:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「夫言非吹也!」其為「天籟」乎﹖
書刊名:國立臺灣體育學院學報
作者:婁世麗 引用關係
作者(外文):Lou, Shyh-lih
出版日期:2000
卷期:7
頁次:頁37-65
主題關鍵詞:天籟齊物論南郭子綦
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:13
     「天籟」一詞,在<齊物論>篇中是由南郭子綦提出的,提出時與「地籟、人籟 」並舉。對於「天籟、人籟」之發生由來,分別指出是:由風吹孔竅、及由人吹管笛等發出 的聲音。但對於「天籟」便只有迂迴轉折地敘述「夫吹萬不同,而使其自己也,咸其自取, 怒者其誰邪?」其中「怒者」亦引起許多的議論。 另外,莊子在提出「言非吹也」之後指出:「言隱於榮華」便會陷入是非之糾纏;只有「不 言」始可謂之為「天府」。「言」與「籟」雖然各有所指,但都是由「空氣震動」而出現的 ;既然「不言」被莊子視為「天府」,那麼「無聲」是否是莊子所認為的「天籟」? 本文將對「怒者」究竟是「誰」?怒者對天籟有何影響?「言」背後有無主導者?這個主導 者是否就是「真宰」?牠具有何種特質?進行討論。最後希望能釐清「天籟」與「言」的關 係。
     The phrase, "the voices of Nature", (天籟) was posed by Nan-Gou Tzyy- Chi (南郭子綦 ) in the <Chi-Wuh-Luenn> (齊物論 ) section together with "sounds coming from the hollows of the forest' (地籟 ) and "the human voices" (人籟 ). And about the origin of the occurrence of "sound coming from the hollows of the forest" and "the human voice", he pointed out separately the voices from winds blowing into apertures and the voices from human playing flutes or pipes, respectively. But there are only the roundabout statement about "the voices of Nature", "The wind blows all the apertures and cause apertures themselves to decide giving out which kind of sounds; sounds are apertures decide by themselves, but it is who actually "the anger" to make the winds blows into apertures? "The 'anger' one in the statement above raises many comments and discusses. Chuang-Tse also mentioned that "The language is not the wind"; it would be sink into the entanglement of right and wrong, true and false, especially when vocabularies and sentences were taken cover or concealed by the reasons of decorating and adorning. And only "saying nothing" can be figure out as "Ten-Fu".( 天府 ) For the same reasons, whether "silence" is "the voices of Nature" that Chuang-Tse stands for or not? In this thesis the writer wants to figure out these problems: Who is "the anger" one actually? What effects is "the anger" one makes to "the voices of Nature"? What kind of characteristic does the genuine dominate behind the "speaking" have? And what is the relationship between "the voices of Nature" and the speaking? The main purpose of the thesis is trying to explain the above problems during the process of discussion, and wish to have some specific results and gains.
圖書
1.(1975)。說文解字注。黎明文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.余培林(1975)。新譯老子讀本。台北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳汝綸。莊子點勘。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
4.張履行。莊子探微。張履行。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉武(1988)。莊子集解內篇補正。台北市:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.張默生。莊子新釋。  延伸查詢new window
7.宣穎。南華經解。  延伸查詢new window
8.成玄英。南華真經註疏。  延伸查詢new window
9.王叔岷。莊子校詮。  延伸查詢new window
10.郭慶藩(1982)。莊子集釋。木鐸出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.宣穎。南華經解。藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
12.嚴靈峰。無求備齋老列莊三子集成補編之41。  延伸查詢new window
13.馬其昶(1989)。定本莊子故。安徽:黃山書社。  延伸查詢new window
14.王先謙(1988)。莊子集解。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE