:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:應用副詞型矛盾修辭於產品之創新設計
作者:朱尚禮
作者(外文):Shang-Li Chu
校院名稱:大同大學
系所名稱:設計科學研究所
指導教授:曹永慶
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2020
主題關鍵詞:矛盾修辭屬性列舉產品使用創新設計模式情感設計Attribute Listing TechniqueOxymoronInnovative DesignEmotional Design
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
設計師為使用者創造衝突的要素,發掘新的使用經驗,是創新產品設計的有效策略。矛盾修辭為運用兩相對立之詞語來形容一件事物,使所欲表達之語意能有更強烈之效果,給人出乎預料、引人入勝之感。本研究旨在嘗試建構可應用於產品使用中之副詞型矛盾修辭設計模式。
本研究分為四階段進行:(1)分析副詞型矛盾修辭組成要件及組合型式,建立副詞型矛盾修辭之構成方法;(2)將各副詞型矛盾修辭例句與屬性列舉法中之詞性對應,結合發展各類設計轉換型式;(3)以各設計轉換型式進行燈具設計,實施矛盾意象測試,探討各樣本與矛盾意象之對應關係以及可能影響「創新性」、「喜好度」兩綜合評價之矛盾意象;(4)建構副詞型矛盾修辭設計模式矛盾意象主成分構面之因果模式。
研究結果顯示:(1)副詞型矛盾修辭組合及其對應之產品特性可分為三種型式,分別為:「副詞搭配形容詞」著重「重現特定經驗之操作行為與場景」;「副詞搭配動詞」著重「依特定目的產生之運作原理及使用狀態」;「副詞搭配副詞」著重在「在同一產品上展示多元特性之使用過程」;(2)以燈具設計為題,依所建構之設計模式過程,發展出副詞型矛盾修辭設計之10件樣本,依操作直接變化程度分為四大類:「直覺型」:可直覺使用並產生形象連結之設計、「衝動型」:具簡單提示並有驚喜的產品使用回饋之設計;「類比型」:可類比產品使用經驗之設計;「迂迴型」為「反轉過往使用經驗」之設計;(3)影響「創新性」之矛盾意象依序為「戲劇性的-平凡的」、「超越現實的-合乎邏輯的」、「引人注目的-深藏不露的」,而影響「喜好度」之矛盾意象為「戲劇性的-平凡的」,「麻煩的-便利的」,「引人注目的-深藏不露的」。
That designers create conflicting elements for users and discover new use experiences is an effective strategy for innovative product design. Oxymoron is the use of two opposite words to describe an entity so that the intended meaning of the expression can have a stronger effect, giving people an unexpected and fascinating feeling. The aim of this research is to try to construct an adverb-type oxymoron design model that can be applied to product use.
This research is divided into four stages: (1) Analyze the constituent elements and combination patterns of adverb-type oxymoron, and establish the method of constructing adverb-type oxymoron; (2) Correspond each example of adverb-type oxymoron with the part of speech in the attribute enumeration method, and combine the development of various design conversion styles; (3) Carry out lamp design with each design conversion style, implement contradictory image tests, explore the correspondence between each sample and contradictory images, and may affect the two comprehensive evaluations of "innovation" and "preference" contradictory imagery; (4) Construct the causal model of adverb-type oxymoron design samples for continuous use with expectation confirmation theory.
The results of the research show: (1) Adverb-type oxymoron combinations and their corresponding product characteristics can be divided into three types, namely: "adverb with adjective", which focuses on "reproducing the operation behavior and scene of specific experience"; "adverb with verb", which emphasizes "the production from operating principle and usage state based on a specific purpose"; "adverbs with adverbs" emphasizes "the use process of displaying multiple characteristics on the same product"; (2) With lamp as the main topic, the design is based on the process of the constructed design model to develop 10 samples of adverb-type oxymoron designs, which are divided into four categories according to the degree of direct change of operation: "intuitive": designs that can be used intuitively and produce image connections, "impulsive": with simple prompts and surprises, product use feedback as the main design; "analogous type": design that can reflect product use experience; "circumflex type" is a design that "reverses previous experience of use” (3) the innovation of oxymoron samples are highly correlated with and "dramatic" -Ordinary", "Transcendence-Logical", and "Attractive-Hidden", and the preference part is significantly related to "Dramatic-Ordinary", "Troublesome-Convenience", and "Attractive-Hidden".
2019 White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprises in Taiwan. Small and Medium Enterprise Administration, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan, R.O.C. 2019, 142.
Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125−143.
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001a). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351−370.
Chou-Yu Cheng Cheng Chou-Yu Poetry Collection Ⅰ; Hong-Fan Bookstore: Taipei, Taiwan, 1979;
Crawford, R. P. (1937). Think for yourself. Whittlesey House, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Incorporated.
Crawford, R. P. (1954). The techniques of creative thinking: How to use your ideas to achieve success (Vol. 110). Hawthorn Books.
Crawford, R.P. Direct Creativity: With Attribute Listing; Fraser Publishing Company, 1968;
Crawford, R.P. The techniques of creative thinking: How to use your ideas to achieve success; Hawthorn Books, 1954; Vol. 110;.
Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice*. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x
Creusen, M.E.H.; Schoormans, J.P.L. The Different Roles of Product Appearance in Consumer Choice*. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2005, 22, 63–81, doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2005.00103.x.
Creusen, M.E.H.; Schoormans, J.P.L.; Veryzer, R.W. The Relationship Between Design Typicality, Novelty and Aesthetic Judgments. ACR European Advances 2005, E-07.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319−342.
Demirbilek, O.; Sener, B. Product design, semantics and emotional response. Ergonomics 2003, 46, 1346–1360, doi:10.1080/00140130310001610874.
Gobe, M. Emotional branding: The new paradigm for connecting brands to people; Simon and Schuster, 2010;
Hegel, G.W.F. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: the science of logic; Cambridge University Press, 2010;
Hegel, G.W.F.; Findlay, J.N.; Miller, A.V. Philosophy of mind; Clarendon Press Oxford, 1971;
Khalid, H.M.; Helander, M.G. A framework for affective customer needs in product design. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2004, 5, 27–42, doi:10.1080/1463922031000086744.
Khalid, H.M.; Helander, M.G. Customer Emotional Needs in Product Design. Concurrent Engineering 2006, 14, 197–206, doi:10.1177/1063293X06068387.
Kumar, M.; Noble, C.H. Beyond form and function: Why do consumers value product design? Journal of Business Research 2016, 69, 613–620.
Kumar, M.; Townsend, J.D.; Vorhies, D.W. Enhancing consumers’ affection for a brand using product design. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2015, 32, 716–730.
Laozi Dao De Jing; 475AD;
McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1986), Time and human interaction: Social psychology of time. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Civitas Books.
Norman, D.A. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things; Basic Civitas Books, 2004;
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, (17)4, 460−469.
Patterson, P. G., & Spreng, R. A. (1997). Modeling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, service context: An empirical examination. Intentional Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(5), 415−432.
Peng-Yen Tsai Oxymoron in the Use of Design Applications (Unpublished master’ s thesis), Tatung University: Taipei, Taiwan, 2014.
Po-Feng Huang The Design Application of Temporal Opposite Image (Unpublished master’ s thesis), Tatung University: Taipei, Taiwan, 2012.
Renate Vos CONCRETE pendant lamps Available online: https://www.renatevos.nl/concrete-pendant-lamps/.
Ruiz, J.H. Paradox and Oxymoron Revisited. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2015, 173, 199–206, doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.053.
Sandelands, L. E., & Buckner G. C. (1989). Of art and work: Aesthetic experience and the concept of job satisfaction. In: Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B.M. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (v.11) (pp.105-132). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Shen, Y. (1987). On the Structure and Understanding of Poetic Oxymoron. Poetics Today, 8(1), 105–122. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/1773004
Solomon, R.L. The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: The costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain. American Psychologist 1980, 35, 691–712, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.35.8.691.
Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 202−212.
Warren, T.F.; Davis, G.A. Techniques for creative thinking: An empirical comparison of three methods. Psychological reports 1969, 25, 207–214.
Yoichi Ueno Originality development and techniques; GIHODO SHUPPAN CO. LTD., 1959;
Zedong Mao ON CONTRADICTION Available online: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-1/mswv1_17.htm.
Frearson, A. (2015, August 12). Postmodern architecture: Vanna Venturi House, Philadelphia by Robert Venturi. https://www.dezeen.com/2015/08/12/postmodernism-architecture-vanna-venturi-house-philadelphia-robert-venturi-denise-scott-brown/
.
陳滿銘. (2013). 修辭「轉化」論. 27, 1–8.
周玟慧. (2007). 設計在後現代. 哲學與文化, 34(2), 77–96.
姜信長. (2016). 請站在感性的盡頭. 新Book House出版.
蔡邦彥. (2014). 矛盾修辭於產品使用上之設計應用 (曹永慶 (ed.)) [碩士]. 大同大學.
顏藹珠, & 張春榮. (1993). 英語矛盾語法賞析. 教學與研究. http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/bitstream/20.500.12235/21256/1/ntnulib_ja_B0001_0015_097.pdf
廖弘州. (2015). 創新矛盾修辭之產品設計應用 (曹永慶 (ed.)) [碩士]. 大同大學.
吳晟. (2000). 吳晟詩選 1963-1999. 洪範.
沈謙. (2010). 修辭學. 五南圖書出版公司.
張春榮著. (2013). 現代修辭學. 萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司.
黃慶萱. (1983). 修辭學. 三民書局.
鍾榮富. (2015a). 當代語言學概論. 台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
楊彥邦. (2007). 不同階段產品使用過程之期待意象, 大同大學工業設計研究所碩士論文.
陳滿銘. (1989). 詞的章法與結構. 教學與研究. http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/21346
陳滿銘. (2009). 意、象形質同構類型論. http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/17001
陳滿銘. (2011). 試論修辭之邏輯性. 國文天地, 319, 99–105.
陳滿銘, & Chen, M.-M. (2008). 論意象組織之基本類型. http://rportal.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/handle/20.500.12235/17646
林若望. (2002). 論現代漢語的時制意義. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 1–25.
林若望, & Others. (2013). 再議中文的關係子句. https://ir.nctu.edu.tw/handle/11536/95268
洪偉肯, & 陳玲鈴. (2010). 如何量測產品的矛盾語意. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 15(4). http://jodesign.org.tw/index.php/JODesign/article/view/857
楊植勝. (2013). 辯證法與現象學—黑格爾《 精神現象學》 的方法論問題. 國立臺灣大學哲學論評. http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/283788
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE