Trade policy and competition policy share the same goal and supplement each other in regards to the effective use of domestic resources and to benefit consumers. The main purpose of competition policy is to protect and promote "competition" so that the consumer can enjoy goods or services at lower prices and better quality. Trade liberalization policy, by reducing tariffs and abolishing non-tariff barriers, aims to open up domestic markets and let good and services be distributed following in the comparative advantage rule. Trade policy and competition policy conflicts in another way. Trade protection policy tends to protect domestic industries and therefore hinders competition. Trade measures adopted by a government could be divided into tariff and non-tariff measures. Tariffs affect competition in a direct way while non-tariff measures are more complicated and cover a broader range. Various trade measures affect the quality and quantity of goods and services in different ways and raise different issues that need to be solved. Competition law protects and promotes "competition" while trade rule considers competition as well as other values, including economic and political ones. Competition law tends to protect consumer benefits and trade protection law tends to protect producers, labor-directly and consumers indirectly. Regulations by national competition authorities differ from each other. Due to differing amounts of enforcement effort that need to be devoted, similar regulations could get different results. There are even some countries that do not have competition laws. As the regulation and prohibition of anti-competitive practices affect global trade liberalization, efforts including cooperation among national competition laws/policies, broadening the coverage of compettion law and ensuring the enforcement of competition law should be devoted to reduce international trade conflicts and enhance economic efficiency.