|
Asai, Erin. 1936. A Study of the Yami Language: An Indonesian Language spoken on Botel Tobago Island. 93pp, Leiden: J. Ginsberg.
Ball, Douglas. 2007. On Ergativity and Accusativity in Proto-Polynesian and Proto-Central Pacific. Oceanic Linguistics, 46: 128-153.
Blake, F.R. 1925. A Grammar of Tagalog Language. New Haven: American Oriental Society. American Oriental Series, 1.
Blust, Robert. 2009. The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1917. Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis. University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature 3:2-4. Urbana: University of Illinois.
Chang, Claire Hsun-huei. 1997. On thematic structure of Yami verbs. NSC report 85-2418-H-004-001.
Chang, Claire Husin-huei. 2000. 雅美語參考語法 (A Reference Grammar of Yami). 台北:遠流出版(Taipei: Yuen Liu Publishing Co.)
Chang, Henry Yungli. 1997. Voice, case, and agreement in Seediq and Kavalan. Ph. D. dissertation, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
Chang, Henry Y. 2004. AF verbs: Transitive, intransitive, or both? In Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-Cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday. Language and Linguistics monograph series number 4, ed. by Lin et al, 95-120. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Chang, Henry Y. 2011. Transitivity, ergativity and status of O in Tsou. Language and cognition: Festschrift in Honor of James H-Y. Tai on his 70th birthday, ed. by Jung-hsing Chang & Jenny Y.-C. Kuo. 227-308. Taipei: Crane.
Chang, Yuching. 2011. 達悟語 ma-型動詞之句法、語意衍生之探討 (A discussion of syntax and semantics on ma-verbs in Yami). MA thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
De Guzman, Videa P. 1997. Verbal affixes in Tagalog: inflection or derivation? Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Cecilia Odé & Wim Stkhof, 303-326. Amsterdam & Atlanta: Editions Rodopi B.V.
Deng, Duen-hun. 2005. Argument-function linking in Yami: An optimality-theoretic account. M.A. thesis, Taipei: Nation Chengchi University.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, Robert M. W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donohue, Mark. 2004. POc *ma- and the adjectives: Oceanic as seen through possibly productive morphology in Tukang Besi. Oceanic Linguistics 43:149–76.
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
Dowty, David R. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67:547-619.
Drossard, Werner. 1984. Das Tagalog als Reprɑ̈sentant des aktivischen Sprachbaus. Schriftenreihe zur Linguistik. Tübingen: Narr.
Drossard, Werner. 1994. The systematization of Tagalog morphosyntax. Arbeitspapier Nr. 19 (Neue Folge). Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universitɑ̈t zu Köln.
Evans, Bethwyn, and Malcolm Ross. 2001. The history of Proto-Oceanic *ma-. Oceanic Linguistics 40:269–90.
Fillmore, C. 1970. The grammar of hitting and breaking. In Jacobs, R. And Rosenbaum, P. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 120-133. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
Foley, William, A. 2005. Semantic parameters and the unaccusative split in the Austronesian language family. Studies in Language 29.2:385-430.
Foley, William, A. 2008. The Place of Philippine Languages in a Typology of Voice Systems. In Peter K. Austin and Simon Musgrave, ed., Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, 22-44. Standford: CSLI Publications.
Gerdts, Donna. 1988. Antipassives and causatives in Ilokano: Evidence for an ergative analysis. In Richard McGinn, ed., Studies in Austronesian Linguistics, 295-321. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Center for International Studies. [Southern Asia Series, 76.]
Harvey, Mark. 1979. Subgroups in Austronesian. Canberra: The Australian National University BA honours thesis.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations. In: Comrie, Bernard & Polinsky, Maria (eds.) Causatives and transitivity, 87-120. (Studies in Language Companion Series, 23.) Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological characteristics. The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, ed. by K. Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann: 110-181. London & New York: Routledge.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2006. How to miss a paradigm or two: multifunctional ma- in Tagalog. Catching Language: The Standing Challenge of Grammar Writing, ed. by Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans, 487-526. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2008. Lexical categories and voice in Tagalog. Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages, ed. by Peter Austin & Simon Musgrave, 247-293. Standford: CSLI.
Ho, Arlene, Y.L. 1990. Yami Structure: A descriptive study of the Yami Language. M.A. thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
Holmer, Arthur. 1996. A parametric grammar of Seediq. Travaux de l’Institut de Linguistique de Lund 30. Lund: Lund University Press.
Hopper, Paul, J. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56.2: 251-299.
Huang, Huei-ju, and Shuanfan Huang. 2007. Lexical perspectives on voice construction in Tsou. Oceanic Linguistics 46.2: 424-455.
Huang, Lillian M. 1993. The voice system in Atayal. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, ed. by Feng-fu Tsao & Mei-hui Tsai, 73-98. Taipei: Crane.
Huang, Lillian M. 1995. 泰雅語參考語法(A Reference of Mayrinax). 台北:遠流出版社(Taipei: Crane Publishing.)
Huang, Lillian M. 2000. Verb classification in Mayrinax Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 39 (2): 364-390.
Huang, Lillian M. 2001. Focus system of Mayrinax Atayal: a syntactic, semantic and pragmatic perspective. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities and Social Sciences 46.1-2:51-69.
Huang, Shuanfan. 2002. The pragmatics of focus in Tsou and Seediq. Language and Linguistics 3.4:665-694.
Huang, Shuanfan. 2005. Split O in Formosan languages. Language and Linguistics 6(4): 783-806.
Huang, Shuanfan, and Michael Tanangkingsing. 2011. A Discourse Explanation of the Transitivity Phenomena in Kavalan, Squliq, and Tsou. Oceanic Linguistics 50.1: 97-123.
Huang, Shuping, and Li-May Sung. 2008. The undergoer focus ma- in Kavalan. Oceanic Linguistics 47.1: 159-184.
Huang, Wan-tin. 2006. Yami voice system revisited: with particular reference to the ditransitive constructions. M.A. thesis, Taipei: National Chengchi University.
Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. New York: Palgrave.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Levin, B., and M. Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liao, Hsiu-Chuan. 2004. Transitivity and Ergativity in Formosan and Philippine Languages. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Hawaii.
Liao, Hsiu-Chuan. 2011. Some morphosyntactic differences between Formosan and Philippine Languages. Language and Linguistics 12.4:845-876.
Maclachlan, Anna E. 1996. Aspects of ergativity in Tagalog. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
Mithun, Marianne. 1994. The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. Voice: its Form and Function. Typological Studies in language 27. Barbara Fox and Paul Hopper, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamin's. 247-277.
Manning, Christopher D. 1996. Ergativity: argument structure and grammatical relaitons. Standford: Center for the Study of Language and Information (CSLI).
McFarland, Curtis D. 1976. A provisional classification of Tagalog verbs. Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa Monograph Series No. 8. Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Mithun, Marianne. 1994. The implications of ergativity for a Philippine voice system. Voice: its Form and Function. Typological Studies in language 27. Barbara Fox and Paul Hopper, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamin's. 247-277.
Payne, Thomas. E. 1982. Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup’ik Eskimo and Tagalog. Studies in Language 6:75-106.
Payne, Thomas. E. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramos, Teresita, and Maria Lourdes Bautista. 1986. Handbook of Tagalog verbs: inflections, modes, and aspects. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Rau, D. Victoria, and Maa-Neu Dong. 2006. Yami texts with reference grammar and dictionary. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Reid, Lawrence A. 1992. On the development of the aspect system in some Philippine languages. Oceanic Linguistics 31.1: 65-69.
Ross, Malcolm D. 2009. Proto Austronesian verbal morphology: A reappraisal, in Alexander Adelaar and Andrew Pawley (ed.), Austronesian Historical Linguistics and Culture History: A festschrift for Robert Blust, Pacific Linguistics, Canberra Australia, pp. 295-326.
Ross, Malcolm. 2015. Reconstructing proto Austronesian verb classes, Language and Linguistics, 16.3:279-345.
Ross, Malcolm & Teng, Stacy Fang-ching. 2005. Formosan Languages and Linguistic Typology. Language and Linguistics 6.4:739-781.
Teng, Stacy Fang-ching. 2007. A Reference Grammar of Puyuma, an Austronesian Language of Taiwan. Ph. D. dissertation, Canberra: Australian National University.
Tsuchida, Shigeru, Yamada, Yukihiro & Moriguchi, Tsunekazu. 1987. Lists of Selected Words of Bantanic Languages. University of Tokyo. 198pp.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1985. Passive and related construction: A prototype analysis. Language 61:821-848.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1988. Voice in Philippine languages. In Passive and Voice, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 85-142. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Shih, Louise Yu-mien. 1997. Yami morphology. MA thesis, Taichung: Providence University.
Shih, Louise Yu-mien.2013. Transitivity and valency-changing derivations in Yami. Ph. D. dissertation, Kaohsiung: National Kaohsiung Normal University.
Starosta, Stanley, Andrew Pawley and Lawrence A. Reid. 1982. The evolution of focus in Austronesian. Paper presented at the Third Internal Conference on Austronesian Languistics, Bali.
Starosta, Stanley. 1997. Formosan clause structure: Ergativity, transitivity, and case marking. In Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China, ed. by Chiu-yu Tseng, 125-154. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Starosta, Stanley. 1999. Transitivity, ergativity, and the best analysis of Atayal case marking. Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-kuei Li, 371-392. Taipei Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Starosta, Stanley. 2002. Austronesian ‘Focus’ as derivation: Evidence from nominalization. Language and Linguistics 3.2:427-479.
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1981. Grammatical Relations in Ergative Languages. Studies in Language 5.3. 361-394.
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Walton, Charles. 1986. Sama Verbal Semantics: Classification, Derivation, and Inflection. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
Wu, Joy Jing-Lan. 2007. “Voice” markers in Amis: A role and reference grammar analysis. Language and Linguistics 8:95-142.
Yami New Testament. 1994. Taipei: The Bible Society in the R.O.C.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 1992. A syntactic and semantic study of Tsou focus system. M.A. thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth and Lillian M. Huang. 2000. Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages, Oceanic Linguistics 39.2: 391-414.
|