:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:中文資訊檢索測試集之設計與製作
書刊名:資訊傳播與圖書館學
作者:陳光華 引用關係江玉婷
作者(外文):Chen, Kuang-huaChiang, Yu-ting
出版日期:2000
卷期:6:3
頁次:頁61-80
主題關鍵詞:資訊檢索測試集資訊檢索評估文件集查詢主題相關判斷Information retrieval benchmarkInformation retrieval test collectionInformation retrieval evaluationDocument setTopicRelevance judgment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:61
在國內資訊檢索研究已日趨受到重視,卻缺少合適的測試評估機制之背景下,本
文參考國外各測試集的結構、特性與建構經驗,設計中文資訊檢索測試集的方法與程序,發
展華文世界第一套中文資訊檢索測試集,實際地進行測試集的規劃建置工作。本研究所建立
的測試集包括 132,207 篇新聞文件、50 個查詣主題、以及文件與查詣主題間的相關判斷,
平均每個查詣主題有 16.32 篇相關文件。 研究結果顯示,以統計抽樣的觀點,本測試集的
文件數量具有一定的效度;查詣主題呈現詳盡且多樣化的查詣需求,能反映真實的檢索情況
;由三位判斷者進行的相關判斷具有顯著的一致性,推斷它們是具有可佔度的。本測試集不
僅具有可應用性,並能作為進一步資訊檢索與評估研究之基礎。
The research and development of information retrieval has made
considerable progress recently.However, there is not any applicable test
mechanism for system evaluation in the Chinese research society. This paper
reports our research on the design and implementation of the first Chinese
information retrieval benchmark. According to the framework and contents of the
existing foreign benchmarks, we develop a methodology to establish the Chinese
IR benchmark. An IR benchmark consists of three parts: document set, topic set,
and relevance judgments. our document set contains 132,207 documents collected
from news web sites, the topic set contains 50 topics transformed from real
users' information needs, and each topic has on the average16.34 related
documents as a result of the relegance judgments. The results of our research
show that the quantity of document set is valid from the viewpoint of sampling
statistics. The topics reveal multiple kinds of information need, and they also
reflect certain real retrieval environment. Besides, the judgments given by
three judges have exhibited significant consistency, so we conclude their
reliability. Although the benchmark is in its first edition, it possesses a
complete structure and medium scale. On this basis, it is readily feasible to
expand this benchmark's current scale to a proper large one in the near future.
期刊論文
1.Burgin, Robert(1992)。Variations in Relevance Judgements and the Evaluation of Retrieval Performance。Information Processing and Management,28(5),619-627。  new window
2.Saracevic, T.(1975)。Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,26,321-343。  new window
3.Salton, Gearrd(1992)。The State of Retrieval System Evaluation。Information Processing & Management,28(4),441-449。  new window
4.Borlund, P.、Ingwersen, P.(1997)。The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems。Journal of Documentation,53(3),225-250。  new window
5.Smeaton, Alan F.、Harman, Donna(1997)。The TREC Experiments and Their Impact on Europe。Journal of Information Science,23(2),169-174。  new window
6.Sparck Jones, K.(1995)。Reflections on TREC。Information Processing & Management,31(3),291-314。  new window
7.Harter, S. P.(1996)。Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,47(1),37-49。  new window
8.黃慕萱(19971200)。檢索系統評估之發展--理論與實務。中國圖書館學會會報,59,109-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Shaw, William M.、Burgin, Robert、Howell, Peter(1997)。Performance Standards and Evaluations in IR Test Collections: Vector-Space and Other Retrieval Models。Information Processing and Management,33(1),15-36。  new window
10.Harman, Donna K.(1992)。Evaluation Issues in Information Retrieval。Information Processing and Management,28(4),439。  new window
11.Harman, Donna K.(1993)。The First Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-1)。Information Processing and Management,29(4),411-414。  new window
12.Jones, Karan Sparck、Rijsbergen, C. J. Van(1976)。Information Retrieval Test Collections。The Journal of Documentation,32,63-73。  new window
13.Salton, Gerard(1972)。A New Comparison between Conventional Indexing (MEDLARS) and Automatic Text Processing (SMART)。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,23(1),75-84。  new window
14.Shaw, William M.、Wood, Judith B.、Wood, Robert E.、Tibbo, Helen R.(1991)。The Cystic Fibrosis Database: Content and Research Opportunities。LISR,13,347-366。  new window
15.Swanson, Don R.(1988)。Historical Note: Information Retrieval and the Future of an Illusion。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,39(2),95。  new window
16.Janes, Joseph W.(1991)。The Binary Nature of Continuous Relevance Judgments: A Study of Users' Perceptions。Journal of the American Society for Information Science,42(10),754-756。  new window
17.Wallis, Peter、Thom, James A.(1996)。Relevance Judgments for Assessing Recall。Information Processing and Management,32(3),273-286。  new window
18.木本晴夫(1993)。情報検索システム評価用データ―ベースの構築の提案。情處研報,7。  延伸查詢new window
19.Cleverdon, Cyril(1967)。The Cranfield Tests on Index Language Devices。Aslib Proceedings,19(6),173-194。  new window
會議論文
1.Kageura, Kyo(1997)。NACSIS Corpus Project for IR and Terminological Research。Phuket, Thailand。493。  new window
2.Voorhees, Ellen M.、Harman, Donna K.(1996)。Overview of the Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5)。Gaithersburg, Maryland。  new window
3.Zobel, Justin.(1998)。How Reliable are the Results of Large-Scale Information Retrieval Experiments?。Melbourne, Australia。397。  new window
4.Harman, Donna K.(1996)。Panel: Building and Using Test Collections。Zurich, Switzerland。337。  new window
5.Hersh, William(1994)。OHSUMED: An Interactive Evaluation and New Large Test Collection for Research。Dublin, Ireland。192-201。  new window
6.Kitani, Tsuyoshi。BMIR-J2: A Test Collection for Evaluation of Japanese Information Retrieval Systems15-22。  new window
7.Voorhees, Ellen M.、Harman, Donna K.(1998)。Overview of the Seventh Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-7)。Gaithersburg, Maryland。  new window
8.Kitani, Tsuyoshi(1998)。Lesson form BMIR-J2: A Test Collection for Japanese IR Systems。Melbourne, Australia。345-346。  new window
9.Eisenberg, Michael B.、Hu, X.(1987)。Dichotomous Relevance Judgments and the Evaluation of Information Systems66-70。  new window
10.Voorhees, Ellen M.(1998)。Variations in Relevance Judgments and the Measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness。Melbourne, Australia。315-323。  new window
研究報告
1.Fox, Edward A.(1983)。Characteristics of Two New Experimental Collections in Computer and Information Science Containing Textual and Bibliographic Concepts。  new window
學位論文
1.Saracevic, Tefko(1970)。On the Concept of Relevance in Information Science(博士論文)。  new window
圖書
1.Bawden, David(1990)。User-oriented Evaluation of Information Systems and Services。User-oriented Evaluation of Information Systems and Services。Aldershot, England。  new window
2.Jones, Karan Sparck(1981)。The Cranfield Tests。Information Retrieval Experiment。London/Boston。  new window
3.Oddy, Robert N.(1981)。Laboratory Tests: Automatic Systems。Information Retrieval Experiment。London。  new window
4.李卓偉(1993)。統計學。統計學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.IREX (Information Retrieval and Extraction Exercise) Homepage。  new window
2.Reid, Jane,Mizzaro, Stefano(1998)。On the Consensus between Relevance Judges in a Multi-media Context,Dublin。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE