臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣地區縣市層級「分立政府」影響之初探
書刊名：臺灣政治學刊
作者：黃紀 引用關係／吳重禮 引用關係
作者(外文)：Huang, Chi／Wu, Chung-li
出版日期：2000
卷期：4
頁次：頁105-147
主題關鍵詞：分立政府；一致政府；分裂投票；政黨政府；政府表現；Divided government；Unified government；Split-ticket voting；Party politics；Government performance
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(62) 博士論文(3) 專書(4) 專書論文(4)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:59
  • 共同引用共同引用:197
  • 點閱點閱:161
邇來，行政部門與立法部門分屬不同政黨所掌握的「分立政府」（divided government），已成為我國各級政府普遍存在的型態。鑑於分立政府意涵及其議題具有相當的重要性，本文旨在探討臺灣地區地方層級分立政府與「一致政府」（unified government）的運作情形。關於分立政府的成因，本文扼要回顧相關文獻，儘管研究者嘗試提供不同學說以詮釋選民分裂投票行為，然而迄今尚未發展出周延的解釋。至於分立政府是否導致政策滯塞和僵局，亦是學界爭議的焦點。本文分析1998年直轄市和縣市政府施政滿意度資料，藉此檢證分立政府與一致政府在施政績效方面的表現差異。分析結果顯示，在一致政府體制之下，民眾對於縣市政府表現的滿意度評價未必高於分立政府，這似乎意味著分立政府並不必然導致行政部門與立法部門的僵局；此外，民眾的評價相當程度受其政黨偏好的影響。在結論中，本文認為分立政府應可成為研究臺灣地區政治發展的另一重要領域，此外亦提出未來研究的方向與建議。
The phenomenon of divided government--that is, the executive and legislative branches are controlled by different political parties--has become daily reality in Taiwan's national and local politics. Yet it receives relatively little attention from a comparative perspective. In the literature, scholars tend to disagree with each other concerning whether divided government leads to policy gridlock, stalemate and inefficiency. This study attempts to shed some light on this important issue by exploring the effects of city/county-level divided government on local residents' perception of their mayor/magistrate in Taiwan. We take advantage of a 1998 survey data set of the public's evaluations of city/county government performance and examine if different forms of divided government affect residents' responses. Our findings indicate that those residents in cities or counties under divided governments express more negative views only on three out of six indicators, although their party identification also seems to be an important intervening variable in shaping their opinion. It seems to imply that divided government at the local level does not necessarily suffer from stalemate between the executive and legislative branches.
期刊論文
1.Brady, David W.(1993)。The Causes and Consequences of Divided Government: Toward a New Theory of American Politics?。American Political Science Review，87(1)，189-194。  new window
2.Petracca, Mark P.(1991)。Divided Government and the Risks of Constitutional Reform。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，634-637。  new window
3.Sigelman, Lee、Wahlbeck, Paul J.、Buell, Emmett H. Jr.(1997)。Vote Choice and the Preference for Divided Government: Lessons of 1992。American Journal of Political Science，41(3)，879-894。  new window
4.吳重禮(19990900)。美國聯邦政府老人行政署的功能及其執行支出之影響因素評析。美歐季刊，13(3)=135，261-285。  延伸查詢new window
5.Binder, Sarah A.(1999)。The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96。American Political Science Review，93(3)，519-533。  new window
6.Born, Richard(1994)。Split-ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina's Policy-balancing Model。Legislative Studies Quarterly，19(1)，95-115。  new window
7.Day, Christine L.(1993)。Older Americans' Attitudes Toward the Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act of 1988。Journal of Politics，55(1)，167-177。  new window
8.Jacobson, G. C.(1991)。Explaining Divided Government: Why Can't the Republicans Win the House?。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，640-643。  new window
9.Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided Party Control: Does It Make a Difference?。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，637-640。  new window
10.Thurber, James A.(1991)。Representation, Accountability, and Efficiency in Divided Party Control of Government。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，653-657。  new window
11.Friedrich, Robert J.(1982)。In Defense of Multiplicative Terms in Multiple Regression Equations。American Journal of Political Science，26(4)，797-833。  new window
12.Menefee-Libey, David(1991)。Divided Government: as Scapegoat。PS: Political Science & Politics，24(4)，643-646。  new window
13.Edwards, George C. III、Barrett, Andrew、Peake, Jeffrey(1997)。The Legislative Impact of Divided Government。American Journal of Political Science，41(2)，545-563。  new window
14.黃紀、Shields, Todd G.(19940500)。Modeling and Interpreting Interactions in Logit Analysis。選舉研究，1(1)，191-196。new window  new window
15.Coleman, John J.(19991200)。Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness。American Political Science Review，93(4)，821-835。  new window
16.Chen, Don-yun、Huang, Tong-yi(19990100)。Divided Government: A New Approach to Taiwan's Local Politics。Issues & Studies，35(1)，1-35。  new window
17.Sundquist, James L.(1990)。Response to the Petracca-Bailey-Smith Evaluation of the Committee on the Constitutional System。Presidential Studies Quarterly，20(3)，533-543。  new window
18.Sundquist, James L.(1988)。Needed: A Political Theory for the New Era of Coalition Government in the United States。Political Science Quarterly，103(4)，613-635。  new window
19.Leonard, John(1991)。Divided Government and Dysfunctional Politics。PS: Political Science and Politics，24(4)，651-653。  new window
20.Cutler, Lloyd N.(1988)。Some Reflections about Divided Government。Presidential Studies Quarterly，18(3)，485-492。  new window
21.Cutler, Lloyd N.(1980)。To Form a Government: On the Defects of Separation of Powers。Foreign Affairs，59(1)，126-143。  new window
22.Beck, Pual Allen、Baum, Lawrence、Clausen, Aage R.、Smith, Charles E. Jr.(1992)。Patterns and Sources of Ticket Splitting in Subpresidential Voting。American Political Science Review，86(4)，916-928。  new window
23.許增如(19990300)。一九九六年美國大選中的分裂投票行為：兩個議題模式的探討。歐美研究，29(1)，83-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.黃德福(19911200)。臺灣地區七十八年底選舉分裂投票之初探研究--以臺北縣、雲林縣與高雄縣為個案。政治學報，19，55-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃秀端(19950500)。一九九四年省市長選舉選民參與競選活動之分析。選舉研究，2(1)，51-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.徐火炎(19951100)。「李登輝情結」與省市長選舉的投票行為:一項政治心理學的分析。選舉研究，2(2)，1-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.吳重禮(20000300)。美國「分立性政府」研究文獻之評析：兼論臺灣地區的政治發展。問題與研究，39(3)，75-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.吳重禮(19980600)。美國「分立性政府」與「一致性政府」體制運作之比較與評析。政治科學論叢，9，61-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.徐火炎(19981100)。李登輝情結的政治心理與選民的投票行為。選舉研究，5(2)，35-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
30.黃紀、Shields, Todd G.(2000)。Interpretation of Interaction Effects in Logit and Probit Analyses: Reconsidering the Relationship between Registration Laws, Education, and Voter Turnout。American Politics Quarterly，28(1)，80-95。  new window
31.Binstock, Robert H.(1972)。Interest-Group Liberalism and the Politics of Aging。Gerontologist，12(Autumn)，265-280。  new window
32.Marimon, Ramon、Jones, Larry E.、Chari, V. V.(1997)。The Economics of Split-Ticket Voting in Representative Democracies。The American Economic Review，87(5)，957-976。  new window
33.Bugarin, M. S.(1999)。Vote Splitting as Insurance Against Uncertainty。Public Choice，98(1)，153-169。  new window
34.Forgette, R.、Platt, G. J.(1999)。Voting for the person, not the party: Party defection, issue voting, and process sophistication。Social Science Quarterly，80(2)，409-421。  new window
35.Petracca, Mark P.、Bailey, Lonce、Smith, Pamela(1990)。Proposals for constitutional reform: An evaluation of the Committee on Constitutional System。Presidential Studies Quarterly，20(3)，503-532。  new window
會議論文
1.黃紀、張益超(2000)。一致與分裂投票 : 嘉義市一九九七年市長與立委選舉之分析。「政治分析的層次問題」國際學術研討會。嘉義：國立中正大學政治學系暨研究所。1-24。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Fiorina, M. P.、Ansolabehere, S.、Brady, David W.(1988)。The Marginals Never Vanished?。Stanford。  new window
圖書
1.Fiorina, Morris(1996)。Divided Government。New York：Macmillan。  new window
2.Hardin, Charles M.(1989)。Constitutional Reform in America。Ames, IA：Iowa State University Press。  new window
3.Tarrance, V. Lance、De Vries, Walter、Mosher, Donna L.(1998)。Checked & Balanced: How Ticket-Splitters Are Shaping the New Balance of Power in American Politics。Grand Rapids, MI：William B. Eerdmans。  new window
4.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1990)。The Decline of American Political Parties。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Wattenberg, Martin P.(1991)。The Rise of Candidate Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
6.Conway, Margaret M.(1991)。Political Participation in the United States。Washington, DC：Congressional Quarterly。  new window
7.Alesina, Alberto、Rosenthal, Howard(1995)。Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Mayhew, David R.(1991)。Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-1990。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
9.Milbrath, Lester W.、Goel, Madan L.(1977)。Political participation: How and why people get involved in politics?。Chicago：Rand McNally College Pub. Co.。  new window
10.Sundquist, James L.(1986)。Constitutional Reform and Effective Government。Washington, D.C.：Brookings Institution。  new window
11.Rosenstone, Steven J.、Hansen, John Mark(1993)。Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America。Longman。  new window
12.Fiorina, Morris P.(1981)。Retrospective Voting in American National Elections。Yale University Press。  new window
13.Jacobson, Gary C.(1990)。The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U. S. House Elections, 1946-1988。Boulder, Colo.：Westview Press。  new window
14.胡佛(1998)。憲政結構與政府體制。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.Lipset, Seymour Martin(1981)。Political Man--The Social Bases of Politics。Baltimore, Maryland：The Johns Hopkins University Press。  new window
16.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
17.Barber, James David(1992)。The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House。The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House。New Jersey。  new window
18.Press, Stata(1999)。Stata Reference Manual Release 6, Volume 4。Stata Reference Manual Release 6, Volume 4。College Station, TX。  new window
19.Wattenberg, M. P.(1991)。The Republican presidential advantage in the age of party disunity。The politics of divided government。Boulder, CO。  new window
圖書論文
1.McCubbins, Mathew D.(1991)。Government on Lay Away: Federal Spending and Deficits Under Divided Party Control。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO.：Westview Press。  new window
2.Fiorina, Morris P.(1991)。Divided Government in the States。The Politics of Divided Government。Westview Press。  new window
3.Cox, Gary W.、Kernell, Samuel(1991)。Introduction: Governing a Divided Era。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
4.Linz, Juan J.(1994)。Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Differnce?。The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspective。Baltimore：John Hopkins University Press。  new window
5.黃紀(2000)。質變數的計量分析員選舉全國大型民意調查研究。政治學的範圍與方法。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
6.Stewart, Charles H.(1991)。Lessons from the Post-Civil War Era。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
7.Petrocik, John R.(1991)。Divided Government: Is It All in the Campaigns?。The Politics of Divided Government。Boulder, CO：Westview Press。  new window
8.王國璋(1993)。美國選舉政治與府會之分黨控制--八八年大選結果的分析。當代美國政治論衡。臺北：三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：985（臺灣：975，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1855660 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67672265
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上