臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：引進再生能源之關係遠景：適合永續市場發展之政策
作者：何婷娜
作者(外文)：Kholod, Tetyana
校院名稱：國立交通大學
系所名稱：經營管理研究所
指導教授：姜真秀
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2016
主題關鍵詞：引進新技術；再生能源；知識庫；競爭；合作；競合關係；再生能源政策；New Technology Introduction；Knowledge Base；Competition；Cooperation；Coopetition；Renewable Energy Policy；Incumbents
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:1
新技術的導入是挑戰性的過程，它包含整個技術系統的轉換並且影響整個產業(包含現行者及其他相關產業)。技術系統的轉換是複雜的現象，它包含多層面向並且已經被深度研究。本論文聚焦專注在學者較少關注的兩個面向：
一、對新興技術的知識基礎的質化評價以及；
二、現行者的角色以及新進入者的策略性行為對新技術發展的步調的影響。
為展演本論文研究目的，我們選用生質能源技術的導入作為代理再生能源技術的轉換。全球競相追逐永續的再生能源，為求降低碳排放量以及增進能源效率的解決方案。生質能源技術是再生能源選項之中早期發展的技術。我們以知識基底的評價，研究現今生質能源知識。我們提出探索-利用指標表示知識基底的學習型態，並演示它如何隨時間演變。除了探索-利用指標之外，我們評價方法亦包含四個從專利引用網絡而來的指標(規模大小，成長性，累積性以及相依性)，五個指標完整的構成我們的評價系統。
我們選擇俄羅斯生質能源技術做為整個演示的基礎。在俄羅斯，儘管生質能源是其一重要的再生能源技術，因為強勢現行者企業的存在，生質能源技術依舊不易發展。
我們進一步比較俄羅斯，德國與中國的生質能源技術發展。德國被視為運用再生能技術的成功先行者之一，而中國則是積極推廣再生能源技術的後進者。研究結果顯示，俄羅斯的生質能源知識基礎缺乏德國具有的增進式特製規格以及中國技術發展的增速成長率。俄羅斯的生質能源知識基礎顯示出巨幅依賴於外國的應用活動。相異於德國以及中國，俄羅斯國內大型現行者企業欠缺探索生質能源的興趣。儘管充足的知識基底對重要技術的發展是關鍵的，但是任何新能源技術的最終目的仍是市場擴散。
當技術已經被普遍認可之後，政府政策成為生質能源技術導入市場的重要或決定性的角色。證據顯示，政策通常無法造成持久性產業，也就是當失去大量政府支持之後依舊能永續經營的產業。依據比較俄羅斯與德國、法國與英國的生質能源技術發展歷程之後，我們提出以下命題，現行者與新進入企業在產業之間的競合行為成為技術導入成功與否的關鍵。
Transition of technological systems is a complex phenomena that includes many aspects and has been studied extensively before. This dissertation focus lies in two particular aspects that still lack attention from scholars: (i) the qualitative assessment of knowledge base for emerging technology; (ii) the role of incumbents and new entrants’ strategic behavior on the pace of new technology development. Introducing renewable energy is even more challenging than other technologies since it requires strong government support. In this dissertation we show the importance of policy fit on different stages of technology introduction, namely formation of (i) knowledge base and (ii) market, for sustainable market development. For the illustrative purpose we chose biofuel technology introduction as part of renewable energy technology transition.
In the world’s race towards sustainability renewable energies became part of the solution for lowering carbon emissions and increasing energy efficiency. The biofuel technology was one of the oldest among renewable energy choices. Our knowledge base assessment sheds the light on the existing biofuel knowledge base. We propose exploration-exploitation index that shows the type of learning in the knowledge base and show how it changes with time. Additionally we propose assessment based on four indicators from patent citation network (size, growth, cumulativeness, and interdependence), that together with exploration-exploitation index completes our knowledge base assessment. We chose Russian biofuel technology for the illustration based on the reason that despite being one of most prominent renewable technologies in Russia, it is still struggling in the presence of very strong incumbent players. We compared it to biofuel technology development of Germany, one of successful leaders in adopting renewable energy, and China, an aggressive latecomer at promoting renewable energy. The results show that Russia’s biofuel knowledge base lacks both the increasing technological specialization of that in Germany and the accelerated growth rate of that in China. Russian biofuel knowledge base shows a big dependence on foreign applicants’ activity. Unlike in Germany or China large domestic incumbents seems not to be interested in exploring biofuels.
Although sufficient knowledge base is vital for new technology development, the ultimate goal for any new technology is successful market diffusion. While it is widely acknowledged that government policy play important if not decisive role for renewable technology introduction to market, the evidence show that often policy fail to shape the sustainable industry that can survive without substantial government support in the future. We propose that cooperative and competitive behavior between incumbents and new entrants in the industry hold a key to successful technology introduction. We illustrate this proposition on Russian biofuel technology development compared to Germany, France and United Kingdom. The results show that simultaneous engagement of incumbents and new entrants in competition and cooperation helps to build a sustainable market for renewable energy.
Afuah, A. 2000. How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change? Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 397–404.
Alberici, S., & Toop, G. 2013. UK biofuel industry overview. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/266090/ecofys-uk-biofuel-industry-overview-v1.5.pdf.
Ansari, S. (Shaz), & Krop, P. 2012. Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics. Research Policy, 41(8): 1357–1374.
Archibugi, D. 1992. Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review. Science and Public Policy, 19(6): 357–368.
Bächtold, J. 2012. Russia Renewable Energy. Moscow, http://www.s-ge.com/de/filefield-private/files/53139/field_blog_public_files/14171.
Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. 2004. Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1): 127–145.
Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. 1999. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286(October): 509–512.
Bartoletto, S., & Mar Rubio Varas, M. del. 2008. Energy Transition and CO2 Emissions in Southern Europe: Italy and Spain (1861-2000). Global Environment 2, 53: 47–81.
Basberg, B. L. 1987. Patents and measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 16(2–4): 131–141.
Bashmakov, I. 2009. Russian Energy Efficiency Potential. Problems of Economic Transition, 52(1): 54–75.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. 2000. ”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5): 411–426.
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. 2014. Coopetition-Quo vadis? Past accomplishments and future challenges. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2): 180–188.
Bergek, A., Berggren, C., Magnusson, T., & Hobday, M. 2013. Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation? Research Policy, 42(6–7): 1210–1224.
Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. 2008. Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. Innovation For A Low Carbon Economy: Economic, Institutional and Management Approaches, 79(July 2015): 79–111.
BIO 2020. 2012. Complex Program of Biotechnology Development in Russian Federation till 2020. Ministry of Economic Development of Russian Federation (In Russian). http://www.economy.gov.ru/wps/wcm/connect/2c9d7d804b0988f09b2a9ba338dd8a95/biotechdevelopcomprog_2020.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=2c9d7d804b0988f09b2a9ba338dd8a95.
Biofuel Quota Act. 2006. b.
Bockey, D. 2007. Biodiesel in Germany 2006: market trends and competition. Uniton for Promoting Oil and Protein Plants, 448(7153): 1–11.
Boeing. 2016. Boeing in Europe: Supporting Development and Commercialisation of Sustainable Aviation Biofuels. The Aviation Blog. http://aviation.blogactiv.eu/2016/06/13/boeing-in-europe-supporting-development-and-commercialisation-of-sustainable-aviation-biofuels/.
Bolter, I., Bacovsky, D., & Wörgetter, M. 2007. Energy for the future: Renewable Sources of Energy. IEA Task 39 Report, T39-B7(2007): 5.
Bomb, C., McCormick, K., Deurwaarder, E., & Kaberger, T. 2007. Biofuels for transport in Europe: Lessons from Germany and the UK. Energy Policy, 35(4): 2256–2267.
Bouncken, R. B., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Bogers, M. 2015. Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions. Review of Managerial Science, 9(3): 577–601.
Boute, A. 2013. Russia’s New Capacity-based Renewable Energy Support Scheme. An analysis of Decree No.449. Washington, DC, http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/ec3c148040c76e01adf4bd5d948a4a50/Energy+Support+Scheme_Eng.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.
Boyaryntseva, A. A., & Popov, N. V. 2014. Some issues of legal regulation of the prodction and use of solid biofuels in Russia and The European Union. Economics, 2(In Russian): 105–115.
Brandenburger, A. M. Nalebuff, B. J. 1996. Co-opetition: A revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation in the marketplace. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Brehm, D., & Henard, M. 2010. First Generation Biofuels Gain Credibility- Next Generation Projects. USDA Report, (March): 6.
Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. 2005. Knowledge networks from patent data : Methodological issues and research targets. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, 613–643.
Broadbent, S. R., & Hammersley, J. M. 1957. Percolation processes. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Mathological Society, 53: 629–641.
Buchanan, J. M. 1980. Rent seeking and profit seeking. Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, vol. 3.
Bulatkin, G. A. 2010. Producing second-generation biofuel from plant materials. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 80(3): 294–298.
Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. 1991. On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 93–118.
Chernitsa, S., & Churikov, A. 2010. Prospects for the Development of Renewable Energy in Russia: Sector Overview. Electrical Market, 1–2: 31–32 (in Russian).
Christensen, C. M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
Chuporov, V. A. 2016. The price of ecological damping in oil industry (in Russian).
Cimoli, M., & Dosi, G. 1995. Technological paradigms, patterns of learning and development: an introductory roadmap. Evolutionary Economics, 5: 243–268.
Cleandex. 2012. Review of Russian wood pellet market (in Russian). Marketing Research. http://www.cleandex.ru/articles/2012/06/25/kogda_opilki_dorozhe_nefti_.
Clover, I. 2013. Russia offers first ever subsidies for renewable energy. PV Magazine. http://www.pv-magazine.com/news/details/beitrag/russia-offers-first-ever-subsidies-for-renewable-energy_100012889/#axzz3g7nwZ3LR.
Council of the European Union. 2007. Presidency conclusions on Brussels European Council from 8/9 March 2007. Brussels, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/93135.pdf.
Csardi, G., & Nepusz, T. 2006. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Sy: 1695.
Directive 2003/30/EC. 2003. Of the European parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport.
Dodgson, M. 2008. Asia’s national innovation systems: Institutional adaptability and rigidity in the face of global innovation challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 589–609.
Dolfsma, W., & Seo, D. 2013. Government policy and technological innovation—a suggested typology. Technovation, 33(6–7): 173–179.
Dosi, G. 1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11: 147–162.
Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Econoimic Literature, XXVI(September): 1120–1171.
Dutta, D. K. 2015. Hypercompetitive Environments , Coopetition Strategy , and the Role of Complementary Assets in Building Competitive Advantage : Insights From the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Review, 9(1): 1–11.
EBTB. 2016. European Biofuels Technology Platform. http://www.biofuelstp.eu/btl.html.
Eikeland, P. O. 2005. Biofuels – the new oil for the petroleum industry? http://www.fni.no/doc&pdf/FNI-R1505.pdf\n(In:\n02.02.10).
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532–550.
EPO. 2013. European Patent Office Worldwide Patent Statistical Database (PATSTAT) - April 2013.
Erdős, P., & Rényi, A. 1959. On random graphs. Publicationes Mathematicae, 6: 290–297.
Ernst Young. 2014. Renewable energy country attractiveness index: Issue 41. RECAI.
Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Becerra, M., & Narayanan, S. 2004. Strategic action in network industries: An empirical analysis of the European mobile phone industry. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 20(1–2): 173–196.
Flier, B., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. 2003. Co-evolution in Strategic Renewal Behaviour of British, Dutch and French Financial Incumbents: Interaction of Environmental Selection, Institutional Effects and Managerial Intentionality. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8): 2163–2187.
Fouquet, D. 2013. Policy instruments for renewable energy – From a European perspective. Renewable Energy, 49(11): 15–18.
Fouquet, R., & Pearson, P. J. G. 2012. Past and prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Energy Policy, 50: 1–7.
Freeman, C., & Perez, C. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In L. Dosi G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R.R., Silverberg, G., Soete (Ed.), Technical Change and Economic Theory: 38–66. London: Pinter.
Fung, M. K., & Chow, W. W. 2003. Identification of technological structures using patent statistics. Economic Innovation and New Technology, 12(4): 293–313.
GAIN. 2015. Russian Federation Biofuels Annual Biofuels Sector Update.
Garbuzova, M., & Madlener, R. 2012. Towards an Efficient and Low Carbon Economy Post-2012: Opportunities and Barriers for Foreign Companies in the Russian Energy Market. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 17(4): 387–413.
Gnyawali, D. R., He, J., & Madhavan, R. 2006. Impact of Co-Opetition on Firm Competitive Behavior: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Management, 32(4): 507–530.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. 2001. Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics : A Structural Embeddedness Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3): 431–445.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. 2011. Co-opetition between giants: Collaboration with competitors for technological innovation. Research Policy, 40(5): 650–663.
Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, XXVIII(December): 1661–1707.
Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2001. The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper Series, October(8498): 1–74.
Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. 1989. Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67(1): 133–139.
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. a a, Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4): 413–432.
Henderson, R. 1993. Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. The RAND Journal of Economics, 24(2): 248–270.
Hill, C. W. L., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 257–274.
Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. T. 2010. Leveraging internal and external experience: exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 734–758.
Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. 2010. Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids - Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5): 481–492.
Hu, A., & Jaffe, A. 2003. Patent citations and international knowledge flow: the cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21: 849–880.
Hu, M.-C., & Phillips, F. 2011. Technological evolution and interdependence in China’s emerging biofuel industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(7): 1130–1146.
IFC. 2011. Renewable Energy Policy in Russia: Waking the Green Giant. Washington, DC.
INFOBIO. 2013. Information and Analytics Agency of Bioenergy Development in Russia (In Russian). http://www.infobio.ru/articles/4.
Interview with Head of Ministry of Energy of Russian Federation. 2015. Interview with Head of Ministry of Energy of Russian Federation, Alexandr Novak (In Russian). http://neftegaz.ru/forum/showthread.php?tid=30891.
Interview with Russian Prime-minister. 2015. Interview with Russian Prime-minister Dmitry Medvedev (In Russian). http://www.rg.ru/2014/06/17/toplivo-site-anons.html.
Interview with V. Subbotin. 2012. Oil of Russia. Lukoil International Magazine, (2).
Jacobsson, S. 2008. The emergence and troubled growth of a “biopower” innovation system in Sweden. Energy Policy, 36(4): 1491–1508.
Jacobsson, S., & Bergek, A. 2004. Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(5): 815–849.
Jacobsson, S., & Johnson, A. 2000. The diffusion of renewable energy technology : an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy, 28: 625–640.
Jaffe, A. B. 1986. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R& D : Evidence from firms’ patents , profits , and market value. The American Economic Review, 76(5): 984–1001.
Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 1999. International Knowledge Flows: Evidence From Patent Citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1/2): 105–136.
Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. 2000. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, (Papers and Proceedings): 215–218.
Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., & Kalamova, M. 2010. Environmental policy design characteristics and technological innovation (No. 15OECD). OECD Environment Working Paper.
Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. 2013. Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4): 299–312.
Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. 1989. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1): 7–15.
Khanna, M., Scheffran, J., & Zilberman, D. 2015. Handbook of Bioenergy Economics and Policy. Social Sciences. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-20092-7.
King, A. a., & Tucci, C. L. 2002. Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities. Management Science, 48(2): 171–186.
Kirichenko, A. 2015. Gazprom teploenergo will be producing biofuel for boilers in Arkhangelskaya oblast (in Russian). LiveEnergo. http://live-energo.ru/articles/gazprom-teploenergo-budet-proizvodit-biotoplivo-dlya-kotelnykh-v-arkhangelskoj-oblasti.
Kivimaa, P., & Kern, F. 2016. Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 45(1): 205–217.
Kolchinskij, J. L. 2008. Problems of development of bio-energetics in the Russian Federation. Agronomy Research, 6(Special issue): 221–227.
Lado, A. a., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. 1997. Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 110–141.
Lall, S. 1992. Technological Capabilities and Industrialization. World Development, 20(2): 165–186.
Lall, S. 2010. The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-98. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3): 337–369.
Larin, V. 2006. Current state and potential of using renewable sources of energy in Russia. Analytic Review. (in Russian).
Leiponen, a. E. 2008. Competing Through Cooperation: The Organization of Standard Setting in Wireless Telecommunications. Management Science, 54(11): 1904–1919.
Liang, J., & Fiorino, D. J. 2013. The Implications of Policy Stability for Renewable Energy Innovation in the United States , 1974 – 2009. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1): 97–118.
Lovio, R., & Kivimaa, P. 2012. Comparing Alternative Path Creation Frameworks in the Context of Emerging Biofuel Fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. European Planning Studies, 20(5): 773–790.
Luo, Y. 2007. A coopetition perspective of global competition. Journal of World Business, 42(2): 129–144.
Lykova, N. 2010. A survey of biofuel production potentials in Russia. TRITA LWR Degree Project.
Lykova, N., & Gustafsson, J.-E. 2011. A Survey of Biofuel Production potentials in Russia. Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 4(1): 64–75.
March, J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71–87.
Martinot, E. 1998. Energy efficiency and renewable energy in Russia and capacity building. Energy Policy, 26(11): 905–915.
Martinot, E. 1999. Renewable energy in Russia: markets, development and technology transfer. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 3(1): 49–75.
Martinot, E., Chaurey, A., Lew, D., Moreira, J. R., & Wamukonya, N. 2002. Renewable Energy Markets in Developing Countries*. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 27(1): 309–348.
MERF. 2009. Energy Strategy of the Russian Federation until 2030. Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation. Approved by Decree 1715-r of the Government of the Russian Federation.
Ministry of Agriculture in Russia. 2008. Federal Programme “Development of Production and Processing of Rape Seed in the Russian Federation for 2008-2010”. Approved by the order No. 194 of Ministry of Agriculture on 08.04.2008, (In Russian).
Ministry of Agriculture in Russia. 2013. Project of the Federal Law of “Development of Production and Consumption of Biofuel”. Project ID: №00/04-10778/12-13/2-4-4 from 12.17.2013, (In Russian). http://regulation.gov.ru/project/10778.html?point=view_project&stage=1&stage_id=4209.
Minprirody 2590p-P9. 2014. Working group for developing and implementing a set of measures for using wood biofuel and peat as renewable energy source and creating settings that stimulate use of low quality wood and wood waste for municipal energy.
Mione, A. 2009. When entrepreneurship requires coopetition: the need for standards in the creation of a market. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 8(1): 92–109.
Mitchell, W. 1989. Whether and When? Probability and Timing of Incumbents’ Entry into Emerging Industrial Subfields. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(2): 208–230.
Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. 1992. Incumbents’ use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18(3): 347–372.
Morohovets, A. E., & Popov, N. V. 2014. Production of solid biofuel in Russia: Development econocy and futute investments (in Russian). Экономикс, (1): 50–57.
Muran, M. 2013. Russian Federation Biofuels Annual Biofuels Sector Update. Report for USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Moscow, http://www.thefarmsite.com/reports/contents/BiofuelsRussiaJuly2013.pdf.
Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. 2010. Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(2): 578–597.
National Biofuel Association. 2016. Program of the Biofuel congress 2016 (in Russian). http://www.bioethanol.ru/kongress_biomassa_toplivo_i_energija/program/.
National Standard GOST R 51866-2002. 2002. Automotive Fuels. Unleaded Petrol. Specifications. Gosstandardt Rosii, Moscow.
National Standard GOST R 52201-2004. 2004. Fuel Motor Ethanol for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engines. Benzanols. General Technical Requirements. Gosstandart Rosii, Moscow.
National Standard GOST R 52808-2007. 2007. Untraditional technologies. Energetics of Biowastes. Terms and Definitions. Standartinform, Moscow.
Ndofor, H. A., Sirmon, D. G., & He, X. 2011. Firm Resources, Competitive Actions and Performance: Investigating a Mediated Model with Evidence from the In-vitro Diagnostics Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32: 60–657.
Negro, S. O., Alkemade, F., & Hekkert, M. P. 2012. Why does renewable energy diffuse so slowly? A review of innovation system problems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6): 3836–3846.
Nill, J., & Kemp, R. 2009. Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? Research Policy, 38: 668–680.
O’Reilly, C. A. I., & Tushman, M. L. 2013. Organizational Ambidexterity : Past , Present and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1–30.
OECD/IEA. 2014. Renewable Energy. Medium-Term Market Report 2014. Market Analysis and Forecasts to 2020. Executive Summary.
Olteanu, A. P. 2011. Recent Developments In The German Biodiesel Market And Implications For Investment Projects. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 1(3): 28–36.
Osborn, R. N., & Hagedoorn, J. 1997. The Insitutionalization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Interorganizational Alliances and Network. Academy of Management Journal.
Padula, G., & Dagnino, G. B. 2005. On the nature and drivers of coopetition. International Studies in Management and Organization.
Park, B. J. R., Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. 2014. Walking the tight rope of coopetition: Impact of competition and cooperation intensities and balance on firm innovation performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2): 210–221.
Pavitt, K. 1985. Patent statistics as indicator of innovative activities: possibilities and problems. Scientometrics, 7(1): 77–99.
Pavitt, K. 2000. Sectoral patterns of technical change : Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13(1984): 343–373.
Peng, T. J. A., & Bourne, M. 2009. The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: Implications from two taiwanese healthcare networks. British Journal of Management, 20(3): 377–400.
Prankl, H., Körbitz, W., Mittelbach, M., & Wörgetter, M. 2004. Review on biodiesel standardization world-wide. IEA Bioenergy Task, 39(May): 38–46.
Pristupa, A. O., & Mol, A. P. J. 2015. Renewable energy in Russia: The take off in solid bioenergy? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50: 315–324.
Pristupa, A. O., Mol, A. P. J., & Oosterveer, P. 2010. Stagnating liquid biofuel developments in Russia: Present status andfuture perspectives. Energy Policy, 38(7): 3320–3328.
R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rakitova, O., Ovsyanko, A., Sikkema, R., & Junginger, M. 2009. Wood Pellets Production and Trade in Russia, Belarus & Ukraine. Pelletsatlas: Market Research Report WP, 6: 25.
Rapid-I GmbH. 2014. RapidMiner Studio 5.0. GUI for machine learning, data mining, text mining, predictive analytics and business analytics. Germany.
Rauch, A., & Thöne, M. 2012. Biofuels – At What Cost ? Mandating ethanol and biodiesel consumption in Germany. http://www.iisd.org/gsi/sites/default/files/bf_awc_germany.pdf.
Rice, B., Blomfield, A., & Rotar, A. 2014. Russia’s Second Renewable Energy Auction Gives Both Glimmer of Hope and Cause for Concern. King&Spalding Energy Newsletter. http://www.kslaw.com/library/newsletters/EnergyNewsletter/2014/July/article1.html.
Ritala, P. 2012. Coopetition Strategy - When is it Successful? Empirical Evidence on Innovation and Market Performance. British Journal of Management, 23: 307–324.
Romer, P. M. 1994. The Origins of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 3–22.
Rosneft. 2015. Rosneft year report (in Russian). Financial report, vol. 1.
Rothaermel, F. T. 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 687–699.
Rothaermel, F. T. 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 687–699.
Russian Government. 2001. Changes and additions to federal target program “Energy-efficient economy” for 2002-2005. Approved by Government of Russian Federation decree from 29.12.2001., (In Russian): 1–101.
Russian Government. 2007. Priority investment projects of forest development. Approved by decree #419 of Government of Russian Federation from 30.06.2007, (In Russian): 1–9.
Russian Government. 2014a. Project of the Federal law “About implementing changes to Federal law ”About government regulation of production and consumption of ethyl spirit, alcohol and spirit-containing products and about limiting consumption of alcohol products". Project ID: 00/03, (In Russian). http://regulation.gov.ru/project/15673.html?point=view_project&stage=2&stage_id=16482.
Russian Government. 2014b. Federal program “Development of industry and increasing its competitiveness” approved by provision No. 328 of Government of Russian Federtion from 14.04.2014: 1–117.
Russo, A., & Vurro, C. 2010. Cross-boundary ambidexterity: Balancing exploration and exploitation in the fuel cell industry. European Management Review, 7(1): 30–45.
Schilling, M. a., & Phelps, C. C. 2007. Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation. Management Science, 53(7): 1113–1126.
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5): 537–554.
Sebastiani, F. 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys, 34: 1–47.
Sims, R., Mabee, W., Saddler, J. N., & Taylor, M. 2010. An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. Bioresource Technology, 101(6): 1570–80.
Sims, R., Taylor, M., Saddler, J. N., & Mabee, W. 2008. From 1st to 2nd Generation Biofuel Technologies. An overview of current industry and RD&D activities. IEA Bioenergy, (November): 1–124.
Solomonoff, R., & Rapoport, A. 1951. Connectivity of random nets. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 13(2): 107–117.
Sorda, G., Banse, M., & Kemfert, C. 2010. An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energy Policy, 38(11): 6977–6988.
Sorensen, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. 2000. Aging Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45: 81–112.
Suurs, R. a a, Hekkert, M. P., Kieboom, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. 2010. Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel. Energy Policy, 38(1): 419–431.
Tatneft. 2015. Tatneft year report (in Russian).
UKPIA. 2015. Statistical Review UKPIA.
Unruh, G. C. 2000. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(March): 817–830.
Upham, P., Tomei, J., & Dendler, L. 2011. Governance and legitimacy aspects of the UK biofuel carbon and sustainability reporting system. Energy Policy, 39(5): 2669–2678.
USDA Report. 2011. France Transposes RED - Plant Based Industry Moving Forward.
USDA Report. 2015. EU Biofuels Annual 2015. Renewable Energy, NL5028(June 2010).
van den Ende, J., & Kemp, R. 1999. Technological transformations in history: how the computer regime grew out of existing computing regimes. Research Policy, 28(8): 833–851.
van Thuijl, E., & Deurwaarder, E. P. 2006. European biofuel policies in retrospect. ECN Report No. C--06-016, (May): 50 S.
Verbio Group. 2016. Verbio Biofuel and Technology. http://www.verbio.de/en/group/corporate-structure/verbio-diesel-schwedt/.
von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. 2005. Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34(10): 1591–1607.
Watts, D. J. 1999. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2): 493–527.
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684): 440–2.
Wiesenthal, T., Leduc, G., Christidis, P., Schade, B., Pelkmans, L., et al. 2009. Biofuel support policies in Europe: Lessons learnt for the long way ahead. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(4): 789–800.
Wu, J. 2014. Cooperation with competitors and product innovation: Moderating effects of technological capability and alliances with universities. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2): 199–209.
Wüstenhagen, R., & Bilharz, M. 2006. Green energy market development in Germany: effective public policy and emerging customer demand. Energy Policy, 34(13): 1681–1696.
Zhang, H., Li, L., Cao, J., Zhao, M., & Wu, Q. 2011. Comparison of renewable energy policy evolution among the BRICs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(9): 4904–4909.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：915（臺灣：912，外國：3） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2071125 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67868483
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上