王谷全（2010）。“看”、“Look”的語法化對比研究（未出版之碩士論文）。長沙理工大學，長沙市。
王東梅、劉豐 (2010)。從體驗哲學和概念隱喻看一詞多義。四川教育學院學報。26(9)，97-101頁。
王紅斌（2002）。現代漢語心理動詞的範圍和類別。晉東南師範專科學校學報。4，62-64頁。
王桂花（2008）。漢英視覺動詞對比研究（未出版之碩士論文）。魯東大學，煙台市。
王磊（2006）。英漢視覺動詞語法化的認知研究（未出版之博士論文）。中央民族大學，北京市。
丰競（2003）。現代漢語心理動詞的語義分析。淮北煤炭師範學院學報。1，106-110。
呂叔湘（1942）。中國文法要略。北京：商務印書館。
呂叔湘（1981）。現代漢語八百詞。北京：商務印書館。
呂叔湘（1999）。現代漢語八百詞(增訂本)。北京：商務印書館。
李英哲、鄭良偉（1990）。實用漢語參考語法。北京：北京語言學院出版社。
李紅儒（2001）。認知意向謂詞與視覺感知謂詞。外語學刊，3，61-65頁。
沈家煊（1994）。R. W. Langacker的“認知語法”。國外語言學，1，12-20頁。
武文杰（2008）。現代漢語視覺行為動詞研究（未出版之博士論文）。山東大學，濟南市。
周有斌、邵敬敏（1993）。漢語心理動詞及其句型。語文研究，3，18-23頁。
周同燕（2005）。現代漢語中看的語法化現象考察。沙洋師範高等專科學校學報，6（6），54-56頁。
屈承熹（1996）。現代漢語中“句子”的定義及其定位。世界漢語教學，4，16-23頁。
屈承熹（2006）。漢語功能篇章語法 - 從認知、功能到篇章結構。臺北市：文鶴出版社。
胡裕樹、范曉（1995）。動詞研究。開封市：河南大學出版社。
侯博（2008）。漢語感官詞的語義語法學研究（未出版之碩士論文）。南京師大碩士論文，南京市。
高琇玟（2007）。台語「講」&;「看」的存在關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
徐睿、王文斌（2005）。心理動詞也析。寧波大學學報，18(3)， 65-69頁。
袁明軍（2000）。程度副詞和動詞的類。語言學論輯(第3輯)。天津：南開大學出版社。
郭永松（2007）。台灣華語視覺感知動詞的語意辨異與原型效應探析：以語料庫為基礎的分析方法。第八屆漢語詞彙語意學研討會。香港：香港理工大學。
許惠玲、馬詩帆（2007）。從動詞到子句標記：潮州方言和台灣閩南話動詞‘說’和‘看’的虛化過程。中國語文研究，23， 61-72頁。
梅家駒、竺一鳴、高蘊琦、殷鴻翔編（1996）。同義詞詞林。上海：上海辭書出版社。
張云（2009）。視覺動詞“看”、“見”使用情況歷時、共時考察（未出版之碩士論文）。華中師範大學，武漢市。
張京魚（2001）。漢語心理動詞及其句式。唐都學刊，17（1）， 112-115頁。
張佩茹（2004）。英漢視覺動詞的時間結構、語義延伸及語法化（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
張曉麗（2007）。現代漢語視覺動詞研究述評。語言理論研究，10，18-19頁。
張麗麗、陳克健、黃居仁（2000）。漢語動詞詞彙語義分析:表達模式與研究方法。Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing，5(1)，1-18頁。
陳平（1994）。試論漢語中三種句子成份與語義成份的配位原則。中國語文，3，161-168頁。
陳佳（2003）。英漢視覺常規隱喻比較。解放軍外國語學院學報，26（1），20-27頁。
陳俊光（2007）。對比分析與教學應用。臺北市：文鶴出版社。
陳振宇、朴珉秀（2006）。話語標記"你看"、"我看"與現實情態。語言科學，5（2），3-13頁。
陳穎、林靜（2009）。看“看V”。現代語文，6，47-48頁。
陸儉明（1959）。現代漢語中一個新的語助詞「看」。中國語文，10，490-492頁。
陶紅印 (2003)。從語音，語法，話語特徵看“知道”格式在談話中的演化。中國語文，4，291-302頁。
畢永峨 (2007)。遠指詞“那”詞串在台灣口語中的詞彙化語習語化。當代語言學，3（2），128-138頁。
莊舒文（2002）。時相與時態的搭配關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
曾心怡（2003）。當今台灣國語之句法結構（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
曾立英（2005）。“我看”與“你看”的主觀化。漢語學習，2，15-22頁。
曾泰元（2012）。Linsanity英文字海之一粟？。中國時報，時論廣場A18。
黃居仁、洪嘉馡（2005）感官動詞的近義辨析：詞義與概念的關係。第六屆漢語詞彙語義學研討會論文集，廈門市。
黃郁純（1999）。漢語能願動詞之語義研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
董秀芳 （2002）。論句法結構的詞彙化。語言研究，3，57-65頁。
董秀芳 （2005）。漢語的詞庫與詞法。北京：北京大學出版社。
楊書平（2007）。從"……看時"到"……一看"。漢語學習，81，56-58頁。
楊華（1994）。試論心理狀態動詞及其賓語的類型。文教資料，33，33-36頁。
趙元任（1994）。中國話的文法。臺北市：學生書局。
趙艷芳（2001）。認知語言學概論。上海：上海外語教育出版社。
劉月華、潘文娛、故韡原著(1996)。實用現代漢語語法。臺北市：師大書苑。
鄧守信 （1984）。漢語及物性關係的語義研究。臺北市：學生書局。
鄧守信 （2009）。對外漢語教學語法。臺北市：文鶴出版社。
鮑莉（2009）。視覺動詞研究綜述。咸寧學院學報，29（5），72-74頁。
鄭良偉（1997）。台語與台灣華語裡的子句結構標誌「講」與「看」。台語、華語的結構及動向II：台、華語的接觸與同義語的互動，105-132頁。臺北市：遠流出版社。
鄭雷（2006）。看的語法化分析。現代語文（語言研究），9，34-35頁。
鄭縈、魏郁真（2006）。「X +子」詞彙化與語法化過程。興大中文學報，20，163-208頁。
蔣紹愚（2005）。古漢語詞彙綱要。北京：商務印書館。
歐德芬（2011）。漢語感官動詞「看」之教學設計。2011年台灣華語文教學年會暨研討會，pp.633-642，台灣，台南市。
戴浩一（2000）。新世紀台灣語言學研究之展望。漢學研究，18，511-519頁。
戴浩一（2002）。概念結構與非自主性語法：漢語語法概念系統初探。當代語言學，4（1），1-12頁。
戴浩一（2007）。中文構詞與句法的概念結構。華語文教學研究，4（1），1-30頁。
韓玉國（2003）。漢語視覺動詞的語義投射及語法化構擬。外國語言文學，4，10-13頁。
蕭國政 (2007)。現代語言學名著導讀。蕭國政主編。北京：北京大學出版社。
蕭惠帆（2004）。來去之間 – 從語法到教學詞彙來去的趨向和情態（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，臺北市。
蘇以文（2005）。隱喻與認知 。台北：台大出版中心。
Ahrens, Kathleen, Chang, Li-li, Chen, Ke-jiann &; Huang, Chu-Ren (1998). Meaning representation and meaning instantation for Chinese nominals, Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 3, 45-60
Altenberg, Bengt (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 101-22). Oxford: Clarendon.
Albertazzi, Liliana (2000). Which semantics? In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 1-24). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Atkins, Sue B.T. (1987). Semantic ID tags: Corpus evidence for dictionary senses. Proceedings of the third annual conference of the UW center for the new oxford English dictionary, pp. 17-36.
Barcelona, Antonio (2000). On the plausibility of caliming a metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 31-58). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bates, Elizabeth &; MacWhinney, Brian (1982). Functionalist approaches to grammar. In E. Wanner, &; L. Gleitman (Ed.), Language acquisition: the state of the art. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bates, Elizabeth &; MacWhinney, Brian (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In B. MacWhinney, &; E. Bates (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Sussan, &; Finegan, Edward (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London, UK: Longman.
Brugman, Claudia &; Lakoff, George (1988). Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In S. Small, G. Cottrell and M. Tannenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution, (pp. 477-507). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
Bybee, Joan (2006). From usage to grammar. Language, 82(4), 529-51.
Chang, Jui-Fen (2001). Grammaticalization processes reflected in Chinese lexemes SHUO and KAN (Master’s thesis). National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung City.
Chao, Yuen Ren (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Chiu, Tsu-Ling (2009). A frame-based lexical semantic study of Mandarin perception verbs (Master’s thesis). National Chiao Tung University, Hsin Chu City.
Comrie, Bernard (1976). Aspect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cowie, Anthony P. (1998). Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications. Oxford: Clarendon.
Croft, William (2003). Typology and universals (2nd edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Croft, William &; Cruse, Alan (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, Alan (2000). Meaning in language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dowty, David R. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-619.
Evans, Vyvyan (2005). The meaning of time: Polysemy, the lexicon, and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 33-75.
Evans, Vyvyan &; Tyler, Andrea (2004a). Rethinking English ‘prepositions of movement’: The case of to and through. Belgian Journal of Linguistics,16
Evans, Vyvyan &; Tyler, Andrea (2004b). Spatial experience, lexical structure and movement: the case of in. In Radden, Gunter &; Panther, Klaus-Uwe (Eds.), Language studies in motivation (pp. 157-192). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fauconnier, Gilles (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach &; R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1-88). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1971). Types of lexical information. In D. Steinberg &; L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics (pp. 370-392). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. &; Atkins, Sue B. T. (1992). Toward a framed-based lexicon : The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lahrer &; E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrast (pp. 75-102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fischer, Olga &; Rosenbach, Anette (2000). Introduction. In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach &; D. Stein (Eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamins.
Gass, Susan &; Selinker, Larry (2001). Second language acquisition: An introduction course(2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Geeraerts, Dirk (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 223-272
Givón, Talmy. (1985). Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In Haiman, J. (Ed), Iconicity in Syntax (pp.187-219). Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. (1990). Syntax: A functional-typological instruction, Vol. II Amsterdam, Holland: J. Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy (1993). English grammar: A function-based instruction. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Gries, Stefan T. &; Divjak, Dagmar (2009). Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. In V. Evans &; S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57-75). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin’s.
Gruber, Jeffrey (1976). Lexical structure in syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hanks, Patrick (1996). Contextual dependency and lexical sets. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1):75-98.
Hill, Archibald A. (1957). Introduction to linguistic structures. New York, NY: Burlingame.
Hopper, Paul J., &; Traugott Elizabeth C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hsieh, Ai-Yu (2008). Semantic extensions from perception – cognition - utterance to modality and manipulation verbs in Mandarin: A frame-based account (Master’s thesis). National Chiao Tung University, Hsin Chu City.
Hu, Chia-Yin (2007). Conceptual schema of the cognition domain: A frame-based study of Mandarin cognition verbs (Master’s thesis). National Chiao Tung University, Hsin Chu City.
Huang, Shuanfan (1995). Chinese as a metonymic language. In O. Tzeng &; M. Chen (Eds.), In honor of William Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change. (pp. 223-252). Taipei : Pyramid Press.
Jackendoff, Ray S. (1990). Semantic structures. Canmbridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, Mark (1987). The body in the mind:The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Joos, Martin (1964). The English verb:Form and meaning. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Zoltan &; Radden, Gunter (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37-77.
Kreitzer, Anatol (1997). Multiple levels of schematization: A study in the conceptualization of space. Cognitive Linguistics, 8, 291-325
Lakoff, George (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). 2nd edition. Canmbridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, George &; Johnson, Mark (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George &; Johnson, Mark (1999). Philosophy in the flesh, the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Lakoff, George &; Johnson, Mark (2003). Metaphors we live by, 2nd edition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George &; Turner, Mark (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. II. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1-38.
Langacker, Ronald W. (2002). Concept, image, and symbol: the cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lee, Adrienne C. (2007). “Kan” as a performative verb in Mandarin Chinese: A case of interaction between semantic/pragmatics and syntactic structure. Chung Hsing Journal of Humanities, 38, 433-450.
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1987). Meaning and the English verbs. London, England: Longman.
Lehrer, Adrienne &; Lehrer, Keith (1995). Field, network and vectors. In F. R. Palmer (Ed.), Grammar and meaning: Essays in honor of Sir John Lyons (pp. 26-47). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, Beth. (1993). English verbs classes and alternations—A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: the University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Minimization and conversational inference. In M. Papi &; J. Verschueren (Eds.), Pragmatic Perspective (pp. 61-129). Amsterdam, Holland: Benjamins
Li, Charles N., &; Thompson, Sandra A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Li, Charles. N., &; Thompson, Sandra A. (2005). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.(漢語語法，黃宣範譯)
Lien, Chinfa (2005). Verbs of visual perception in Taiwanese Southern Min: A cognitive approach to shift of semantic domains. Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 109-132.
Lin, Chien-Jer &; Ahrens, Kathleen (2000). Calculating the number of senses: Implications for Ambiguity advantage effect during lexical access. Seventh International Symposium on Chinese Language and Linguistics Proceedings, 141-156.
Lin, Chien-Jer &; Ahrens, Kathleen (2010). Ambuguity advantate revisited: Two meanings are better than one when accessing Chinese nouns, Journal of Psycholinguist, 39(1), 1-19.
Liu, Mei-Chun (2002). Mandarin Verbal Semantics: A Corpus-based Approach. Taipei: Crane publishing Co.
Liu, Mei-Chun &; Chiang, Ting-Yi (2008). The construction of Mandarin VerbNet: A frame-based study of statement verbs. Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 239-270.
Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics, Vol. II. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John (1981). Language, meaning and context. London, England: Fontana.
MacWhinney, Brian (1989). Competition and lexical categorization. In R. Corrigan, F. Eckman, &; M. Noonan (Eds.), Linguistic categorization. New York, NY: Benjamins.
McCaughren, Amanda (2009). Polysemy and homonymy and their importance for the study of word mening. ITB Journal, 18(12), 107-115
Moon, Rosamund (1998). Fixed expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan &; Wasow, Thomas (1994). Idioms. Language, 70, 491-538.
Osgood, Charles E. &; Sebeok, Thomas A. (Eds.). (1954). Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problem. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Palmer, Frank R. (1965). The English verb. London, England: Longman.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sydney, Leech, Geoffrey, &; Svartvik, Jan (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York, NY: Longman.
Radden, Gunter &; Kövecses, Zoltan (1999) .Toward a theory of metonymy. K. U. Panther &; G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17-60). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamin’s.
Ravin, Yael &; Leacock, Claudia (2002). Polysemy: theoretical and computational approaches. Oxford, England: Oxford Linguistics Press.
Renouf, Antoinette &; Sinclair, John (1991). Collocational frameworks in English. In K. Aijmer &; B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics (pp. 128-143). London, UK: Longman.
Rosch, Eleanor (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192-233.
Saeed, John. (2003). Semantics, 2nd edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Sandra, Dominiek (1998). What linguists can and can’t tell you about the human mind: A reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 361-378.
Sperber, Dan &; Wilson, Deirdre (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Stubbs, Michael (2002). Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 7(2), 215-244.
Sweetser, Eve. (1986). Polysemy vs. abstraction: Mutually exclusive or complementary? Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 528-538)
Sweetser, Eve. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and culture aspect of semantic structure. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Tai, James. H.-Y. (1985). Temporal sequence and Chinese word order. In L. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp.49-72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Tai, James. H.-Y. (2003). Cognitive relativism: Resultative construction in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 4(2), 301-314.
Talmy, Leonard (1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universl in human language Vol. 4 (pp. 625-649). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Talmy, Leonard (1983). How language structures space. In H. Pick &; L. Acredelo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225-320). New York, NY: Plenum.
Teng, Shou-hsin (1973). A semantic study of transitivity relations in Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Teng, Shou-hsin (1974). Verb classification and its pedagogical extensions. JCLTA, 9(2), 84-92.
Traugott, Elizabeth &; Heine, Bernd (1991). Introduction. In E. C. Traugott &; B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization Vol. I. (pp. 1-14). Amsterdam, Holland: John Benjamins.
Tyler, Andrea &; Evans, Vyvyan (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over, Language,77(4), 724-765.
Tyler, Andrea &; Evans, Vyvyan (2003). The semantics of English preposition: Spatial scenes, embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge university press.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. (1993). A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In R.Van Valin, Jr. (Ed.), Advance in role and reference grammar. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. (2001). An introduction to syntax. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Vendler, Zeno (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wu, Xiu-Zhi (1993). Psychological predicates in Chinese (Master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Xing, Janet Z. (2006). Teaching and Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language: A Pedagogical Grammar. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Yang, Su-Fen (2000). On Chinese psych verbs (Master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Yu, Ning (2002). Body and emotion: Body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. Journal of Pragmatics and Cognition, 10(1/2), 341-367
Yu, Ning (2004). The eyes for sight and mind. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 663-686
Zhung, Feng-Ya (2001). A semantic study of Mandarin perception verbs Kan, Ting and Wen (Master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.
Zimbardo, Philip G. &; Gerrig, Richard J. (1996). Perception. In Daniel J. Levitin (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive psychology：Core reading (pp. 133-188). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zipf, George K. (1949). The human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.