Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., Di Costa, F., &; Solazzi, M. (2009). University–industry collaboration in Italy: a bibliometric examination. Technovation, 29, 498–507.
Agrawal, A., &; Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44–60.
Aiken, L., &; West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aksnes, D. W. (2006). Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 169–185.
Alexander, F. K. (2000). The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 411–431.
Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-de-Lucio, I., Perruchas, F., &; Mattsson, P. (2009). What do patent examiner inserted citations indicate for a region with low absorptive capacity?. Scientometrics, 80(2), 441-455.
Bainbridge, W. S., &; Roco, M. C. (Eds.). (2006). Managing nano-bio-info-cogno innovations: converging technologies in society. Berlin: Springer.
Blomkvist, K., Kappen, P., &; Zander, I. (2014). Superstar inventors — Towards a people-centric perspective on the geography of technological renewal in the multinational corporation. Research Policy, 43(4), 669–682.
Bollen, K. A., &; Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Breschi, S. &; Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists' and inventors' networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14–26.
Caballero, R., &; Jaffe, A. (1993). How high are the giants’ shoulders: an empirical assessment of knowledge spillovers and creative destruction in a model of economic growth. In: Blanchard, Olivier, Fischer, Stanley (Eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Calero, C., van Leeuwen, T.N., &; Tijssen, R.J.W. (2007). Research cooperation within the bio-pharmaceutical industry: Network analyses of co-publications within and between firms. Scientometrics, 71(1), 87–99.
Calero, C., van Leeuwen, T. N., &; Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Research cooperation within the bio-pharmaceutical industry: Network analyses of co-publications within and between firms. Scientometrics, 71(1), 87–99.
Caloghirou, Y., Constantelou, A., &; Vonortas, N. S. (2001). Knowledge flows in European industry: Mechanisms and policy implications. London: Routledge.
Calvert, J., &; Patel, P. (2003). University-industry research collaborations in the UK: bibliometric trends, Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 85–96.
Dill, D., &; Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49(4), 495–533.
Ding, C. G., &; Jane, T. D. (2012). Using SAS PROC CALIS to fit level-1 error covariance structures of latent growth models. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 765–787.
Dosi, G., Llerena, P., &; Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called ‘European Paradox’. Research Policy, 35(10), 1450–1464.
Eom, B. Y., &; Lee, K. (2009). Modes of knowledge transfer from PROs and firm performance: The case of Korea. Seoul Journal of Economics, 22(4), 499–528.
Etzkowitz, H., &; Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix university-industry- government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(4), 14–19.
Etzkowitz, H., &; Webster, A. (1998). Entrepreneurial science: The second academic revolution. In H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, P. Healey (Eds.). Capitalizing knowledge: New intersections of industry and academia (pp. 21–46). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
European Commission (1995). Green paper on innovation. Bruxelles: European Commission.
Friedman, J., &; Silberman, J. (2003). University technology transfer: Do incentives, management, and location matter? Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 17–30.
Glänzel, W., &; Schubert, A. (1992). Some facts and figures on highly cited papers in the sciences, 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 25(3), 373–380.
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing – its theory and applications in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
Geuna, A., &; Martin, B. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.
Gittelman, M., &; Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logit of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366–382.
Godin, B. (1996). Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy, 25, 587–606.
Hagedoorn, J., &; Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy, 32(8), 1365–1379.
Henderson, R., Jaffe, A. B., &; Trajtenberg, M. (1998). Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965–1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119–127.
Hicks, D., Breitzman, A., Hamilton, K., &; Narin, F. (2000). Research excellence and patented innovation. Science and Public Policy, 27(5), 310–320.
Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., &; Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the U.S.: A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30(4), 681–703.
Hou, C., &; Gu, S. (1993). National Systems supporting technical advance in industry: The case of Taiwan. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp.76–114). New York: Oxford University Press.
Huang, M. H., Chang, H. W., &; Chen, D. Z. (2006). Research evaluation of research-oriented universities in Taiwan from 1993 to 2003. Scientometrics, 67(3), 419–435.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., &; Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.
Jaffe, A., &; Trajtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 105–136.
Jencks, C., &; Reisman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. New York: Doubleday.
Katz, J.S. &; Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
Lemley, M. A., &; Sampat, B. (2012). Examiner characteristics and patent office outcomes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 817–827.
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., &; Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.), Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). Introduction. In B. Å. Lundvall (Ed.), National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning (pp.1 –17). London: Pinter.
Marginson, S., &; van der Wende, M. (2007). To rank or to be ranked: The impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 306–329.
McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., &; Deeds, D. L.(2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8.
Meyer, M. (2001). Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 163–183.
Meyer, M. (2006). Measuring science-technology interaction in the knowledge-driven economy: The case of a small economy. Scientometrics, 66(2), 425–439.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K., &; Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330.
Nelson, A. J. (2012). Putting university research in context: Assessing alternative measures of production and diffusion at Stanford. Research Policy, 41(4), 678-691.
Nelson R. R., &; Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems – introduction. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 3–28). New York: Oxford University Press.
O’Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A, &; Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34, 994–1009.
Petruzzelli M.A. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university–industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31, 309–319.
Raudenbush, S. W., &; Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.), London: Sage.
Roach, M., &; Cohen W. M. (2013). Lens or prism? Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows from public research. Management Science, 59(2), 504–525.
Roco, M. C., &; Bainbridge, W. S. (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance: Integrating from the nanoscale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4(4), 281–295.
Rosenberg, N.(1990). Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy, 19(2), 165–174.
Rosenberg, N., &; Nelson, R. R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23(3), 323–348.
Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38(1), 103–116.
Sorenson, O., &; Fleming, L. (2004). Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy, 33(10), 1615–1634.
Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., &; Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 59–72.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science–technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54.
Tijssen, R.J.W. (2004). Is the commercialisation of scientific research affecting the production of public knowledge?: Global trends in the output of corporate research articles. Research Policy, 33(5), 709–733.
Tijssen, R.J.W., &; van Leeuwen, T.N. (2006). Measuring impacts of academic science on industrial research: A citation-based approach. Scientometrics, 66(1), 55–69.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2009). How globalized is corporate pharmaceutical research? An analysis of Europe’s multinational companies. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 21(7), 859–879.
Tijssen, R. J. W., Buter, R. K., &; van Leeuwan, T. N. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389–412.
Van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glanzel, U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&;T systems (pp. 19–50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economy theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University.
White, M. J., &; White, K. G. (1977). Citation analysis of psychology journals. American Psychologist, 32(5), 301–305.