:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:五感包裝設計之研究
作者:李貴連 引用關係
作者(外文):Kuei-Lien Lee
校院名稱:國立雲林科技大學
系所名稱:設計學研究所博士班
指導教授:陳俊宏
嚴貞
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2012
主題關鍵詞:官感品評五感包裝設計腦波腦電圖Sensory EvaluationElectroencephalograms (EEG)BrainwavesPackage DesignFive Senses
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:147
以包裝設計而言,作品中呈現的視覺美感是十分重要的元素,而增加多元感官,在許多研究中被證實能使受測者產生優於單一視覺元素的回憶能力與情感訊息,於記憶暫存時間較長。本研究第一階段以觀看包裝設計前、包裝設計後,及包裝設計後分別增加觸覺、聽覺、嗅覺刺激之實驗,進行視覺與觸覺、聽覺、嗅覺感官對於腦波變化之探索性研究。研究從專家焦點團體訪談評選出三類包裝,包含烏龍茶、有機米和牛軋糖包裝。實驗各有三種不同型式之樣本,分別是「包裝設計前之樣本」、「包裝設計後之樣本」與「增加觸覺、聽覺、嗅覺之包裝設計後樣本」。運用腦波圖譜(EEG)蒐集不同受測者的腦波資料。第二階段採用「官感品評」實驗,結合視覺、嗅覺與味覺面向,探討視覺色彩的改變是否會影響嗅覺、味覺的官感判斷。首先從市場調查、文獻彙整及焦點團體,評選出受測水果飲料;接著依兩回合隨機品嚐葡萄、柳橙、檸檬與草莓水果飲料進行實驗。
第一階段實驗結果顯示:增加觸覺、聽覺、嗅覺刺激玩賞包裝設計作品之腦波呈現漸趨活化的狀態,經由變異數分析結果顯示,「包裝設計前觀賞」、「包裝設計後觀賞」,以及「增加觸覺、聽覺、嗅覺之包裝設計後玩賞」,三樣本間具有顯著差異。此外,本研究亦進行了受測者的樣本喜好度問卷調查,調查結果比對其腦β波,發現喜好度會影響腦β波的活化,證實了兩項測量結果是一致的。「包裝設計後」的樣本雖然比「包裝設計前」增添了視覺美感的設計要點,但「包裝設計前觀賞」與「包裝設計後觀賞」兩者間沒有顯著差異。男性與女性受測者在「包裝設計後觀賞」與「包裝設計後加入觸覺、聽覺」呈現顯著差異。第二階段「官感品評」結果顯示:若嗅覺、味覺與視覺的固有色彩相符合,94%的受測者能正確判斷。若嗅覺、味覺和呈現之固有色彩不符合,只有41%的人能正確判斷。視覺上的色彩影響了「嗅覺」及「味覺」的感知判斷。
綜觀以上兩階段的研究,本研究得到以下結果:(1)歸納出五感包裝設計相關理論;(2)解析出影響五感包裝設計之元素與發展;(3)經由專家團體產生關鍵實驗包裝樣本,應用「腦波EEG」與「官感品評」驗證五感包裝設計。(4)經實驗結果共有如下四點設計準則:「視覺+觸覺」、「視覺+觸覺+聽覺」、「視覺+觸覺+嗅覺」此三種途徑被證實能活化受測者的腦β波;而「視覺+嗅覺+味覺」的共感運用,需要各感官間的同步表現,方能使受測者做出正確的感知判斷。本研究所探討之五感包裝設計結果與準則,有助於提供五感包裝設計實務與設計教學之參考。
Aesthetics exhibited in the design of packaging works are an essential element of packaging design. Numerous studies have verified that the use or addition of multiple senses enables the test recipients to produce recall capability and emotional messages superior to those achieved for single visual elements, thereby extending the periods these effects are stored in the memory. During the first phase of the experiment, we observed the pre- and post-packaging design, and then conducted experiments for kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli added to the post-design packaging. We conducted exploratory research investigating the effects that visual, kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory senses have on brainwave changes. We conducted expert focus group interviews to select three packaging designs, which were for Oolong tea, organic rice, and nougat candy products. The experiments each comprised the following three sample types: pre-packaging design; post-packaging design; and post-packaging design with kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli. For this study, we used electroencephalograms (EEG) to collect the data of brainwaves for different samples. From the perspective of sensory evaluation, this study combined vision, smell, and taste to assess whether a color alteration would affect sensory judgments. Therefore, color selection is an important component for drink packaging design. This research is conducted in two stages: (1) from the market research, literature review, and focus groups, four types of juice were selected for an experiment; and (2) to perform the experiment, two sessions of random taste of different fruit drinks were organized for subjects to identify them.
