:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:社會與福利脈絡中的障礙研究與障礙政策發展
作者:賴俊帆
作者(外文):LAI, CHUN-FAN
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:社會福利研究所
指導教授:張世雄
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2023
主題關鍵詞:障礙研究福利社會個人主義正義倫理關懷倫理disability studieswelfarethe socialindividualismjustice ethicsethics of care
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:4
本研究主要立論,個人主義的軸線貫穿了障礙研究與倡議、正義理論,以及福利國家的福利政策。福利國家視「福利」為一種調節資本主義市場經濟的工具,因而在大幅經濟動盪後,從傳統凱恩斯政治經濟學,轉向貨幣學派經濟學。這表示,福利國家背離了「社會(the social)」,轉向個人主義。福利國家在經濟上採用資本積累的自由市場經濟制度,在政治上,福利國家的主政者以「新古典自由主義(neo liberalism)」意識形態意圖對社會進行去體現化的政治支配。新古典自由主義的私有化策略、解除管制、擴大民間部門參與、權力下放等一系列的政治改革,剛好搭配上從「社會為基礎的需要(social based needs)」轉向「權利為基礎的需要(rights-based needs)」,以及後來廣為障礙研究與倡議採用的「人權為基礎的需要(human rights based needs)」之福利概念變遷。在法政哲學中,正義與權利哲學隸屬個人主義陣營。因此,無論是與「福利」毫不相干的「正義」,又或者「權利」,都在福利國家變遷下,藉由新古典自由的個人主義手段,納入障礙研究與倡議對獨立和自主性追求的政策設計中。最後,作者提出「反個人主義」本體論的關懷倫理,對當今正義與權利論述當道的個人主義狀態,提供化解個人的「社會」位置和自我生命規劃之間緊張關係的另一倫理選擇選項。
The main argument of this research is that individualism runs through the study and advocacy of disabilities, theories of justice, and welfare policies of the welfare state. The welfare state views "welfare" as a tool to regulate capitalist market economies, which led to a shift from traditional Keynesian political economy to monetary economics after significant economic turbulence. This indicates that the welfare state has moved away from the "social" and embraced individualism. Economically, the welfare state adopts a free-market economic system based on capital accumulation, and politically, its leaders intend to politically dominate society through the ideology of "neoliberalism," aiming to de-embodiment. The political reforms of neoliberalism, such as privatization strategies, deregulation, increased involvement of the private sector, and decentralization, align with the transformation of the welfare concept from "social-based needs" to "rights-based needs," and later the widely adopted "human rights-based needs" in disability studies and advocacy.
In legal and philosophical terms, theories of justice and rights belong to the individualistic camp. Therefore, whether it is "justice," which is unrelated to "welfare," or "rights," they have been incorporated into disability research and advocacy through the individualistic means of neoliberalism in the welfare state transformation, emphasizing independence and autonomy in policy design. Finally, the author proposes a concern for ethics of "anti-individualism" ontology, offering an alternative ethical choice to address the tense relationship between an individual's "social" position and self-life planning amidst the prevailing individualism in contemporary discourses of justice and rights.
中文部分
人權公約施行監督聯盟(2017)人權公約施行監督聯盟CPRD官方網頁。https://covenantswatch.org.tw/ 【2018.07最後搜尋】
王育瑜(2012)照顧與社區生活。收於 王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(合編),障礙研究:理論與政策應用。高雄:巨流。203-238。
王育瑜、謝儒賢(2015)需求評估的假象,社會控制的事實:身心障礙鑑定評估新制的批判。社區發展季刊,150,123-133。
王國羽(2008)聯合國身心障礙者權利公約對我國的啟示。社區發展季刊。123,106-116。
王國羽(2010) Nagi之功能限制概念分析:國際健康、功能與身心障礙分類系統(ICF)評估概念與編碼。身心障礙研究,8(1):1-17。
王國羽(2012a)世界衛生組織分類系統與障礙測量議題。見王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪(合編),障礙研究:理論與政策應用。高雄:巨流。71-100。
王國羽(2012b)台灣推動ICF制度面臨的挑戰與問題。收錄於 李英琪 主編,更好的改變,還是更多的限制?: 國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統(ICF)概念與應用。台北:愛盲基金會。230-239。
王國羽(2013)缺角的台灣社會學研究:身心障礙研究。刊於巷仔口社會學,https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/06/06/wangguoyu/ 【2023.05最後搜尋】。
王國羽(2015)台灣障礙者的需求是什麼?從ICF談起。刊於巷仔口社會學,https://twstreetcorner.org/2015/01/23/wangguoyu-2/ 【2023.05最後搜尋】。
王國羽(2017a)The Disabled State:失能的治理與失控的政策:檢閱臺灣身心障礙政策。臺灣社會學通訊,87,5-10。
王國羽(2017b)聯合國身心障礙者權利公約第十二條對臺灣未來身心障礙者服務體制的影響。社區發展季刊,157:168-180。
王國羽(2019a)在社區中生活:體驗障礙。收於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪 編(2019)障礙研究與社會政策。高雄:巨流。v-viii。
王國羽(2019b)障礙模型發展與核心概念。收於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪 編,障礙研究與社會政策。高雄:巨流。頁53-84。
王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪 編(2012)障礙研究:理論與政策應用。高雄:巨流。
王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪 編(2019)障礙研究與社會政策。高雄:巨流。
王順民、陳麗芬、賴俊帆(2016)105年桃園市身心障礙者福利與服務需求評估結果分析委託研究報告。桃園:桃園市政府。
王增勇(2009)解嚴後臺灣福利運動建制化的過程。臺灣社會研究季刊。74,407-417。
吳秀瑾(2005)依靠與平等:論Kittay 愛的勞動。女學學誌,19:157-183。
吳秀瑾(2006)關懷倫理的道德蘊含。國立政治大學哲學學報,16:107-162。
吳秀瑾(2009)德沃金機運平等觀評論:女性主義批評。政治與社會哲學評論,28:89-138。
吳秀瑾(2022)魯迅與關懷倫理學十六堂課。台北:致出版。
李淑貞、陳政智(2014)我國身心障礙者福利與服務需求評估指標、工具、流程與實務操作模式之驗證修正。台北:衛生福利部社會及家庭署。
李碧涵(2005)福利國家向右走:工作福利國家的創新性改革。論文發表於《臺灣社會福利學會年會暨「社會暨健康政策的變動與創新趨勢:邁向多元、整合的福利體制」國際學術研討會》,台灣社會福利學會、高雄醫學大學醫學社會工作學系、中正大學社會福利學系主辦,高雄:高雄醫學大學,2005.05.06-07。
周月清、朱貽莊(2011)檢視臺灣身心障礙福利政策與法案之歷史進程與變革。論文發表於財團法人中華文化社會福利事業基金會(主辦),《社會福利模式-從傳承到創新:2011年兩岸社會福利學術研討會》(4月15-19日)。舉辦地點:北京中國社會科學院社科會堂。
周宇翔、李淑貞、謝東儒、張聿淳(2015)ICF架構下的身心障礙者需求評估制度現況與挑戰。社區發展季刊,150,40-57。
周怡君(2017)制度化障礙者的生活樣貌:福利國家與身心障礙者政策。臺灣社會學通訊,87,52-57。
林萬億(2012)臺灣的社會福利:歷史與制度的分析。臺北:五南。
邱大昕(2011)誰是身心障礙者:從身心障礙鑑定的演變看「國際健康功能與身心障礙分類系統」(ICF)的實施。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(2):187-213。
邱大昕(2013)誰來為獅子寫歷史?身心障礙者故事的社會學分析。刊於巷仔口社會學,https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/09/02/chiutahsin/ 【2023.05最後搜尋】。
邱大昕、陳美智(2015)身心障礙醫療化的在地經驗與反思。科技、醫療與社會,21,135-158。
姚奮志(2016)身心障礙者個案管理及生涯轉銜服務 現況分析檢討與發展。臺灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,6(1),77-138。
洪惠芬、王國羽(2019)障礙理論與政策:分配政治與公民身分。收於王國羽、林昭吟、張恆豪 編,障礙研究與社會政策。台北:巨流。27-54。
張世雄(1996)社會福利的理念與社會安全制度。台北:唐山。
張世雄(2008)【書評】身心障礙研究、社會建構與生命歷程政策。台灣社會福利學刊,6(2):203-212。
張世雄(2013)大社會和大政府的福利爭論—道德煙火秀、財政煙霧彈和英國柴契爾主義的遺緒。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,3(1):127-136.
張恆豪(2013)我們還在為上公車抗爭:制度歧視與障礙者文化資訊權。刊於巷仔口社會學,https://twstreetcorner.org/2013/11/28/changhenghao/ 【2023.05最後搜尋】。
張恆豪、顏詩耕(2011)從慈善邁向權利:臺灣身心障礙福利的發展與挑戰。社區發展季刊,113,402-416。
張恆豪、蘇峰山(2009)【書評】:Disability Rights and Wrongs。台灣社會福利學刊,7(2):191-205。
莊舒涵(2021)當被罵成為日常──A級社區整合型服務中心個案管理員之建制民族誌分析。國立政治大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
郭惠瑜、就采榆、余秀芷、游鯉綺、黃雅雯、許朝富(2023)以愛之名的錯待?我們需要更具障礙平權意識的音樂祭。報導者,https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-music-festival-equal-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities 【2023.06最後搜尋】
彭于徵(2014)身心障礙鑑定及需求評估新制上路兩年之回顧。網址:http://personnelold.e-land.gov.tw/personnel/OrganizeLearn/file/km/20150317153559_f3.docx 【2023.05最後搜尋】。
彭均媛、趙永茂(2017)政府與非營利組織之互動關係:以台北市社會福利服務為例。見趙永茂、韓保中(編著),臺灣的民主生機:治理能力、政策網絡與社區參與。台北:國立臺灣大學出版中心。313-344。
鈕文英(2012)國際健康功能與身心障礙分類的發展及對障礙鑑定和服務提供的意涵。南屏特殊教育,3:1-22。
臺灣障礙研究學會(2023)2023臺灣障礙研究學會年會-障礙正義與政治:過去與未來宣傳網站 https://reurl.cc/7kMpqb 【2023.05最後搜尋】。
劉宏鈺、吳明儒、林淑容、許秝語(2022)鄉鎮型時間銀行多元培力實踐經驗之初步分析。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,12(2):1-43.
