參考文獻
中文部分
王思如（2003）。快速人種誌研究方法應用於產品開發之使用需求研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學應用藝術所，新竹市。
但昭偉（2004）。最低限度的道德要求。現代教育論壇，11，236-240。
何雅娟（2008）。混成式與數位式互動視訊學習成效比較之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系，臺北市。
吳芝儀、廖梅花（2001）。質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法。濤石。
吳剛、洪建中（2012）。一種新的學習隱喻：擴展性學習的研究—基於“文化-歷史”活動理論的視角。遠程教育雜誌，3，23-30。
吳清山、林天祐（2010）。教育e辭書（二版）。高等教育文化事業有限公司。
周淑卿、王郁雯（2019）。從課程統整到跨領域課程：台灣二十年的論述與問題。教育學報 ，47（2），4 -59。
林永豐（2017）。核心素養的課程教學轉化與設計。教育研究月刊，275，4-17。
林志宜（2009）。建構小五學生Google地球地圖學習情境：以活動理論為架構之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班，臺北市。
林佩璇（2002）。行動研究在課程發展中的理念與實踐。課程與教學季刊，5（2），81-96
林佩璇（2019）。教學活化，活化教學：文化歷史活動理論觀。課程與教學季刊，22（1），17-37。
林佩璇、高翠鴻、許燕萍（2016）。差異化教學的矛盾與轉化：活動理論觀。中等教育，67（4），7-20。
林佳慧（2020）。國中自主學習校訂課程之實踐。中等教育季刊，146，67-80。
林怡君（2010）。從活動理論觀點研究臺灣中學跨國協作交流計畫。國立臺灣科技大學應用外語系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林盈均（2016）。以活動理論為視角探析國小教師擴展學習歷程之研究。國立臺北教育大學博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
林郁婷（2010）。以活動理論檢視三位中學英語教師對於資訊融入教學的理念與實踐。國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
唐昇志（2002）。以活動理論為架構分析網路主題式學習活動。。國立東華大學國小科學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮市。
孫志麟（2004）。開啟專業學習的新視窗：教師的知識管理。教育研究月刊，126，4-18。
高敬文（1988）。「質的研究派典」之理論分析與實際應用。東益。
張芷瑄（2021）。探究公立學校轉型實驗教育學校的師資困境─質性後設分析研究。學校行政雙月刊，131，118-137。doi: 10.6423/HHHC.202101_(131).0007
張芷瑄、陳斐卿（2020）。教師集體課程創新——轉化能動性概念工具的再探究。課程與教學季刊，23(1)，93-116。
張淑玲（2005）。合作成長小組促成國小教師數學教學之能與反思能力成長之探討。國立臺灣師範大學數學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張智鈞（2010）。以大型多點觸控螢幕進行數位遊戲式協同學習活動之研究。國立臺灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
張新仁、王瓊珠、馮莉雅（主編）（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（再版）。臺北市：教育部。
張新仁、馮莉雅、潘道仁、林美惠、李美穗、韓桂英、謝曉慧編著（2011)。教師專業學習社群－領頭羊葵花寶典。教育部。
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。教育部。
教育部（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊（再版）。教育部。
許珀文（1999）。應用活動理論來發展人機介面─以WebTV為例。國立交通大學工業工程與管理系所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
陳向明（2002）。教師如何做質的研究。臺北市：洪葉。
陳向明（2003）。實踐性知識：教師專業發展的知識基礎。北京大學教育評論，2003(1)，104-112。
陳向明（2011）。搭建實踐與理論之橋—教師實踐性知識研究。教育科學出版社。
陳宏維（2010）。以活動理論探討兩位台灣大學英文寫作老師教學信念及實施。國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
陳佩英、曾正宜（2011）。探析專業學習社群的擴展學習經驗與課程創新行動―AT取徑。教育研究集刊，57(2)，39-84。
陳佩英、焦傳金（2009）。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構：一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究期刊，54(1)，55-86。
陳彥廷（2016）。活動理論觀點下國小師資生數學課程轉化的阻力與助力。教育學報，44(2)，51-79。
陳美娟（2015）。我國國民補習學校課程綱要總綱研擬團隊的擴展學習歷程研究。國立臺中教育大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺中市。
陳斐卿、林盈秀、蕭述三（2013）。教師合作設計課程的困難——AT觀點。教育實踐研究，26(1)，63-94。
游永菁（2007）。發展小學中年級學生進行行動學習的手持設備雛型。國立交通大學工業工程與管理系所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
黃志賢（2007）。臺灣泰雅族國中生數學教學模式之研究-活動理論的探討與實踐。國立臺灣師範大學數學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃志賢、林福來（2008）。利用AT分析台灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學活動。科學教育學刊，16(2)，147-169。
黃冠達（2017）。種子教師推動閱讀理解教學及其教學知識共享之研究－活動理論徑。臺北市立大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
黃冠達、張純、幸曼玲（2015）。國小教師參與閱讀理解教學實踐社群與其專業成長之研究。教育研究與發展期刊，11(1)，57-80。
黃秋鑾（2009）。臺灣地區國民中學校長知識領導、學習社群與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。國立臺北教育大學博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
董濤（2008）。從活動理論看校本教研。福建師範大學學報，153，143-147。
甄曉蘭（2001）。從課程組織的觀點檢討統整課程的設計與實施。課程與教學季刊，4(1)，1-19。
趙金婷（2000）。學習社群理念在教學上的應用。教育資料與研究，35，60-66。
趙慧軍（1997）。活動理論的產生、發展和前景。東北師大學報（哲學社會版），165。東北師大。
劉宜汶（2010）。部落格為中介行為之教師發展。國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
歐用生（2003）。內容分析法，載於黃光雄、簡茂發主編，教育研究法，229-254。師大書苑。
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範的流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，115-143。
蔡進雄 (2009)。國民中小學校長領導之研究：專業、情緒與靈性的觀點。高等教育。
賴志宏（2007）。行動科技對經驗學習之支援性。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所博士論文，未出版，桃園縣。
簡紅珠（2002）。教師知識的不同詮釋與研究方法。課程與教學季刊，5(3)，1-16。
魏士欽、陳士強（2021）。跨領域教師專業學習社群發展的問題與策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，10(7)，100-102。
魏淑君（2008）。由團體討論探究幼兒園主題課程的發展歷程—以Vygotsky的社會文化活動理論觀點。國立臺灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系博士論文，未出版，臺北市。
丁一顧、江姮姬（2020）。臺灣教師專業學習社群實徵研究之分析與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，16（2），135-162。
吳依純（2012）。教師專業學習社群建構歷程之個案研究：以互動式電子白板導入五年級數學科教學為例。教育研究論壇，4（1），165-196。
吳俊憲（2010）。教師專業學習社群的理念與實施。靜宜大學師培實習輔導通訊，9，5-7。
吳俊憲、吳錦惠、紀藶珊、姜宏尚（2016）。推動「精進教學」教師專業學習社群發展之運作模式－以學習共同體為焦點。臺灣教育評論月刊，5（10），164-196。
張德銳、王淑珍（2010）。教師專業學習社群在教學輔導教師制度中的發展與實踐。臺北市立教育大學學報教育類，41（1），61-90。
張新仁（主編）（2009）。中小學教師專業學習社群手冊。2021年9月6日，取自：https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/BOOK/UpLoad/eBook/477/477-%E4%B8%AD%E5%B0%8F%E5%AD%B8%E6%95%99%E5%B8%AB%E5%B0%88%E6%A5%AD%E5%AD%B8%E7%BF%92%E7%A4%BE%E7%BE%A4%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A.pdf
林孟郁、鍾武龍、張月霞、李哲迪、陳穎儀（2013）。高中教師在創新科學課程專業學習社群中的發展歷程。科學教育學刊，21（1），75-96。
江蕙伶、張繼寧（2011，9月）。專業學習社群（PLC）。臺灣師資培育電子報，24。檢索日期：2023年7月21日，取自https://tted.cher.ntnu.edu.tw/?p=430
洪志成、林佳蓁（2021）。教師社群研究中的配角：實務檔案？。臺灣教育評論月刊，10（5），16-23。
外文部分
Aas, M. (2017). Understanding leadership and change in schools: expansive learning and tensions. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 278-296.
Ackerman, D. V. (2011). The impact of teacher collaboration in a professional learning community on teacher job satisfaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Anthony, A. B. (2012). Activity theory as a framework for investigating district-classroom system interactions and their influences on technology Integration. Technology Integration, 44(4), 335-356.
Avila, P. G. (2011). Capturing a team-based professional learning community's essence (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Barab, S., A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002). Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 76-107.
Basharina, O. K. (2007). An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 82-103.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Beane, J. (1995). Curriculum Integration and The Disciplines of Knowledge. Phi　Delta Kappan, April, pp.616~22.
Berge, O., & Fjuk, A. (2006). Understanding the roles of online meetings in a net-based course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 13-23.
Bingham, A. J. (2016). Drowning digitally? How disequilibrium shapes practice in a　blended learning charter school. Teachers College Record, 118(1), 1-30.
Bogdan & Biklen (1998).Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Bratus, B. S., & Lishin, O. V. (1983). Laws of the development of activity and problems in the psychological and pedagogical shaping of the personality. Russian Education & Society, 21(3), 38-50.
Burns, S. E.(1995) Issuesin Workplace Sexual Harassment Lawand Related Social Science Research. Journal of SocialIssues, 51(1), 196-198.
Castaneda, M. (2019). An examination of professional learning community and teacher leadership practices as perceived by educators in a district-wide PLC (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1991). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition (pp.1-47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M., & Gajdamashko, N. (2009).The concept of development in cultural-historial activity theory: Vertical and Horizontal. In A. Sannino H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutiérrez (Eds.) Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory (pp. 129-143). NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cox, T. D. (2011). Teachers' perspectives on building a professional learning community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66, 46-53.
Davydov, V. V. (1988). Problems of developmental teaching: The experience of theoretical and experimental psychological research. Excerpts (Part II). Soviet Education, 30(9), 3-83.
Davydov, V. V. (1999). The content and unsolved problems of activity theory. In Y. Engeström & R. Miettinen & R. L. Punamaki(Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory(pp. 39-52). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.
DiNardo, L. M. (2010). The impact of professional learning communities on student achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Dippe, G. (2006). The missing teacher: Contradictions and conflicts in the experience of online learners. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Networked Learning 2006, pp.1-8. Lancaster University, England.
Drake, S. M. (1998). Creating integrated curriculum: Proven ways to increase student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Drake, S. M. , & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Alexandria, VA: ASCD(Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development).
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a professional learning community. Educational Leadership，61 (8)，6–11.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational Service.
DuFour, R., DuFour, R. B., & Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Dufour, R., Dufour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service.
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2021) From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engestrom, Y. (1996). The tensions of judging: Handling cases of driving under the influence of alcohol in Finland and California. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 199-232). Cambridge
Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory(pp.377-406). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
Engeström, Y. (2005) Developmental Work Research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.
Engeström, Y. (2008). Disturbance management and masking in a television production team. In Y. Engeström (Ed.), From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work (pp.22-47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. D. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Y. (2010). Activity theory and learning at work. In Malloch, M., Cairns, L., Evans, K., & O'Connor, B. N. (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of workplace learning. London, England: SAGE Publications.
Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598-628.
Engestrom, Y. (2018). Expertise in transition: Expansive learning in medical work. Cambridge University Press.
Engestrom, Y., & Engestrom, R. (1986). Developmental work research: The approach and the application of cleaning work. Nordisk Pedagogik, 6, 2–15.
Engeström, Y., & Pyörälä, E. (2020). Using activity theory to transform medical work and learning. Medical Teacher, 1-7.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24.
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2011). Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(3), 368-387.
Engestrom, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, C., & Gregory, J. (1991). Coordination, cooperation and communication in courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 13, 88–97.
Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells, & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Oxford: Blackwell.
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity-theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211-224). London, England: Blackwell.
Engestrom, Y., Engestrom, R., & Vahaaho, T. (1999). When the center does not hold: The importance of knotworking. In S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 345–374). Aarhus University Press.
Engeström, Y., Rantavuori, J., & Kerosuo, H. (2013). Expansive learning in a library: Actions, cycles and deviations from instructional intentions. Vocations and Learning, 6(1), 81-106.
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A. (2021) From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28(1), 4-23, DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A., & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118-128.
Engeström, Y., Virkkunen, J., Helle, M., Pihlaja, J., & Poikela, R. (1996). The change laboratory as a tool for transforming work. Lifelong Learning in Europe, 1(2), 10-17.
Englund, C., & Price, L. (2018). Facilitating agency: The change laboratory as an intervention for collaborative sustainable development in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 192-205.
Erickson, H. L. (1995). Stirring the head, heart, and soul: Redefining curriculum and instruction.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Erickson, H., L. Lanning and R. French (2017), Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom (2nd ed.), Corwin.
Evans, P. L. (2012). A qualitative study on the impact of professional learning communities in an elementary school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Feldman, A., & Weiss, T. (2010). Understanding change in teachers’ ways of being through collaborative action research: a cultural–historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29-55.
FitzSimons, G. E. (2003). Implications from Engeström’s concept of expansive learning for enriching learning cultures in VET. Keynote address. In J. Searle, I. Yashin-Shaw, & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on Post-Compulsory Education and Training, (Vol. 1). (pp.201-212). Brisbane, Australia: Australian Academic Press.
Fogarty, R. (1991). How to integrate the curricula. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishing.
Fullan, M.,Quinn, J., & McEachen, J.(2018).Deep learning: Engage the world change the world.Corwin, A Sage Publishing Company.
Gillespie, K. P. (2010). Leadership to sustain professional learning communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Goodnough, K. (2018). Addressing contradictions in teachers’ practice through professional learning: An activity theory perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2181-2204.
Grady, J. B. (1994). Interdisciplinary curriculum: A fusion of reform ideas. Aurora, Co.: Mid-continent Regional Education Lab.
Guarino, J. (2009). The transformation from interdisciplinary team to professional learning community: The perspective of the middle school principal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S.(1989). Naturalistic in inquiry. London: Sage.
Guba, E. G.(1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29 (1981), 75–91.
Gustavsson, M. (2009). Facilitating expansive learning in a public sector organization. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(3), 245-259.
Haapasaari, A., & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 4, 37-47.
Haapasaari, A., Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H. (2014). The emergence of learners’ transformative agency in a Change Laboratory intervention. Journal of Education and Work, 29(2), 232-262.
Haavisto, V. (2002). Court work in transition: An activity-theoretical study of changing work practices in a Finnish district court. University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Herrington, R. (2011). Professional learning communities: Perceptions of teacher quality and sustainability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Hirsh, A., & Segolsson, M. (2019). Enabling teacher-driven school-development and collaborative learning: An activity theory-based study of leadership as an overarching practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(3), 400-420.
Hord, S. M. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. In S. M. Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing school through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). NY: Teachers College Press.
Hord, S. M., & Summers, W. A. (2008). Leading Professional Learning Communities: Voices from Research and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Oxford: Scarecrow Education.
Il’enkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: essays in its history and theory. Moscow, Russia: Progress.
Jacobs, H. H. (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Kärkkäinen, M. (1999). Teams as breakers of traditional work practices: A longitudinal study of planning and implementing curriculum units in elementary school teacher teams. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Department of Education.
Kerosuo, H., & Engeström, Y. (2003). Boundary crossing and learning in creation of new work practice. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(7/8), 345-351.
Kochenour, R. B. (2010). Evaluation of a professional learning community at one elementary school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.Lindahl, 2011;
Kovač-Cerović, T., Jovanović, O., & Pavlović-Babić, D. (2016). Individual education plan as an agent of inclusiveness of the educational system in Serbia: Different perspectives, achievements and new dilemmas. Psihologija, 49(4), 431-445.
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lautenbach, G. (2010).Expansive learning cycles: Lecturers using educational technologies for teaching and learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 24(5), 699-715.
Leadbetter, J. & Warmington, P. (2010). Expansive learning, expansive labour: conceptualising the social production of labour‐power within multi‐agency working. In H. Daniels, A. Edwards, Y. Engeström, T. Gallagher, & S. R. Ludvigsen (Eds.), Activity Theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies (pp. 72-89). NY: Routledge.
Lee, L. H. J., & Tan, S. C. (2020). Teacher learning in Lesson Study: Affordances, disturbances, contradictions, and implications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 1-15.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.
Lippy, D. (2011). Implementing effective professional learning communities with consistency at the middle school level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Loffer, B. K. (2002). Creating a culture of collaboration in secondary schools: A necessary component of a professional learning community. Unpublished master’s thesis. Pacific Lutheran University, Tacoma, WA .
Lofland, J., Snow, D., Anderson, L., & Lofland. L. H. (2006). Analyzing social setting: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. (4th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson.
Marwan, A., & Sweeney, T. (2019). Using activity theory to analyse contradictions in English teachers’ technology integration. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 115-125.
Marzano, R. J., Heflebower, T., Hoegh, J. K., Warrick, P., & Grift, G. (2016). Collaborative teams that transform schools: The next step in PLCS. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Timewell, E. & Alexander, L.(1995) In-depth Interviewing, (2nd ed.). South Melbourne: Longman.
Mosvold, R., & Bjuland, R. (2011). An activity theory view on learning studies. International Journal of Early Childhood, 43(3), 261-275.
Murphy, E., & Manzanares, M. R. (2008). Contradictions between the virtual and physical high school classroom: A third-generation activity theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1061-1072. Doi: 10.111/j.146-8535.2007.0076.x
Ng, C., & Leicht, A. (2019). ‘Struggles as engagement’ in teacher change: a longitudinal case study of a reading teacher’s changing practices. Teachers and Teaching, 25(4), 453-468.
Niemann, R. (2013). Revisiting expansive learning for knowledge production and capability development at postgraduate level in higher education studies. Perspectives in Education, 31(1), 30-39.
Norman, D. A. (1982). Learning and memory. W. H. Freeman & Company.
Paavola, S., & Hakkarainen, K. (2005). The knowledge creation metaphor–An emergent epistemological approach to learning. Science & Education, 14(6), 535-557.
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557-576.
Patton. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Pleace, N., Knutagard, M., Granfelt, R., & Culhane, D. (2016). The strategic response to homelessness in Finland: Exploring innovation and coordination within a national plan to reduce and prevent homelessness. In N. Nichols & C. Doberstein (Eds.), Exploring effective systems responses to homelessness (pp. 426–442). The Homelessness Hub Press.
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland : or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation of ruined hopes (3rd ed.). University of California Press.
Puonti, A. (2004). Learning to work together: Collaboration between authorities in economic-crime investigation. Vantaa, Finland: National bureau of investigation.
Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2009). Organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Rantavuori, J., Engeström, Y., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Learning actions, objects and types of interaction: A methodological analysis of expansive learning among pre-service teachers. Frontline Learning Research, 4(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i3.174
Razak, N. A., Jalil, H. A., Krauss, S. E., & Ahmad, N. A. (2018). Successful implementation of information and communication technology integration in Malaysian public schools: An activity systems analysis approach. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 17-29.
Reeves, D. B. (2008). Reframing teacher leadership to improve your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Roberts, M.S., Pruitt Z. E. (2003). School as professional learning communities: Collaborative activities and strategies for professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press. Inc.
Rodriguez, H. (1998). Activity theory and cognitive sciences. Perspectives on activity theory,
Roth, W. M., & Lee, Y. J. (2007). ‘Vyogotsky’s neglected Legacy’: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 2, 186-232. DOI: 10.31020/0034654306298273.
Ruane, J. M. (2005) Essentials of research methods: A guide to social science research. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sannino, A. (2008). Sustaining a non-dominant activity in school: Only a utopia? Journal of Educational Change, 9(4), 329-338.
Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers' talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 838-844.
Sannino, A. (2016). Double stimulation in the waiting experiment with collectives. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 142–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9324-4
Sannino, A. (2017). Researching work and learning for enacted utopias: The struggle to overcome homelessness. Keynote address at the 10th International Conference on Researching Work and Learning, South Africa: Rhodes University.
Sannino, A. (2020). Enacting the utopia of eradicating homelessness: Toward a new generation of activity-theoretical studies of learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2020.1725459
Sannino, A. (Ed.). (2015). The emergence of transformative agency and double stimulation: Activity-based studies in the Vygotskian tradition. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, (4), 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07. 001
Sannino, A., & Engestrom, Y. (2018). Valuable innovations out of nonsense? Expansive organizational learning and transformative agency in the Mann Gulch disaster and in the Finnish homelessness strategy. Teoria E Pratica Em Administracao, 8(2), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.21714/2238-104X2018v8i2S-40728
Sannino, A., & Laitinen, A. (2015). Double stimulation in the waiting experiment: Testing a Vygotskian model of the emergence of volitional action. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 4, 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014. 07.002
Sannino, A., Daniels, H., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (Eds.). (2009). Learning and expanding with activity theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809989
Sannino, A., Engeström, Y., & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599-633.
Schiermeyer, B. L. S. (2010). Learning communities creating master teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. College of Saint Mary, Omaha, NE.
Senechal, A. (2011). Improving student achievement by investigating factors influencing high school teachers’ use of professional learning communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Senge, P. M. (1993). 第五項修練：學習型組織的藝術與實務（郭進隆譯）。台北：天下。（原著出版於1990）。
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2004). Building a community of hope. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 33-37.
Smidt, S. (2009). Introducing Vygotsky. NY: Routledge.
Smith, K. L. (2010). The relationship between professional learning communities and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
Solomon, Y., & Lewin, C. (2016). Measuring ‘progress’: performativity as both driver and constraint in school innovation. Journal of Education Policy, 31(2), 226-238.
Speck, M. (1999). The principalship: Building a learning community. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Spiegel-Stroud, C.M. (2007). Characteristics of professional learning communities in two Maryland elementary schools and the process they undergo in an effort to improve student learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The George Washington
Spinuzzi, C. (2019). “Trying to predict the future”: Third-generation activity theory’s codesign orientation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 27(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1660790
Toiviainen, H. (2007). Inter-organizational learning across levels: An object-oriented approach. Journal of Workplace Learning, 19 (6), 343-358.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Vänninen, I., Pereira-Querol, M., & Engeström, Y. (2015). Generating transformative agency among horticultural producers: An activity-theoretical approach to transforming Integrated Pest Management. Agricultural Systems, 139, 38-49.
Vare, P. (2020). Beyond the ‘green bling’: Identifying contradictions encountered in school sustainability programmes and teachers’ responses to them. Environmental Education Research, 26(1), 61-80.
Venkat, H., & Adler, J. (2008). Expanding the foci of activity theory: accessing the broader contexts and experiences of mathematics education reform. Educational Review, 60(2), 127-193.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R.W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4: The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp.154-171). New York, NY: Plenum.
Wright, E. O. (2013). Transforming capitalism through real utopias. Irish Journal of Sociology, 21(2), 6–40. https://doi. org/10.7227/IJS.21.2.2
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., & Haudenschild, M. T. (2009). Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 507-517.
Yennie, A. (2020). A quantitative quasiexperimental study on the effects of a professional learning community on student performance outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ashford University, San Diego, CA.