從偏執到後人類：科幻小說中科技對人性的衝擊__臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	從偏執到後人類：科幻小說中科技對人性的衝擊
作者：	白堂隆
作者(外文)：	PAUL JAMES BUTLER
校院名稱：	國立高雄師範大學
系所名稱：	英語學系
指導教授：	張逸帆
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2021
主題關鍵詞：	科技；科幻文學；壯美；偏執狂；後人類；後現代；Technology；science fiction；sublime；paranoia；posthuman；postmodern
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:3

中文摘要
本論文探討科幻文學中，人類與科技間關係的巨大轉變，以及人們對於科技的態度：從整體的恐懼與不信任，至全心全意地與其合為一體。
近幾年來，科技逐漸入侵人類各個領域。這種無可避免的侵蝕過程只會在未來不斷快速擴大。當這個過程變得難以收拾，人類又一直想要改善生活品質，到後來恐怕會讓我們忘了身為「人」的真實意義。面對無法完全理解的科技，即所謂的科技壯美，人類身份認同的界線重新定義。本論文援用後現代主義理論，探討科幻文學裡的科技壯美。
新科技無論在任何時期出現總是像把雙面刃，一方面為我們完成生理無法達成的事，另方面卻又剝奪人性與自制力。此論文將分析工業革命到數位時代所經歷的科技壯美。主要研討的文學作品為：塞缪爾‧巴特勒《艾爾荒》﹝1872﹞、唐‧德里羅《白噪音》﹝1985﹞與《大都會》﹝2003﹞、威廉‧吉布森《神經漫遊者》﹝1984﹞。此論文探討科幻文學如何打破人類與非人類之間的隔閡，同時檢視人類身份的新觀點。面對科技壯美時，偏執狂與後人類的立場皆扮演重要的角色。
關鍵字：科技、科幻文學、壯美、偏執狂、後人類、後現代

以文找文

ABSTRACT
        This dissertationinvestigates the massive transformation in the human-technology relationship in science fiction. It traces the spectrum of the human attitude totechnology, from fear and distrust to wholehearted integration.
        In recentyears technology has encroached exponentially into all areas of the humanexperience, a process which will inevitably continue yet more rapidly in thefuture. As this progress escalates, in our eagerness to improve the humancondition, we are in danger of forgetting what it means to be human. The boundaries of human identity are beingredefined as we confront technologies which we do not fully comprehend, thetechnological sublime. Inthe light of postmodern theories, this dissertation examines experiences with the technologicalsublime in science fiction.
Emerging technology in any era is always adouble-edged sword, bringing the promise of the further liberation of humanityfrom its physical limitations whilst usurping facets of human agency. This dissertation will analyze encounters withthe technological sublime from the Industrial Revolution to the Digital Age andbeyond. It will focus on Samuel Butler’sErewhon (1872), Don DeLillo’s White Noise (1985) and Cosmopolis(2003), and William Gibson’s Neuromancer (1984).
        This dissertation explores how science fiction breaksdown the barriers between the human and the non-human, thus allowing us toexamine new perceptions of human identity. The dissertation demonstrates thatparanoid and posthuman standpoints are both crucial when encountering thetechnological sublime.

Keywords:Technology / science fiction / sublime/ paranoia / posthuman / postmodern

以文找文

WORKSCITED

Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding ofHow Matter      Comes to Matter.” Signs,vol. 28, no. 3, Gender and Science: New Issues, Spring 2003,      pp. 801-831.
Barrett, Laura. “How theDead Speak to the Living: Intertextuality and the Postmodern      Sublime in White Noise.” Journal of Modern Literature, vol. 25, 2003. pp. 97-113.
Babaee, Ruzbeh. “BodyMetamorphosis in Dystopian Cyber-Capital of Don DeLillo’s     Cosmopolis.”Journal of Language and Literature, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014. pp. 108-116.
Behrooz, Niloufar. “The RidiculousSublime in Don DeLillo’s White Noise and Cosmopolis.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies,vol.16, Feb. 2016, pp. 183-197.
Bostrom, Nick. “What isTranshumanism? FAQ,” www.transhumanism.org/index.php/w/faq2. Accessed12 May 2021.
Boxall, Peter. DonDeLillo: The Possibility of Fiction. Routledge, 2006.
Braidotti, Rosi. ThePosthuman. Polity, 2013.
Brandstetter, Thomas.“The Lives of Mechanical Servants.” Interdisciplinary Science                              Reviews, vol. 37, no. 4, Dec. 2012, pp.345-53.
Buchanan, Ian. Deleuzism: A Metacommentary. EdinburghUniversity Press, 2000.
Bukatman, Scott. TerminalIdentity: The Virtual Subject in Postmodern Fiction. Duke        University Press, 1993.
---. “Postcards from the Posthuman Solar System.”Science Fiction Studies, vol. 18, no. 3,       Nov. 1991, pp. 343-357.
---. “There's Always Tomorrowland: Disney andthe Hypercinematic Experience.” October, vol. 57, Summer 1991, pp. 55-78.
Burke, Edmund. APhilosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and      Beautiful.Oxford University Press, 2015.
Butler, Samuel. Erewhon.Penguin, 1979.
---. “Darwin among theMachines,” The Press, ChristchurchNZ, Jun 13, 1863.
Conte, Joseph. “WritingAmid the Ruins: 9/11 and Cosmopolis.”The Cambridge Companion    to Don DeLillo.Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Cowart, David. “DeLilloand the Power of Language.” The CambridgeCompanion to Don        DeLillo. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Craft-Jenkins,Kyle. “Artificial Intelligence and the Technological Sublime: How Virtual Characters Influence the Landscape of ModernSublimity.”      https://uknowledge.uky.edu/english_etds/1 - Accessed11 July 2021.
Csicsery-Ronay,Istvan. “Cyberpunkand Neuromanticism.” Mississippi Review, vol. 16,       no.2, 1988, pp. 266-278.
Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. Wordsworth Books,1998.
Dawkins, Richard. The Selfish Gene. Oxford UniversityPress, 1976.
DeLanda, Manuel. Warin the Age of Intelligent Machines. Zone Books, 1991.
De Lauretis, Teresa.“Signs of Wo/ander.” The Technological Imagination. Ed. Teresa de Lauretis, Andreas Huyssen, and KathleenWoodward. Madison, WI: Coda, 1980. 159-174.
Deleuze, Gilles andFelix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia.                       University of MinnesotaPress, 1983.
---. A ThousandPlateaus. Continuum, 2004.
DeLillo, Don. Cosmopolis.Picador, 2003.
---. White Noise.Picador, 2011.
---. “In the Ruins of the Future: Reflections onTerror and Loss in the Shadow of September.” Harper's, Dec. 2001, pp. 33–40.
Dennett, Daniel C. Consciousness Explained. Viking, 1992.
Duvall, John N. “Introduction: The Power of History and thePersistence of Mystery.” The CambridgeCompanion to Don DeLillo. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Flieger, Jerry Aline.“The Listening Eye: Postmodernism, Paranoia and the Hypervisible.” Diacritics,vol. 26, no. 1, Spring 1996, pp. 90-107.
Gibson, William. Neuromancer.HarperCollins, 1993.
---. “Johnny Mnemonic.” Burning Chrome. Harper Voyager, 2003.
---. “The Gernsback Continuum.”Burning Chrome. Harper Voyager, 2003.
---. “Will We HaveComputer Chips in Our Heads?” DistrustThat Particular                      Flavor.London: Viking, 2000.
Gleick, James. The Information: A History, a Theory, aFlood. Pantheon, 2011.
Graham, Elaine L. Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens and Others in           Popular Culture. Manchester UniversityPress, 2002.
Grant,Glen. “Transcendence through Detournement in William Gibson's Neuromancer.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 17, no. 1,Mar. 1990, pp. 41-49.
Gutiérrez-Jones, Carl. “StealingKinship: Neuromancer and Artificial Intelligence.” Science             FictionStudies, vol. 41, no. 1, Mar. 2014, pp. 69-92.
Haraway,Donna. "A Cyborg Manifesto:Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in              theLate Twentieth Century." Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention                  of Nature. Routledge, 1991,pp.149-181.
Hassan, Ihab. “Prometheus as Performer: Toward a PostmodernCulture?” In Michel                  Benamou, Charles Caramello. Eds. Performancein Postmodern Culture. Madison,              Wisconsin:Coda Press, 1977.
Hayles, N. Katherine. HowWe Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature,         andInformatics. University of Chicago Press, 1999.
---. “Wrestling withTranshumanism” from Transhumanism and ItsCritics. Metanexus, 2011.
Hansell, George. Transhumanism and Its Critics.Metanexus, 2011.
Henneberg, Julian. “‘Something Extraordinary Hovering Just Outside Our Touch’:The      TechnologicalSublime in Don DeLillo’s White Noise”.Aspeers: Emerging Voices            inAmerican Studies, Issue 4, 2011. p. 52-73.
Herbert, Frank. Dune. Hodder, 2006.
Herbrechter, Stefan. Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis.Bloomsbury, 2013.
     Hofstadter, Douglas R. “An Interview with Douglas Hofstadter” American Scientist,                      www.americanscientist.org/bookshelf/pub/douglas-r-hofstadter. Accessed 12 May 2021.
Hollinger, Veronica. “CyberneticDeconstructions: Cyberpunk and Postmodernism” Mosaic: AnInterdisciplinary Critical Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, Spring 1990, pp. 29-44.
Huxley, Aldous. BraveNew World. Vintage, 2004.
Huxley, Julian. “Transhumanism.”New Bottles for Old Wine. London:Chatto & Windus, 1957, pp.13-17.
Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism,or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke                    University Press, 2005.
---. Archaeologies of the Future: The DesireCalled Utopia and Other Science Fictions.       Verso, 2005.
Johnson,John. “Computer Fictions: Narratives of the Machinic Phylum.”Special Issue:      Papers from the Eighteenth InternationalConference on the Fantastic in the Arts ,
vol. 8, no. 4, 1997, pp.443-463.
---. The Allure ofMachinic Life: Cybernetics, Artificial Life, and the New AI. MIT Press,2008.
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement. Hackett, 1987.
Knight, Peter. “DeLillo,Postmodernism, Postmodernity.” The CambridgeCompanion to Don DeLillo. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Kurzweil, Ray. The Age of Spiritual Machines. Orion, 1999.
Laist, Randy. Technology and Postmodern Subjectivity inDon DeLillo’s Novels. Lang,2010.
---. “The Concept ofDisappearance in Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis.” Critique: Studies in    Contemporary Fiction, vol. 51, no. 3,2010, pp. 244-263.
      Lin, Jiann-Guang.“Technology, Postmodernism and Don DeLillo’s White Noise.” Intergrams:         Studiesin Language and Literatures, vol. 3, Issue 2. Spring 2003, pp. 12-31.
    Lyotard,Jean-Francois. The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Blackwell, 1991.
---. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge.University of Minnesota Press,    1979.
Martins, Susana S. “WhiteNoise and Everyday Technologies.” AmericanStudies, vol. 46, no. 1, Spring 2005,pp. 87-113.
Marx, Leo. TheMachine in the Garden: Technology and thePastoral Ideal in America. OUP, 1964.
Mazlish, Bruce.“Butler’s Brainstorm.” PrefiguringCyberculture: An Intellectual History.
Ed. Tofts, Darren. MIT Press, 2002.
McHale, Brian. Postmodernist Fiction. Methuen, 1987.
McQuire, Scott. “Space for Rent in the LastSuburb.” Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History. MIT Press,2002.
Mehlman, Maxwell. Transhumanist Dreams and DystopianNightmares: The Promise and       Peril of Genetic Engineering. JohnHopkins University Press, 2012.
      Merkle,Ralph. C. “Uploading.” The TranshumanistReader. Ed. Max More. pp. 157-165.    Wiley,2013.
Miccoli, Anthony. Posthuman Suffering and the TechnologicalEmbrace. Lexington, 2010.
Miller, Perry. TheLife of the Mind in America. From the Revolutionto the Civil War. Harvest, 1965.
More, Max. (ed.)Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology and Philosophy of the Human Future.Wiley, 2013.
Myers, Tony. “ThePostmodern Imaginary in William Gibson’s Neuromancer.” Modern     Fiction Studies, vol. 47, no. 4, Winter2001, pp. 887-909.
Nayar, Pramod K. Posthumanism.Polity Press, 2014.
Nye, David E. AmericanTechnological Sublime. MIT Press, 1994.
Olster, Stacy. “White Noise.” The CambridgeCompanion to Don DeLillo. Cambridge        University Press, 2008.
O'Donnell,Patrick. Latent Destinies:Cultural Paranoia and Contemporary U.S.
Narrative. DukeUniversity Press, 2000.
---. “Engendering Paranoia in Contemporary Narrative.” Boundary2, New Americanists: National Identitiesand Postnational Narratives. vol. 19, no. 1, Spring 1992), pp. 181-204.
Pepperell, Robert.The Post-Human Condition. Exeter: Intellect Books, 1995.
Pordzik,Ralph. “The Posthuman Future of Man: Anthropocentrism and the Other of Technology in Anglo American Science Fiction.” Utopian Studies,vol. 23, no. 1, 2012,     pp. 142-161.
Poster, Mark and Savat,David, eds. Deleuze and the New Technology.         Edinburgh University    Press, 2009.
Pynchon, Thomas. Gravity’s Rainbow. Penguin, 2006.
      Roden,David. Posthuman Life: Philosophy at theEdge of the Human (2015). Routledge,            2015.
      Ruddick,Nicholas. “Putting the Bits Together: Information Theory, Neuromancer,and        Science Fiction.” Journal ofthe Fantastic in the Arts, vol. 3, no.4, 1994, pp. 84-92.
     Sciolini,Martina. “The Contemporary American Novel as World Literature: The NeoliberalAntihero in Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis.” Texas Studies in Literatureand Language, vol. 57, no. 2, Summer 2015, pp 210-241.
     Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Norton, 1996.
Shonkwiler, Alison. “Don DeLillo’s FinancialSublime.” Contemporary Literature,
         vol. 51, no. 2, 2010, pp. 246-282.
Siivonen, Timo. “Cyborgs and GenericOxymorons: The Body and Technology in William Gibson's Cyberspace Trilogy.” Science FictionStudies, vol. 23, no. 2, Jul. 1996, pp. 227-24.
Sofoulis, Zoe. “Cyberquake: Haraway’sManifesto.” Prefiguring Cyberculture: An Intellectual History. MITPress, 2002.
Sponsler, Claire. “Cyberpunk and the Dilemmasof Postmodern Narrative: The Example of William Gibson.” ContemporaryLiterature, vol. 33, no. 4, Winter 1992, pp. 625-64.
   Strombeck, Andrew. “The Limousine andTechnicity in Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis.” Modern Fiction Studies,vol. 63, no. 1, 2017, pp. 146-167.
Tabbi, Joseph. PostmodernSublime: Technology and American Writing from Mailer to      Cyberpunk. CornellUniversity Press, 1996.
Tofts, Darren, Jonson,Annemarie and Cavallaro, Alessio, eds. Prefiguring Cyberculture:           An Intellectual History. MITPress, 2002.
Trendel, Aristi. “ThePosthuman in Don DeLillo’s Cosmopolis.” War on the Human, edited             by Theodora Tsimpouki and KonstantinosBlatanis, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017. Wertheim, Margaret. “InternetDreaming: A Utopia for All Seasons.” Prefiguring         Cyberculture: An Intellectual History. MIT Press, 2002.
Wiese, Annjeanette. “RethinkingPostmodern Narrativity: Narrative Construction and        Identity Formation in Don DeLillo's White Noise.” CollegeLiterature, vol. 39, no. 3,       Summer2012, pp. 1-25.
Wilson, Rob. “Techno-Euphoriaand the Discourse of the American Sublime.” Boundary 2, vol. 19, no. 1,Spring 1992, pp. 205-229.
Wisnicki, Adrian. Conspiracy, Revolution, and Terrorism.Routledge, 2008.
Wolfe, Cary. What is Posthumanism? University ofMinnesota Press, 2010.
Wordsworth, William. The Collected Poemsof William Wordsworth. Gray, 2008.
Valdez Moses, Michael. “Lust Removed FromNature”. New Essays on White Noise, edited by Frank Lentricchia, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
     Valentino, Russell Scott. “From Virtue toVirtual: DeLillo’s Cosmopolis and the Corruption             ofthe Absent Body.” Modern Fiction Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, Spring 2007,pp. 140-162.
Varsava, Jerry A. “TheSaturated Self: Don DeLillo on the Problem of Rogue Capitalism.” ContemporaryLiterature, vol. 46, no. 1, Spring 2005, pp. 78-107.
Voelz, Johannes. “In theFuture, Toward Death: Finance Capitalism and Security in DeLillo's Cosmopolis.”Amerikastudien / American Studies, vol. 60, no. 4, 2015. pp. 505-526.
   Zemka, Sue. “Erewhon and the End ofUtopian Humanism.” ELH, vol. 69, no.2, Summer    2002, pp. 439-472.

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	《超速性追緝》中的身體與科技

1.	科技之旅：史丹力‧庫伯力克的《2001：太空漫遊》中的人類後人類指南

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	後人類話語反思--以齊澤克為中心
2.	元電影、後電影與後人類藥理學--貝爾納．斯蒂格勒電影理論的跨越性批判與發掘
3.	“微時代”與人類學文化批評的理論歸趨
4.	從反人文主義到一種狹義的後人類：跨越擬人辯證法
5.	“後人類／人本”轉向下的人類、動物與生命--從阿甘本到青年馬克思
6.	Writing//Posthuman: The Literary Text as Cognitive Assemblage
7.	技術哲學視野中人與物居間關係的現代性危機診斷
8.	媒介性主體性--後人類主體話語反思及其新釋
9.	後人類主義、主體性重構與技術政治--人與技術關係的再敘事
10.	從“代理”到“替代”的技術與正在“過時”的人類？
11.	微關係：後人類時代翻譯研究的大方向
12.	劉慈欣《三體》中的後人類擲骰論
13.	從“賽博格”與“人工智能”看科幻小說的“後人類”瞻望--以《他，她和它》為例
14.	後人類的警示：《羚羊與秧雞》中的語言哲學
15.	從城市空間到賽博空間：論《血尖》中的空間書寫與技術政治

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