:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從部落聯盟到契丹王朝--以遼代中央政樞之官僚化為中心
書刊名:興大歷史學報
作者:廖啟照
作者(外文):Liao, Chi-chao
出版日期:2000
卷期:11
頁次:頁153-173
主題關鍵詞:契丹部落聯盟官僚化樞密院于越皮室軍橫帳Ch'i-tanTribal confederacyOfficializationChancelleriesYu-yuehP'i-shin armyHorizontal tents
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:2
  • 點閱點閱:87
遼朝的建立象徵所謂中國「征服王朝」的興起。繼之,女真民族建立金朝,到蒙古和滿洲帝國的創建達於頂點。這些征服者都面臨兩個問題:第一、怎樣鞏固皇族在征服民族,尤其是統治階層裏的地位。第二、如何治理和控制國內複雜多元的民族,尤其是佔絕對多數的漢人。歷史的發展軌跡固然因著特定的歷史條件有其必然的趨勢,但更能反映變遷過程裏歷史人物意志的實現。本文企圖從部落聯盟到契丹王朝轉型的歷史過程中,掌握契丹皇帝政治運作的輪廓。遼太祖代立部落聯盟可汗之後,利用皇弟叛亂的機會削弱貴族政治勢力,以鞏固皇族的地位。這從于越逐漸變為不具實權的虛銜和腹心部、皮室軍的建立可窺其端倪。不過,耶律阿保機並未建立新的政治中樞,太宗即位後便很自然地採用中國政治制度正在發展中的樞密制做為中央政樞。樞密院組織到聖宗朝逐漸完備而成為定制,就遼代政治運作的本質來說,遼朝中期完成了部落聯盟到集權王朝的過渡。
The establishment of Liao Dynasty symbolized the rise of “conquest dynastries” in the Chinese history. Thereafter, Jurchen constructed Chin Dynasty, and then it arrived the top of “conquest dynasties” while the forming of the Empire of Mongol and Manhcu. These conquerors had two problem to resolve: first, how to consolidate the status of imperial family in the conquest nation, especially in the ruling class. Second, how to rule and control domestic complex and diverse nations, especially the Han People. The locus of historical development, is an inevitable trend because of special historic circumstances, also reflects the practice of historic people's will in the process of historic changes. This paper tries to sketch the outline of Ch'i-tan emperors dominating historical development. T'ai-tsu (太祖) weakened the power of nobles to consolidate the status of imperial family by the opportunity of his brother rebellion after he was elected as the leader of tribal confederacy. Nonetheless, Yeh-lü A-pao-chi didn't establish a new political centre, his heir (T'ai-tsung 太宗) adopted naturally Chancelleries as the new political system of the central goverment in Liao Dynasty. The organization of Chancelleries was getting self-contained and became a fixed system at San-tsung period (聖宗). By the viewpoint of political operation, the transition from “tribal confederacy” to “totaltarian dynasty” has been finished at the middle of Liao Dynasty.
期刊論文
1.島田正郎(1964)。遼朝北面中央官制的特色。大陸雜誌,29(12),1-10。  延伸查詢new window
2.李錫厚(1988)。論遼朝的政治體制。宋遼金元史,1988(4)。  延伸查詢new window
3.唐統天(1988)。契丹于越考。宋遼金元史,1988(3),56。  延伸查詢new window
4.島田正郎。遼代于越考。大陸雜誌,35(10),1-6。  延伸查詢new window
5.唐統天(1989)。關于契丹北、南宰相的幾個問題。宋遼金元史,1989(1),61-62。  延伸查詢new window
6.李錫厚(1987)。遼代宰相制度的演變。宋遼金元史,1987(5),61。  延伸查詢new window
7.唐統天。遼代宰相制度的研究。東北地方史研究,1992(1),23。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉昫、楊家駱(1981)。新校本舊唐書附索引。臺北:鼎文書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳述(1982)。全遼文。北京:中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳述。論契丹之選汗大會與帝位繼承。遼史彙編。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.姚從吾。契丹君位繼承問題分析。遼史彙編。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.楊若薇(1992)。契丹王朝政治運事制度研究。契丹王朝政治運事制度研究。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.張亮采。遼代漢人樞密院之研究。遼史彙編。  延伸查詢new window
7.王明蓀(1981)。契丹與中原本土之歷史關係。宋遼金史論文稿。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(宋)葉隆禮。契丹國志。  延伸查詢new window
2.(北宋)余靖。武溪集。  延伸查詢new window
3.(北齊)魏收(1988)。魏書,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊家駱(1973)。遼史世表長箋,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.(1987)。遼史,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top