臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：資訊科技促成政府服務創新之研究
作者：王聲威
作者(外文)：Shang-Wei Wang
校院名稱：國立臺灣大學
系所名稱：資訊管理學研究所
指導教授：翁崇雄
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2012
主題關鍵詞：資訊科技；電子化政府；服務創新；互補性資產；核心能力；過程模式；資訊科技價值；information technology；e-government；service innovation；complementary assets；core competence；process model；IT value
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:65
資訊科技對企業與政府的運作，是不可或缺且非常重要。各國政府受企業大量採用電子商務與電子化企業的影響，爭相仿效採用資訊科技，加強對民眾與企業的服務、提升政府效率、改變過時的科層(官僚)制度及促進民眾對民主政治的參與。但卻有將近百分之七十的專案無法達成最初預期的目標，原因在於太過強調資訊科技，未以民眾的需求與利益來規劃提供新服務及忽略互補性資產對資訊科技的重要性。而在服務業已遠超過製造業成為最重要的經濟活動，服務創新已成重要的課題。政府是非常重要的服務業，亦須重視服務創新，以爭取民眾的支持與滿意
本研究從服務創新發展過程的角度切入，結合資訊科技與互補性資產的觀點，探討政府如何運用資訊科技來成功達成服務創新。透過回顧電子化政府、服務創新、資訊科技與互補性資產等相關文獻，了解影響政府導入資訊科技創新其服務的因素及過程，並提出資訊科技促成政府服務創新模式。本研究提出以民眾涉入程度與政府需變革程度等兩項維度，將電子化政府服務區分為四個類型，並以其中民眾低涉入、政府需大幅變革的類型作為研究範圍，採用個案研究方法，探討政府創新單一窗口話務服務的歷程。
本研究發現政府服務創新發展過程是規劃、發展、實施(營運)、評估回饋等四階段的循環，是不斷的學習與調整的循環；不同階段的目的與工作內容不同，所需的資訊科技與互補性資產並不相同，發展與取得所需資訊科技與互補性資產並結合，有助於各階段目的的達成。此外，服務創新發展的結果不只是新服務的產生，同時也使服務提供者(政府)發展出提供新的核心能力。因此，本研究結合服務創新過程、資訊科技、互補性資產、核心能力等，提出「資訊科技促成政府服務創新的資源-過程-能力模式」，完整呈現服務創新過程、資訊科技、互補性資產、核心能力間的關係，及對新服務績效的影響過程。更進一步提出資訊科技「資源-過程-能力」價值模式，較以往的模式，更能完整呈現資訊科技對組織績效影響的過程。
Information technology (IT) is indispensible and critical to both business and government. Governments around the world influenced by the adoption of electronic commerce and electronic business in the private sector have been eagerly adopting IT to improve their services, to increase their efficiencies, to transform their outdated bureaucratic systems, and to promote civil participation. However, around seventy percent of electronic government (e-government) projects failed due to too much focus on IT without considering the needs of citizens and neglecting the importance of complementary assets to IT. Since service has surpassed manufacturing and becomes the most important economic activity today, service innovation has become a critical issue for both academia and industry. Governments as very important servicing entities, therefore, should place emphasis on service innovation to win citizens’ support and satisfaction.
This study aims to explore the way governments use IT to enable their service innovation from the perspectives of new service development process, IT, and complementary assets. Based on the review of relevant research in e-government, service innovation, IT and complementary assets, a conceptual framework is proposed and adopted as a theoretical lens to study the case─the Taipei 1999 citizens’ hotline service.
This study argues that the process of public service innovation is a cycle composed of the planning stage, the development stage, the implementation (operation) stage, and the review and feedback stage. The purpose and core tasks of each stage are different; therefore, different IT and complementary assets are needed in each stage. It is necessary to develop and acquire the needed IT and complementary assets. In addition, the outcome of new service development process is not only a new service, but also a new core competence to provide the new service. Based on the findings of the case study, the Resource-Process-Competence Model of IT-enabled Public Service Innovation is proposed. Furthermore, this study proposes the Resource-Process-Competence Model of IT Business Value. This Model amends Melville, et al.’s (2004) IT Business Value Model by adding the “core competence” variable in the IT value generation process. It fully depicts the process relationship among business process, IT, complementary assets, core competence and organizational performance. This Model is valuable for future IT business value research.
參考文獻
Accenture. (2004). eGovernment leadership: High performance, maximum value.
Agarwal, R. & Lucas, H. C. (2005). The information systems identity crisis: focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 381-398
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.new window
Anonymous. (2004). 85% e-gov plans have failed. Retrieved 14 February, 2009, from http://www.rediff.com/money/2004/nov/05egov.htm
Avlonitis, G.J., Papastathopoulou, P.G., & Gounaris, S.P. (2005). An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5), 324-342.
Beynon-Davies, P. (2005). Constructing electronic government: the case of the UK Inland Revenue. International Journal of Information Management, 25(1), 3-20.new window
Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169-196.new window
Bloomfield, B. P., & Hayes, N. (2009). Power and organizational transformation through technology: hybrids of electronic government. Organization Studies, 30(5), 461-487.
Chan, C. M. L., Hackney, R., Pan, S. L., & Chou, T. C. (2011). Managing e-Government system implementation: a resource enactment perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(5), 529-541.
Chatfield, A. T. (2009). Public service reform through e-government: a case study of ''e-Tax'' in Japan. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7(2), 135-146.
Chen, A. J., Pan, S. L., Zhang, J. L., Huang, W. W., & Zhu, S. (2009). Managing e-government implementation in China: A process perspective. Information & Management, 46(4), 203-212.
Chen, I. J., & Popovich, K. (2003). Understanding customer relationship management (CRM): people, process and technology. Business Process Management Journal, 9(5), 672-688.
Chen, J., Wang, D., & Pan, S. L. (2011). Understanding organizational agility development for government - a process model of resource configuration. Paper presented at the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS).
CTPR. (2009). UK Public Sector IT. London: Centre for Technology Policy Research.
D''Alvano, L., & Hidalog, A. (2011). An extended approach for service innovation study: an empirical research. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management.
den Hertog, P., & Bilderbeek, R. (1999). Conceptualising service innovation and service innovation patterns (Research Programme on Innovation in Services (SIID) for the Ministry of Economic Affairs). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Dialogic.
den Hertog, P., van der Aa, W., & de Jong, M. W. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 490-514.
Detlor, B., Hupfer, M. E., & Ruhi, U. (2010). Internal factors affecting the adoption and use of government websites. Electronic Government, 7(2), 120-136.
Dimitrova, D., & Chen, Y. C. (2006). Profiling the adopters of e-government information and services: the influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channels. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2), 172-188.
Edvardsson, B., & Olsson, J. (1996). Key concepts for new service development. The Service Industries Journal, 16(2), 140-164.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Ennen, E., & Richter, A. (2010). The whole is more than the sum of its parts - or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations. Journal of Management, 36(1), 207-233.new window
Essén, A., & Conrick, M. (2008). New e-service development in the homecare sector: Beyond implementing a radical technology. .International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(10), 679-688.
Fichman, R. G., & Nambisan, S. (2010). Deriving business value from IT applications in product development: a complementarities-based model. In S. Nambisan (Ed.), Information Technology and Product Development, Annals of Information Systems (Vol. 5).
Fountain, J. F. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Froehle, C. M., & Roth, A. V. (2007). A resource-process framework of new service development. Production and Operations Management, 16(2), 169-188.
Garicano, L. (2010). Policemen, managers, lawyers: New results on complementarities between organization and information and communication technology. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28(4), 355-358.
Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286-301.
Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.new window
Gouscos, D., Kalikakis, M., Legal, M., & Papadopoulou, S. (2007). A general model of performance and quality for one-stop e-Government service offerings. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 860-885.
Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and Managing e-Government: an International Text. London: Sage Publication.
Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265.
Helbig, N., Gil-García, J. R., & Ferro, E. (2009). Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 89-97.new window
Ho, A. T. K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiatives Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444.
Introna, L., Hayes, N., & Petrakaki, D. (2010). The working out of modernization in the public sector: the case of an e-government initiative in Greece. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(1), 11-25.new window
Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Opinion piece: electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(4), 327-335.
Javidan, M. (1998). Core competence: what does it mean in practice? Long Range Planning, 31(1), 60-71.new window
Johnson, S. P., Menor, L. J., Roth, A. V., & Chase, R. B. (2000). A critical evaluation of the new service development process. In J. Fitzsimmons & M. Fitzsimmons (Eds.), New Service Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kannabiran, G., Xavier, M. J., & Anantharaaj, A. (2004). Enabling e-governance through citizen relationship management - concept, model and applications. Journal of Services Research, 4(2), 223-240.
Karimi, J., Somers, T. M., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2007). The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(2), 221-260.
Karniouchina, E., Victorino, L., & Verma, R. (2005). Product and service innovation: ideas for future cross-disciplinary research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 274-280.
Kifle, H., & Cheng, P. L. K. (2009). e-Government implementation and leadership - the Brunei case study. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 7(3), 217-282.
Kim, H. J., Pan, G., & Pan, S. L. (2007). Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 338-352.
King, S. F. (2007). Citizens as customers: exploring the future of CRM in UK local government. Government Information Quarterly, 24(1), 47-63.new window
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2009). Realizing joined-up government—Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 275-284.
Kunstelj, M., Jukie, T., & Vintar, M. (2007). Analysing the demand side of e-government: what can we learn from Slovenian users? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4656, 305-317.
Lacity, M., & Janson, M. A. (1994). Understanding qualitative data: A framework of text analysis methods. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(2), 137-155.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2012). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm (12th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education International.
Lenk, K., & Schuppan, T. (2010). An unsuccessful effort to implement one stop government in Germany. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of European Group for Public Admnistration (EGPA), Toulouse.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
Lim, J. H., & Tang, S. Y. (2008). Urban e-government initiatives and environment decision performance in Korea. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18(1), 109-138.new window
Liu, S., & Hwang, J. D. (2003). Challenges to transform IT in the US government. IT Professional, 5(3), 10-15.
Lovelock, C., & Gummesson, E. (2004). Whither services marketing? in search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of Service Research, 7(1), 20-41.new window
Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87-119.new window
Melitski, J. (2003). Capacity and e-government performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 376-390.
Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283-382.
Mitchell, L. A. (1986). Government as service industry: A Grenadian case example. The Service Industries Journal, 6(1), 61-73.new window
Montealegre, R. (2002). A process model of capability development: lessons from the electronic commerce strategy at Bolsa de Valores de Guayaquil. Organization Science, 13(5), 514-531.
Morgan, R. E., Katsikeas, C. S., & Appiah-Adu, K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Learning Capabilities. Journal of Marketing Management 14(4), 353-381.
Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationship. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 163-183.new window
Ong, C. S., & Wang, S. W. (2009). Managing citizen-initiated email contacts. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 498-504.
Ong, C. S., & Wang, S. W. (2011). e-Service and organizational change: a process model. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 9(3), 39-51.
Pentland, B. T. (1999). Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 711-724.
Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 747-776.
Potter, K., Smith, M., Guevara, J. K., Hall, L., & Stegman, E. (2011). IT Metrics: IT Spending and Staffing Report, 2011: Gartner.
Reddick, C. G. (2009). The adoption of centralized customer service systems: A survey of local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 219-226.new window
Rowley, J. (2010). e-Government stakeholders: who are they and what do they want? International Journal of Information Management in press.
Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2011). Towards a model of dynamic capabilities in innovation-based competitive strategy: Insights from project-oriented service firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1251-1263.
Schellong, A. (2005). CRM in the public sector: towards a conceptual research framework. Paper presented at the 2005 national conference on Digital government research.
Schellong, A., & Langenberg, T. (2007). Managing citizen relationships in disasters: Hurricane Wilma, 311 and Miami-Dade County. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Song, L.Z., Song, M., & CA Di Benedetto, C.A. (2009). A staged innovation model. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 571-599.
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450-463.
Tan, C. W., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269-281.
Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). e-Democracy, e-commerce, and e-research: examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259-280.
Toivonen, M., & Tuominen, T. (2009). Emergence of innovations in services. The Service Industries Journal, 29(7), 887-902.
Van den Bosch, F. A. J., Volberda, H. W., & de Boer, M. (1999). Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568.
Van Veenstra, A. F., Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2009). Barriers for transformation: impediments for transforming the public sector through e-government. Paper presented at the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
van Veenstra, A. F., & Zuurmond, A. (2009). Opening the black box: exploring the effect of transformation on online service delivery in local governments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5693, 234-244.
Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems reserach: review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.new window
Wang, C. L. & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.new window
Weerakkody, V., Dhillon, G., Dwivedi, Y., & Currie, W. (2008). Realising transformational stage e-government: challenges, issues and complexities. Paper presented at the 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto.
World Bank. (2011). World Development Indicators 2011. Washington DC.
Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646-665.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj., S. (2007). Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749-762.
Zhu, K. (2004). The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(1), 167-202.new window
Zomerdijk, L.G. & Voss, C.A. (2011). NSD process and practices in experiential services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 63-80.new window

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：873（臺灣：858，外國：15） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2702204 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68494653
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上