劉莘譯(2003)Will Kymlica原著 當代政治哲學導論。台北:聯經出版。
蔡依倫(2010)從非營利到社會企業?臺灣非營利身心障礙組織場域制度變遷之研究。國立中山大學企業管理學系博士論文。
蔡依倫、高明瑞(2013)制度變遷與組織型態創設:身心障礙者社會企業的浮現歷程研究。中山管理評論,21(2),339-368。
謝世民(2017)全民基本收入與正義。思想,34:147-158。

外文部分
Abberley, P. (1987) The Concept of Oppression and the Development of a Social Theory of Disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 2(1): 5-20.
Abrams, T. (2016) Heidegger and the Politics of Disablement. NY: Springer.
Abrams, T. (2020) Disability at the Limits of Phenomenology. Journal of Critical Phenomenology, 3(2): 15-18.
Abreu, L. (2022) The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: UK implementation. London: House of Commons Library.
Adorno, T. (1976) Sociology and Empirical Research. In Adorno, W. Theodor Ed. The Positivist Dispute in Germany Sociology. London: Harper Torchbooks. Pp. 68-86. (Trans. By G. Adey and D. Frisby)
Altman, B. M. (2001) Definitions, Models, Classifications, Schemes, and Applications. In Gary L. Albrecht and Katherine Seelman and Michael Bury Eds. Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, U.S.A.: Sage Publications. Pp. 97-122.
Areheart, B. A. (2011) Disability Trouble. Yale Law and Policy Review, 29(2): 347-388.
Arneson, R. (2006) Rawls, Responsibility, and Distributive Justice. In Marc Fleurbaey, and Maurice Salles , John A. Weymark, Eds. Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 80-107.
Atkinson, A. B. (1999) The Economic Consequences of Rolling Back the Welfare State. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Baert, P. (2005) Philosophy of the Social Science: Towards pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Barnartt, S. N. (2017) Introduction: An Historical Overview of Sociology Looking at Gisability: What Did We Know and When Did We Know It? In S. Green and S. N. Barnartt Eds. Sociology Looking at Disability: What Did we Know and When Did we Know it? Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Pp. xv-xxxiii.
Barnes, C. (2012) Understanding the Social Model of Disability: Past, Present and Future. In Watson, N., A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas Eds. Routledge Handbooks of Disability Studies. London and NY: Routledge. Pp. 12-29.
Barry, N. (1990) Welfare. Bristol: Open University Press.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Beck, U., Giddens, A. and S. Lash (1994) Reflexive Modernization. London: Polity Press.
Beitz, C. (2009) The Idea of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bernstein, R. J. (1985) Dewey, democracy: The task ahead of us. In Rajchman, J., and West, C.(eds.), Post-analytic Philosophy. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1989) Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.
Bhaskar, R. and B. Danermark (2006) Metatheory, Interdisciplinarity and Disability Research: A Critical Realist Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 8(4): 278-297.
Bickenbach, J. E., Chatterji, S., Badley, E. M., and T. B. Üstün (1999) Models of Disablement, Universalism and the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Social Science & Medicine, 48: 1173-1187.
Block, F. (1977) The Ruling Class Does Not Rule: Notes on the Marxist Theory of the State. In Richard Quinney, ed., 1979. Capitalist Society.
Block, F. (2001). Introduction to The Great Transformation. In K. Polanyi, The Great Transformation: the Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (xviii-xxxviii). Boston: Beacon Press.
Blyth, M. (2004) The great transformation in understanding Polanyi: Reply to Hejeebu and McCloskey. Critical Review, 16, 117-133.
Boyer, R. (1990). The Regulation School: A Critical Introduction. New York: Columbia University Press.
Boyer, R. (1991). Justice sociale et performance économique. in Couverture Orange Centre d'Etudes Prospectives d'Economie Mathematique Appliquees a la Planification. Paris: CEPREMAP.
Boyer, R. (2002) Is There A Welfare State Crisis. Geneva: ILO.
Brandom, R. (1989). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Zürich and New York: George Olms,
Bubeck, D. (1995) Care, Gender and Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press,
Calder, G. (2010) Pragmatism, critical theory and democratic. Ethics & Politics, 12(1): 52−67.
Caspersen, C. J., Powell, K. E. and G. M. Christenson (1985) Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep, 100(2): 126-131.
Chang, H.-J. (2001). Breaking the Mould. An Institutionalist Political economy Alternative to the neoliberal Theory of the Market and the State. UNRISD Programme Paper 6. NY: UNRISD.
Coburn, D. and Coburn, E.S. (2007) Health and Health Inequalities in a Neo-Liberal Global World. In D. McIntyre and G. Mooney (eds) The Economics of Health Equity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–35.
Collini, S. (1975) Idealism and 'Cambridge Idealism'. The Historical Journal, 18(1) 171-177.
Collini, S. (1979) Liberalism and Sociology, L.T. Hobhouse and Political Argument in England 1880–1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corker, M. and T. Shakespeare (2002) Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. London: Continuum.
Danermark, B. and L. C. Gellerstedt (2004) Social Justice: Redistribution and Recognition: a Non-reductionist Perspective on Disability. Disability & Society, 19(4): 339-353.
Danforth, S. (2001) A Pragmatic Evaluation of Three Models of Disability. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 13(4): 343-359.
Daniels, N. (2002) Justice and Long-Term Care: Need We Abandon Social Contract Theory?: A Reply to Nussbaum. In WHO ed. Ethical Choices in Long-term Care: What Does Justice Require? Geneva: WHO. Pp.67-75.
Daniels, N. (2008) Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Davis, Lennard J. (2002) Bending over Backwards: Disability, Dismodernism & Other Difficult Positions. NY: New York University Press.
Dean, E. K. Eds. (2000) Social Policy and the Body: Transitions in Corporeal Discourse. London: Palgrave MacMillan
Dean, H. (2002) Welfare rights and social policy. London: Pearson Education / Prentice Hall.
Derksen, A. A. (1980) The Failure of Comprehensively Critical Rationalism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 10(1), 51–66.
Devlin, R. and D. Pothier (2006) Critical Disability Theory: Essays in Philosophy, Politics, Policy, and Law. NY: UBC Press - University of British Columbia.
Dewey, J. (1930). Individualism, Old and New. NY: Minton, Balch and Company.
Drake, R. F. (1999) Understanding Disability Policies. London: Macmillan.
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. NY: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2011) Justice for Hedgehogs. Harvard: Harvard University Press
Elder-Vass, D. (2010) The Causal Power of Social Structures: Emergence, Structure and Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engster, D. (2007) The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. NY: Oxford University Press
Engster, D. (2015) Justice, Care and the Welfare State. NY: Oxford University Press
Erni, J.N. (2009) Human Rights in the Neo-Liberal Imagination. Cultural Studies, 23(3): 417-436.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985) Politics against Market: The Social Democratic Road to Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Esping-Andersen, G. (1989/1990) The three World of Welfare Capitalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009) The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press
EU Commission (2012) Long-term care: need, use and expenditure in the EU-27. Brussels: Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs , European Commission.
European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], 6(1), https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/517 【2023.05最後搜尋】
Fallon-Kund, M. and J. Bickenbach (2016) New Legal Capacity Laws and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. European Journal of Health Law, 24(3): 285-310.
Farmer, F. (2013) After the Public Turn: Composition, Counterpublics, and the Citizen Bricoleur. Utah: Utah State University Press.
Fealy, T. (2008). Heidegger, Dasein and disability: Rethinking what it means to be human Retrieved March 9, 2008 from http://www.assid.org.au/Portals/0/Conferences/42nd%20Fremantle/Fealy%20(Heidegger%20Dasein%20and%20disability).pdf. 【2023.04最後搜尋】
Feinstein, C. Eds. (1997) The Economic Development of the United Kingdom Since 1870. London: Oxford University Press.
Fineman, M.(1995)The Neutered Mother, The Sexual Family: And Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. NY: Routledge.
Finkelstein, V. (1980) Attitudes and Disabled People. NY: WRF.
Floud, R. and D. McCloskey Eds. (1994) The Economic History of Britain since 1700. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Fowler, C. A. and J. S. Wadsworth (1991) Individualism and equality: Critical values in North American culture and the impact on disability. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22(4), 19–23.
Fraser, N. (1996) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the "Postsocialist" Condition. NY: Routledge.
Fraser, N. and L. Gordon (2002) A Genealogy of Dependency: Tracing a Keyword of the US Welfare State. In Eva F. Kittay and Ellen K. Feder Eds. The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency. Boston, NY: Roman & Littlefield Publishers.
Gabel, S. and S. Peters (2004) Presage of Paradigm Shift? Beyond the Social Model of Disability toward Resistance Theories of Disability. Disability & Society, 19(6): 587-600.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1982) Class division, class conflict and citizenship rights" in A. Giddens, Profiles & Citizens in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
Gill, M. and C. J. Schlund-Vials Eds. (2014) Disability, Human Rights and the Limits of Humanitarianism. Dorchester: Ashgate.
Gilleard, C. and P. Higgs (2016) Connecting Life Span Development with the Sociology of the Life Course: A New Direction. Sociology, 50(2): 301–315.
Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Goodley D., B. Hughes, and L. Davis (2012) Introducing Disability and Social Theory. In Goodley D., B. Hughes, and L. Davis Eds. Disability and Social Theory. Basingstoke and NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 1-16.
