資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.221.123.73)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
移動連續性線索與因果知覺
書刊名:
中華心理學刊
作者:
張欣戊
作者(外文):
Chang, Hsing-wu
出版日期:
2000
卷期:
42:1
頁次:
頁101-112
主題關鍵詞:
因果知覺
;
連續性移動
;
Causal perception
;
Motion continuity
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:0
點閱:168
物體移動連續性線索是過去解釋撞擊事件的因果知覺的基礎。本研究的目的是探 討物體移動連續性線索的必要性。以電腦畫面模擬撞擊事件,本研究的實驗一明確的顯示物 體移動連續性線索並非因果知覺的必要條件。實驗二的結果更進一步顯示,無論有無此線索 ,時、空的操弄對撞擊事件的因果知覺有類似的影響。另外,由一個簡單的問卷結果顯示, 吾人對撞擊事件的因果知覺與吾人的物理知識有密切的關連。由此本文對撞擊事件的因果知 覺提出一個新的解釋。
以文找文
The cue of motion continuity has often been regraded as the key to perceived causality involving colliding objects. The present investigation, using computer simulation of colliding objects, was designed to determine the necessity of this cue to perceived causality in mechanical collision. Results from Experiment Ⅰ clearly refuted the hypothesis that motion continuity is necessary for perceived causality. Furthermore, temporal (delay) and spatial (gap) manipulations had similar effects on causal perception of events with or without motion continuity. Additional evidence from a brief questionnaire lends support to the hypothesis that perceived causality is intimately related to our knowledge of physical collisions in nature.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Leslie, A. M.、Keeble, S.(1987)。Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?。Cognition,25,265-288。
2.
White, P. A.(1988)。Causal processing: Origins and development。Psychological Bulletin,104,36-52。
3.
Hall, L.、Shaklee, H.(1983)。Methods of assessing strategies for judging covariation between events。Journal of Educational Psychology,75,583-594。
4.
Oakes, L. M.、Cohen, L. B.(1990)。Infant perception of a causal event。Cognitive Development,5,193-207。
5.
Schlottmann, A.、Shanks, D. R.(1992)。Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality。The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A,44(2),321-342。
6.
Wasserman, E. A.(1990)。Detecting response-outcome relations: toward an understanding of the causal texture of the environment。The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory,26,27-82。
7.
Chapman, G. B.(1991)。Trial order affects cue interaction in contingency judgment。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,17,837-854。
8.
Cheng, P. W.(1997)。From covariation to causation: a causal power theory。Psychological Review,104,367-405。
9.
Wasserman, E. A.、Elek, S. M.、Chatlosh, D. L.、Baker, A. G.(1993)。Rating causal relations: The role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,19,174-188。
10.
White, P. A.(1989)。A theory of causal processing。British Journal of Psychology,80,431-454。
11.
White, P. A.(1998)。Causal Judgment: Use of different types of contingency information as confirmatory and disconfirmatory。European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,10,131-170。
圖書
1.
Michotte, A.(1963)。The Perception of Causality。The Perception of Causality。New York, NY:Basic books, Inc.。
2.
Cheng, P. W.、Holyoak, K. J.(1995)。Complex adaptive systems as intuitive statisticians: Causality, contingency, and prediction。Comparative approaches to cognition。Cambridge, MA。
3.
Von Helmholtz, H.(1867)。Treatise on physiological optics, Vol. III。Treatise on physiological optics, Vol. III。New York, NY。
4.
Hume, D.(1739)。A treatise of human nature。A treatise of human nature。Oxford。
5.
Hume, D.(1740)。An abstract of a treatise of human nature。An abstract of a treatise of human nature。New York, NY。
6.
Leslie, A. M.(1982)。The perception of causality in infants。Perception II。沒有紀錄。
7.
Leslie, A. M.(1995)。A theory of agency。Causal cognition。Oxford。
8.
Rock, I.(1997)。Indirect perception。Indirect perception。Cambridge, MA。
9.
Rock, I.(1983)。The logic of perception。Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press。
10.
Shultz, T. R.(1982)。Rules of causal attribution。
11.
Shanks, D.、Dickinson, A.(1987)。Associative accounts of causality judgment。The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 21。San Diego, CA。
12.
Sperber, D.、Premack, D.、Premack, A. J.(1995)。Causal cognition。Causal cognition。Oxford。
13.
White, P. A.(1993)。Psychological metaphysics。Psychological metaphysics。London, UK。
14.
Kant, I.(1783)。Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics。Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics。Indianapolis, IN。
其他
1.
Chang, H. W.(1999)。The effect of auditory information on causal perception of mechanical collision,0。
圖書論文
1.
Bullock, M.、Gelman, R.、Baillargeon, R.(1982)。The development of causal reasoning。The developmental psychology of time。New York, NY:Academic Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
無相關期刊論文
1.
撞擊事件因果知覺的發展
1.
撞擊事件因果知覺的發展
2.
撞擊事件因果知覺的發展
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code