The EEG experiment results in the first phase indicated that the participants’ brainwaves when viewing the packaging design with kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli showed gradual activation. The statistical results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) show that significant differences existed for the three samples when viewing the pre-packaging design and the post-packaging design and viewing the post-packaging design with kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli. The observation results showed that viewing the pre-packaging design differed significantly from viewing the post-packaging design with the kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli. Furthermore, viewing the post-packaging design and the post-packaging design with kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli demonstrated a significant difference. A comparison between the EEG and self-reported questionnaire results indicated that the preferred factors for sample design could influence the level of the participants’ beta wave activation. The preferred packaging samples showed more beta wave activation during the experiment than the less preferable packaging samples. This conclusion verified that the two measurement results were consistent. The experiment results finally showed that the participants’ beta waves for the samples including post-packaging design with kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli were the largest, followed by the post-packaging design samples and then the pre-packaging design samples. Based on related research and discussions, kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli can facilitate the activation of beta waves; the results of the experiment conducted in this study support this idea. Therefore, we can conclude that beta waves may be influenced by changes caused by kinesthetic, auditory, and olfactory stimuli.
The results revealed that if the color of a beverage matches its taste, the average rate of accuracy is above 94 %. Upon switching the taste and the color, only 41 % of participants identified certain flavors. The experimental results showed that the majority of participants chose to rely on vision of color, subsequently ignoring judgments of smell and taste. The results can act as a reference for fruit juice packaging designs. This study suggests that color schemes and product packaging have a close relationship of interdependence, particularly with natural food products’ “appropriate or natural color” being emphasized by current consumers. Thus, an excellent drink packaging design and an appropriate implication of contents’ color require serious consideration. Compared to the pre-packaging design, although the post-packaging design included design elements of synesthesia (e.g., forms, colors, textures, and pictures and text), the viewing results for the pre-packaging design and those of the post-packaging design showed no significant differences. This indicates that pure visual viewing of both the pre-packaging design and the post-packaging design had no significant difference regarding the participants’ level of beta wave activation. The result does not support the hypothesis that brainwaves are more active when observing unique packaging designs compared to general packaging designs.
The experiment results of the two phases are as follows: (1) We summarized the theories related to packaging design for the five senses; (2) we identified and analyzed the factors influencing packaging design for the five senses and investigated the development of this kind of packaging design; (3) we selected the key experimental packaging samples through expert groups and employed EEG and the sensory evaluation experiment for verification. The visual design was combined with actual tactile or contact sensations, sound that conformed to the product content, and actual olfactory stimuli to activate the participants’ brainwaves; (4) visual senses can interfere with olfactory and gustatory senses. The visual sense sees symbolic colors and judgments should be conducted aided by combination with olfactory and gustatory senses. Therefore, the presentation of olfactory and gustatory senses should be performed simultaneously with the visual sense.
1.王世德(主編)(1986)。美學辭典。北京:知識。
2.吳瑪琍(譯)(1998)。藝術的精神性(原作者:Wassily Kandinsky)臺北:藝術家。(原著出版年:1963)
3.朱介英(1998)。色彩設計計劃。臺北:美工圖書。
4.李天來(1992)。CI視覺設計-包裝點線面PART 1。臺北:北星。
5.李元洛(1990)。詩美學‧五官的開放與交感。臺北:東大。
6.汪志龍、施錦標(譯)(1975)。廣告心理學(原作者:川勝久)。臺北:巨浪。
7.林文昌(1988)。色彩計劃。臺北:藝術圖書。
8.林泰利(2009)。色彩與香味的情緒作用與關聯性(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣科技大學,臺北。
9.長町三生(1993)。感性工學。東京:海文堂。
10.姜志輝(譯)(2001)。知覺現象學(原作者: Merleau-Ponty, M.)。北京:商務印書館。(原著出版年:1962)
11.洪慧娟(譯)(2001)。嗅覺符碼:記憶和慾望的語言(原作者:Piet Vroon, Anton van Amerongen, Hans de vries)。臺北:商周。(原著出版年:1994)
12.洪蘭(譯)(2001)。透視記憶(原作者:Squire, L. R., & Kandel, E. R.)。臺北:遠流。(原著出版年:1998)
13.洪蘭(譯)(2001),發展的認知神經科學(原作者:Johnson, M. H.)。臺北:信誼。(原著出版年:1997)
14.洪蘭(譯)(2002)。大腦的祕密檔案(原作者:Carter, R.)。臺北:遠流。(原著出版年:2000)
15.洪蘭(譯)(2004)。大腦總指揮--一位神經科學家的大腦之旅(原作者:Goldberg, E.)。臺北:遠流。(原著出版年:2001)
16.原研哉(2004)。株式會社竹尾(編),HAPTIC五感的覺醒。日本:朝日新聞社。
17.夏嘉玲(2007,2月6日)。手機有味道挑逗你的嗅覺。經濟日報。國際新聞A8版。
18.孫嘉欣(2006)。食品包裝瓶罐外形與味覺共感覺探究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北。
19.張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華書局。
20.張春興(2003)。心理學原理。臺北:東華書局。
21.張錦華(譯)(1995)。傳播符號學理論(原作者:Fiske, J.)。臺北:遠流。(原著出版年:1990)
22.許天治(1987)。藝術感通之研究,臺北:台灣省立博物館。
23.郭炳宏(2003)。高感性的人性化品牌。感性學講義。
24.野村順一(1996)。增補色の秘密-最新色彩學入門。東京:文藝春秋。
25.陳仁政(1996)。從人類感覺特性探討盲人人因設計之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南。
26.陳俊宏(1997)。色彩與味覺嗅覺之共感覺研究(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告編號:NSC87-2415-H-224-002)。臺北:中華民國行政院國家科學委員會。
27.陳俊宏、楊東民(1998)。視覺傳達設計概論。臺北:全華。
28.陳建宇(2004)。生醫訊號小波分析及疊紋量測系統(未出版之博士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園。
29.陳美香(2005)。呈現介面與亮度對比對認知(記憶與概念形成)績效之影響與腦波反應(未出版之博士論文)。國立台灣科技大學,臺北。
30.陳源明(譯)(1976)。商品的包裝戰略(原作者:加納光)。臺北:新太。
31.陳學毅(2003)。由音樂感知引導設計發想之脈絡研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學,雲林。
32.博誌文化(編譯)(2008)。Nikkei Design包裝向上委員會(編著),就是要設計!商品包裝的50個暢銷關鍵。臺北:博誌文化。
33.黃雅雯(譯)(2005)。設計中的設計(原作者:原研哉)。臺北:磐築創意。
34.塚田敢(1993)。色彩の美學。東京:紀伊國屋。
35.經濟部商品檢驗局(1984)。食品官感檢查手冊,臺北:作者。
36.趙侖(2004)。ERP實驗教程。天津:天津社會科學院。
37.劉國彬、楊德友(譯)(1997)。榮格自傳:回憶、夢、省思(原作者:Jung, C. G.)。臺北:張老師文化。
38.鄧成連(1992)。現代商品包裝設計。臺北:北星圖書。
39.賴惠鈴(譯)(2008)。五感行銷(原作者:高橋朗)。臺北:漫遊者。
40.龍冬陽(1982)。商業包裝設計。臺北:檸檬黃文化。
41.鍾霓(譯)(2006)。博報堂生活總和研究所(編),五感的時代:視、聽、嗅、味、觸的消費社會學。臺北:經濟部工業局、財團法人中衛發展中心。
42.簡佑宏、陳建雄、黃室苗、張文德與江潤華(2005)。運用腦波測量儀量測聽覺情緒反應。中原學報,33。桃園:中原大學。
43.Ackerman, D. (1990). A Natural History of the Senses. New York, NY: Random House.
44.Avery, G. (2008). What the nose knows: The science of scent in everyday life. New York, NY: CROWN Publishers.
45.Bailey, R. W. (1989). Human performance engineering (2nd ed.). Englewood, New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46.Barthes, R. (1975). The Pleasure of the Text. New York, NY: Hill and Wang Press.
47.Bone, P. F. & Scholder, E. (1999). Scents in The Marketplace: Explaining a Fraction of Olfaction, Journal of Retailing, 75(2), 243.
48.Bone, P. F. & Swati J. (1992). Olfaction as a cue for product quality. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 289-296.
49.Bosmans, A. (2006). Scents and sensibility: When do (In) congruent ambient scents influence product evaluations? Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 32-43.
50.Bruce, N. C., Harald T. S., Margaret M. B., Niels B., & Peter J. L. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52, 95-111.
51.DuBose, C. N. (1980). Effects of Colorants and Flavorants on Identification, Perceived Flavor Intensity, and Hedonic Quality of Fruit-Flavored Beverages and Cake, Journal of Food Science, 45, 1393-1399.
52.Fehmi, L. & Robbins, J. (2007). The open-focus brain: Harnessing the power of attention to heal mind and body. Boston, MA: Trumpeter Books.
53.Gevins, A. (1958). The future of electroencephalography in assessing neurocognitive Jasper, H. H., Report of the committee on methods of clinical examination in Electroencephalography. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 370-376.
54.Gleitman, H. (1997).Psychology. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
55.Goldstone, R. L., Son, J. Y., & Byrge, L. (2011). Early Perceptual Learning. Infancy, 16(1), 45-51.
56.Gregory, R. L. (1997). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson Ltd.
57.Haas, L. F. (2003). Hans Berger (1873-1941), Richard Caton (1842-1926), and electroencephalography. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 74(1).
58.Hinckley, K. & Sinclair, M., (1999). Touch-Sensing Input Devices, ACM CHI''99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 223-230.
59.Hintzman, D. L., (1986). Schema Abstraction in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
60.Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10(1), 371-375.
61.Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Deve.
62.Lawson, A. E. (2003). The neurological basis of learning, development and discovery: Implications for teaching science and mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63.Lindstrom, M. (2005). Brand sense: Build powerful brands through touch, taste, smell, sight, and sound, Simon & Schuster INC, American.
64.Lloyd, J. & Mitchinson, J. (2006). The Book of General Ignorance. New York, NY: Random House.
65.Lorig, T. S., Herman, K. B., Schwartz, G. E. & Cain, W. S. (1990). EEG activity during administration of low-concentration odors. Bulletin of the Psychonomic So-ciety, 28, 405-408.
66.Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W.H.Freeman.
67.Martinovic, J., Gruber, T., & Müller, M. M. (2008). Coding of Visual Object Features and Feature Conjunctions in the Human Brain. Public Library of Science, 3.
68.Medina, J. (2008). Brain Rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School. Pear Press.
69.Morrot, G., Brochet, F., & Dubourdieu, D. (2001). The color of odors. Brain and Language , Journal of Food Science, 79, 309-320.
70.Natarajan, K., Acharya, U. R., Alias, F., Tiboleng, T., Puthusserypady, S. K. (2004). Nonlinear analysis of EEG signals at different mental states. Biomed Eng Online, 16, 3.
71.Overbeeke, C. J. & Peters, M. E. (1991). The taste of desserts'' packages. Perceptual Motor Skills, 73, 575–583.
72.Parkes, L. M., Marsman, J. C., Oxley, D. C., Goulermas, J. Y., & Wuerger, S. M. (2009). Multivoxel fMRI analysis of color tuning in human primary visual cortex. Journal of Vision, 9(1), 1-13. doi:10.1167/9.1.1
73.Pilditch, J. (1961). The silent salesman: how to develop packaging that sells. London: Business Publications.
74.Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157-171.
75.Pruehsner, W. R., Liebler, C. M., Rodriguez-Campos, F., Enderle, J. D. (2003). The eye tracker system- A system to measure and record saccadic eye movements. Biomed Sci Instrum, 39, 208-213. USA: University of Connecti-cut.
76.Prytherch, D. and McLundie, M. (2002). So what is haptics anyway?. Research issues in art design and media, 2.
77.Rachel H. (2007). The scent of desire: Discovering our enig-matic sense of smell. New York, NY: Harpercollins Publishers.
78.Ray, W. (1990). The electrocortical system. In Cacioppo, T. & Tassinary, L. (Eds.), Principles of Psychophysiology: Physical, Social, and Inferential Elements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.385-412
79.Rebecca, L. A. & Thomas. R. A. (1998). The Influence of Physical State and Color on Perceived Sweetness, Journal of Psychology, 132.
80.Rodaway, P. (1994). Sensuous Geography: Body, Sense, and Place. London: outledge.
81.Roth, H. A. (1988). Psychological Relationships Between Perceived Sweetness and Color in Lemon-and-Lime Flavored Drinks, Journal of Food Science, 53, 1116-1119.
82.Schmitt, B. H. & Simonson, A. (1997), Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity & Image. New York, NY: Free Press.
83.Schmitt, B. H. (1999), Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act, and Relate to Your Company and Brands. Simon & Schuster.
84.Schreuder, D. (2008). Outdoor Lighting: Physics, Vision and Perception. New York, NY: Springer.
85.Selame, B. H., & Selame, J. (1988). The company image: Building your identity and influence in the marketplace. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
86.Shoji, H., & Skrandies, W. (2006). ERP topography and human perceptual learning in the peripheral visual field. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61.
87.Stafford, C. (1999). Trade Secrets of Great Design Packaging. Massachusetts, MA: Rockport Publishers. Inc.
88.Strong, E.K. (1925). Theories of Selling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 9, 75-86.
89.Underwood, R. L. (2001). Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(7), 403-422. doi: 10.1108/10610420110410531
90.Werblin, F., & Roska, B. (2007). The movie in your eyes. Scientific American, 296(4).
91.Wise, A. (1995). The high-performance mind: Mastering brainwaves for insight, healing, and creativity. New York: Putnam.
92.Wodsworth, R. H. (1983). Basics of audio and visual system design. Washington, D. C.: National Audio-visual Association.
93.Wolpaw, J., Mc Farland, D., Neat, G., & Forneris, C. (1991). An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor con-trol. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiol-ogy, 78(3), 252-259.
94.Wolpin, M. & Weinstein, C. (1983). Visual imagery and olfac-tory stimulation. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7(1), 63-73.
95.Zelano, C., Bensafi, M., Porter, J., Mainland, J., Johnson, B., Bremner, E., Telles, C., Khan, R., & Sobel, N. (2005). Attentional modulation in human primary olfactory cor-tex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 114-120.
96.Zimmer, H. D. (2008). Visual and spatial working memory: From boxes to networks. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1373-1395.

網站資料:
http://mujisuke.cocolog-nifty.com/2007/12/24
http://www.singtaonet.com/2007/07/05
http://brandcafe.blogspot.com/2007/01/blog-post_17.html/2007/01/16
http://member.nownews.com/2008/06/05
http://www.monell.org/index.htm/2008/06/28
http://people.brunel.ac.uk/~hsstnns/synesthes.html/2010/09/20
http://www.gtdi.co.jp/2011/12/24
http://froosh.com/2012/01/28
http://www.absolut.com/2012/06/07
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE