:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:揭開台灣照顧的多重面紗—揭開台灣照顧的多重面紗~個人生命經驗與社會政策的對話
作者:劉香蘭
作者(外文):Hsiang-Lan Liu
校院名稱:國立臺灣大學
系所名稱:社會工作學研究所
指導教授:古允文
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2015
主題關鍵詞:照顧世代差異化女性主義生命歷程觀點社會政策caregeneration differencefeminismlife course theorysocial policy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
照顧成為一個分析概念在西方發展已有40年之久,最早源自於女性在家庭的無酬照顧,當代發展出照顧提供的多元性和制度分化的概念,照顧提供的責任與角色,已在國家、市場、社區和家庭間進行重組,雖有相當多與照顧相關的文獻,但缺乏從世代觀點探索女性生命歷程
樣態和照顧分工轉型的鑲嵌性。
為此,本文以質性研究為典範,女性主義理論和生命歷程觀點為視角,以深入訪談法和檔案分析法,訪談兩個世代女性(生於1950年代和1970年代,共17位女性),發現不同世代的女性生命歷程樣態、照顧分工轉型與國家行動的關係,資料蒐集與分析從2013年7月起,一直到完成正式論文。
本文主要發現有三:1.女性面對的壓迫,不僅是性別的,更是世代性。兩代女性生命歷程呈現世代女性差異化生命歷程樣態,因成長的制度性脈絡和福利措施存在的機會與責任有別,透過中老年和照顧工作的相遇,使1950年世代女性高齡時,在家庭成為雙重勞動者,1970年世代女性透過照顧工作或是使用育嬰留職停薪津貼、購買照顧和使用喘息服務,產生照顧與工作都要做的多樣性,女性角色擴大遂為事實,照顧成為工作,不過是女性勞動力在世代與階級的重組,為父權國家所用;2.國家、家庭與市場的照顧分工,產生複雜的變遷,尤其是20世紀發展出照顧在家庭化生產模式,透過準部門運作,將國家照顧責任層層轉嫁到特定家庭與女性,產生家庭間與女性間的不平等;3.本研究發展本土化的照顧本質,照顧除了有生產性經濟性的價值,還有照顧成傷的倫理,照顧也因準部門模式,存在跨領域的多重性。
在研究建議,本研究發展出5個領域轉移的照顧國家概念:照顧轉為公共財和公共倫理、照顧價值的經濟性、生產性、生命歷程軌進的雙重性和拒斥準部門的運作模式,扭轉照顧往私領域的走向,回到國家責任為主,投資照顧,促進照顧外部效應極大化的根本定位。
Care as a concept has been developing for 40 years, from putting women in an unpaid care context to diversity of care provision. Care as commodity or welfare goods implies the re-organization of responsibility between state, market, community, and family. This study reviews many existing papers relating to care and finds an important research gap: the different female experiences across generations and their interaction with institutional structure are missing. Thus, this study is integrating feminist approach and life course theory, to explore the nature of care between two generations (born in 1950s & 1970s) of female carers in Taiwan. To achieve this goal, research design is primarily based on qualitative method research, including in-depth interviews and document analysis. The data collection and analysis is from July 2013 continually until the finish of dissertation.
The study has three main findings: First, the oppression faced by women is not only a gender issue, but also one of a generational difference. The lived experience of the two generations of female care-workers is markedly different, since the opportunities and responsibilities, in terms of the growth of organizational structures and welfare measures encountered, filtered through the encounter of aging and care-work, are such that the women of the 1950s are considerably older and play a dual role as workers within their own family, whilst the women of the 1970s through care work or by using opportunities to take maternity leave, hire carers or use temporary labor, resulting in multi-tasking both in terms of care and work. While an expansion of the role of women is effected, care becomes a form of work. However, given the simultaneous presence of generational and class differences, the female labor force is exploited by the patriarchal state. Secondly, the division of labor in care between the state, family and market have led to severe complications. This applies especially to the development in the twentieth century of a family-produced model of care which operates via a quasi-sector model, whereby the various levels of state responsibility for care are hived off to particular families and women, such that there is inequality within families and among women. Thirdly, this research has developed an inculturation of the nature of care: in addition to its value as a productive economic force, and the ethics of its potentially dangerous side, care has a cross-sector multiplicity on account of the use of a quasi-sector model.
The study recommends the concept of a caring state in which five areas should be transformed. Care should be transformed into a public good regulated by public ethics, that is, the dual nature of the economic, productive and life course features of care should be adopted whilst rejecting the current quasi-sector model; the tendency for care to be privatized should be countered; there should be a return to the state as having prime responsibility; there should be investment in care; and there should be promotion aimed at ensuring the proper role of care by maximizing its external effects.
參考文獻

內政部 (2010)。中低收入家庭幼童托教補助實施計畫。
內政部 (2011)。內政統計年報。台北:行政院主計處。
內政部、教育部 (2010)。5歲幼兒免學費教育計畫。
衛生福利部社會及家庭暑 (2013)。103年度各地方政府與社區保母連絡表。〔on line〕2014年6月16日,available: http://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=148&pid=635
女學會 (1997)。結論:讓國家作人民的照顧者。載於劉毓秀(編),女性、國家、公 民身分(256-277頁)。台北:女書文化。
中研院社會所 (2009)。台灣社會變遷全記錄。〔on line〕2009年12月30日,available:http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/TSCpedia/index.php/%E4%BA%BA%E5%8F%A3%E8%88%87%E5%AE%B6%E5%BA%AD.
王麗容 (1999)。婦女二度就業之檢視與政策建議。社會政策與社會工作學刊,3(2),181~226。
王淑英、孫嫚薇 (2003)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊,2(4),147-174。
王苡斯 (2007)。論我國娼妓政策之性別意涵:從社會秩序維護法觀察出發(碩士論文)。桃園縣:中原大學財經法律學系桃園縣。取自台博碩士論文系統。
王舒芸 (2007)。向左走?向右走?兒童照顧政策「去」或「再」家庭化初探。發表於女性學會與高師大舉辦之「40周年校慶研討會--家庭與工作:變遷現象與多元想像研討會」(2007年10月6日至7日),地點:高雄/高師大。
王增勇 (2011)。家庭照顧者作為一種改革長期照顧的社會運動。台灣社會研究季刊,85,397-414。
王增勇校訂 (2012)。為弱勢者畫權力地圖︰建制民族誌入門。臺北:群學。
包淳亮、張國城譯 (2009)。政治社會學 : 批判的導論。高雄:麗文。
古允文譯 (1995)。福利國家的政治經濟學。台北:巨流。
譯自Ian Gough. The Political Economy of the Welfare State.Macmillan Education Ltd.
古允文 (2001)。平等與凝聚:台灣社會福利發展的思考。社會政策與社會工作學刊,5(1),145-149。
行政院 (2007)。我國長期照顧十年計畫~大溫暖社會福利套案之旗艦計畫。〔on line〕.2014/4/28. Available: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DONAHC/DM1.aspx?f_list_no=581
行政院 (2011)。中華民國人口政策綱領。〔on line〕.2014/4/28. Available: www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/26/188147/242614405671.pdf
行政院 (2012)。中華民國建國一百年社會福利政策綱領(核定本)。〔on line〕. 2014/4/28. Available: www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/.../
行政院(2013)。我國長期照顧十年計畫~101至104年中程計畫,〔on line〕. 2014/11/27.http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DONAHC/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_no=581&fod_list_no=1402&doc_no=3411
行政院 (2013)。人口政策白皮書:少子女化、高齡化及移民(核定本)。〔on line〕. 2014/4/28. Available: www.tamsui.ntpc.gov.tw/web66/_file/.
行政院主計處 (2005)。工作與家庭。
行政院主計處 (2009)。性別統計專題:工作與家庭。〔on line〕2014/4/20. Available: http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/fp.asp?xItem=835&ctNode=6010.
行政院主計處 (2007)。social indicators:生育概況。〔on line〕2014/4/20. Available: www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/8811136871.doc
行政院主計處 (2009)。人力資源調查提要分析。
行政院主計處(2010)。國情統計通報。〔on line〕.2014/4/28. Available: http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/lp.asp?CtNode=1481&CtUnit=690&BaseDSD=7&mp=1
行政院主計處(2013)。102年婦女婚育與就業調查結摘要分析。〔on line〕2015/1/15. Available: http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=35732&ctNode=3303&mp=1.
行政院勞委會 (2010)。國際勞動。〔on line〕.2014/5/1. Available: http://www.mol.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&ids=123
行政院勞委會(2011)。勞動統計。〔on line〕.2014/4/28. Available :http://www.mol.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&ids=371
行政院勞委會(2012)。性別勞動統計。〔on line〕. 2014/4/30. Available: http://english.mol.gov.tw/cgi- bin/siteMaker/SM_theme?page=4e522114
行政院勞委會 (2012)。100年中高齡(45~64歲)人力資源統計提要分析。〔on line〕. 2012/12/5.Available: https://www.google.com.tw/#q=100%E5%B9%B4%E4%B8%AD%E9%AB%98%E9%BD%A1%EF%BC%8845%EF%BD%9E64%E6%AD%B2%EF%BC%89%E4%BA%BA%E5%8A%9B%E8%B3%87%E6%BA%90%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E6%8F%90%E8%A6%81%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90
行政院婦女權益促進委員會(2000)。跨世紀婦女政策藍圖,〔on line〕. 2014/5/12. Available: http://www.gec.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=98D52D5BD48ACC6D/
行政院婦女權益促進委員會(2004)。婦女政策綱領與政策白皮書,〔on line〕. 2014/5/12.Available: http://www.gec.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=5363FBD9C9B60127
行政院性別平等處(2011)。性別平等政策綱領,〔on line〕. 2014/5/12.Available: http://www.gec.ey.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=363DC330E476B467
朱雲漢(1992)。寡佔經濟與威權政治體制,蕭新煌等(編),解剖台灣經濟-威權體制下的壟斷與剝削(頁139-160)。台北:前衛出版社。
江明修 (1994)。社會科學多重典範的爭辯:試論質與量研究方法的整合。政大學報,64,319-333。
江亮演、應福國 (2005)。社會福利與公設民營化制度的探討。社區發展季刊,108,54-71。
利翠珊、張妤玥(2010)。代間照顧關係—台灣都會地區成年子女的質性訪談研究。中華心理衛生學刊,23(1),9-124。
阮新邦 (1993)。批判詮釋論與社會研究。八方文化企業公司。
成露茜、熊秉純(1993)。婦女、外銷導向成長與國家:台灣個案。台灣社會研究季刊,14,39-76。
宋麗玉等著 (2002)。社會工作理論。台北:洪葉出版社。
何碧珍 (2009)。女性的小抉擇、國家的大麻煩,發表社團法人台灣社會福利總盟舉辦之「第三次民間社會福利會議研討會」, 2009年9月11日-12日,台北:台大法社學院國際會議廳。
何明修 (2009)。研究方法論。台北:智勝。
李悅端、柯志明 (1994)。小型企業的經營與性別分工:以五分埔成衣業社區為案 例的分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,17,41-81。
李少軍、尚新建譯 (1995)。民主的模式。台北:桂冠。
李碧涵 (2002)。勞動體制的發展:全球化下的挑戰與改革。社會政策與社會工作學刊,6(1),185-219。
李建德等 (2005)。照顧精神病患之經驗:男性家屬的觀點。實證護理,2(3),180-188。
李大正、楊靜利 (2004)。台灣婦女勞動參與類型與歷程之變遷,人口學刊,28, 109-134。
李駿毅 (2007)。論「性」之刑事法規制—以語言、權力、系統等差異理論作觀察(碩士論文)。台北市:國立臺灣大學法律學院法律學系碩士論文。取自台博碩士論文系統。
李淑如 (2013)。淺析保母居家托育費用管理政策,以「台中市育兒支持-平價托育 服務實施計畫」為例。兒童照顧與教育,3,81-86。
李易駿、古允文(2003)。另一個福利世界?東亞發展型福利體制初探。臺灣社會學刊,31,189-241。
李易駿 (2003)。發展型福利體制探析—以日本、韓國與台灣為例(博士論文)。南 投縣:國立暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系。取自台博碩士論文系統。
呂朝賢 (2007)。貧窮動態及其成因—從生命週期到生命歷程。臺大社工學刊, 14,167-210。
呂寶靜、陳景寧 (1997)。女性家屬照顧者的處境與福利建構。收錄於劉毓秀(編),女性、國家、公民身分( 57-92頁)。台北:女書文化。
呂寶靜 (1999)。我國推動福利社區化的省思—從英國社區照顧政策的發展出發。 收錄於林萬億等(編著),臺灣社會福利的發展:回顧與展望(209-242頁)。台北:五南。
呂寶靜 (2005)。支持家庭照顧者的長期照顧政策之構思。國家政策季刊,4(4),25-40。
呂寶靜 (2007)。人口政策白皮書及實施計畫之研究—子計畫四「我國人口政策白皮書規劃與研究」期末報告。內政部委託研究報告。
伊慶春、呂玉瑕 (1996)。台灣社會學研究中家庭和婦女研究之評介。收錄於蕭新煌、章英華(編),兩岸三地社會學的發展與交流(169-192頁)。台北:台灣社會學社。
伊慶春、簡文吟 (2001)。已婚婦女的持續就業:家庭制度與勞動市場的妥協。台灣社會學,1,149-182。
邱啟潤、陳武宗 (2007)。誰來關懷照顧者?護理雜誌,44(6),25-30。
林方皓 (1997)。生命中不可承受之母職。中華心理衛生學刊,11(1),61-70。
林瑞穗 (1996)。社區發展與村里組織功能問題之探討。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會編印。
林宗弘 (2009)。台灣的後工業化:階級結構的轉型與社會不平等,1992-2007。 台灣社會學刊,43,93-158。
林萬億等著 (1999)。臺灣社會福利的發展:回顧與展望。台北:五南。
林萬億 (2002)。台灣的家庭變遷與家庭政策。臺大社工學刊,6,35-88。
林萬億 (2006)。台灣的社會福利-歷史經驗與制度分析。台北:五南。
林萬億 (2010)。社會福利。台北:五南。
林勝義 (2002)。兒童福利。台北:五南。
林歐貴櫻審譯 (2007)。老年與家庭:理論與研究。台北:五南。
林世華、陳柏熹等譯 (2005)。社會科學研究法:量化與質化取向。台北:心理出版社。
林津如 (2007)。父系家庭與女性差異認同:中產階級職業婦女家務分工經驗的跨世代比較。台灣社會研究季刊,68(12),1-73。
林妏蓁、陳國樑、黃勢璋 (2013)。生育津貼對我國生育率的影響。社會政策與社 會工作學刊,17(2),259-297。
周建卿編著 (1992)。中華社會福利法制史。台北:黎明。
周添城 (1992)。權力邊陲的中小企業。收錄於蕭新煌等(編),解剖台灣經濟-威權體制下的壟斷與剝削(72-100頁),台北:前衛出版社。
周月清 (2000)。英國社區照顧:源起與爭議。台北﹕五南圖書公司。
周月清等 (2005)。我國長期照顧服務輸送之初探:目標原則、服務對象、提供方式與服務項目。台灣社會福利學刊,4(2),97-138。
吳玉琴 (2004)。台灣居家服務現況與檢討。社區發展季刊,106,132-141。
吳玉琴 (2011)。台灣老人福利百年軌跡—老人福利政策及措施之省思和展望。社區發展季刊,133,139-159。
吳淑瓊 (1999)。台灣功能障礙老人家庭照顧者的全國性概況分析。中華衛誌,18(1),44-53。
吳淑瓊、楊坤洋 (2001)。在地老化:台灣21世紀長期照護的政策方向。台衛雜誌,20(3),192-202。
吳書昀 (2000)。「甜蜜的負荷」外一章:兒童少年家庭照顧者的生活境遇與福利建構。臺大社工學刊,21,153-190。
吳嘉苓、蘇國賢 (2007)。性別角色態度與婦女勞動參與:跨國比較觀點下的台灣:台灣的社會變遷 1985~2005,發表於台灣社會變遷調查計畫第十一次研討會(第二階段)。available:http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/conf11-2.php。
吳聰敏 (2004)。從平均每人所得的變動看台灣長期的經濟發展。經濟論文叢刊, 32 ( 3),293 - 320。
吳聰敏 (2008)。從資本主義化到現代經濟成長—台灣經濟現代化研究的回顧與展望,發表於「東亞經濟的回顧與展望:劉進慶、涂照彥教授紀念研討會」,2008年3月21日,中華經濟研究院。
范情譯 (1999)。馬克思主義和女性主義不快樂的婚姻:導向更進步的結合。見顧燕翎、鄭至會(主編),女性主義經典(323-338頁)。台北:女書文化。
柯志明 (1995)。原始積累、平等與工業化—以社會主義中國與資本主義:台灣為案例之分析。台灣社會研究季刊,1(1),11-51。
胡愈寧、張菁芬 (2004)。促進婦女就業之研究。育達研究叢刊, 5、6,15-26。
胡幼慧 (1995)。三代同堂:迷思與陷阱。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧主編 (1996)。質性研究。台北:巨流。
胡幼慧主編 (2008)。質性研究-理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北:巨流。
洪惠芬 (2003)。「照顧者正義」—性別正義不只是法律平等。台灣社會學研究季刊,51,5-142。
洪惠芬、廖美蓮、謝玉玲 (2012)。照顧任務分配的公平性:對台灣社會的照顧體制的步檢視。社會發展研究學刊,11,33-70。
俞智敏、陳光達等譯 (1996)。女性主義的社會學觀點。台北:巨流。
家庭照顧者總會 (2013)。串起有職照顧者的網鏈。家總會訊,69。
徐震 (1983)。台灣省十年來社區發展成效之評鑑及未來發展之研究。專業研究報 告第31輯。台灣省政府研究發展考核委員會印。
徐正光、蕭新煌(1995)。台灣的國家與社會。台北:東大圖書公司。
徐宗國 (1990)。女人和男人的工作與家庭—攸關時間。婦女與兩性學刊,4,175-206。
孫健忠 (1997)。台灣社會津貼實施經驗的反省—以敬老津貼為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊,1(1),73-89。
施世駿 (2002)。生命歷程研究對社會政策效果的探討。社會政策與社會工作學 刊,6(1),101-157。
馬慧君、張世雄 (2006)。變遷社會中的女性~一個生命歷程研究觀點。國際文化 研究,2(2),60-99。
教育部(2013)。12年國民基本教育實施計畫,〔on line〕2014/6/17. Available: http://12basic.edu.tw/Detail.php?LevelNo=885
梁嘉莉 (2011)。工作與家庭的平衡。主計月刊,699,37-44。
莫永榮 (2004)。政府服務委託外包理論與實務:台灣經驗。行政暨政策學報, 39,75-104。
曹愛蘭 (2003)。家庭托顧服務手冊。台北:行政院社會福利推動委員會長期照護專案小組。
唐文慧 (2004)。誰來照顧? 母職與社會政策在台灣。國科會研究報告, NSC91-2412-H-006-002。
唐文慧 (2004)。誰來照顧?台灣幼托政策的政治經濟分析。國科會研究報告, NSC92-2412-H-006-001。
莊秀美 (2009)。從老人的類型與照顧需求看「居家照顧」、「社區照顧」及「機構 照顧」三種方式的功能。社區發展季刊,125,177-194。
經濟建設委員會(2012)。2010兩岸經貿、中國大陸與香港經濟情勢分析,〔on line〕. Available: http://www.ndc.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0015557
陸洛、黃茂丁、高旭繁 (2005)。工作與家庭的雙向衝突:前因、後果與調節變項 之探討。應用心理研究,27,133-166。
彭安娜、黃美靜、張櫻薰 (2006)。嘉義地區喘息服務利用之研究。發表於「健康與管理學術研討會」,2006年10月28日-10月29日。
陳明珍 (2009)。我國居家服務政策發展與省思。社區發展季刊,127,287-303。
陳昭如 (1998)。女性主義法學的理論與實踐—一個初步的介紹。近代中國婦女史 的研究,6,213-236。
陳昭如 (2002)。創造性別平等,抑或與父權共謀?關於臺灣法律近代西方法化的女性主義考察。思與言,40(1),183-248。
陳向明 (2002)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南圖書。
陳正芬、劉淑瓊 (2006)。家庭照顧者對長期照顧服務使用意願之探討。人口學刊,32,83-121。
陳正芬、王正 (2007)。台北市居家服務方案論時計酬適切性之研究。台灣社會福 利學刊,6(1),93-129。
陳正芬 (2012)。我是媳婦還是看護工?外籍媳婦照顧角色形成與照顧經驗之初探。臺大社工學刊,26,88-139。
陳正芬 (2011)。家庭托顧服務發展狀況及其評估。社區發展季刊,136,383- 403。
陳思賢譯 (2008)。政治的意識形態。台北:五南。
陳雅玲 (2007)。貧窮幼童(3-7歲)托育品質之探討:它需要被改善嗎?(精簡本), 國科會研究報告,NSC95-2413-H-153-004。
陳燕楨 (2005)。社區老人照顧支持體系與政策探討。社區發展季刊,110,158- 177。
陳燕禎 (2008)。福利?市場?台灣照顧產業政策之初探。通識研究集刊,12,77-100。
陳淑君、莊秀美 (2008)。台北市居家服務現況與相關議題探討。社區發展季刊, 122,183-199。
陳亮汝、劉淑瓊 (2008)。居家失能老人使用外籍監護工之相關因素分析。台衛雜 誌,28(1),32-43。
陳淑美、林佩萱 (2010)。親子世代的財務支援、照顧需要對老人居住安排與生活 滿意度影響之研究。住宅學報,19(1),29-58。
陳明珍 (2009)。我國居家服務政策發展與省思。社區發展季刊,217,287-303。
曾薔霓 (2007)。尋找家庭場域中「照顧選擇及實踐」的可能與價值:中低收入老人生活特別照顧津貼政策思考。台灣社會福利學刊,6(1),131-175。
曾敏傑 (2009)。我國結構性失業與因應政策之探討:以1996年到2000年資料推 估。東吳社會工作學報,20,95-137。
張世雄 (2000)。認識婦女政策與福利議題的一般分析架構。收錄於古允文(編)。新台灣社會發展學樹叢書(9-34頁)。台北:允晨文化。
張晉芬、李奕慧 (2007)。女人的家事、男人的家事:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文與社會科學集刊,19(2),203-229。
張俊豪 (2012)。臺灣社區發展的脈絡與類型:一個歷史制度主義的分析。國家與 社會,12,259-297。
夏曉鵑 (2000)。資本國際化下的跨國婚姻—以台灣的「外籍新娘」現象為例。台灣社會研究季刊,39,45-92。
郭登聰 (1999)。我國社會福利民營化形成與發展的歷史分析(博士論文)。嘉義:國立中正大學社會福利研究所。
郭佩宜、王宏仁主編 (2006)。野的技藝:自我、研究與知識建構。臺北:巨流。
郭寶蓮、袁千雯譯 (2009)。工作社會學導讀。台北:韋伯文化。
Forble, N.(2001).The invisible heart: Economics and family values.N.Y.: New Press.許慧如譯 (2002)。心經濟、愛無價。台北:新新文化事業股份有限公司。
許介鱗 (2008)。戰後台灣史記(卷一~卷三)(第五版)。台北:文英堂。
許雅惠 (2011)。未完成的革命:台灣婦女權益與福利之發展。社區發展季刊,
133,363-383。
黃忠正 (2012)。論世代正義。思與言,50(3),185-209。
黃志隆 (2008)。荷蘭與丹麥彈性安全策略的探討:制度主義的生命歷程政策研究途徑。社會政策與社會工作學刊,12(1),91-144。
黃志隆 (2009)。我國親職假改革方案的探討:理論觀點的解釋。靜宜人文社會學報,3(2),1-30。
黃志隆 (2012)。台灣家庭政策的形成:家計承擔與兒童照顧的整合。人文及社會科學集刊,4(3),331-366。
黃協源 (2000)。社區照顧:臺灣與英國經驗的檢視。台北:楊智。
黃協源 (2001)。台灣社區照顧的實施與衝擊—福利多元主義的觀點。台大社工學刊,5,53-101。
黃協源 (2004)。從全控機構到最佳價值—英國社區照顧的發展脈絡與省思。社區發展季刊,106,308-331。
黃煜文編譯 (2005)。民營化歷程:公部門、非營利、企業的夥伴雙贏之道。台北:五觀藝術管理。
畢恆達 (2005)。教授為什麼沒告訴我:論文寫作的枕邊書。台北:學富。
畢恆達 (2010)。教授為什麼沒告訴我:2010全見版。新北市:小畢空間。
經建會 (2012)。產業發展與民營化統計資料,〔on line〕2013/2/3,available: http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0012619。
蔡素琴 (2009)。女性主義母職理論的發展與演變。諮商與輔導,284,24-29。
傅立葉 (2010)。從性別觀點和台灣的國家福利體制。台灣社會研究,80,207-236。
傅立葉 (2012)。高齡化與少子化福利國家與照顧政策:家庭照顧者就業與照顧工作共容與永續發展-福利國家體制、工作與家庭角色認同與福祉。國科會成果報告,計畫編號NSC98-2621-M-004-002。
傅立葉、王兆慶 (2011)。照顧公共化的改革與挑戰。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,29,79-120。
楊美惠 (1999)。女性主義一詞的誕生。收錄於顧燕翎、鄭至會(編),女性主義經典 (31-35頁)。台北:女書文化。
楊惠中、黃文鴻 (2006)。法定照顧責任之家庭化—我國現行親屬法評析。社區發展季刊,114,249-255。
楊靜利、陳寬政、李大正(2008)。台灣近二十年來的家庭結構變遷。台灣社會福利學會2008年年會暨「新世紀社會保障制度的建構與創新:跨時變遷與跨國比較」國際學術研討會。
鄭麗珍 (2011)。家庭社會工作。收錄於呂寶靜(編),社會工作與台灣社會(330-363 頁)。台北:巨流。
鄭雅文、莊秀美 (2010)。老人家庭托顧服務:「非自宅的居家照顧」之實踐。社區發展季刊,131,385-396。
劉淑瓊 (2011)。理想與現實:論台灣社會服務契約委託的變遷與課題。社區發展 季刊,133,462-478。
劉亞蘭 (2008)。平等與差異—漫遊女性主義。台北:三民。
劉梅君 (1997)。建構「性別敏感」的公民權:從女性照顧工作本質之探析出發。見劉毓秀(編),女性、國家、照顧工作(187-223頁)。台北:女書系列。
劉梅君 (2008)。性別與就業:前瞻與省思~兼檢討部分時間工作、育兒照顧政策及玻璃天花板現象。研考雙月刊,32(4),54-67。
劉毓秀 (1997)。前言—從父權國家到政府媽媽。見劉毓秀(編),女性、國家、照顧工作(15-55頁)。台北:女書系列。
劉毓秀主編 (1997)。女性、國家、照顧工作。台北:女書系列。
劉毓秀 (2011)。北歐普及照顧與與充分就業政策及其決策機構的台灣轉化。女學雜誌:婦女與性別研究,29,1-77。
劉雅文、莊秀美 (2005)。中低收入老人特別照顧津貼之相關探討:關於使用自主權與照顧者女性化議題之探討。社區發展季刊,108,237-248。
劉碧素、黃惠璣 (2009)。綜觀老人家庭照顧與孝道。護理雜誌,56(4),83-88。
潘淑滿 (2003)。質性研究:理論與應用。台北:心理出版社。
潘淑滿 (2005)。臺灣母職圖像。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,20,41-91。
潘淑滿 (2006)。平等與差異?母親身分與母性政策的論述。社區發展季刊,114, 219-238。
賴清霞、洪惠芬 (2005)。養育責任的集體分攤:公共財與外部性分析。台大社工學刊,10,55-112。
賴兩陽 (2002)。社區工作與社會福利社區化。台北:紅葉。
顏士程 (2011)。幼兒教育和照顧法評析。學校行政雙月刊,76,205-219。
謝美娥 (2000)。成年子女照顧老年失能父母後果之探討。行政院國科會專題研究計畫,計畫編號NSC89-2412-H-004-007-SSS。
謝美娥 (2009)。就業母親之母職經驗與就業策略初探。中華心理衛生學刊,22(3), 299-334。
謝玉玲 (2010)。看得到的照顧政策、看不到的勞動差異:照顧工作者與照顧勞動場域的檢視。台灣社會福利學刊,10(1),53-96。
謝國雄 (1992)。隱形工廠:台灣的外包點與家庭代工。台灣社會研究季刊,13, 137-160。
謝國雄編 (2007)。以身為度、如是我做:田野工作的教與學。臺北:群學出版社。
簡春安、鄒平儀 (2004)。社會工作研究法。台北:巨流。
嚴祥鸞 (2009)。性別與工作:社會建構的觀點。台北:巨流。
瞿宛文 (1999)。婦女也是國民嗎?談婦女在「國民所得」中的位置。見顧燕翎、鄭至會(編),女性主義經典(頁178-187)。台北:女書系列。
藍佩嘉 (2008)。跨國灰姑娘:當東南亞幫傭遇上台灣新富家庭。台北:行人出版 社。
藍佩嘉 (2009)。照顧工作:文化觀點的考察。社會科學論叢,3(2),3-27。
蕭全政 (1996)。政治民主化與台灣對外政策--「一個中國」原則的鬆懈。政治科學 論叢,7,287-304。
蕭全政 (2000)。社會科學本土化的意義和理論基礎。政治科學論叢,13,1-26。
蕭全政 (1989)。台灣地區的新重商主義。國家政策研究基金會智庫。
蕭新煌 (1992)。台灣新興社會運動的剖析-自主性與資源分配,蕭新煌(編),解剖台灣經濟-威權體制下的壟斷與剝削(頁9-32)。台北:前衛出版社。
Amsden, A.H. (1985).The state and Taiwan’s development. In Peter B. Evans (ed.), Bring the state back. Cambridge University Press.
Allen, J. (1992). Post-industrialism and post-Fordism. In Stuart Hall, Davis Held & Anthony McGrew (Eds.), Modernity and its futures (pp.169-220). Cambridge: Polity Press in Association with the Open University.
Arnlung, L.(1994). Conception of caring: Loving, thinking and doing. Social ServiceReview, 68(2), 185-201.
Altheide, D. & Johnson, J.M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretative validity in qualitative research. In Denzin, N.K. (Ed), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp.485-499). Sage Publications.
Ascoli, U. & Ranci, C. (2002). The context of new social policies in Europe. In Ugo Ascoli & Costanzo Ranci Kluwer (Eds.), Dilemmas of the welfare mix- The new structure of welfare in an era of privatization (pp.1-24). New York: Academic /Plenum Publishers.
Anderson, P.; Butcher, K., & Levine, P. (2003). Maternal employment and overweight Children Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 477-504.
Allan,G. & Jones, G. (Eds.).( 2003). Social Relations and the Life Course. Palgrave. pp.14-15.
Arber, S. (2003). Gender and Generation: Changing pension inequalities over time. In Allan, G. & Jones (Eds.), Social Relations and the Life Course (pp.14-15). Palgrave.
Alcock, P. (2004).The influence of dynamic perspectives on poverty analysis and anti-poverty policy in the UK. Jnl Soc, 33(3), 395-416.
Abbott, P. and Wallace, C. (2005). An introduction to sociology-feminist perspectives. Routledge.
Archer, J. (2009).Intersecting feminist theory and ethnography in the context of social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 8(2), 143-160.
Bulmer, M. (1987).The social basis of community care. London: Allen & Unwin.
Block, F. (1990). Postindustrial possibilities-A critique of economic discourse. University of California Press.
Bradley, H. (1992).Changing social structure: class and gender. In Stuart Hall & Bram Giben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp.177-228). Cambridge: Polity
Press in Association with the Open University.
Bradley, H. (1992). Changing social divisions: class, gender and race. In Robert Bocock & Kenneth Thompson (Eds.).Social and cultural forms of modernity (pp.11-68). Cambridge: Polity Press in Association with the Open University:
Bengtson,V.L. & Allen,K.R. (1993).The life course perspectives applied to families over time. In P.G. Boss, W.J. Doherty & R LaRossa (Eds.), Sourcebook of Family Theories and Methods (pp. 469-504). Springer. US .DOI:10.1007/978-0-387-85764-0_19.
Banks, J. S & Hanushek, E. A. (1995).Modern political economic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bowlby, S.; Gregory,S, & Mckie, L. (1997).” Doing home”: Patriarchy, caring and space. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), 343-350.
Boyd, S. B.(1997).Challenging the public/private divide—Feminism, law and publicity. University of Toronto Press.
Badgett, M.V. L. & Forlbe ,N. (1999).Assigning care: Gender norms and economic outcomes. International Labor Review, 138(3), 311-326.
Bulmer, M. (2001). Social measurement:What stands in its way?Social Research, 68(2), 455-480.
Bengston, V.L.(2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1-6.
Bettio, F. & Plantenga, J. (2004).Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85-113.
Baker, M. (2006). Restructuring family policies: Convergence and divergence. London.
Bernard, H.R. & Ryaw, G.W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data-systematic approaches. California: SAGE Publications.
Bianchi, S.; Folbre, N. & Wolf, D.(2012) .Unpaied care work. In Folbre, N.(ed.), For work and for money-care provision in United States(pp.40-64). N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cohen, J. & Arato, A. (1992). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Cox, D., Eser, Z. & Jimenez, E. (1998).Motives for private transfers over the life cycle: an analytical framework and evidence for Peru. Journal of Development Economics, 55, 57-80.
Cox, D. (1987).Motives for private income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 508-846.
Caporaso, J. A. & Levine, D. P. (1992).Theories of political economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Coltrane, S. & Galt, J. (2000).The history of men’s caring. In Madonna Harrington Meyer (Ed.), Care work –Gender, class and the welfare state (pp.15-36). Routledge.
Chung, C.-C. & Han,W.-J. (2003).The cost and effectiveness of elder allowance in Taiwan. Social Policy & Social Work, 7(1), 1-33。
Croissant, A.(2004). Changing welfare regimes in East and Southeast Asia: Crisis, change and challenge. Social Policy & Administration,38(5), 504-524.
Carling, J. (2005). Global migration perspective--gender dimensions of international migration. Global Commission on Internal Migration. No. 35.
Chen, H. (2008).Resources, resources and resources: Long term care services provision of elder people in England, Netherlands and Taiwan. EASP conference. ”Welfare reform in East Asia: meeting the needs of social change, economic competitiveness and social justice”. Taipei 2008.Nov.3-4.
Chan, R. K.H & Soma, N. & Yamashita, J. (2011). Care regimes and responses: East Asian experiences compared. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(2), 175-186.
Chan, R. K.H. & Soma, N., Yamashita, J. (2011).Care regimes and responses: East asian experiences compared. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27, 175-186.
Chiu, C P & Wei, S. (2011). Child care friendly policies and integration of ECEC in Taiwan. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 5(2), 1-19.
Chuang, J. C.-C. (2012). Do social allowance transfers crowd out private transfers? Maternal employment and preventive child health practices. Preventive Medicine, 27, 488-492.
Desrosieres, A. (2001). How real are statistics? Four possible attitudes. Social Research, 68(2), 339~355.
Daly, M. (2002). Care as a good for social policy. Journal of Social Policy, 31(2), 51-270.
Daly, M. & Lewis, J. (2000).The concept of social care and analysis of contemporary welfare states. British Journal of Sociology, 21(2), 281-298.
Danby, C. (2004). Toward a gendered post Keynesianism: Subjectivity and time in a nonmodernist framework.Feminist Economics, 10, 55-75.
Daaland, S. O. & Lowenstein, A. (2005). Intergenerational solidarity and the family-welfare state balance. Europe Journal of Aging, 2, 174-182.
D’Addio, A.C. & White, P. (2007).From separate life phases to interrelated life risks: A life- course approach to social policy. In OECD. (Ed.), Modernizing social policy for the new social policy (pp.13-22). Paris: OECD.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990).The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1992). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002).Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G..(2009). The incomplete revolution. Polity.
Esping-Andersen, G. & Sarasa, S. (2002). The generational conflict reconsidered. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 5-21.
Engester, D. & Olofsdotter Setnsota, H. (2011). Do family policy regimes matter for children’s well-being? Social Politics, 8(1), 82-124.
England, P. & Folbre, N. (1993).Contracting for care. In Marianne Ferber & Julie Nelson (Eds.), Beyond economic man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
England, P. & Folbre, N. (1999). The cost of caring. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Emotional labor in the service economy (Jan, 1999). Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. 561, 39-51
England, P. (1993).The separate self: androcentric bias in neoclassical assumptions. In Nicole W Biggart (Ed.), Economic sociology .Blackwell Publishers.
Eikas, M. & Sele, P. (2002). A contract culture even in Scandinavia. In Ugo Ascoli & Costanzo Ranci (Eds.), Dilemmas of the welfare mix the new structure of welfare in an era of Privatization (pp.47-75). New York: Kluwer Academic /Plenum Publishers,
Elder, GH Jr. (2003).The life course in time and place. In Walter R. Heinz & Victor (Eds.), Social dynamics of the life course (pp.57-72). New York: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Elmore, D.L. & Talley, R.C. (2009). Family caregiving and U.S. Federal Policy. In Qualls, S.H. & Zarit, S.H. (Eds.).Aging families and caregiving (pp.209-232.).John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fitzpatrick, T. (2001). Welfare theory: an introduction. N.Y.: Palgrave.
Fink, J. (2004). Questions of care. In Janet Fink (Ed.), Care-personal lives and social policy (pp.1-42). The Open University.
Folbre, N. (1994).Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structure of constraint.New York: Routledge.
Folbre, N. & Nelson, J. (2003). For love or money? Or both? In Ellen Mutari et al (Ed ). From Women and the Economy: A Reader. M.E. Sharpe.
Forlbe, N. (2012).For work and for money-care provision in United States. N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.
Forlbe, N. & Howes, C. (2012). A care policy and research agenda. In Forlbe, N.(ed).For work and for money-care provision in United States(pp.183-214). N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.
Feiock, R.C. (2002). A quasi-market framework for development competition. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(2), 123-142.
Graham, H. (1983). Caring: a labor of love. In Janet Finch & Dulcie Groves (Eds.), A labor of love-women, work and caring (pp.13-30). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc.
Graham, H. (1991).The Informal sector of welfare: A crises in caring? Soc. Sci .Med, 32 (4), 507-515.
George,V. & Wilding, P.(1994). Welfare and ideology. Boston, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Guba & Lincoln. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin & Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.109). SAGE Publications.
Gibbs, A. (2001).The changing nature and context of social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 687-704.
Gornick, J. C. & Meyer, M. K & Ross, K. E. (1997). Supporting the employment of mothers: Policy variation across fourteen welfare states. Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper#139.
Gornick, J. C& Meyer, M.K & Ross, K K. E. (1998). Public policies and the employment of mothers: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly, 79(1), 35-54.
Gornick & Meyers (2003).Families that work: Policies for Reconciling parenthood and employment. Russel Sage Foundation.
Gornick, J.C.(2008).Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalities across countries. Feminist Economics, 14,1, 37~72.
Gornic, K. & Janet, C. (2008). Working for Less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across Countries. Feminist Economics, 14(1), 37~72.
Gornick.J. & Meyers, M.K. (2008). Creating gender egalitarian societies: an agenda for reform. Politics & Society .36(3), 313-349. Doi: 10.1177/0032329208320562
Gornick, J. Howes, C. & Braslow, L. (2012). The care policy landscape. In Forlbe, N. (ed.), For love and money: Care provision in the United States (pp.183-204).N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gornick, J. Howes, C. & Leana, C. (2012). A care policy and research agenda. In Forlbe, N. (Ed.), For love and money: Care provision in the United States (pp.181-202).N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.
Gizelis, T.-I. (2005). Globalization, integration, and the European Welfare State. International Interactions, 31, 139-162.
George, L.K. (2009).Conceptualizing and measuring trajectories. In Glen H. Elder, Jr. & Janet Z. Giele(Eds.) The craft of life course research( pp.163-186).NY.: The Guilford Press.
Glenn, E.N. (2010). Forced to care-coercion and caregiving in America. Harvard
University Press.
Glendinning, C. & Kemp, P.(2006). Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State. Policy Press.
Hoskins, I. (1993).Combining work and care for the elderly: An overview of the issue. International Labor Review, 132 (3), 347-370.
Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48, 706-723.
Hobson, B. & Lister, R.( 2002).”Keywords: Citizenship” In Hobson, B.、Lewis, J. & Siim, B.(eds.), Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Hobson, B.、Lewis, J. & Siim, B. (2002).Contested concepts in gender and politics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Heinz, W. R. (2003).Introduction. In Walter R. Heinz & Victor W. Marshall (Eds.), Social dynamics of the life course (pp. xi-xix).NY: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Heinz, W. R. (2003).Combining methods in life-course research: a mixed blessing. In Heinz, Walter R. & Marshall, Victor W. (Eds.), Social dynamics of the life course (pp.73-90).N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Huang, S.-L. & Chen, Y.-C. (2005). A research of mixed economy of care: An investigation of domiciliary care services users in Taiwan. Social Policy and Social Work, 9(1),77-120。
Huston, A.C. & Aronson, S. R. (2005).Mother’s time with infant and time in employment as predictors of mother-child relationships and children’s early development. Child Development, 76(2), 467-482.
Hill, J., W.; J., Brooks-Gunn J. & Han,W-J.(2005). Maternal employment and child development. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(1), 177-211.
Hunt, S. (2005). The life course-A sociological introduction. Palgrave.
Holliday,I.(2005). East Asian social policy in the wake of the financial crisis: Farewell to productivism? The Policy& Politics, 33(1), 145-162.
Han, W.-J. (2006). Child care usage and expenditure in Taiwan: Evidence from the 1991-1997 family income and expenditure survey. Social Policy and Social Work, (1), 5-44.
Hesse-Biber,S. N. (2007).The practice of feminist in-depth interview. In Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber & Patricia Lina Leavy. (Eds.), Feminist research practice (pp.111-148). SAGE Publications.
Halpern, D.F. Tan, S.J.& Carsten, M.(2008). California paid family leaves: Is it working for caregivers? In Marcus-Newhall, A. Halpern, D.F. and Tan, S.J. (Eds.), The changing realities of work and family-a multidisciplinary approach (pp.159-174).Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Huang, C-C., & Ku,Y-W. (2010). Patterns of expenditures in families with children in Taiwan: Do level of poverty and family structure make a difference? 發表於 「弱勢家庭與兒童:社會福利全球觀點—以中國、臺灣、美國為例」研討會。台北:臺灣大學社工系。
Harris J. & Chou, Y-C. (2011). Globalization and globalization? Community care in Taiwan and Britain. European Social Work, 4(2), 161-172.
Howes, C.& Larrie, L. Smith, K. (2012). Paid care work. In Forlbe, N. (Ed.), For love and money: Care provision in the United States (pp.61-140).N.Y.: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hooren, F. v. & Becker, U. (2012). One welfare state, two care regimes: Under -standing developments in child and elderly care policies in the Netherlands. Social Policy & Administration, 46 (1), 83-107. .
James, N. (1992). Care=Organization+ physical activities+ emotional labor. Sociology of Health & Illness, 14(4), 488-509.
Jean,G.(1997).Gender, care and economy. Macmillan Press LTD. Ch.5-6(pp.82-126).
Jacobs, J.A. & Gerson, K. (2001).Overworked individuals or overworked families? Explaining trends in work, leisure, and family time. Work and Occupations, 28, 40-65.
Jensen, R. T. (2003).Do private transfer ‘displace’ the benefits of public transfers? Evidence from South Africa. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 89-112.
Jager, M. M. & Kvist, J. (2003). Pressure on state welfare in post-industrial societies: Is more or less better? Social Policy & Administration, 37, 6, 555-572.
Jordan, A. B. (2006).Make yourself at home: The social construction of research roles in family studies. Qualitative Research, 6 (2), 169-185.
Kwon, H.-J. (1998). Democracy and the politics of social welfare: A comparative analysis of welfare system. In Roger, G, White, G. & Kwon,H.(Eds.), East Asia Welfare Model(pp28-74). London and New York.
Kao, H.-F. & Stuifbergen. (1999).Family experiences related to decision to institutionalize the elderly member in Taiwan: An exploratory research. Social Science and Medicine, 49, 1115-1123.
Kamerman, S.B. (2000). Parental leave policies: An essential ingredient in early childhood education and care policies. SRCD Social Policy Report, 14(2), 3-15.
Kiujn,T. (2000).Marketization and the struggling logics of (home) care in the Netherlands. In Meyer, M.H. (Ed.), Care Work –Gender, class and the Welfare State (pp.232-249.). NY: Routledge.
Kurger, H. (2003). The life-course regime-ambiguities between interrelatedness and individualization. In Heinz, W. R. & Marshall, V. W. (Eds.), Social Dynamics of the Life Course (pp.33-56). NY: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Kim, P.S. (2003).Management innovation of quasi-government agencies in Korea. International Review of Administration Science, 69, 535-552.
Kohli, M. & Kunemund, H. (2003).Intergenerational transfer in the family: What motivates giving? In Vern L. Bengtson & Ariela Lowenstein (Eds.), Global aging and Challenges to Families (pp.123-142). New York. Aldine de Gruyter
Kim, Y.M. (2005). The re-examination of east welfare regime. Paper contributed at the workshop on East Asian Social Policy (13th – 15th, January, 2005. the University of Bath, U.K.).
Kessler, L. T. (2005). The politics of care: Transgressive caregiving.33 Florida State University Law Review 1.
Kremer, M. (2005). The cultural dimension of welfare states: Ideals of care and women’s work. Paper presented at RC19 Meeting Chicago, 8-10 Set.2005. Re-theorizing welfare states: Restructuring states, Restructuring Analysis.
knijn,T. & Selten, P.et al.(2006) The rise of contractualization in public services. In Duyvendak, J., knijn,T. and Kremer, M.(eds.), Policy, people,and the new professional- deprofessionalization and re-professionalization in care and welfare(p.26). Amsterdam University Press.
Kemp, P.A. & Glendinning, C. (2006).Introduction. In Cash and Care-Policy Challenges in the Welfare State. The Policy Press.
Kimbro, R. T. (2006). On-the-job mons: Work and breastfeeding initiation and duration for a sample of low-income women. Maternal and Health Journal, 10(1), 19-26.
Ku, Y-W. (2007). Developments in East Asian Welfare Studies. Social Policy & Administration, 41 (2), 115-131.
Kok, J. (2007).Principles and prospects of the life course paradigm. Annals Demographie Historique, 203-230.
Kate Yeong-Tsyr, W. (2011).Child care and elder care arrangements in Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(2), 165-174.
Kosar, K. R. (2008). The quasi-government: Hybrid organizations with both government and private sector legal characteristics. CRS report for congress. Cornell
University ILR School.
Kremer, M. (2007). How welfare state care- Culture, gender and parenting in Europe. Amsterdam University Press.
Lanyan, C. (2008). Gender and Chinese development- Towards an equitable society. Routledge.
Littleton, C.A. (1987) .Reconstructing sexual equality. California Law Review, 75, 1279-1338
Lesley, R. (1983).The economics of work and caring. In Finch, J. & Groves, D. (Eds.), A labor of love: Women, work and caring (pp.129-166). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul plc.
LeGrand, J. (1991). Quasi-markets and social policy. The Economic Journal, 101.
Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159-173.
Leira, A. (1994). Concept of caring: Loving, thinking and doing. Social Service Review, 68(8): 185-201.
Leira, A. & Sarsceno, C.(2002). Care: actors, relationships and contexts. In Lewis, J. & Siim, B. (Eds.), Contested concepts in gender and social politics (pp.55-83).Elgar Publishing Limited.
Lewis, J. (2002).Gender and Welfare State Change. European Societies, 4(4), 331-357.
Lewis, J. (2006).Care and gender: Have the arguments for recognizing care work now been won? In Lewis, J. (Ed.), Cash and care-policy challenges in the welfare state (pp.11-31). The Policy Press.
Lewis J. (2009). Work-family balance, gender and policy. Edward Elgar.
Leavy, P. L. (2007).The feminist practice of content analysis. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. L. (Eds.), Feminist research practice (pp.223-248). SAGE Publications.
Leckenby, D. & Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2007). Feminist approaches to mixed-methods research. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. & Leavy, P. L. (Eds.), Feminist research practice (pp.249-292). SAGE Publications.
Lee,Yiunn-Jiunn. & Ku, Y-W. (2007). East Asian welfare regimes: testing the hypothesis of the developmental welfare state. Social Policy & Administration, 41 (2), 197-212.
Marshall, H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Read 30-39 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacKinnon, C.A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press.
MacKinnon, C.A. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Mass.: Harvard University Press
Mayer, K. U. & Schoepflin, S. (1989). The state and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 187-209.
McCouat, M. & Peile, C. (1997). The rise of relativism: The future of theory and knowledge development in Social Work. Br.J. Social Wk., 27, 343~360.
Moroney, R. M. [et al.] (1998). Caring & competent caregivers. University of Georgia Press.
Mellor, J. M. (2000). Filling in the gap in the long term care insurance. In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Care work-gender, class and the welfare state (pp.202-228). NY: Routledge.
Michel, S. (2000). Claiming the right to care. In Meyer, M.H. (Ed.), Care work-gender, class and the welfare state (pp.37-44). NY: Routledge.
McClain, L. (2001).Care as a public value: Linking responsible, resources, and republicianism. Chicago Kent Law.Review, 76, 1673-1733.
McDaniel, S.A. (2001). Generating gender: Justice and the division of welfare. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 27-44.
Marshall, V.W. & Mueller, M.M. (2003).Theoretical Roots of the Life-Course Perspective. In Heinz, W. R. & Marshall, V. W. (Eds.), Social dynamics of the life course (pp.31-32). NY: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Mayer, K. U. (2004). Whose lives? How history, societies, and institutions define and shape life courses. Research in Human Development, 1(3), 161-187.
.McDaniel, S.A. (2004). Born at the right time? Gendered generations and webs of entitlement and responsibility. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 26 (2), 193-214.
Moran-Ellis, J. & Alexander, V. D. & Cronin, A., Dickinson, M. (2006).Trigulation and integration: Process, claim and implication. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 45-59.
Neal, M.B. & Hammer, L.B. (2007). Working couples caring for children and aging parents-effects on work and well-being. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Offe, C. (1984). Contradictions of the welfare state. Camparsion: The MIT Press.
Orloff, A.S. (1993). Gender and the social rights of citizenship: the comparative analysis of gender relations and welfare states. American Sociological Review, 58, 303-328
Oliker, S. J. (2000). Examining care at welfare’s end. In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Care work-gender, class and the welfare state (pp.167-185). NY: Routledge.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Leech, N. L. (2005).On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 357-387.
Ochiai, E. (2009). Care diamonds and welfare regimes in East and East-South Asian societies: Bridging the family and welfare sociology. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 18, 60-78.
Pifer, A. (1968).The quasi nongovernmental organization. The annual report of the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Putnam, H. (1981). Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE publications.
Punch, M.(1994). Politics and Ethics in Qualitative Research. In N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 83–97) .CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Payne, M. (2005).Modern social work theories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005).Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements. European Societies, 7(2), 321-347.
Pfau-Effinger, B. & Geissler, B. (2005). Change in European: Care arrangements. Care Arrangements in European. http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/soz/we/arbeit/geissler/ch-1-neu-18-1.pdf
Pocock, B. (2005). Work/care regimes: institutions, culture and behavior and the Austrian case. Gender, Work and Organization, 12(1), 32-49.
Pylkanen, A. (2007). Transformation of the Nordic model: From welfare politics to gendered rights. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 19(2), 335-354.
Pavalko, E. K. (2011).Caregiving and the life course: connecting the personal and the public In Settersten, Jr. and Angel, J.L. (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp.603-616). Springer Science+Business Media,LLC.
Rimmer, L. (1983). The Economics of work and caring. In Finch, J. & Groves, D. (Eds.), A labor love -Women, work and caring. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis-qualitative research methods series30. Boston University: Sage Publications.
Ruth, L. (2000). Gender & the analysis of social policy. In Lewis, G., Gewirtz,S., & Clarke, J.(Eds.), Rethinking Social Policy. London: Sage.
Ruspini, E. (2002). Introduction to longitudinal research. London: Routledge.
Ranci,C. (2002). The context of new social policies in Europe. In Ugo Ascoli & Costanzo Ranci (Eds), Dilemmas of the welfare mix: The new structure of welfare in an era of privatization (pp.24-45). New York: Kluwer Academic /Plenum . Publishers.
Ruhm, C. (2008).Maternal employment and adolescent development. Labor Economics, 15, 958-983.
Rubin, A. & Babbie, E. (2008). Research methods for social work. Thomson Brooks /Cole.
Ray, R., Gornick, J.C., & Schmitt, J. (2009) Parental leave policies in 21 countries: Assessing generosity and gender equality. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
Raymond, K.H. Chan, Naoko Soma & Junko, Y. (2011). Care regimes and responses: East Asian experiences compared. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(2), 175-186.
Rummery, K. & Fine, M. (2012). Care: A critical review of theory, policy and practice. Social Policy & Administration, 46(3), 321-343.
Radicioni, S. (2012). The relationship between public opinion, migration and care regime: A six country studies. Social Policy and Social Intervention. Faculty of Social and Behavior Science, Utrecht University.
Schoeni, R. F. (1997). Private interhousehold transfers of money and time: New empirical evidence. Review of Income and wealth, 43(4), 423-448.
Sainsbury, D. (1993). A dual welfare and sex segregation of access to social benefits: Income maintenance policies in the UK, the US, the Netherlands and Sweden .Jnl Soc, 22(1), 69-98.
Schumm, W.R. & Steinmetz, S.K. (Eds.) (1993).Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contextual approach. (pp.469-505). New York: Plenum Press.
Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender, equality and welfare states. Cambridge.
Stone, D. (2000). Caring by the Book. In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Care work-gender, class and the welfare state (pp.89-111). NY: Routledge.
Strell, M. & Duncan, S. (2001). Lone motherhood, ideal type care regimes and the case of Austria. Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 149-164.
Stolzenberg. R. (2001). It’s about time and gender: Spousal employment and health. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (1), 61-100.
Shyu, Y.-I. L. (2002).A Conceptual framework for understanding the process of family caregiving to frail elders in Taiwan. Research in Nursing and Health, 25, 111-121.
Shyu,Y.-I.L. & Hsu, H.-C. (2003). Implicit exchanges in family caregiving for frail elders in Taiwan. Qualitative Research, 13 (8), 1078-1093.
Sackmann, R. & Wingens, M. (2003). From tTransitions to trajectories –Sequence types. In Heinz, W. R. & Marshall, V.W. (Eds.), Social dynamics of the life course (pp.93-116). NY: Walter de Gruyter, Inc.
Sevenhuilsen, S. & Svab, A. (2003). Labyrinths of care: The relevance of the ethics of care perspective for social policy. Peace Institute, 13-42.
Sayer, L., Bianchi,S., & Robinson, J. (2004). Are parents investing less in children?
Trends in mother’s and father’s time with Children. American Journal of Sociology, 11:1-43.
Seidman, I.(2006) .Interviewng as qualitative research: A guide for a researchers in education and social sciences(3 ed).New York: Teachers College Press.
Sumer, S. (2009). European gender regimes and policies: Comparative perspectives. Surrey: Ashgate.
Soma, N., Yamashita ,J. & Chan, K.H.(2010). Comparative framework for care regime analysis in East Asia. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27 (2), 111-121.
Staveren, I. van.(2010). Post-keynesianism meets feminist economics. Journal of Economics, 34, 1123-1144.
Shahra, R. (2012). Rethinking care in a development context: An introduction. In Razavi, S. (Ed.), Seen, heard and counted (pp.124-137).Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Titmuss, R. (1968). Welfare state and welfare society. In Timuss, R. (Ed.), Commitment to welfare. NY: Pantheon.
Titmuss, R.M.(1970).The gift relationship: From human blood to social policy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Tyson, K.B (1992). A new approach to relevant scientific research for practitioners: The heuristic paradigm. Social Work, 37, 541-556.
Thomas, C. (1993).De-constructing concepts of care. Sociology, 27(4), 649-669.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries. London: Routledge.
Tronto, J. (2002). The value of care-A response to ‘can working families ever win’? Issue of Boston Review.February/March. Received 12 August 2012 from http://www.bostonreview.net/BR27.1.tronto.html.
Tuominen, M. (2000). The conflicts of caring. In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Care work-gender, class and the welfare state (pp.112-135). NY: Routledge.
Tarlow, B. J., Stephen R. Wisniewski, Steven H. ET el. (2004). Positive aspects of caregiving. Research on Aging, 26, 429-453.
Taylor, B.A, Dearing, E. & McCartney, K. (2009). Does higher quality early child care promote low income children math and reading achievement in middle childhood? Child Development, 80(5), 1329-1349.
Tseng, Y.-F. (2010). Cross-border marriage migration in East Asia: propositions in making comparisons, in cross-border marriage migration in east and Southeast Asia: Socio-demographic patterns and issues edited by International Institute of Asian Studies, Amsterdam University Press.
Talley, R.C. & Montgomery, R.J.V. (2012). Caregiving across the lifespan: research, practice, and policy. Springer.
Ungerson, C.(2000). Cash in care. In Meyer, M. H. (Ed.), Care work-gender, class and the welfare state (pp. 68-88). NY: Routledge.
Yu, Wei-Hsin. (2009). Gendered trajectories: Women, work, and social change in Japan and Taiwan. Stanford University Press.
Vespa, J. (2009). Gender ideology construction:A life course and intersection approach. Gender & Society, 23, 363-387.
West, R. (1988) .Jurisprudence and gender, The University of Chicago Law Review( Chi. L. Rev.), 55(1): 1-72.
Williams, F. P.J. & Dakley, A. (1999). Welfare Research: A Critical Reviews. London: UCL Press.
Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labor: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21, 467-493.
Walker, A. (2002).The politics of intergenerational relations. Z Geronttol Geriat35, 297-303.
Warness, K. (2006). Research on care: What impact on policy and planning? In Glendinning, C. & Kemp, P. (Eds.), Cash and care-policy challenges in the welfare stat (pp.21-44). The Policy Press.
Wang, K.Y.-T. (2011). Child care and elder care arrangements in Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(2), 165-174.
Wang,Y.-N. & Shyu, Y.-I.L. (2012). Reconciling work and family caregiving among adult-child family caregivers of old people with dementia: Effects on role strain and depressive symptoms. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 829-840.
Wang, K.Y.-T. (2012). Child care and elder care arrangement in Taiwan. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 2(7), 165-174.
Zelizer, V.A. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.


 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE