臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以知識翻新促進社群設計思考能力
作者：蔡以寧
作者(外文)：Tsai, Yi-Ning
校院名稱：國立政治大學
系所名稱：教育學系
指導教授：洪煌堯
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2023
主題關鍵詞：知識翻新環境；設計思考；機遇式分組；雙鑽石模式；鍊結表記；Knowledge building environment；Design thinking；Opportunistic collaboration；Double diamond model；Linkography
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:2
本研究旨在探討學生在設計問題解決方案時，如何透過以想法發展為核心的知識翻新環境(knowledge building environment)，進行設計思考(design thinking)活動，同時創新知識並形成設計社群。研究分兩個面向：一是探討在協作歷程中，學生感知其學習環境對知識翻新支持的程度、其社群意識(sense of community)發展的程度、以及其知識創造觀點(knowledge creation)形成的程度為何？二是探討個別學生設計思考行為發展的歷程，與整體社群合作設計的知識共構歷程為何？
研究對象為某國立大學修習有關「設計與科技研究」課程之21位學生，課程為期一學期。任課教授運用知識翻新與設計思考相關理論進行教學，協助學生進行協作與創新，並各別設計出一解決日常生活問題的方案。在課程中運用機遇式分組(opportunistic grouping)使全體學生能充分進行想法交流。學習平台則使用「知識論壇」(Knowledge Forum)，讓課程中社群成員持續於此科技平台中貼文，記錄課間與課後之討論、並互相針對他人的方案設計提出建議、再各自進行方案修正、與想法的反思。透過設計思考雙鑽石模式(the Double Diamond design model)的引導，社群成員之設計想法在知識翻新與設計思考活動中持續發散與收斂，再經由學期中的方案報告與學期末YouTube頻道影片的彙製，以促進知識社群發展。
本研究為一混合式個案研究(mix-methods case study)。收集之量化與質性資料來源如下：1.「知識翻新環境量表」(Knowledge-Building Environment scale)；2.「社群意識量表」(Classroom Community Scale)；3.學生回答「何謂知識社群？」之開放式問卷；4.學生整學期於知識論壇的想法貼文。量化與質性資料分析結果如下：1.「知識翻新量表」測量結果顯示本課程確實逐漸在上課過程中形塑出一個更好的知識翻新環境。2.「社群意識量表」顯示學生的社群意識感知也有被強化。3.知識社群開放式問卷答案顯示，學生在知識社群的三種觀點上（即「知識是講述的」、「知識是分享的」、「知識是創造」），對「知識是創造」的感知程度有提高。4.針對學生在知識論壇想法紀錄的編碼與後續的行為序列分析顯示，學生在整個學期的設計行為呈現內在序列關係，服膺設計思考的雙鑽石模式。5.知識論壇想法紀錄在編碼並進行鍊結表記(Linkography)分析後顯示，社群成員於設計各自的方案過程中亦能同時進行高度合作，其過程也呼應了設計思考的雙峰模式。
綜上所述，本研究以想法中心的知識翻新進行機遇式分組學習，學生在集體交流協作下，提昇了知識翻新環境與社群意識的感知；同時也能進一步理解知識是由社群共創而來。而在設計思考活動實踐方面，社群的設計思考行為亦能呼應想法發散與收斂的設計思考雙鑽石模式；鍊結表記圖像也顯示學生能進行高度合作的設計歷程。根據上述研究成果，本研究也進一步對高等教育如何進行知識翻新與設計思考活動提出一些相關建議。
This study aimed to foster a design community in a knowledge-building environment. Under the guidance of knowledge building principles, students worked on their design projects and collaboratively transformed a leaning class into a design community. The study explored how students perceived a knowledge-building environment, formed a strong sense of community, and developed the perspective of knowledge creation. In addition, the study investigated and explicated students’ design thinking processes, and used Linkography as a means to illustrate students’ collaborative learning process to support design thinking activities.
Participants in the study were 21 college students enrolled in a one-semester course pertaining to “design and educational technology” in a national university in Taiwan. The instructor is an experienced knowledge builder to utilize idea-centered knowledge building principles for course instruction and for engaging students in conducting design thinking for effective learning. Opportunistic collaboration was employed to allow students to freely work with one another based on their learning interest while developing a strong sense of community. Knowledge Forum as a learning platform was used to support students’ online discussions and interaction, while working creatively and reflectively with diverse design ideas. Students were also required to present their design projects in the midterm and produce final video clips on YouTube channel at the end of the course as learning outcome.
The study was a mix-methods case study and collected quantitative and qualitative data, including: (1) the " Knowledge-Building Environment scale"; (2) the "Classroom Community Scale"; (3) an open-ended questionnaire concerning “what is a knowledge community”; and (4) online discussion notes concerning students’ design ideas and design thinking processes.
The results from quantitative data analysis were reported as follows. First, the "Knowledge-Building Environment scale" suggested that students were able to see their class as a knowledge building environment. Second, the "Classroom Community Scale" showed that students were able to develop a strong sense of community in this course. In contrast, the results from qualitative data analysis were presented as follows. First, the coding results of knowledge community showed that students were able to understand an effective knowledge community should support not merely knowledge acquiring and sharing, but also knowledge creating. Second, Lag Sequential Analysis further revealed that the processes of students’ online design activities synchronized a double diamond design-thinking model that embodies both divergent and convergent thinking processes. Finally, a Linkography analysis also illustrated that students were able to develop an effective collaborative design community. Some implications for how to cultivate and enhance community awareness for effective collaborative learning and how to design more effective instructional activities to enhance students’ design capacity were also discussed.
參考文獻
壹、中文部分
吳清山 (2019)。設計思考。教育研究月刊，297，159-160。
吳穎沺、蔡今中(2005)。建構主義式的科學學習活動對國小高年級學生認知結構之影響–以「電與磁」單元為例。科學教育學刊，13(4), 387-411。
洪國財、許菱雅、洪煌堯(2021)。國小學生集體共構達悟族大船文化知識之知識翻新活動。教育研究月刊，324，38-56。
洪煌堯、蔡佩真、林倍伊 (2014)。透過知識創新教學理念與學習平臺以培養國小學生自然課合作學習與翻新想法的習慣。科學教育學刊，22(4)，413-439。
陳美如、曾子沁、曾莉婷 (2021)。透過社群協作之知識翻新活動以促進在職教師碩士論文研究。教育研究月刊，324，57-76。
陳美如、雷嗣汶 (2019)。跨領域學習：創新課程發展關鍵元素。教育研究月刊，300，18-35.
曾莉婷、陳美如 (2022)。運用知識翻新活動提升學生在能源教育之認知與情意學習。科學教育學刊，30(3)，241-265。

貳、英文部分
Alshanty, A. M., & Emeagwali, O. L. (2019). Market-sensing capability, knowledge creation and innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial-orientation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(3), 171-178.
Balboni, G., Perrucci, V., Cacciamani, S., & Zumbo, B. D. (2018). Development of a scale of Sense of Community in university online courses. Distance Education, 39(3), 317-333.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2014). Knowledge building and knowledge creation: One concept, two hills to climb. In Knowledge creation in education (pp. 35-52). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
Blom, N. W. (2019). Utilising linkography to understand the cognitive mechanisms of technology learners during the design process [Upublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pretoria.
Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by design. Journal of product innovation management, 28(3), 381-383.
Cao, J., Zhao, W., Hu, H., Liu, Y., & Guo, X. (2022). Using linkography and situated FBS co-design model to explore user participatory conceptual design process. Processes, 10(4), 713.
Chen, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2016). Schools as knowledge-building organizations: Thirty years of design research. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 266-288.
Chen, N., Hong, H. Y., Chai, C. S., & Liang, J. C. (2023). Highlighting ECE Teachers’ Proximal Processes as Designers: An Investigation of Teachers’ Design Thinking Engagement, TPACK Efficacy, and Design Vitality. Early Education and Development, 1-20.
Chen, N., Wu, D., Hong, H. Y., Chai, C. S., & Liang, J. C. (2023). Developing a design thinking engagement scale for early childhood teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-25.
Dahiya, A., & Kumar, J. (2021). Effect of User Information on Conceptual Design Thinking: A Linkographic Study. Journal of Design Thinking, 2(2), 97-112.
Egan, J., Williams, C., Dixon-Hardy, J., & Ellwood, P. (2013). When Science Meets Innovation: a new model of research translation. In ISPIM Innovation Symposium (p. 1). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).
Ejsing‐Duun, S., & Skovbjerg, H. M. (2019). Design as a mode of inquiry in design pedagogy and design thinking. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 38(2), 445-460.
Ergün, E., & Avcı, Ü. (2018). Knowledge sharing self-efficacy, motivation and sense of community as predictors of knowledge receiving and giving behaviors. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 60-73.
Gan, Y., Hong, H. Y., Chen, B., & Scardamalia, M. (2021). Knowledge building: idea-centered drawing and writing to advance community knowledge. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2423-2449.
Goldschmidt, G. (1992). Criteria for design evaluation: a process-oriented paradigm. Evaluating and predicting design performance, 67-79.
Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: unfolding the design process. MIT Press.
Goldschmidt, G. (2016). Linkographic evidence for concurrent divergent and convergent thinking in creative design. Creativity research journal, 28(2), 115-122.
Goldschmidt, G. (2022). Critical Design and Design Thinking vs. critical design and design thinking. In Different Perspectives in Design Thinking (pp. 6-20). CRC Press.
Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., Montejo-Gámez, J., Ma, L., Chen, B., Muñoz de Escalona-Fernández, M., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2019). Exploring collective cognitive responsibility through the emergence and flow of forms of engagement in a knowledge building community. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy: Smart Pedagogy for Technology Enhanced Learning, 213-232.
Hatcher, G., Ion, W., Maclachlan, R., Marlow, M., Simpson, B., Wilson, N., & Wodehouse, A. (2018). Using linkography to compare creative methods for group ideation. Design Studies, 58, 127-152.
Hong, H. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2017). Principle-based design: Development of adaptive mathematics teaching practices and beliefs in a knowledge building environment. Computers & Education, 115, 38-55.
Hong, H. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2023). Computer‐supported knowledge building to enhance reading motivation and comprehension. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(1), 375-393.
Hong, H. Y., & Sullivan, F. R. (2009). Towards an idea-centered, principle-based design approach to support learning as knowledge creation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(5), 613-627.
Hong, H. Y., Lin, P. Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2019). Developing effective knowledge-building environments through constructivist teaching beliefs and technology-integration knowledge: A survey of middle-school teachers in northern Taiwan. Learning and Individual Differences, 76, 101787.
Hong, H. Y., Lin, P. Y., Chai, C. S., Hung, G. T., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Fostering design-oriented collective reflection among preservice teachers through principle-based knowledge building activities. Computers & Education, 130, 105-120.
Hong, H. Y., Ma, L., Lin, P. Y., & Lee, K. Y. H. (2020). Advancing third graders’ reading comprehension through collaborative Knowledge Building: A comparative study in Taiwan. Computers & Education, 157, 103962.
Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., & Zhang, J. (2010). Knowledge Society Network: Toward a dynamic, sustained network for building knowledge. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 36(1).
Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers & Education, 89, 91-102.
Hung, G. T., Shiu, L. Y., & Hong, H. Y. (2021). Elementary Students Engaging in Knowledge Building to Co-construct Tao's Big Boat Culture Knowledge. Journal of Education Research, (324), 38-56.
IDEO (2011). Design thinking toolkit for educators. Retrieved on February 9, 2022, from http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/
Indrastyawati, C., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). The Effects of the Synchronous Discussion and Reflection System (SDRS) in Perception of Knowledge Building and Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 699-710.
Jahanbakhsh, B. (2018). Analyzing the effect of available technologies on the thinking of product beginner and pro designers using linkography method. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba: Honar-Ha-Ye-Tajassomi, 23(2), 111-118.
Kochanowska, M., & Gagliardi, W. R. (2022). The double diamond model: in pursuit of simplicity and flexibility. Perspectives on Design II: Research, Education and Practice, 19-32.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 535-543.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In Design thinking for education, 1-15. Springer, Singapore.
Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Developing and Evaluating Design Thinking. In Design Thinking for Education (pp. 109-120). Springer, Singapore.
Li, P. J., Hong, H. Y., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C. C., & Lin, P. Y. (2020). Fostering students’ scientific inquiry through computer-supported collaborative knowledge building. Research in Science Education, 50, 2035-2053.
Lin, P. Y., Hong, H. Y., & Chai, C. S. (2020). Fostering college students’ design thinking in a knowledge-building environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 949-974.
McMillan, D. W. (1996). Sense of community. Journal of community psychology, 24(4), 315-325.
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Mohammed, A. A., Baig, A. H., & Gururajan, R. (2019). The effect of talent management processes on knowledge creation: A case of Australian higher education. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration.
Nathan, M. J., & Sawyer, R. K. (2014). Foundations of the learning sciences. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 21-43).
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge Creating. New York, 304.
Nonaka, L., Takeuchi, H., & Umemoto, K. (1996). A theory of organizational knowledge creation. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(7-8), 833-845.
Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Bob, G. D. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University press.
Ordieres-Meré, J., Prieto Remon, T., & Rubio, J. (2020). Digitalization: An opportunity for contributing to sustainability from knowledge creation. Sustainability, 12(4), 1460.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2019). PISA 2021 Creative Thinking Framework (Third Draft). Retrieved on February 9, 2022, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2021-creative-thinking-framework.pdf
Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2002). Three Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a Cscl Community (Cscl 2002 Proceedings), 24.
Pande, M., & Bharathi, S. V. (2020). Theoretical foundations of design thinking–A constructivism learning approach to design thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100637.
Park, H., & Zhang, J. (2022). Learning Analytics for Teacher Noticing and Scaffolding: Facilitating Knowledge Building Progress in Science. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning-CSCL 2022, pp. 147-154. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Pea, R. D. (2016). The prehistory of the learning sciences. Reflections on the learning sciences, 32-58.
Popper, K. (2014). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. routledge.
Resendes, M., Chen, B., Acosta, A., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). The effect of formative feedback on vocabulary use and distribution of vocabulary knowledge in a grade two knowledge building class.
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1-16.
Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2021). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-29.
Sándorová, Z., Repáňová, T., Palenčíková, Z., & Beták, N. (2020). Design thinking-A revolutionary new approach in tourism education?. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 26, 100238.
Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. Liberal education in a knowledge society, 97, 67-98.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology (pp. 97-118).
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2010). A brief history of knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 36(1).
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2020). Will knowledge building remain uniquely human?. Qwerty-Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 15(2), 12-26.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2021). Knowledge building: Advancing the state of community knowledge. International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning, 261-279.
Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
Soliman, D., Costa, S., & Scardamalia, M. (2021). Knowledge building in online mode: Insights and reflections. Education Sciences, 11(8), 425.
Tan, S. C., Chan, C., Bielaczyc, K., Ma, L., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2021). Knowledge building: aligning education with needs for knowledge creation in the digital age. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2243-2266.
Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2014). Explaining the intention to use technology among university students: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Computing in Higher education, 26(2), 124-142.
Thani, F. N., & Mirkamali, S. M. (2018). Factors that enable knowledge creation in higher education: a structural model. Data Technologies and Applications.
Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. In ISPIM Conference Proceedings (p. 1). The International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM).
Tzeng, J. Y. (2015). Learning Sciences: Core Issues and Research Trends. Bulletin of Educational Research, 61(3), 105.
Ustun, A. B., Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2021). Investigating the role of accepting learning management system on students’ engagement and sense of community in blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4751-4769.
Vartiainen, H., Vuojärvi, H., Saramäki, K., Eriksson, M., Ratinen, I., Torssonen, P., ... & Pöllänen, S. (2022). Cross‐boundary collaboration and knowledge creation in an online higher education course. British Journal of Educational Technology.
Wang, S., & Zhang, D. (2019). Student-centred teaching, deep learning and self-reported ability improvement in higher education: Evidence from Mainland China. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 581-593.
Yuan, G., & Zhang, J. (2019). Connecting knowledge spaces: Enabling cross‐community knowledge building through boundary objects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2144-2161.
Zhang, J., Tian, Y., Yuan, G., & Tao, D. (2022). Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge‐building practices. Science Education, 106(4), 890-923.
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1086（臺灣：1076，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2541260 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68335113
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上