Goodley D., B. Hughes, and L. Davis Eds. (2012) Disability and Social Theory. Basingstoke and NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goodley, D. (2011) Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
Gottfried, P. E. (1999) After Liberalism: Mass Democracy in the Managerial State. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Graeber, D. (2014) On the moral grounds of economic relations: A Maussian approach. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(1): 65-77.
Green, S. and S. Barnartt Eds. (2016) Sociology Looking at Disability: What Did We Know and When Did We Know It. NY: Emerald Insight.
Griffin, J. (2008) On Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grue, J. (2009) Critical discourse analysis, topoi and mystification: Disability policy documents from a Norwegian NGO. Discourse Studies, 11(3): 285–308.
Grue, J. (2015) The Problem of the Supercrip: Representation and Misrepresentation of Disability. In T. Shakespeare Ed. Disability Research Today: International Perspective. London and NY: Routledge. Pp. 204-218.
Grue, J. (2016) The Social Meaning of Disability: A Reflection on Categorisation, Stigma and Identity. Sociology of Health & Illness, 38(6): 957-964.
Gustavsson, A. (2001) The Role of Theory in Disability Research: Springboard or Strait-jacket? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1): 55-70.
Hahn, H. (1987) Advertising the acceptably employable image: Disability and capitalism. Policy Stud. J. 15(3): 551–570.
Hampton, J. (1993) Feminist Contractarianism. Louise M.Antony, C. Witt eds. A Mind of One’s Own. Oxford:Westview Press. 227-256.
Hartley, C. (2018) Contractualism, Disability, and Inclusion. In David T. Wasserman and Adam Cureton Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Disability [Online] 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190622879.013.18 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Harvey, D. (1982) The limits to capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. NY: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, F. (1974) The Pretence of Knowledge. https://fee.org/resources/the-pretense-of-knowledge/ 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Held, V. (2006) The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. NY: Oxford University Press.
Hemerijck, Anton and Vandenbroucke, Frank (2012) Social Investment and the Euro Crisis: The Necessity of a Unifying Social Policy Concept. Intereconomics, 47 (4), 200-206.
Hickel, Jason (2012) A short history of Neoliberalism (and how we can fix it). New Left Project.
Hirvonen, H. (2014) Habitus and Care: Investigating Welfare Service Workers’ Agency. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä(Dissertation of Education, Psychology and Social Research)
Honneth, A.(1992). Integrity and disrespect: principles of a concept of morality based on the theory of recognition. Political Theory, 20(2), 187-201.
Horwitz, S. and M. J. McPhillips (2013) The Reality of the Wartime Economy: More Historical Evidence on Whether World War II Ended the Great Depression. The Independent Review, 17(3): 325-347.
Hughes, B. and K. Paterson (1997) The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment. Disability & Society, 12(3), 325-340.
Hughes, B., D. Goodley and L. Davis (2012) Conclusion: Disability and Social Theory. In Goodley D., B. Hughes, and L. Davis Eds. Disability and Social Theory. Basingstoke and NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 308-317.
Hyejin, K. (2017) How Does a Welfare State achieves Fiscal Sustainability? A Study of the Impact of Tax Equity. In Iwin-Garzyńska, J. Ed. Taxes and Taxation Trends. [Online] https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/58324v 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Jacobs, L. A. (1993) Rights and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Jenkins, S. (2007) Thatcher's Legacy. Political Studies Review, 5: 161-171.
Jessop, Bob (2006) Spatial Fixes, Temporal Fixes and Spatio- Temporal Fixes. In David Harvey: A Critical Reader. Antipode Book Series. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 142-166.
Johnston, M. (2023) Economic Conditions That Helped Cause World War II. Investopedia [Online] https://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/022516/economic-conditions-helped-cause-world-war-ii.asp 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Kalb, D., M. van der Land, R. Staring, B. van Steenberger, and N. Wilterdink Eds (2009) The Ends of Globalization: Bringing Society Back In. NY: Roman & Littlefield Publishers.
Kant, I. (1996) The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by M. Gregor, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kemp, P. and C. Glendinning (2006) Introduction. In C. Glendinning and P. Kemp Eds. Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State. Bristol: Policy Press.
Keynes, J. (1923) A Tract on Monetary Reform. London: Macmillan.
Keynes, J. M. (2012) The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Online] https://www.cambridge.org/core/series/collected-writings-of-john-maynard-keynes/76BAC759DE69633B2FE5A471646FE40E 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Kittay, E. F. (1999) Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. New York: Routledge.
Kittay, E. F. (2011) The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability. Ratio Juris, 24(1): 49-58.
Kittay, E. F. (2015) Centering Justice on Dependency and Recovering Freedom. Hypatia, 30(1): 285-291.
Kuhlmann, E. (2006) Traces of Doubt and Sources of Trust: Health Professions in an Uncertain Society. Current Sociology, 54 (4), 607-620.
Larkin, P. (2014) The New Puritanism Resurgence of Contractarian Citizenship in Common Law Welfare States. Journal of Law and Society, 41(2): 227-256
Legg, Catherine and Christopher Hookway (2021) Pragmatism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism/ 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Liachowitz, C. (1988) Disability as a Social Construct. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Linton, S. (1998) Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. NY: New York University Press.
Linton, S., Mello, S., and O’Neill, J. (1995) Disability studies: Expanding the parameters of diversity. Radical Teacher, 47: 4–10.
Lister, A. (2013) The “Mirage” of Social Justice: Hayek Against (and For) Rawls. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 25 (3-4): 409-444
Maddalena, G. (2015) The three waves of Italian reception of Peirce. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, 1/VI: 9-14.
Maddalena, G. (2020) Rorty as a legitimate member of the pragmatist family. European Journal of Pragmatismand American Philosophy, XII-1: 1-11.
Maddalena, G. Frega, R. and R. Bernstein (2014) Interview with Richard J. Bernstein. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy [Online], VI-1, https://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/517 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Maffettone, S. (2011) Sen’s Idea of Justice versus Rawls’ Theory of Justice. Indian Journal of Human Development, 5(1): 121-132.
Mallon, Ron (2014) Naturalistic Approaches to Social Construction. In Edward N. Zalta Ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/social-construction-naturalistic/.【2023.06最後搜尋】
Marshall, T. H. (1973) Class, citizenship and social development. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Martin, L. L. (1997) Jeremy Bentham: utilitarianism, public policy and the administrative state. Journal of Management History, 3(3): 272-282.
Martins, N. (2019). Human Development: Which Way Now. New Political Economy, 25(3): 404-418.
Mayer, K. U. (2004 a). Life Courses and Life Chances in a Comparative Perspective. Retrieved 05-07-2018, from: https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwih6qb_6MDQAhXJmJQKHS98DEYQFggdMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.470.5799%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&usg=AFQjCNELhvpG6a62nbvaXXZpf_z9etmjcA&sig2=zAO6wyfWYuq-FovHtfYboQ .
Mayer, K. U. (2004 b). Whose Lives? How History, Societies, and Institutions Define and Shape Life Courses. Research in Human Development, 1(3), 161-187.
Mills, C. W. (1959) Sociological Imagination. NY: Oxford University Press.
Milonakis, D. and B. Fine (2009) From Political Economy to Economics Method, the social and the historical in the evolution of economic theory. London: Routledge.
Mishra, R. (1984) The Welfare State in Crisis. Social Thought and Social Change. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
Mitchell, D. T. and S. L. Snyder (2015) The Biopolitics of Disability: Neoliberalism, Ablenationalism, and Peripheral Embodiment. Ann Abbor: University of Michigan Press.
Moore DP, Moore JW, and J. L. Moore (2007) After fifteen years: the response of small businesses to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Work, 29(2): 113-126.
Morris, J. (1991) Pride Against Prejudice. London: Women’s Press.
Morsink, L. (2009) Inherent Human Rights: Philosophical Roots of the Universal Declaration, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Murray, C. (1984) ave the Poor Been "Losing Ground"? Political Science Quarterly, 100(3): 427-445.
Nadash, P. (1998) Creating a balance among home care, the disability community, regulators, and payors. Caring, 17(7): 20-25.
Neufeld, D. (2021) Long waves: How innovation cycles influence growth. World Economic Forum [Online] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/this-is-a-visualization-of-the-history-of-innovation-cycles/ 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Newman, J. (2007). Rethinking ‘The Public’ in Troubled Times. Public Policy and Administration, 22(1), 27-47.
Newman, J. and J. Clarke (1997). The Managerial State: power, politics and ideology in the remaking of social welfare. London: Sage.
Newman, J. and J. Clarke (2009). Publics, Politics and Power : Remaking the Public in Public Services. London: Sage.
Newman, J. and J. Clarke (2016). Managerialism and the continuing project of state reform. Retrieved 05-07-2018, from: https://people.unipi.it/matteo_villa/wp-content/uploads/sites/366/2017/05/Clarke-Newman-2013-Managerialism-State-Reform.pdf . 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Nickel, J. (2019) Human Rights. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/rights-human/【2023.06最後搜尋】
Noddings, N. (1984) Caring: a Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (1992) The challenge to care in schools –an alternative approach to education. New York & London: Teachers College Press.
Noddings, N. (2010) The Maternal Factor: Two Paths to Morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Noddings, N. (2015) Philosophy of Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1999) Disabled Lives: Who Cares? The New York Review of Books.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2002) Long-Term Care and Social Justice: A Challenge to Conventional Ideas of the Social Contract. In WHO ed. Ethical Choices in Long-term Care: What Does Justice Require? Geneva: WHO. Pp.31-65.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2004) Beyond the Social Contract: Capabilities and Global Justice. Oxford Development Studies, 32(1): 3-18.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Oliver, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. NY: St. Martin’s Press.
Oliver, M. and C. Barnes (2012) The New Politics of Disablement. NY: Macmillan.
Owen, R., Sarah, K., and P. Harris (2012) No Rights without Responsibilities Disability Rights and Neoliberal Reform under New Labour. Disability Studies Quarterly [Online], 32(3), https://dsq-sds.org/index.php/dsq/article/view/3283/3110 【2023.05最後搜尋】
Paiva-Silva, J. (2020) Pragmatism as a pillar of the New Developmentalism. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 40(2): 376-397.
Perkins, D. H. (2013) East Asian Development. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Pettersen, T. (2011) The Ethics of Care: Normative Structures and Empirical Implications. Health Care Anal, 19: 51–64.
Piketty, T. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
Priest, S. (2007) The British Empiricists. London and NY: Routledge.
Priestley, M. (1998) Constructions and Creations: Idealism, Materialism and Disability Theory. Disability & Society, 13(1): 75-94.
Priestley, M. (2003) Disability: A Life Course Approach. Cambridge: Polity.
Putnam, H. (2004) Ethics without Ontology. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Quinn, G, and T. Degener (2002) The current use and future potential of United Nations human rights instruments in the context of disability. NY and Geneva: United Nations.
Rahkola, J. (2011) Markets: Source of Efficiency or Costs? An Analysis on the Production of Public Services. In Finland. In V. Sorsa (Ed.) Rethinking Social Risk in the Nordics. Pp: 91-110.
Ralston, D. C. and J. Ho (2010) Introduction: Philosophical Reflections on Disability. In Ralston, D. C. and J. Ho Eds. Philosophical Reflections on Disability. NY: Springer. Pp. 1-18.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. NY: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999) A Theory of Justice. (Revised) Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reinders, H. S. (2000) The Future of the Disabled in Liberal Society: An Ethical Analysis. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Robertson, T. and P. Atkins (2016) Essential vs. Accidental Properties. In Edward N. Zalta Ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/essential-accidental/.【2023.05最後搜尋】
Rodrigues, R., Huber, M., and G. Lamura (2012) Facts and Figures on Healthy Ageing and Long-term Care. Berggasse: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research.
Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press, J.
Rorty, R. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1998) Truth and Progress. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Roth, R. J. (1993) British Empiricism and American Pragmatism. NY: Fordham University Press
Roulstone, A. and S. Prideaux (2012) Understanding Disability Policy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Ryan, A. (1984) Property and Political Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Ryan, A. (2003) The Critique of Individualism', in Jack Hayward, Brian Barry, and Archie Brown Eds., The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century. London: Oxford University Press. Pp.89-116.
Samaha, A. M. (2007) What Good Is the Social Model of Disability? The University of Chicago Law Review, 74(4): 1251-1308.
Sayer, A. (2010) Method in Social Science (Revised 2nd Edition). London: Routledge.
Sen, A. (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2009) The Idea of Justice. London: Penguin Books.
Shakespeare, T. (2010) The Social Model of Disability. In Davis, Lennard J., ed. The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd. London: Routledge. Pp. 266-273.
Shakespeare, T. (2015) Introduction. In T. Shakespeare Ed. Disability Research Today: International Perspective. London and NY: Routledge. Pp.1-6.
Shakespeare, T. W. (2006a) Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. W. (2006b) Social Model. In Davis, Lennard J., ed. The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd. London: Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. W. (2013) Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. London: Routledge.
Shakespeare, T. W. (2018) Disability: the Basics. London: Routledge.
Sheldon, A., Traustadóttir, R., Beresford, P., Boxall, K., and M. Oliver (2007) Review Symposium: Disability Rights and Wrongs? Disability & Society, 22(2): 209-234..
Shepherd, S.(2017). Managerialism: An Ideal Type. Studies in Higher Education, 2017, 1-11.
Sherry, M. (2014) The Promise of Human Rights for Disabled People and the Reality of Neoloberalism. In Gill, M. and C. J. Schlund-Vials Eds. Disability, Human Rights and the Limits of Humanitarianism. Dorchester: Ashgate. Pp. 15-26.
Shildrick, M. (2012) Critical disability studies; rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In Watson, N., A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas Eds. Routledge Handbooks of Disability Studies. London and NY: Routledge. Pp. 30-41.
Silvers, A. (1998). Formal Justice. In A. Silvers, D. Wasserman, M. B. Mahowald eds. Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Lonahm, Boulder, New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. pp. 13-145.
Silvers, A. (2010) An Essay on Modeling: The Social Model of Disability. In Ralston, D. C. and J. Ho Eds. Philosophical Reflections on Disability. NY: Springer. Pp. 19-36.
Skocpol, T. (1985) Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysisi in Current Research. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol Eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Pp. 3-43.
Slote, M. (2007) The ethics of care and empathy. London: Routledge.
Smith, S. R. (2005) Equality, Identity and the Disability Rights Movement: from Policy to Practice and from Kant to Nietzsche in more than One uneasy Move. Critical Social Policy, 25(4): 554-576.
Smith, S. R. (2009) Social justice and Disability: Competing Interpretations of the Medical and Social models. In Kristiansen, K., Vehmas, S., and T. Shakespeare Eds. Arguing about Disability. London and NY: Routledge. Pp. 15-29.
Söder, M. (2009) Tensions, Perspectives and Themes in Disability Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 11(2): 67-81.
Sontag, S. (2003) Regarding the Pain of Others. NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Stone, D. (1984) The Disable State. London and Hampshire: Macmillan.
Streeck, W. and K. Thelen (2005) Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In W. Streeck and K. Thelen eds. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. pp. 1-39. NY: Oxford University Press.
Streeck, W. and K. Thelen Eds. (2006) Beyond Continuity-Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economy. NY: Oxford University Press.
Svallfors, S. and Taylor-Gooby, P. Eds. (1999) The End of the Welfare State? London: Routledge.
Swain, J. and S. French (2000) Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability & Society, 15(4), 569–582.
Swedberg, R. (2014) From Theory to Theorizing. In R. Swedberg Ed. Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Pp. 1-28.
August. Testa, I. and R. Brandom (2003) Hegelian Pragmatism and Social Emancipation. Constellations, 10(4): 554-570.
Thelen, K. (2014) Varieties of Liberalization: The New Politics of Social Solidarity. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, C. (2007) Sociologies of Disability and Illness: Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Thomson, R. G. (1995) Integrating disability studies in the existing curriculum: The example of ‘Women and Literature’ at Howard University. Radical Teacher, 47: 15–21.
Tremain, S. (1996) Dworkin on Disablement and Resources. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 9(2), 343-359.
Tremain, S. (2002). On the Subject of Impairment. In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory, edited by M. Corker and T. Shakespeare, pp. 32–47. London: Continuum.
Tremain, S. (2005) “Foucault, governmentality and critical disability theory: an introduction,” in S. Tremain Ed. Foucault and the Government of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Tremain, S. (2006) On the Government of Disability. In Davis, Lennard J., ed. The Disability Studies Reader, 2nd. London: Routledge. Pp. 185-196.
Tremain, S. (2012)【Book Review】The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Philosophical Reflections. By Licia, Carlson. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009. Racism and Sexual Oppression in Anglo-America: A Genealogy. By Ladelle, McWhorter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2009. Hypatia, 27(2): 440-445.
Tronto, J. (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. NY: NYU Press.
Tronto, J. C. (1993) Moral boundaries: apolitical argument for an ethic of care. N. Y. & London: Routledge.
Turner, B.S. (2009) The Sociology of the Body. In Bryan S. Turner, ed. The new Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. Pp. 513-532.
Twigg, J. (2000) Care Work as a Form of Bodywork. Ageing and Society, 20(4): 389– 411.
Twigg, J. (2002) The Body in Social Policy: Mapping a Territory. Journal of Society and Politics, 31(3): 421-439.
UPIAS (1976) Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
van Parijs, P and Y. Vanderborght (2017) Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Vehmas, S. and P. Mäkelä (2008) A Realist Account on the Ontology of Impairment. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34: 93-95.
Vehmas, S., Kristiansen, K., and T. Shakespeare (2009) Introduction: the Unavoidable Alliance of Disability Studies and Philosophy. In Kristiansen, K., Vehmas, S., and T. Shakespeare Eds. Arguing about Disability. London and NY: Routledge. Pp. 1-12.
Verbrugge, L. M. and J. M. Jette (1994) The Disability Process. Social Science & Medicine, 38: 1-14.
Waldron, J. (1988) The Right to Private Property . Oxford , GB: Clarendon Press.
Wasserman, D. (1998) Distributive Justice. In Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, Mary B. Mahowald & Lawrence C. Becker Eds. Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Lonahm, Boulder, New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers. pp. 147-207.
Wasserman, D. and S. Aas, (2022) Disability: Definitions and Models. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/disability/ 【2023.05最後搜尋】
Wasserman, David; Asch, Adrienne; Blustein, Jeffrey; Putnam, Daniel (2019) Disability: Definitions, Models, Experience. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/disability/ 【2023.06最後搜尋】
Weber, E. (2003) Bringing Society Back In: Grassroots Ecosystem Management, Accountability, and Sustainable Communities. London: The MIT Press.
Wells, T from IEP (The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy) (2016) Sen’s Capability Approach. http://www.iep.utm.edu/ 【20160502】
West, C. (1993) Keeping Faith: Philosophy and Race in America. NY: Routledge.
WHO (2002) Ethical Choices in Long-term Care: What does Justice Require? Geneva: WHO.
Williams, S. J. (1999) Is Anybody There? Critical Realism, Chronic Illness and the Disability Debate. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(6): 797-819.
Woods, A. (1991) Does Hegel Have an Ethics? The Monist, 74 (3): 358-385
World Bank (2010) Long-Term Care Policies for Older Populations in New EU Member States and Croatia: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Zola, I. K. (1989) Toward the Necessary Universalizing of a Disability Policy. Milbank Quarterly, 83(4): 401-428.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE