:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:長榮管理學院學生體適能比較分析
書刊名:長榮學報
作者:陳金海 引用關係陳淑利 引用關係黃泰源 引用關係林信佑 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, King HaiChen, Shu LeeHuang, Tai YuanLin, Hsin Yu
出版日期:2000
卷期:4:1
頁次:頁43-57
主題關鍵詞:體適能學生Physical fitnessStudent
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:37
     本研究目的在比較長榮管理學院86、87學年度各學群一年級學生體適 能的差異情形,以做為將來本校體育教學課程編排之參考。本研究以長榮管理學 院86學年度一年級學生600名(男生186名、女生414名)、87學年度一年級學 生728名(男生277名、女生451名)共計1328名為研究對象,測驗方法是採用 教育部所訂定之方法為標準,項目包括身高、體重、身體質量指數(BMI)、坐姿 體前彎、屈膝仰臥起坐、立定跳遠、跑走(男生:1600公尺,女生:800公尺)。所 測得之各項體適能成績以t-test考驗統計方法進行分析,研究結果如下: 各學群體適能的比較,身體質量指數以87學年度管理學群男、女生及公衛學群 女生較好,且達p<.05顯著水準,坐姿體前彎以87學年度人文學群和公衛學群 女生較好,且達p<.05顯著水準,一分鐘仰臥起坐以86學年度人文、公衛和管 理學群之男、女生較好,且達p<.05顯著水準,立定跳遠以87學年度公衛、管 理學群女生較好,且達p<.05顯著水準,跑走以86學年度人文、管理學群之男、 女生和公衛學群女生較好,且達p<.05顯著水準。全體男、女生體適能在86、87 學年度的比較上,除了男生身體質量指數、坐姿體前彎和男、女生立定跳遠未達 顯著水準(p>.05)外,其餘各項體適能均達p<.05顯著水準。
     The purpose of this study is to compare the physical fitness of freshman in three colleges of Chang Jung University in roder to establish a reference for phyiscal education curriculum in the further. The subjects of this study were 600 freshman(186 males, 414 females)from the class of 1997 and 728 freshman(277 males, 451 females) from the class of 1998, for a total of 1328 students. The mothod, as standardized by the Taiwanese Ministry of Education, includes height, weight, body mass index(BMI), sitting bent posturem bent-knee sit-ups, long jump, and running(male-1600m.; female-800m.) The results have been statistically analyzed usung a T-test as follows: For BMI, both males and females of the 1998 freshman class of the management college, and females in the public health college did better with an obvious difference of p<0.05. For sitting bent posture, females of the humanities college and public health college did better with p<0.05. For the number of sit-ups per minute, males and females from the freshman 1997 humanities, public health, and management colleges did better with p<0.05. For the long jump, females from the freshman 1998 management and public health colleges did better with p<0.05. For running, males and females from 1997 humanities and management colleges, and females from 1998 public health college did better with p<0.05. Comparing all males and females from the freshman classes of 1997 and 1998, all tested items arrived the difference of p<0.05, with the exception of BMI and sitting bent posture of males, and the long jump of males and females.
期刊論文
1.莊逸萍、陳信吉(1997)。國立臺南師範學院八十四、八十五學年度入學新生體適能之比較。南師體育,5,92-119。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳谷宗、張宏明、楊明顯(19990400)。德明商專男生體適能測量與評估。大專體育,42,77-82。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.涂國誠(19980500)。國立成功大學八十六學年學生健康體能狀況研究。成大體育研究集刊,4,97-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳文銓(19940400)。私立大仁藥學專科學校八十二學年度入學新生體能分析研究。大仁學報,12,65-108。  延伸查詢new window
5.姚東生(19960500)。專科學校日夜間部一年級新生男生體適能概況及其差異。光武學報,21,267-299。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄭任國、廖俊傑(1998)。國立台南師範學院八十四、八十五、八十六學年入學新生體適能分析研究。南師體育,6,159-180。  延伸查詢new window
7.羅龍飛(19970600)。勤益工商專科學校一年級學生健康體能及其相關因素之研究。大專體育,31,186-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Caspersen, Carl J.、Powell, Kenneth E.、Christenson, Gregory M.(1985)。Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: Definitions and distinctions for health-related research。Public Health Reports,100(2),126-131。  new window
會議論文
1.李大麟、盧淑雲、林貴福(1996)。清大入學新生健康體能評析--兼論大一體育課程內容之因應導向。中華民國大專院校八十九年度體育學術研討會。中華民國大專院校體育總會。145-160。  延伸查詢new window
2.程一雄(1995)。中台醫專學生健康體適能調查及運動處方。中華民國大專院校八十四年度體育學術研討會,31-59。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1996)。八十五年度提昇國民體能專案體能檢測講習手冊。臺北:教育部體育司。  延伸查詢new window
2.Greenberg, J. S.、Pargman, D.(1986)。Physical fitness: A Wellness Approach。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall。  new window
3.方進隆(1993)。健康體能的理論與實際。漢文書店。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lamb, D. R.(1984)。Physical of Exercise: Responses & Adaptations。New York:Macmillan Publishing Co.。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top