公司經營風險的分析指出信用風險、市場風險及風險傳遞均會對公司的管理績效有顯著的影響。而透過這些指標的運用，金控公司的管理階層及投資者，不僅可以瞭解公司的風險偏好及投資組合的風險來源，並可進一步降低公司的風險程度及提高經營的績效。
Taiwan’s financial industry remains highly fragmented and competitive after a series of financial liberalization and restructuring. With the enforcement of these fiscal policies, domestic financial institutions face a more dynamic, increasingly intense and highly competitive environment even as the banking industry’s overall efficiency has gradually been enhanced. This structural change has further forced financial institutions to inspect the performance of their strengths and weaknesses and to identify improvement directions so as to gain further competitive advantages.
To provide sufficient details of managerial performance and competitive advantage for financial holding companies (FHCs) in Taiwan, a multiple-factors performance model based on two-stage series model is employed to assess managerial performance and subsequently identify determinant governance mechanisms and risk factors of the FHCs in Taiwan by the truncated regression model.
The results of managerial performance indicate that the a FHC’ s profitability plays a critical role in the overall competitive advantage and small-size FHCs are suitable types in Taiwan’s current fragmented and overcrowded environment due to achieving better performance in profit efficiency and firm value productivity. In addition, the profit niche of all FHCs comes from their main businesses but other sideline activities also play an important role for FHCs’ overall profit, indicating that the cross-business integration of financial institutions can enlarge their business scope and then can create more benefits and profits for their survival and development.
With respect to the effect of governance mechanisms and risk factors, the results of the former indicated that the conventional governance mechanism has been confirmed as having a limited effect on the FHCs’ performance and the protection of shareholder’s rights. Thus, investors can adopt auxiliary governance variables to supervise the operation of invested firms and to help them to diagnose the probability of managerial expropriation for their investment. The latter reveals that the FHC’s managerial performance is significantly influenced by three factors including credit risk, market risk, and risk spillover. By using these risk measures, the FHCs’ management team and investors can not only conduct evaluation for their risk preferences but they can also diagnose the risk source of their investment portfolio and reduce operation risks to enhance managerial performance. This study provides a sufficient and informative perspective for the firm’s managers and investors to explore the FHCs’ managerial performance by considering competitive capability, governance mechanisms and risk factors.
References
Acharya, V.V., Pedersen, L.H., Philippon, T., Richardson, M.(2010). A tax on systemic risk. Working Paper, New York University and Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York.
Adrain, T., Brummermeier, M. (2008). CoVaR. Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Adrain, T., Shin, H.S. (2010). The changing nature of financial intermediation and the financial crisis of2007-2009. Annual Review of Economics, 2,603-618.
Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C.R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377-397.
Akhigbe, A., McNulty, J.E. (2003). The profit efficiency of small US commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, 307-325.
Ataullah, A., Cockerill, T., Le, H. (2004). Financial liberalization and bank efficiency: A comparative analysis of India and Pakistan. Applied Economics, 36, 1915-1924.
Athanassopoulos, A.D., Giokas, D. (2000). The use of data envelopment analysis in banking institutions: Evidence from the commercial bank of Greece. Interfaces, 30, 81-95.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078-1092.
Barney, J. (1991).Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
Bauer, P.W., Berger, A.N., Ferrier, G.D., Humphrey, D.B. (1998). Consistency conditions for regulatory analysis of financial institutions: a comparison of frontier efficiency methods. Journal of Economics and Business, 50, 85-114.
Beder, T.S. (1995).VAR: Seductive but dangerous. Financial Analysts Journal, 15, 12-24.
Berger, A.N., DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem Loans and Cost Efficiency in Commercial Banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 849-870.
Berger, A.N., Hancock, D., Humphrey, D.B. (1993). Bank efficiency derived from the profit function. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 317-347.
Berger, A.N., Humphrey, D.B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175-212.
Bharadwaj, S.G., Varadarajan, P.R., Fahy, J. (1993). Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 57, 83-99.
Bonn, I. (2004). Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Management and Organization, 10, 14-24.
Boyd, B.K. (1995). CEO duality and firm performance: A contingency model. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 301-312.
Boyson, N.M., Stahel, C.W., Stulz, R.M. (2010). Hedge fund contagion and liquidity shocks. Journal of Finance, 65, 1789-1816.
Brunnermeier, M.K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch2007-08. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 77-100.
Casu, B., Molyneux, P. (2003). A comparative study of efficiency in European banking. Applied Economics, 35, 1865-1876.
Cebenoyan, A.S., Cooperman, E.S., Register, C.A. (1993). Firm efficiency and the regulatory closure of S&Ls: An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistic, 75, 540-45.
Cha, B., Cheung, Y.L. (1998). The impact of the US and the Japanese equity markets on the emerging Asia-Pacific equity markets. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 5, 191-209.
Chakravarthy, B.S. (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 437-458.
Chang, T.C., Chiu, Y.H. (2006). Affecting factors on risk‐adjusted efficiency in Taiwan's banking industry. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24, 634-648.
Chan-Lau, J.A. (2008). Default risk codependence in the global financial system: Was the bear stearns bailout justified. Working paper, International Monetary Fund.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L., Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30, 91-107.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L., Stutz, J. (1982). A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 16, 223-224.
Cho, D.S., Kim, J. (2007). Outside directors, ownership structure and firm profitability in Korea. Corporate Governance, 15, 239-250.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Lang, L.H.P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation, Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.
Claessens, S., Fan, J.P.H. (2002). Corporate Governance in Asia: A Survey. International Review of Finance, 3, 71-103.
Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., Tavares, G. (2008). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151-157.
Faccio, M., Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 365-395.
Fan, P.H. and Wong, T.J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of according earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33, 401-425.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50, 65-70.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34, 35-49.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84, 66-83.
Ferrier, G.D., Lovell, C.A. (1990). Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 229-245.
Fethi, M.D., Pasiouras, F. (2010). Assessing bank efficiency and performance with operational research and artificial intelligence techniques: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 204,189-198.
Fong, T., Fung, L., Lam, L., Yu, I.W. (2009). Measuring the interdependence of banks in Hong Kong. Working paper, Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Reisman, A. (2004). Data envelopment analysis literature: A bibliography update (1951-2001). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 38, 159-229.
Giokas, D.I. (2008). Assessing the efficiency in operations of a large Greek bank branch network adopting different economic behaviors. Economic Modelling, 25, 559-574.
Gompers, P., Ishii, J., Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 107-155.
Haslem, J., Scheraga, C.A., Bedingfield, J.P. (1999). DEA efficiency profiles of US banks operating internationally. International Review of Economics and Finance, 8,165-182.
Hendricks, D. (1996). Evaluation of value-at-risk models using historical data. Economic Policy Review, 2, 39-69.
Hill, C.W.L., Jones, G.R. (2004). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Huang, C.J. (2010). Board, ownership and performance of banks with a dual board system: Evidence from Taiwan, Journal of Management and Organization, 16, 219-234.
Jensen, M., Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Jorion, P. (2006). Value at Risk. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Jorion, P., Zhang, G. (2009). Credit contagion from counterparty risk. Journal of Finance, 64, 2053-2087.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.(1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113-1155.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (2000). Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 3-27.
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance, 57, 1147-1170.
Liu, J., Yang, C. (2008). Corporate governance in Taiwan: Could the independent director system be an effective remedy. Asia Survey, 48, 816-838.
Lo, S.F., Lu, W.M. (2009). An integrated performance evaluation of financial holding companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 341-350.
Lovell, C.A.K., Pastor, J.T. (1995). Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations research letters, 18, 147-151.
Miller, S.M., Noulas, A.G.(1996). The technical efficiency of large bank production. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 495-509.
Paradi, J.C., Rouatt, S., Zhu, H. (2011a). Two-stage evaluation of bank branch efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Omega, 39, 99-109.
Paradi, J.C., Yang, Z., Zhu, H. (2011b). Assessing bank and bank branch performance modeling considerations and approaches, in Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Data Envelopment Analysis. pp. 315-361. Springer, New York.
Pastor, J.T., Lovell, C.A.K., Tulkens, H. (2006). Evaluating the financial performance of bank branches. Annals of Operations Research, 145,321-337.
Rappaport, A. (1997). Creating shareholder value: A guide for managers and investors. The Free Press, New York.
Sánchez-Ballesta, J.P., García-Meca, E. (2007). A meta‐analytic vision of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance. Corporate Governance, 15, 879-892.
Schaffnit, C., Rosen, D., Paradi, J.C. (1997). Best practice analysis of bank branches: An application of DEA in a large Canadian bank. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 269-289.
Seiford, L.M. (1997). A bibliography for data envelopment analysis (1978-1996). Annals of Operations Research, 73, 393-438.
Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J. (1999). Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Management Science, 45, 1270-1288.
Sherman, H.D., Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: Evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9, 297-315.
Sheu, H.J., Cheng, C.L. (2012). Systemic risk in Taiwan stock market. Journal of Business Economics and Management, forthcoming.
Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.
Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783.
Simar, L., Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of econometrics, 136, 31-64.
Solomon, J.F. Lin, S.W., Norton, S.D. (2003). Corporate governance in Taiwan: Empirical evidence from Taiwanese company directors. Corporate Governance, 11, 235-248.
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 498-509.
Tulkens, H. (1993). On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 183-210.
Wong, A., Fong, T. (2011). Analysing interconnectivity among economies. Emerging Markets Review, 12, 432-442.
Yeh, Y.H. (2005). Do controlling shareholders enhance corporate value. Corporate Governance, 13, 313-325.
Yeh, Y.H., Lee, T.S., Woidtke, T. (2001). Family Control and Corporate Governance: Evidence for Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2, 21-48.
Yeh, Y.H., Woidtke, T. (2005). Commitment or entrenchment? Controlling shareholders and board composition. Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, 1857-1885.
Yu, T.S. (1999). The evolution of commercial banking and financial markets in Taiwan. Journal of Asian Economics, 10, 291-307.
Zhu, J. (2000). Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. European Journal of Operational Research, 123,105-124.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：726（臺灣：715，外國：11） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2344557 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68149540
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上