:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:元代蒙古色目進士背景的分析
書刊名:漢學研究
作者:蕭啟慶
作者(外文):Hsiao, Chi-ching
出版日期:2000
卷期:18:1=35
頁次:頁101-128
主題關鍵詞:元朝科舉進士蒙古色目Yuan dynastyCivil service examinationChin-shihMongolsSemu
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:44
  • 點閱點閱:95
     元朝的科舉制度是當時特殊政治社會結構的反映。蒙古、色目人在科舉中與漢族享有相等的配額,則可說是元朝科舉制度的一大特色。蒙古、色目人為征服族群,與漢族地位不同,其固有文化與漢族亦大有差異。本文係根據《元統元年進士錄》及筆者重構之其他十五科進士錄,自三方面探討蒙古、色目進士的背景及其與登科的關係。自家族仕宦經歷言之,多達八成的蒙古、色目進士出身於官宦家族,而來自布衣之家者不過二成。可見科舉制度的主要作用在於為官宦子弟增加一修入仕的途徑,但亦為原來甚為閉鎖的蒙古、色目統治菁英階層注入數量不大,卻甚重要的新血。自族群分布言之,蒙古各族原有文化水平頗為近似,科舉所產進士的數目亦甚平均。而色目各族所產生進士人數的多寡則與其本族原有文化水平的高低具有密切的關聯。自婚姻關係言之,甚多蒙古、色目進士的家族早已與漢族建立密切的通婚關係,嫁入蒙古、色目家庭的婦女不少來自漢族士人之家。這些漢族婦女往往知書識禮,對其子孫的文化取向及登科應舉的動向具有重要影響。總之,從社會觀點來說,大多數進士是蒙古、色目族群中傳統菁英家族的延伸。從文化觀點來說,蒙古‘色目進士則是其族群中漢化最深的一群。
     The vivil service examination system of the Yuan dynasty was a faithful reflection of the unique sociopolitical structure of that period. The fact that the Mongols and the Se-mu were guaranteed a quota of chin-shih(successful candidates in the metropolitan examinations) equal to that of the Chinese majority was a salient feature of the Yuan system. The Mongols and the Se-mu were privileged conquering minority groups with cultural backgrounds sharply different from that of the Chinese. Using the List of Chin-shih of A.D. 1333 and 15 other chin-shih records reconstructed by the author, this paper examines the relationship between the backgrounds of Mongol and Se-mu chin-shih and their success in the examinations from three different perspectives. In terms of the bureaucratic background of their families, more than 80% of the chin-shih had official backgrounds, and less than 20% could be considered " new blood" in the sense that none of their forebears in the previous three generations had held an office under the Mongol-Yuan regime. These statistics indicate that the main function of the examination system was to open a new door to officialdom for the scions of bureaucratic families. Nevertheless, the system still injected a small but significant amount of "new blood" into the originally closed Mongol and Se-mu elite stratum. In terms of ethnic background, while the numbers of the chin-shih produced by various Mongolian tribes and clans show no major differences, those produced by various Se-mu groups differed greatly from each other. This is because while the Mongols had become an ethnically and culturally homogeneous group by the 14th century, the Se-mu was constituted of peoples from sharply divergent ethnic and cultural backgrounds. The degree of success achieved by various Se-mu groups in the Yuan examinations was closely related to the original levels of culture these ethnic groups had achieved before entering China. In terms of the marital background of the chin-shih families, a significant proportion of the chin-shih were from Mongol and Se-mu families that had intermarried with the Chinese. The Chinese mothers in elite families were often educated and exerted great influence on their scions in terms of cultural orientation. In sum, from a social perspective, the chin-shih as a group can be considered an extension of the original Mongol and Se-mu elite stratum. From a cultural perspective, the chin-shih were the products of the most heavily sinicized Mongol and Se-mu families.
Other
1.Rossabi, Morris(1981)。The Muslims in the Early Yuan Dynasty,Princeton。  new window
期刊論文
1.Kracke, E. A., Jr.(1947)。Family vs Merit in Chinese Civil Service Examinations under the Empire。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,10,103-121。  new window
2.Hartwell, Robert M.(1982)。Demograpmc, Political, and Social Transformations of China, 750-1550。Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies,42(2),414-415。  new window
3.馬肇曾(1998)。《懷寧馬氏宗譜》及歷代主要人物考。回族研究,3,19-30。  延伸查詢new window
4.陸峻嶺、何高濟(1982)。元代的阿速、欽察、康里人。文史,16,117-130。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊鐮(1993)。答祿與權事跡勾沉。新疆大學學報,1993(4),97-103。  延伸查詢new window
6.蕭啟慶(19830500)。元統元年進士錄校注。食貨月刊,13(1/2),72-90。  延伸查詢new window
7.片山共夫(1980)。怯薛と元朝官僚制。史學雜誌,92(12),1-37。  延伸查詢new window
8.王乃棟(1985)。康里子山的族屬及其書法藝術的探索。新疆社會科學,1985(4),117-121。  延伸查詢new window
9.孟楠(1992)。元代西夏遺民婚姻研究。寧夏社會科學,2,67-74。  延伸查詢new window
10.姚大力(1982)。元朝科舉制度的行廢及其社會背景。元史及北方民族史研究集刊,1982(6),25-69。  延伸查詢new window
11.蕭啟慶(1987)。至正十一年進士題名記校補。食貨月刊,16(7/8),69-84。  延伸查詢new window
12.王梅堂(1999)。元代內遷畏兀世家-廉氏家族考述。元史論叢,7,123-136。  延伸查詢new window
13.丁崑健(19820400)。元代的科舉制度。華學月刊,124/125,46-57。  延伸查詢new window
14.桂栖鵬、尚衍斌(1994)。元代色目人進士考。新疆大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1994(4),72-78。  延伸查詢new window
15.桂栖鵬(1997)。元代進士仕宦研究。元史論叢,6,68-95。  延伸查詢new window
16.桂栖鵬(1997)。元代科舉中的高麗進士。韓國研究,2,108-116。  延伸查詢new window
17.任崇岳(1995)。元濬州達魯花赤追封魏郡伯墓碑考釋。寧夏社會科學,1995(2),19-22。  延伸查詢new window
18.王佑夫、周紹祖(1988)。馬祖常及其詩歌創作。新疆大學學報(哲學社會科學版),1988(4),89-95。  延伸查詢new window
19.陳高華(1988)。元代的哈剌魯人。西北民族研究,1988(1),145-154。  延伸查詢new window
20.周良霄(1982)。元和元以前的基督教。元史論叢,1982(1),137-162。  延伸查詢new window
21.洪金富(1977)。元代漢族人與非漢族人通婚問題初探。食貨,復刊6(12),1-19。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉元珠(1993)。元代儒吏關係:延祐之開科與抑吏。瀋陽。432-440。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡其德(1995)。元代畏吾兒人華化的再檢討—一個新的詮釋。臺北。169-201。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.托克托等。《金史》一百三十五卷。  延伸查詢new window
2.虞集。道園學古錄。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃溍。金華黃先生文集。新文豐。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉岳申(1970)。申齋文集。台北:國立中央圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
5.阮元(1971)。石渠寶笈續編。台北:故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
6.楊維楨(1966)。東維子文集。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.任士林(1986)。松鄉文集。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
8.蘇天爵(1965)。國朝文類。台北:臺灣商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
9.虞集(1985)。道園類稿。台北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
10.張古(1985)。嘉靖內黃縣志。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
11.趙孟頫、任道斌(1986)。趙孟頫集。浙江古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.邱樹森(1997)。中國回族史。銀川:寧夏人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
13.陳垣(1932)。元也里可溫考。上海:商務印書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊鐮(1998)。元西域詩人群體研究。烏魯木齊:新疆人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.蒙思明(1938)。元代社會階級制度。北平:哈佛燕京學社。  延伸查詢new window
16.羅賢佑(1996)。元代民族史。成都:四川民族出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.歐陽玄(1987)。圭齋文集。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.白壽彝(1997)。中國通史(第8卷)。上海。  延伸查詢new window
19.何炳棣(1962)。The Ladder of Success in Late Imperial China。New York。  new window
20.方回。桐江續集。  延伸查詢new window
21.元好問、姚奠中(1990)。元好問全集。山西人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
22.袁桷(1999)。清容居士集。香港:迪志文化。  延伸查詢new window
23.宋濂(1936)。宋文憲公全集。上海:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
24.顧嗣立、席世臣、吳申揚(2001)。元詩選癸集。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
25.徐璉(1985)。正德袁州府志。上海:上海書店。  延伸查詢new window
26.馬祖常、李叔毅、傅瑛(1991)。石田先生文集。河南鄭州:中州古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳垣(1934)。元西域人華化考。勵耘書屋。  延伸查詢new window
28.宋濂(1976)。元史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
29.許有壬(1985)。至正集。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
30.高樹林(1997)。元代賦役制度研究。保定:河北大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
31.Hymes, Robert P.(1986)。Statesmen and Gentlemen: The Elite of Fu-chou, Chiang-hsi in Northern and Southern Sung。Cambridge University Press。  new window
32.蕭啟慶(1999)。元代科舉與菁英流動─以元統元年進士為中心。元朝史新論。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.陳高華(1996)。元泰定甲子科進士考。內陸亞洲歷史文化研究。南京。  延伸查詢new window
34.王頲(1992)。元統元年進士錄。元統元年進士錄。杭州。  延伸查詢new window
35.蕭啟慶(1996)。元代蒙古人的漢學。蒙元史新研。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
36.楊鐮(1998)。馬祖常‧元詩史的也里可溫。元西域詩人群體研究。烏魯木齊。  延伸查詢new window
37.黃清連(1977)。元代戶計制度。元代戶計制度。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
38.Gabain, A. von(1973)。Das Leben im uighurischen Konigreich von Qoco。Das Leben im uighurischen Konigreich von Qoco。Wiesbaden。  new window
39.程溯洛(1993)。高昌回鶻王國。唐宋回鶻史論集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
40.吳天墀(1982)。西夏史稿。西夏史稿。成都。  延伸查詢new window
41.白濱(1992)。西夏的學校與科舉制度。西夏文史論叢(第1輯)。銀川。  延伸查詢new window
42.Barthold, W.(1956)。Four Studies on the History of Central Asia (Vol. 1)。Four Studies on the History of Central Asia (Vol. 1)。Leiden。  new window
43.Franke, H.(1981)。Tibetans in Yuan China。China under Mongol Rule。Princeton。  new window
44.楊志玖(1985)。元代的阿兒渾人。元史三論。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
45.蕭啟慶(1999)。元代多族士人圈的形成。元朝史新論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
46.安部健夫(1954)。西ウイグル國史の研究。西ウイグル國史の研究。京都。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)張端義。書史會要。  延伸查詢new window
2.(明)王逢。梧溪集。  延伸查詢new window
3.(明)顧清。(正德)松江府志。  延伸查詢new window
4.(明)胡謐。成化河南總志。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉敏中。中菴集。  延伸查詢new window
6.(1973)。明史,北京。  延伸查詢new window
7.(元)蘇天爵(1991)。滋溪文稿,北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.(清)熊象階。濬縣金石錄。  延伸查詢new window
9.(元)薩都剌(1982)。雁門集,上海。  延伸查詢new window
10.(元)危素。危太僕文集。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃時鑑(1999)。元高昌偰氏入東遺事,新竹。  延伸查詢new window
12.(清)錢大昕(1997)。元進士考,南京。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.李符桐。畏吾兒人對於元朝建國之貢獻。李符桐論著全集。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊訥(1994)。關於《元統元年進士錄》的版本與校勘。祝賀楊志玖教授八十壽辰中國史論集。天津:天津古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Allsen, Thomas T.(1983)。The Yuan Dynasty and the Uighurs of Turfan in the 13th Century。China among Equals。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
4.Hsiao, Ch'i-ch'ing(1993)。Lien Hsi-hsien。In the Service of the Khan。Wiesbaden:Harrassowitz Verlag。  new window
5.蕭啟慶(1999)。元色目文人金哈剌及其「南遊寓興詩集」。元朝史新論。臺北:允晨文化公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.池內功(1984)。元朝における蒙漢通婚とその背景。アジア諸民族における社會と文化•岡本敬二先生退官記念論集。東京:國書刊行會。  延伸查詢new window
7.李符桐(1992)。回鶻與元朝建國之關係。李符桐論著全集。台北:臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊志玖(1985)。元代回漢通婚舉例。元史三論。北京:人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.蕭啟慶(1999)。蒙元時代高昌偰氏的仕宦與漢化。元朝史新論。台北:允晨文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.蕭啓慶(199904)。元朝科舉與江南士大夫之延續。元史論叢。南昌:江西教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.蕭啟慶(19830000)。元代四大蒙古家族。元代史新探。臺北:新文豐。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.蕭啟慶(19830000)。元代的宿衛制度。元代史新探。臺北:新文豐。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張旭光(1985)。薩都剌生平仕履考辨。回族人物志:元代。銀川:寧夏人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
14.周清樹(1979)。汪古部事輯。中國蒙古史學會成立大會紀念集刊。呼和浩特。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE