|
98年度-「想像力與科技研究/實作能力培育」整合型計畫(2009)。2012年7月10日,取自http://www.nsc.gov.tw/sci/ct.asp?xItem=16326&;ctNode=3395 王佳琪、何曉琪、鄭英耀(2014)。科學創造性問題解決測驗之發展。測驗學刊,61(3),337-360。 王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩(2012)。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究,23,105-134。 任東屏(2001)。想像類型的知識與活動~一項多元智慧的課程。課程與教學季刊,5(1),37-54。 吳可久、蘇于倫、曹筱玥(2013)。由激發想像力思維探索設計課程教學方式。建築學報,83,19-35。 呂愛麗(2009年1月10日)。愈閱讀,愈創意。遠見雜誌,2009創意特刊,28-29。 李賢哲、李彥斌(2002)。以科學過程技能融入動手做工藝教材培養國小學童科學創造力。科學教育學刊,10(4),341-372。 周進洋、韓承靜(1999)。心智表徵與創造思考。科學與教育學報,3,1-25。 林緯倫、連韻文、任純慧(2005)。想得多是想得好的前提嗎?探討發散性思考能力在創意問題解決的角色。中華心理學刊,27,3,211-227。 邱發忠、陳學志、林耀南、涂莉苹(2012)。想像力構念之初探。教育心理學報,44(2),389-410。 侯雅齡(2009)。幼兒科學創造力評量方法之發展:嵌入式評量設計。教育科學研究期刊,54(1),113-142。 洪文東(2002)。創造型兒童之思考特性與科學創造力的關聯性。屏東師院學報,16,355-394。 洪瑞雲、王精文、拾已寰、李泊諺、王愉敏(2013)。以概念結合理論為基礎的想像力測驗之編製。測驗學刊,60(4),681-713。 張蕙慧(2001)。想像的本質及其在音樂審美活動中的效用探析。新竹師院學報,14,281-301 教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。台北:教育部。 教育部顧問室人文社會科學教育計畫(無日期)。2012年7月10日,取自http://hss.edu.tw/plan_detail.php?class_plan=174。 曹筱玥、林小慧(2012)。想像力量表之編製。教育科學研究期刊,57(4),1-37。 梁朝雲(2011)。轉化虛無-試論想像力評測指標。資訊傳播研究,2:1(October 2011),99-111。 梁朝雲、許育齡、林威聖(2014)。探究想像力內涵暨評測量表研發。測驗學刊,61(1),27-50。 許育齡、梁朝雲(2012)。探究想像力的意涵與特徵-探索性與驗證性因素分析之發現。教育心理學報,44(2),349-372。 許育齡、梁朝雲、林志成(2013)。教師發揮教學設計想像力的心理與環境因素探究。當代教育研究季刊,21(2),113-148。 許育齡、黃文宗、林立中(2012)。視覺傳達設計學習者發揮想像的內在因素探索與驗證。藝術教育研究,23,41-66。 陳坤淼、沈思岑(2011)。設計想像力之探討-以個案創意設計分析為例。文化創意產業研究學報,1(1),1-12。 陳昭儀(2000)。傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創造歷程之研究。師大學報-科學教育類,45(1),27-45。 陳慧霞、游萬來(2006)。平面設計過程中使用傳統工具與電腦工具的草圖行為研究。設計學報,11,113-135 。 曾秀玉(2014)。「漫聯奇妙」科學發明想像力歷程之教學成效。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。 曾琬迪(2009)。觀察與想像,讓世界更美好。科學月刊,472,243。 楊宜倫(2006)。「小小發明家」創造思考課程之探討。生活科技教育月刊。39(5),154-169。 楊瑪利(2009年1月10日)。你今天說故事了嗎?遠見雜誌,2009創意特刊,10。 葉玉珠、彭月茵、林志哲、蔡維欣、鍾素香(2008)。「情境式科學創造力測驗」之發展暨科學創造力之性別與年級差異分析。測驗學刊,55(1),33-60。 詹志禹(2002)。科學發現與知識成長:我們能從科學哲學當中學到什麼?應用心理研究,15,105-127。 詹志禹(2010)。「未來想像與創意人才培育」中程個案計畫。教育部顧問室委託計畫。台北市:教育部。 詹志禹、陳玉樺(2011)。發揮想像力共創臺灣未來-教育系統能扮演的角色。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,23-52。 鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學:理論與實踐。台北市:桂冠。 謝甫佩、洪振方(2006)。從匯合取向的觀點探討科學創造力的評量。科學教育月刊,291,11-23。 韓承靜、洪蘭、蔡介立(2008)。心、眼與世界的連結—從認知神經科學看知覺與心像的關係。科學教育月刊,308,16-23。 韓承靜、洪蘭、蔡介立(2010)。心像旋轉之心智表徵特性—探討圖形複雜度與整合性的影響。教育心理學報,41(3),551-578。 Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999/2005). 創造力理論(Handbook of creativity)(李乙明、李淑貞譯)。台北﹕五南。 Adadan, E., Trundle, K. C., &; Irving, K. E. (2010). Exploring grade 11 students'' conceptual pathways of the particulate nature of matter in the context of multirepresentational instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1004-1035. doi: 10.1002/tea.20366 Adams, J. (2004). The imagination and social life. Qualitative Sociology, 27, 277-297. doi: 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000037619.28845.ef Al-Balushi, S. M. (2009). Factors influencing pre-service science teachers’ imagination at the microscopic level in chemisity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1089-1110. doi: 10.1007/s10763-009-9155-1 Alonzo, A. C., &; Gearhart, M. (2006). Considering learning progressions from a classroom assessment perspective. Measurement, 14(1&;2), 99-126. Alonzo, A., &; Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education,93, 389-421. doi: 10.1002/sce.20303 Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, &; National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Authors. Ayas, M. B., &; Sak, U. (2014). Objective measure of scientific creativity: Psychometric validity of the creative scientific ability test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 195-205. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001 Baer, J., &; Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75-105. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x Bencze, J. L., &; Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2459-2483. doi: 10.1080/09500690802398127 Berland, L. K., &; McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94, 765-793. doi: 10.1002/sce.20402 Black, P., Wilson, M., &; Yao, S. Y. (2011). Road maps for learning: A guide to the navigation of learning progressions. Measurement, 9, 71-123. doi: 10.1080/15366367.2011.591654 Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., &; Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239-263. doi: 10.1002/acp.1182 Briggs, D. C., Alonzo, A. C., Schwab, C., &; Wilson, M. (2006). Diagnostic assessment with ordered multiple-choice items. Educational Assessment, 11, 33-63. doi: 10.1207/s15326977ea1101_2 Brill, F. (2004). Thinking outside the box: Imagination and empathy beyond story writing. Literacy, 38, 83-89. doi: 10.1111/j.0034-0472.2004.03802004.x Campbell, K. H. S., Mcwhir, J., Ritchie, W. A., &; Wilmut, I. (1996). Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature, 380, 64-66. doi:10.1038/380064a0 Caravita, S., &; Hallde´n, O. (1994). Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89-111.doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90020-5 Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chan, D. W., Cheung, P. C., Lau, S., Wu, W. Y., &; Kwong, J. M., &; Li, W. L. (2001). Assessing ideational fluency in primary students in Hong Kong. Creativity Research Journal, 13 (3-4), 359-365. doi: 10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_13 Cheng, Y. Y., Wang, W. C., &; Ho, Y. H. (2009). Multidimensional Rasch analysis of a psychological test with multiple subtests: A statistical solution for the bandwidth–fidelity dilemma. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 369-388. Church, E. B. (2006). Let’s invent. Scholastic Parent &; Child, 13, 28-35. Claesgens, J., Scalise, K., Wilson, M., &; Stacy, A. (2009). Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The perspectives on chemists. Science Education, 93, 56-85. doi: 10.1002/sce.20292 Cooper, M. M., Underwood, S. M., Hilley, C. Z., &; Klymkowsky, M. W. (2012). Development and assessment of a molecular structure and properties learning progression. Journal of Chemical Education, 89, 1351-1537. doi: 10.1021/ed300083a Cruz, H. D., &; Smedt, J. D. (2010). Science as structured imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 29-44. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01324.x Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers. Dilek, D. (2009). The reconstruction of the past through images: An iconographic analysis on the historical imagination usage skills of primary school pupils. Educational Sciences: Theory &; Practice, 9, 665-689. Douville, P. (2004). Use mental imagery across the curriculum. Preventing School Failure, 49, 36-39. doi: 10.3200/PSFL.49.1.36 Dudek, S. Z., Strobel, M. G., &; Runco, M. A. (1993). Cumulative and proximal influences on the social environment and children’s creative potential. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 487-499. doi: 10.1080/00221325.1993.9914747 Duncan, R. G. (2009). Learning Progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 606-609. doi: 10.1002/tea.20316 Duncan, R. G., &; Rivet, A. E. (2013). Science learning progressions. Science, 339, 396-397. doi: 10.1126/science.1228692 Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., &; Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 655-674. doi: 10.1002/tea.20312 Duschl, R., Maeng, S., &; Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47, 123-182. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2011.604476 Eckhoff, A., &; Urbach, J. (2008). Understanding imaginative thinking during childhood: Sociocultural conceptions of creativity and imaginative thought. Early Childhood Educ J, 36, 179-185. doi: 10.1007/s10643-008-0261-4 Egan, K., &; Judson, G. (2009). Values and imagination in teaching: With a special focus on social studies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41, 126-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00455.x Elmesky, R. (2013). Building capacity in understanding foundational biology concepts: A K-12 learning progression in genetics informed by research on children’s thinking and learning. Research in Science Education, 43, 1155-1175. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9286-1 Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Finke, R. A., &; Slayton, K. (1988). Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental synthesis in mental imagery. Memory &; Cognition, 16, 252-257. doi: 10.3758/BF03197758 Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., &; Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Foley, M. A., Wozniak, K. H., &; Gullun, A. (2006). Imagination and false memory inductions: Investigating the role of process, content and source of imagination. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1119-1141. doi: 10.1002/acp.1265 Freidenreich, H.B., Duncan, R. G., &; Shea, N. (2011). Exploring middle school students'' understanding of three conceptual models in genetics. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 2323-2349. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.536997 Gallas, K. (2001). Look, Karen, I’m running like Jell-O: Imagination as a question, a topic, a tool for literacy research and learning. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 457-492. Gerard, R. W. (1946). The biological basis of imagination. The Science Monthly, 62, 477-499. Glenberg, A. M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J. R., Japuntich, S., &; Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Activity and imagined activity can enhance children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 424-436. Gotwals, A. W., &; Songer, N. B. (2013). Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 597-626. doi: 10.1002/tea.21083 Grant, E. (2004). Scientific imagination in the middle ages. Perspectives on Science, 12, 394-422.doi:10.1162/1063614042776021 GÜNDOĞAN, A., ARI, M., &; GÖNEN, M. (2013). Test of creative imagination: Validity and reliability study. Educational Sciences: Theory &; practice, 13, 15-20. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., &; Stefanich, G. (2000). Imagination in science education. Contemporary Education, 71, 23-28. Hampson, P. E. &; Morris, P. J. (1983). Imagery and consciousness. London: Academic Press. Hargreaves, D. J. (1977). Sex roles in divergent thinking. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1977.tb02997.x Hill, D. (1988). Humor in the classroom: A textbook for teachers and other entertainers! Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas. Ho, H. C., Wang, C. C., &; Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Analysis of the scientific imagination process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68-78.doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003 Holland, P. W., &; Wainer, H. (Eds.) (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Hu, W., &; Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 389-403. doi: 10.1080/09500690110098912 Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., &; Kaufman, J. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 3-21. doi: 10.1002/jocb.20 Jin, H., &; Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149-1180. doi: 10.1002/tea.21051 Johnson, P., &; Tymms, P. (2011). The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 849-877.doi: 10.1002/tea.20433 Kaewowski, M., &; Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination? Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 163-171. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2008.07.001 Karwowski, M. (2008). Measuring creativity using the Test of Creative Imagination (TCI). Part 2. On validity of the TCI. The New Educational Review, 2, 216–232. King, A. (2007). Developing imagination, creativity, and literacy through collaborative storymaking: A way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 77, 204-227. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., &; Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31, 549-579. doi: 10.1080/15326900701399897 Kuhrik, M., Kuhrik, N., &; Berry, P. A. (1997). Facilitating learning with humor. Journal of Nursing Education, 36, 332-334. LeBoutillier, N., &; Marks, D. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: A meta-analytic review study. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 29-44. doi: 10.1348/000712603762842084 Lee, H. S., &; Liu, O. L. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94, 665-68. doi: 10.1002/sce.20382 Lehrer, R., &; Schauble, L. (2009). Images of learning. Images of progress. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 731-735. doi: 10.1002/tea.20317 Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky’s theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2 &; 3), 245-251. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2003.9651416 Long, S.A., Winograd, P.N., &; Bridge, C.A. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on reports of imagery during and after reading. Reading Research Quarteriy, 24, 353-372. Lothane, Z. (2007). Imagination as reciprocal process and its role in the psychoanalytic situation. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 16, 152-163. doi: 10.1080/08037060701278636 Loui, M. C. (2006). Teaching students to dream. College Teaching, 54, 58. Masters, G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149-174. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp.449-460). NY: Cambridge. McCormack, A. (2010). Imagine and invent: Create a great future. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 8-9. McGown, A., Green, G., &; Rodgers, P. (1998). Visible ideas: Information patterns of conceptual sketch activity. Design Studies, 19, 431-453.doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00013-1 McLellan, R., &; Nicholl, B. (2011). “If I was going to design a chair, the last thing I would look at is a chair”: Product analysis and the causes of fixation in students’ design work 11-16 years. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21, 71–92. doi: 10.1007/s10798-009-9107-7 Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232. Mellou, E. (1995). Creativity: The imagination condition. Early Child Development and Care, 114, 97-106. doi: 10.1080/0300443951140108 Mellou, E. (1996). The two-conditions view of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 126-143. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00763.x Mey, T. D. (2006). Imagination’s grip on science. Metaphilosophy, 37, 222-239. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00432.x Mikulan, P. (2013). Imaginative science teaching: A brief guide for teachers. Resource from http://ierg.ca/IST/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/IST-Brief-Guide.pdf Miles, M. B., &; Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mohan, L., Chen, J., &; Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675-698. doi: 10.1002/tea.20314 Mountain, V. (2007). Educational contexts for the development of children’s spirituality: Exploring the use of imagination. International Journal of Children’s Spirituality, 12, 191-205. doi: 10.1080/13644360701467535 National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. J. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, &; R. Glaser (Eds). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2006). Systems for state science assessment. Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement. M. Wilson &; M. Bertenthal (Eds.), Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, &; A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Ontell, V. (2003). Imagine that! Science fiction as a learning motivation. Community &; Junior College Libraries, 12, 57-70. doi: 10.1300/J107v12n01_09 Osborn, A. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Charles Scribner''s Sons. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Parloff, M. B., &; Handlon, J. H. (1964). The influence of criticalness on creative problem-solving in dyads. Psychiatry, 27, 17-27. Pendry, J. B., Schurig, D., &; Smith, D. R. (2006). Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science, 312, 1780–1782. doi: 10.1126/science.1125907 Pérez-Fabello, M. J., &; Campos, A. (2011). Dissociative experiences and creativity in fine arts students. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 38-41. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.545721 Peterson, R. E. (2002). Establishing the creative environment in technology education. Technology Teacher, 61, 7-10. Plummer, J. D., &; Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 768-787. doi: 10.1002/tea.20355 Raju, N. S., Price, L. R., Oshima, T. C., &; Nering, M. L. (2007). Standardized conditional SEM: A case for conditional reliability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 31, 169-180. doi: 10.1177/0146621606291569 Razumnikova, O. M. (2004). Gender differences in hemispheric organization during divergent thinking: An EEG investigation in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 362, 193-195.doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.066 Ren, F., Li, X., Zhang, H., &; Wang, L. (2012). Progression of Chinese students’ creative imagination from elementary through high school. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 2043-2059. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.709334 Robinson, A. (2010). Chemistry’s visual origins-Vivid imagination was key to unlocking the secrets of molecular structure in the nineteenth century. [Review of the book Image and Reality: Kekulé, Kopp, and the Scientific Imagination, by A. Rocke]. Nature, 465, 36. Root-Bernstein, M., &; Root-Bernstein, R. (2006). Imaginary worldplay in childhood and maturity and its ımpact on adult creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 405-425. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1804_1 Schumacker, R. E., &; Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007). A Rasch perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 394-409.doi: 10.1177/0013164406294776 Schwab, K., &; Porter, M. E. (2008). The global competitiveness report 2008-2009. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., &; Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632-654. doi: 10.1002/tea.20311 Sevian, H., &; Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: A learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 10-23. doi: 10.1039/C3RP00111C Shea, N. A., &; Duncan, R. G. (2013). From theory to data: The process of refining learning progressions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 7-32. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2012.691924 Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., &; Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children’s learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic-molecular theory. Measurement, 14, 1–98. doi: 10.1080/15366367.2006.9678570 Smith, C., Wiser, M., Carraher, D. (2010, March).Using a comparative, longitudinal study with upper elementary school students to test some assumptions of a learning progression for matter. Paper presented at NARST, Philaelphia, PA. Smith, M., &; Mathur, R. (2009). Childrens'' imagination and fantasy: Implications for development, education, and classroom activities. Research in the Schools, 16, 52-63. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., &; Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge: MIT Press. Smolucha, F. (1989). The relevance of Vygotsky’s theory of creative imagination for contemporary research on play. Paper presented at the National Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Songer, N. B., &; Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 141-165. doi: 10.1002/tea.20454 Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., &; Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 610-631. doi: 10.1002/tea.20313 Steedle, J. T., &; Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 699-715. doi: 10.1002/tea.20308 Sternberg, R. J., &; Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688. Sternberg, R. J., &; Williams, W. M. (1996). How to develop student creativity.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., &; Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 47, 687-715. doi: 10.1002/tea.20324 Stumpf, H. (1995). Scientific creativity: A short overview. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 225-241. doi: 10.1007/BF02213372 The Next Generation Science Standards. (2013, April). Appendix h – Understanding the scientific enterprise: The nature of science in the next generation science standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Appendix H - The Nature of Science in the Next Generation Science Standards 4.15.13.pdf Thomas, N. J. T. (1999). Are theories of imagery theories of imagination? An active perception approach to conscious mental content. Cognitive science, 23, 207-245.doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00004-X Vygotsky, S. L. (1930/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7-97. Wang, C. C., Cheng, Y. Y., Liu, K. S., &; Ho, H. C. (2011). Validation of the multidimensional sense of humor scale using Rasch analyses. Psychological Testing, 58, 691-713 (In Chinese). Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., &; Cheng, Y. Y. (revised). Building a learning progression for scientific imagination: A measurement approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity. Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., Cheng, C. L., &; Cheng, Y. Y. (2014). Application of the Rasch model to the measurement of creativity: The Creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 1-8. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.843347 Wang, C. C., Ho, H. C., Wu, J. J.,&; Cheng, Y. Y. (2014). Development of the scientific imagination model: A concept-mapping perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 106–119.doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2014.04.001 Wang, W. C. (2008). Assessment of differential item functioning. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1-22. Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1010 Ward, T. B., &; Wickes, K. N. S. (2009). Stable and dynamic properties of category structure guide imaginative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 21, 15-23. doi: 10.1080/10400410802633376 Wilson, M. (2005). Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Wilson, M. (2009). Measuring processions: Assessment structures underlying a learning progression. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 716-730. doi: 10.1002/tea.20318 Wilson, M., &; Carstensen, C. (2005). Assessment to improve learning in mathematics: The BEAR assessment system. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 1, 27-50. Wolfe, E. W., &; Smith, E. V., Jr. (2007). Instrument development tools and activities for measure validation using Rasch models: Part II-Validation activities. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8, 204−233. Wood, K. D., &; Endres, C. (2004). Motivating student interest with the imagine, elaborate, predict, and confirm (IEPC) strategy. The Reading Teacher, 58, 346-357. doi: 10.1598/RT.58.4.4 Wright, B. D., &; Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370. Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., &; Wilson, M. R. (2007). ConQuest [Computer software and manual]. Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research. Zabriskie, B. (2004). Imagination as laboratory. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49, 235-242. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-5922.2004.00455.x Zarnowski, M. (2009). The thought experiment: An imaginative way into civic literacy. Social Studies, 10, 55-62. doi: 10.3200/TSSS.100.2.55-62 Zhao, M., Hoeffler, S., &; Dahl, D. W. (2009). The role of imagination-focused visualization on new product evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 46-55.doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.1.46
|