臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：融合邏輯：創新再脈絡的調適轉譯過程
作者：林雅萍
作者(外文)：LIN, YA-PING
校院名稱：實踐大學
系所名稱：管理學院創意產業博士班
指導教授：蕭瑞麟
謝明宏
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2022
主題關鍵詞：再脈絡；在地調適；轉譯；衝突邏輯；跨國移轉；recontextualization；local adaptation；translation；conflicting logics；cross-nation transfer
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:0
追求原創雖為上策，然因各種限制，企業需要藉由再脈絡轉移最佳實務。過去文獻分析相容性與在地化，理解水土不服的問題，然而對調適過程卻仍有待深入。跨國移轉時，從原地轉換到移入地會面對各式制約，如何發展出解決方案，是當前研究面臨的瓶頸，也是實務遭遇的困難。本文分析連鎖超商由日本與美國轉移商品、服務、店型至臺灣的調適動態。學理上，點出在地調適的轉譯以及再脈絡的連貫性等觀念。解釋再脈絡取決於衝突邏輯的融合。實務上，本文點出再脈絡需考量由念舊原地、懷舊在地，進而融合創新於創舊。故此，轉換在地制約並非頭痛醫頭的回應，而是借力使力的轉譯。轉移前要先轉換認知，方可由衝突中找出融合的可能。由複製走向複合的思維，由抄襲轉向超越的心態。
Enterprises should strive for original innovation, but due to various constraints, they need to transfer best practices through recontextualization. As such, how local adaptation may facilitate smooth transfer of innovation becomes current literature’s attention. Although prior studies have examined compatibility and localization issues, while explaining approaches to overcome acclimatization problems, we still know relatively little about local adaptation process. In cross-nation transfer, moving innovation from the original domain to the recipient side inevitably have to confront many constraints. How could firms develop solutions for local adaptation? This issue becomes the bottleneck for current research, as well as difficulties facing practical implementation. This study examines the transfer process of food products, services, and store types from Japan and the United States to Taiwan in franchise convenient stores, in order to understand the dynamics of local adaptation. Theoretically, this research highlights concepts relating to the translation within local adaptation and coherence of recontextualization. This elaborates that smooth recontextualization relies on cognitive conversion, and depends on synthesizing conflicting logics, so that innovation may be assimilated with the local memories. Practically, this study indicates that effective recontextualization requires the translation of nostalgia from the output side and recollects acquaintances in the local habitation. Therefore, converting local constraints should not be superficial responses, but should leverage the translation of local signals. This article points out that before innovation transfer, we need to change local cognition so that we may identify possible synthesis from conflicting situation. This entails a change from replication to hybridization mentality, and a shift from mimicry to transcendental mindset.
中文文獻
何明豐與林博文 (2015)，「移地邏輯：進入新興市場的商業模式演進」，中山管理評論，第23卷，第1期，頁91-135。(Ho, Ming-Feng, and Lin, Bou-Wen. 2015. The logic of relocation: The evolving business models for entering emerging markets. Sun, Yat-Sen Management Review, 23(1): 91-135.)
李貴惠、于卓民與司徒達賢，2009，多國公司執行區域策略對子公司的影響：貢獻型子公司組織角色的改變，管理評論，2卷28期：1-24。(Li, Guey-Huey, Yu, Chow-Ming, and Seetoo, Dah-Hsian. 2009. The impact of MNC regional strategies on subsidiaries: Changes in the role of contributing subsidiaries. Management Review, 2(28): 1-24.)
羅顯辰、許文靜、吳清炎與胡美智，2018，台灣中小企業進入新興市場之商業模式初探：以印尼為例，產業與管理論壇，20卷3期：56-77。( Lo, Hsien-Chen, Hsu, Wen-Ching, Wu, Ching-Yan, and Hu, Mei-Chih. 2018. Explore the business model for Taiwan’s SMEs in entering an emerging market: The case of Indonesia. Industry and Management Forum, 20(3): 56-77.)
蕭瑞麟，2016，《思考的脈絡：創新可能不擴散》，台北：天下文化學術叢書。
蕭瑞麟，2017，《不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡》，台北：五南學術原創系列。
蕭瑞麟、廖啟旭與陳蕙芬，2011，「越淮為枳：從實務觀點分析跨情境資訊科技移轉」， 資訊管理學報，第18卷，第2期，頁131-160。(Hsiao, Ruey-Lin, Liao, Raffael, and Chen, Hui-Fen. 2011. When oranges become sour: An analysis of organizing practice in cross-context technology adoption. Journal of Information Management, 18(2): 131-160.)
英文文獻
Abrahamson, E. 1991. Management fads and fashion: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16: 586-612.
Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. 2019. Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1): 96-121.
Aggerholm, H. K., Asmuß, B., & Thomsen, C. 2012. The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(4): 413-428.
Almandoz, J. 2014. Founding teams as carriers of competing logics: When institutional forces predict banks’ risk exposure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3): 442-473.
Ansari, S., Reinecke, J., & Spaan, A. 2014. How are practices made to vary? Managing practice adaptation in a multinational corporation. Organization Studies, 35(9): 1313-1341.
Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2010. Made to Fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35(1): 67-92.
Avgerou, C. 2001. The significance of context in information systems and organizational change. Information Systems Journal, 11: 43-63.
Bailey, M. 2016. Absorptive Capacity, international business knowledge transfer, and local adaptation: Establishing discount department stores in Australia: Absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer, and adaptation. Australian Economic History Review, 57.
Barab, S., & Luehmann, A. 2003. Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87: 454-467.
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. 2005. Understanding user response to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29(3): 493-526.
Berchtold, S., Pircher, R., & Stadler, C. 2010a. Global integration versus local adaptation: A case study of Austrian MNCs in Eastern Europe. European J. International Management, 4.
Berchtold, S., Pircher, R., & Stadler, C. J. E. J. o. I. M. 2010b. Global integration versus local adaptation: a case study of Austrian MNCs in Eastern Europe. 4(5): 524-549.
Bhagat, R. S., Kedia, B. L., Harveston, P. D., & Triandis, H. C. 2002. Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 204-221.
Boxenbaum, E., & Battilana, J. 2005. Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3(4): 355-383.
Brannen, M. Y. 2004. When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semantic fit, and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review, 29(4): 593-616.
Brannen, M. Y., Liker, J. K., & Fruin, W. M. 1998. Recontextualization and factory-to-factory knowledge transfer from Japan to the US: The Case of NSK. In J. K. Liker, W. M. Fruin, & P. S. Adler (Eds.), Remade in America: Transplanting and Transforming Japanese Management Systems: 117-153. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chesbrough, H. 2012. Open innovation: Where we've been and where we're going. Research-Technology Management, 55(4): 20-27.
Christianson, M. K. 2019. More and less effective updating: The role of trajectory management in making sense again. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1): 45-86.
Cox, J., & Mason, C. J. T. S. I. J. 2007. Standardisation versus adaptation: geographical pressures to deviate from franchise formats. 27(8): 1053-1072.
D’Adderio, L. 2014. The replication dilemma unravelled: How organizations enact multiple goals in routine transfer. Organization Science, 25(5): 1325-1350.
Dalpiaz, E., Rindova, V., & Ravasi, D. 2016. Combining logics to transform organizational agency: Blending industry and art at Alessi. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3): 347-392.
Di Stefano, G., King, A., & Verona, G. 2014. Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine. Strategic Management Journal.
Drew, S. 1997. From knowledge to action: The impact of benchmarking on organizational performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3): 427-441.
Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. 1991. Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 517-554.
Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 685-716.
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D'Adderio, L., & Lazaric, N. 2016. Beyond routines as things: Introduction to the special issue on routine dynamics. Organization Science, 27(3): 505-513.
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. 1994. Logics of identity, contradiction, and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review, 19(4): 756-785.
Frenkel, M. 2005. The politics of translation: How state-level political relations affect the cross-national travel of management ideas. Organization, 12(2): 275-301.
Frost, T. S., Birkinshaw, J. M., & Ensign, P. C. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11): 997-1018.
Galbraith, C. S. 1990. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high-technology firms. California Management Review, 32(4): 56-70.
Gertsen, M. C., & Zølner, M. 2012. Recontextualization of the Corporate Values of a Danish MNC in a Subsidiary in Bangalore. Group & Organization Management, 37(1): 101-132.
Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. 2005. From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5): 1031-1055.
Greenall, A. K., & Løfaldli, E. 2019. Translation and adaptation as recontextualization: The case of the Snowman. Adaptation, 12(3): 240-256.
Hsiao, R.-L., Wu, S. W., & Hou, S. T. 2008. Sensitive cabbies: Ongoing sense-making within technology structuring. Information and Organization, 18(4): 251–279.
Hutková, K. 2017. Transfer of European technologies and their adaptations: The case of the Bengal silk industry in the late-eighteenth century. Business History, 59(7): 1111-1135.
Javidan, M., Stahl, G. K., Brodbeck, F., & Wilderom, C. P. M. 2005. Cross-border transfer of knowledge: Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(2): 59-76.
Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. 2004. Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6): 508-523.
Johnson, G., Langley, A., Mein, L., & Whittington, R. 2007. Strategy-as-Practice: Research, Directions, and Resources. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
Kaufmann, P. J., & Eroglu, S. J. J. o. B. V. 1999. Standardization and adaptation in business format franchising. 14(1): 69-85.
Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. C. 2009. Institutionalisation framing and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among USA hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5): 897-918.
Kostova, T. 1999. Transformational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308-324.
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. 1999. Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. The Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 64-81.
Lam, A. 1997. Embedded firms, embedded knowledge: Problem of collaboration and knowledge transfer in global cooperative ventures. Organization Studies, 18(6): 973-996.
Landau, C., Karna, A., & Sailer, M. 2016. Business model adaptation for emerging markets: A case study of a German automobile manufacturer in India. R&D Management, 46(3): 480-503.
Lapping, C. 2007. Interpreting 'Resistance' Sociologically: A Reflection on the Recontextualization of Psychoanalytic Concepts into Sociological Analysis. Sociology, 41(4): 627-644.
Lawrence, T. B. 2017. High-stakes institutional translation: Establishing North America’s first government-sanctioned supervised injection site. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5): 1771-1800.
Leonard-Barton, D. 1988. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy., 17(5): 251-267.
Leung, F. F., Tse, C. H., & Yim, C. K. 2019. Engaging customer cocreation in new product development through foreign subsidiaries: Influences of multinational corporations’ global integration and local adaptation mechanisms. Journal of International Marketing, 28(2): 59-80.
Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. 1993a. Innovation Modification during Intraorganizational Adoption. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2): 322-354.
Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. 1993b. Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Management Review, 18(2): 322-354.
Lieberman, M. B., & Asaba, S. 2006. Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 366-385.
Lounsbury, M. 2006. Strategy as practice: an Activity-based approach. Organization Studies, 27(6): 906-909.
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 545–564.
Malhotra, N., Zietsma, C., Morris, T., & Smets, M. 2021. Handling resistance to change when societal and workplace logics conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(2): 475-520.
Markus, M. l. R. D. 1988. Information technology and organizational change: Causal structural in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5): 583-598.
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R., & Narula, R. 2011. Multinational enterprises and local contexts: The opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 235-252.
Morris, T., & Lancaster, Z. 2005. Translating management ideas. Organization Studies, 27(2): 207-233.
Morris, T., & Lancaster, Z. 2006. Translating management ideas. Organization studies, 27(2): 207-233.
Newell, S., Swan, J., & Galliers, R. D. 2000a. A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: The BPR example. Information Systems Journal, 10(3): 239-259.
Newell, S., Swan, J. A., & Galliers, R. D. 2000b. A knowledge-focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: the BPR example. Information Systems Journal, 10(3): 239-259.
O'Dell, A., & Grayson, C. J. 1998. If only we know what we know: Identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review, 40(3): 154-174.
Orlikowski, W. J. 1996. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1): 63–93.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 972-1001.
Peltokorpi, V., & Vaara, E. 2012. Language policies and practices in wholly owned foreign subsidiaries: A recontextualization perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(9): 808-833.
Pettigrew, A. 1987. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6): 649-670.
Pettigrew, A. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267-292.
Pettigrew, A. M. 1988. The Management of Strategic Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. 2006. Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense: Profiting from evidence-based management. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Purdy, J. M., & Gray, B. 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2): 355-380.
Ramus, T., Vaccaro, A., & Brusoni, S. 2017. Institutional complexity in tubulent times: Formalisation, collaboration and the emergence of blended logics. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4): 1253-1284.
Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Saka, A. 2004. The cross-national diffusion of work systems: Translation of Japanese operations in the UK. Organization studies, 25(2): 209-228.
Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. 2002. Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 222-247.
Sogner, K. 2009. Innovation as adaptation: The digital challenge in the Norwegian Fishing Industry, 1970-1985. Business History Review, 83(2): 349-367.
Stadler, C., Helfat, C., & Verona, G. 2021. Transferring knowledge by transferring individuals: Innovative technology usage and organisational performance in multi unit firms. Organization Science.
Strang, D., & Macy, M. 2001. In search of excellence: Fads, success Stories, and adaptive emulation. American Journal of Sociology.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1): 35-67.
Suddaby, R., & Royston, G. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1): 35-67.
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 27.
Szulanski, G., & Jensen, R. J. J. S. m. j. 2006. Presumptive adaptation and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 27(10): 937-957.
Thomas, P. 2003. The recontextualization of management: A discourse-based approach to analysing the development of management thinking. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4): 775-801.
Tracey, P., Dalpiaz, E., & Phillips, N. 2018. Fish out of water: Translation, legitimation, and new venture creation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5): 1627-1666.
Tyre, M., & Orlikowski, W. 1994. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organization Science, 5(1): 98-118.
Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. 2012. Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1): 285-336.
Värlander, S., Hinds, P., Thomason, B., Pearce, B. M., & Altman, H. 2015. Enacting a constellation of logics: How transferred practices are recontextualized in a global organization. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(1): 79-107.
Walsham, G. 1995. The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research, 6(4): 376–394.
Walsham, G., & Sahay, S. 1999. GIS for district-level administration in India: Problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly, 23(1): 39-66.
Westney, D. E., & Piekkari, R. 2020. Reversing the translation flow: Moving organizational practices from Japan to the U.S. Journal of Management Studies, 57(1): 57-86.
Williams, C. 2007a. Transfer in context: Replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9): 867-889.
Williams, C. 2007b. Transfer in context: replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9): 867-889.
Winter, S. G., Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. J. 2011. Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organization Science, 23(3): 672-685.
Yamauchi, Y., & Swanson, E. B. 2010. Local assimilation of an enterprise system: Situated learning by means of familiarity pockets. Information & Organization, 20(3/4): 187-206.
Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yu, J., & Zaheer, S. 2010. Building a process model of local adaptation of practices: A study of Six Sigma implementation in Korean and US firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3): 475-499.
Zbaracki, M. J. 1998. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3): 602-636.
Zilber, T. 2006. The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high-tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49: 281-303.
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 70-105.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：603（臺灣：603，外國：0） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68336934
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上